Jump to content
IGNORED

Twitter Rumour


Guest Laner95

Recommended Posts

Well, a sellable asset sat on the bench... good use of resources in a relegation battle... :fish:

I tend to agree with that he is a sellable asset and we're not playing him. But I don't understand why you've got it in for him and always have to have a dig every time his name is mentioned? Is it because you're sticking to your pro-Maynard stance and therefore feel the need to criticise Pitman at every opportunity to bolster that argument?

I actually think selling him and reinvesting him isn't a bad idea, because he's not getting game time and doesn't suit our preferred formation. Doesn't make him a bad player though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, a sellable asset sat on the bench... good use of resources in a relegation battle... :fish:

:laugh:, in all seriousness though, if we aren't going to play him and Maynard is staying, we may as well sell him!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...