Guest Baloonz Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 Sorry if this been discussed else where, haven't read every post of late. If we had not signed (properly that is) Misfit or Motab would Maynard be here ? Or was Maynard always on Lansdown and Johnson's radar ? If he wasn't, then it looks like maybe the two failed signings may have worked in City's favour, we know that at the end of the season. Its going to tough league this year, I keep getting all the latest news from workmates about Reading, Wolves, QPR, Crystal Palace, Watford, Swansea they all think they are up for it this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted August 2, 2008 Share Posted August 2, 2008 We were in for Maynard before any of the other to&&ers you mention but the fee was prohibitive at that time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
internetjef Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 i think its fair to say that if either A) Meteb didnt play that game B) Mifsud wasnt a greedy **** we wouldnt have nicky. although we did enquire before he was obviously considered too expensive, and the afformentioned deals were def deemed better value by board before they went t*ts up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SyntaxtheRed Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 maynard was more than we wanted to py, but has clearly informed us that ego is no substitite for talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEnderSeb94 Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 I Think GJ Wanted M&M But Wen They Fell Through And Maynard Was Still On Offer Hes Gambled On Him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.