Jump to content
IGNORED

4-3-3 Or 3-5-2?


Guest alex_mike

Recommended Posts

Guest alex_mike

which one do you prefer i prefer 4-3-3 because we will have a solid back line solid midfield and good strikers upfront and we can keep the strikers happier easier! :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah but who do u play in midfield?

Tommy and Murray are starters - but bell on the left wing? do u think he could last a whole season?! Goodfellow? Is he proven? Youngsters - ok prospects, but we need to get off to a good start!!

Then where does tinman/caskey/wilkshire/orr and all these players fit in?!

I dunno either!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest hairyshamrock

I'm not bothered by either as i think we can play both. What does please me is that Tins is showing he can be more flexible than previous managers (not to name any WILSON) were willing to be. He also seems willing to listen to the players and play what they are happiest with rather than making us go down the lines of square pegs and round holes.

Good on you Tins!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 3-5-2 is the way forward. It offers us far more flexibility

and crucially width which is essential when you have Murray in the

team. Equally you switch to a 4-4-2 with ease during a game if it is

not working out. I think the only reason why we are playing 3 up top

tonight is to ensure that all the strikers in the squad get a regular

run out to gain sharpness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...