Davefevs

Swansea: How Swansea City went from model club to desperate cautionary tale Chaotic transfers and incompetence at the top have put the club into a downward spiral with no obvious source of salvation Stuart James @StuartJamesGNM Sat 16 Feb 2019 18.26 GMTFirst published on Sat 16 Feb 2019 18.00 GMT Shares 643 Swansea City’s Jay Fulton looks downcast after a missed chance against Birmingham. Photograph: John Sibley/Action Images As the clock ticked down on transfer deadline day last month, and chaos reigned behind the scenes at Swansea City, Connor Roberts tweeted a gif showing Milhouse, a character from The Simpsons, throwing a frisbee to himself in the park. The Wales international removed the post not long afterwards but the inference was clear: Swansea’s players were feeling every bit as disillusioned as the supporters. Swansea were doing what Swansea now have a reputation for doing on deadline day – shifting everything they possibly can. The same happened last August, when four players departed in the final 24 hours of business. On that occasion it was the turn of the top scorer, Oli McBurnie, to post a soon-to-be-deleted message on Twitter expressing his bemusement. Graham Potter: I did not move the family back from Sweden just for a job Read more Plenty of others felt the same. Privately, players are dismayed at the way the club is being run and feel disappointed for the manager, Graham Potter, as much as themselves. Leroy Fer, the captain, was so frustrated with the prospect of Daniel James leaving in January that – and this was before the deadline-day fiasco when the plug was pulled on the winger’s move to Leeds at the last minute – he telephoned Swansea’s American owners, Steve Kaplan and Jason Levien, to ask what was going on. Perhaps at this stage it is worth pointing out to anyone who has taken a break from football for the past three years that Swansea, who host Brentford in the FA Cup fifth round on Sunday, are no longer the model club they once were. Huw Jenkins, who was a hero when he presided over Swansea’s rise through the leagues, was cast as a villain by the time he resigned as chairman a fortnight ago, and the supporters trust is engaged in a bitter legal dispute with those who sold their shares to the Americans in 2016. As for Kaplan and Levien, it has been a disastrous two and a half seasons under their watch and the harsh reality is that the wording on the cover of the latest edition of the Swansea Oh Swansea fanzine probably sums up how the vast majority of supporters feel about them: “Get out of our club”. Physically, they are rarely in it. Decisions are made from the other side of the Atlantic and apart from appointing Potter, who had previously guided Ostersund from the fourth to the top tier of Swedish football, it is hard to think of much else Kaplan and Levien have got right. Quick guide Follow Guardian sport on social media Show Advertisement The strategy since relegation has been cuts, cuts and more cuts. Or, to borrow the Americans’ phrase, “hard medicine”. Sixteen senior players have left and only five have arrived. When the summer transfer window closed, Potter was left with one senior central defender after two were sold on deadline day. Backed into a corner, Potter has relied on youngsters to such an extent that Swansea, who spent seven seasons in the top flight and were relegated from the Premier League nine months ago, are fielding a team in the Championship that, in terms of the age of their players, resembles that of a club operating on a shoestring in League Two. FacebookTwitterPinterest Jordan Ayew is one of Swansea’s high-earners now out on loan. Photograph: Andrew Matthews/PA Before this weekend’s matches – and this is an extraordinary statistic – players aged 23 and under had racked up 17,357 minutes for Swansea in the Championship this season – the third-highest total by the 72 Football League clubs, behind Yeovil and Swindon with Crewe fourth on the list. The two other clubs relegated from the Premier League last season, West Brom and Stoke, are 65th (5,101 minutes) and 71st (2,717 minutes) respectively. The primary factor in all of this is that Swansea are in a dire position financially, paying the price for a wage bill that was allowed to spiral out of control over the course of several years and a series of calamitous signings during their last season in the Premier League in particular. Each party will cite mitigating circumstances but the reality is that Jenkins and the owners – not one or the other – have their fingerprints on that mess. It is sobering to think that the best part of £45m was wasted on Sam Clucas, Wilfried Bony and André Ayew last season, and £25m on wages, loan fees and transfer fees for Renato Sanches, Tammy Abraham and Roque Mesa. Swansea wrote off millions when they sold Clucas to Stoke in that deadline day fire sale in August. Bony was earning £4.5m a year in the Championship until a heavily subsidised loan move was agreed in January – the Ivorian had no relegation clause in his contract – while no permanent buyer could be found for Ayew last summer. Bony and Ayew, incidentally, were August and January deadline-day signings last season. For an image of Swansea’s approach to transfers during that turbulent campaign, picture a bloke dashing down Oxford Street as the shops prepare to close on Christmas Eve, buying the wrong present for his wife and overpaying at the same time. Then later finding out nobody else wants it. The Fiver: sign up and get our daily football email. Worryingly for Swansea, Ayew, who is on loan at Fenerbahce, will still have two years to run on a lucrative contract when this season is over. Borja Bastón, who was the £15.5m club-record signing until Ayew rejoined from West Ham, is also out on loan – the Spaniard has started four league games for Swansea in three years – and under contract until 2020. Jordan Ayew, Jefferson Montero and Tom Carroll, on loan at Crystal Palace, West Brom and Aston Villa respectively, also have deals that run for another 16 months. The same applies to Nathan Dyer and Kyle Naughton. Swansea’s Oli McBurnie: ‘I wear toddlers’ shin pads, the smallest I can find’ Read more All of which means that as much as Swansea want to press the reset button, they cannot leave the pain of their financial profligacy in the Premier League behind, and that has damaging ramifications for Potter. It is understood there is another £30m hole to fill in the summer, even allowing for a second parachute payment, and it is hard to see how selling the players listed above – if buyers can be found – would make much of a dent in that figure. With Swansea’s owners unwilling or unable to put any money in themselves to cover that shortfall – “We will be relentless in our determination to continually improve this club, and we have the financial resources to do so” was the dubious claim made by Kaplan and Levien after they became majority shareholders – the concern is that Potter will have to sell one or more of the youngsters who have thrived under him and played with the sort of hunger and passion that restores the faith of supporters. It is remarkable then that despite all this doom and gloom, the off-field distractions and the clear sense that things could get worse at Swansea before they get better, Potter continues to diligently go about his work, refusing to sound downbeat and remaining totally committed to the job that he took on last summer. He is the glue holding a broken club together. Since you’re here … … we sincerely hope you enjoyed this article, which was our gift to you. At The Guardian we don’t believe in putting up paywalls, seeing our journalism as a Sunday league centre-back sees possession of a football, as something to be given away in a manner some would consider reckless. But not all the best things in life are free and sending crack journalists to top sporting events armed with deep knowledge, a working laptop and a vaguely acceptable level of literacy certainly is not. We welcome you here all the same, because we like you – all of you, but especially the ones who give us money. If you like what we do, perhaps you might consider becoming the small-scale Sheikh Mansour to our miniature Manchester City by making a small contribution. If everyone who reads and enjoys our reporting helps to support it, our future will become much more secure

