cummins17 Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Excuse me if this has already been stated somewhere but anyone know when Danns is back off to Leicester or if we have extended the loan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!james Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Quote from tonights Q&A: DM: "Danns is a player I'd love to work with. The good news is that we are going to extend his loan period, but we cannot look beyond that." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cummins17 Posted December 6, 2012 Author Share Posted December 6, 2012 Cheers fella, had a horrible feeling that Leicester simply loaned us him to get him match fit for the busy Christmas period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Quote from tonights Q&A: DM: "Danns is a player I'd love to work with. The good news is that we are going to extend his loan period, but we cannot look beyond that." Great news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC101 Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Quote from tonights Q&A: DM: "Danns is a player I'd love to work with. The good news is that we are going to extend his loan period, but we cannot look beyond that." was just about to post that, very good news, hopefully it's until the end of the season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokey Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 I was under the impression that because the loan is now out of the transfer window, that it could not be extended. Goalies are different, whoever has Rabchuka at the moment, (Leeds?) have only been able to extend his loan by seven days at a time. Ive not seen anything other wise to suggest we are able to extend his loan. So if someone can explain how we are able to do this please can you explain. Cheers I thought the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambodinho Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 I'd imagine the clubs have agreed an extension to the loan which will be finalised in January. The loan has not yet been extended, but they have agreed to extend it in January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC101 Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 I was under the impression that because the loan is now out of the transfer window, that it could not be extended. Goalies are different, whoever has Rabchuka at the moment, (Leeds?) have only been able to extend his loan by seven days at a time. Ive not seen anything other wise to suggest we are able to extend his loan. So if someone can explain how we are able to do this please can you explain. Cheers maybe if a player is already on loan you can extend it then without any rules? just a thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eastonboy Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Dm is fairly unequivocal on Bcfctweets, it's not a case of WANTING to extend the loan, we ARE extending his loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glynriley Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Extension has been agreed with Leicester for Neil Danns, though paperwork and exact date to be completed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 The club have loaned players before so I'm fairly sure they're perfectly aware of all the connotations of extending loans. I would presume that when the loan was submitted for FL approval it was until January with a break in the middle for if he was going back to Leicester. We may be shit at many things, but we have vast experience in loaning players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Albert Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Fantastic news! Maybe these means a Danns/ Skuse partnership when he's back? Good/bad? Hmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semblar Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Aye, I get that. I just wish to know how it is possible Is it possible that the loan was formally notified to the FA for longer, but with agreement that only the first month was announced publically with a review after 28 days and a decision as to whether to implement the extra time? It would fit with Derek's statement this morning that there was agreement but it [the decision to include the optional part] wasn't signed. It would also fit with his (good IMHO) preference to keep business dealings quiet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Aye, I get that. I just wish to know how it is possible Perhaps it'll have to be chalked down as a 'nice surprise'; one of lifes little mysteries, like why a ducks's quack doesn't echo or how Carlton Palmer got so many England caps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazred Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Perhaps it'll have to be chalked down as a 'nice surprise'; one of lifes little mysteries, like why a ducks's quack doesn't echo or how Carlton Palmer got so many England caps... The ducks quack thing has long since been debunked. Carlton's caps however, has baffled even the greatest minds of this generation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pondlife Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Loan has been extended. Sky sports news just published Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Aye, I get that. I just wish to know how it is possible I'd guess its like extending a players contract, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 The loan agreement is between BCFC and LCFC and applies to his registration. We have already registered him, so the rule probably doesn't apply. I guess it was agreed in theory at the beginning but needed clarification nearer to the month being up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest China Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Think I saw on BBC that they had a recall clause - standard I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flagman Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 danns wont play for leicester again, him jermaine beckford, and paul gallagher placed a bet on burton to beat leicester in the cup earlier on in the season, leicester found out about this and all of them have since been loaned out, good news for us i hope! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.