94th Minute Posted November 24, 2003 Share Posted November 24, 2003 now both the new signings have started to settle who was a better buy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciderhead Reynolds Posted November 24, 2003 Share Posted November 24, 2003 Miller at the mo , simply because he's doing what hes being payed to do , Wilkshire is still a bit iffy , where as i think Miller has setteled perfectly now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted November 25, 2003 Share Posted November 25, 2003 Two different types of players playing in two completely different positions. Ones a striker and the other is a midfielder. I don't think it's quite that easy to detirmine which one is the better buy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chalky Posted November 25, 2003 Share Posted November 25, 2003 I voted Miller but i think it is a bit unfair to judge Wilkshire just yet as he has been played out of his positoin all season until now and i'm sure goven time he will improve and bang more in as the season progresses. I think Miller will get at least 15 goals this season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2iamdavies Posted November 25, 2003 Share Posted November 25, 2003 Its a tough one, as there different players as Tazman said but i voted Miller, as on the last few performances. I would like to hope, they are both our best buys that help us go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted November 25, 2003 Share Posted November 25, 2003 Its a tough one, as there different players as Tazman said Who!? Liam I'm ashamed of you. You could of at least got my name right Edit: Spelling, grammar, you name it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bow_Legged_Chicken Posted November 25, 2003 Share Posted November 25, 2003 I'm starting to belive both of them are turning out to be good signings and its hard to judge which one is better. I voted Wilkshire simply cause in the middle he is a very good player and keeps the ball down and plays some very good football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest citylady Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 i voted wilkshire as long as danny plays him where he should be played in the middle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTID 7 Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I voted miller as he has really delivered as of late, but like many other post suggest they are two different types of players so its not easy to judge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myoudale Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 they both play to diffrent roles so i would say both of them are equally as good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted December 2, 2003 Share Posted December 2, 2003 Wilkshire, now he is playing in his favorite area, scoring goals too, so he edges Miller, who I feel hasnt yet come to terms with our level of football, but next season, should be a massive improvement by both, with a season behind them, getting there though' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x3widRacin Posted December 2, 2003 Share Posted December 2, 2003 wilky was cheaper so there it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wishbone Posted December 3, 2003 Share Posted December 3, 2003 Too early still to say. Anyway, unproductive topic. Wishbone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
94th Minute Posted December 24, 2003 Author Share Posted December 24, 2003 its not that unproductive theres 38 votes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.