and for all of you wondering whether it’s worth a read, Kieran Maguire’s stuff is always worth opening just to read / work out what little message he gives from the starting letter of each paragraph. I wonder if it’s true!!!

If there was one good thing to come out of this terrible thing it would be the uncovering of dubious agent practices, practices that both clubs and players are responsible for allowing.

“Decision by the end of the season”....I should hope so!

Think Fam was pretty fired up in the away game....should be the same for the home game too.

Fam will be spitting if they do....or is it sweat?

Isn’t there a possibility that they could also give a points deduction to next season too?

Woah.....nice. Hope you’re right. No point in FFP otherwise. Watershed moment.

@JamesBCFC

In fairness, he’s only played 1st Team football this season. Signed a contract until 2020 (back in Nov 17), and BBC report it as “at least” until 2020....so might even be a year option....meaning no rush during the window just gone.

@RumRed, yes, as Silvio says above.

That is Mrs F’s View too (ex-Insurance Underwriter).

They could insure against payment default (unlikely), but... They are more likely to sue for breach of contract.

Assuming he is Cardiff’s player officially, Nantes no longer have an insurable Interest over Sala.

They have to offer him a contract of at least equal to his current contract. yes, re pasted bit, I missed that, but they don’t have to offer him anything yet....of course it would be good if they could tie him to a new deal. But they don’t have to let him go in the summer, and they can wait til next summer to offer him another contract. Gonna piss the player off, yes, but it’s in their control to some extent.

I wonder if this is down to Cardiff’s insurers making them check everything is present and correct before authorising the claim.

They were satisfied enough with the documents to fly him over privately to start training the next day. As you say, no surprise though.

They probably have and he’s turned it down on interest from other clubs.

Really need the EFL to come down hard on Brum to set a precedent for Villa if needed. Thought the Swansea / Leeds / Dan James But was worth copying in full. It’s not just a case of agree a fee, the terms that go with it are key also. Loan terms cost Leeds Huw Jenkins, the Swansea City chairman, vetoed the club’s decision to sell the winger Daniel James to Leeds United at 10pm on Thursday after discovering the terms of the payment structure, which would have meant that they did not receive any money for one of their best players until June. The club had agreed to loan James for £1.5 million for the rest of the season, with Leeds obliged to buy him for a set fee of £7 million if they are promoted to the Premier League. On closer examination of the paperwork, however, Jenkins found that Leeds were not obliged to pay the loan fee for the 21-year-old winger until June 30, with any subsequent transfer fee payable in instalments over four years. That deal would have significantly strengthened Marcelo Bielsa’s Leeds squad, as they chase promotion, for no initial outlay. Leeds are unhappy at the late collapse of the transfer but may benefit in the long run as James has only 18 months left on his contract and Swansea have not offered him a new deal, so he is likely to be available for much less this summer.

Yeah, glad you can’t see anything (apart from the plane).

Hope the family of both guys get some closure on this ASAP.

Flint’s amortisation would’ve been pretty minimal, so having paid a sell-on percentage to Swindon, he probably went through the accounts as a £6m profit.

Mrs F who hates footie, said exactly that.

Yes, I have a relevant life policy set up on my business.

Wondering the same. Not a nice subject. Deal has been signed I assume, so Nantes due Transfer Fee, etc. Cardiff you would expect to have a key-person type policy to cover for this, but covering his value as an asset. How you value that is not something i’ve Got a clue about. Sala’s dependent could be due death in service payments, so expect Cardiff to insure against that too. Could be a compensation claim against the aviation company under aviation law. Who knows, murky old subject.