Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

Shoot me down if you wish, but will there ever be a day when rovers aren't discussed in so much detail on this forum?  I can't be the only one who feels sick of seeing their name seemingly glued to the pages of OTIB for almost 2 years now.  Sorry, I just had to say it and get it off my chest!!!

 

There's plenty of other threads to check in on. The one that is dedicated to them, to appease people who got fed up with several threads, quite clearly will contain detailed discussion. It's in the only place for it to go, the football section, because when there was a 'BCFC Only' forum people complained that there was no general football chat within.

 

Not really sure why you despair, or indeed compounded the despair by contributing to having the thread 'glued to page one of OTIB'...

 

And I'm not being funny, but in the past two years you've had the slide to relegation, them playing in the Conference and then this whole saga in between. God knows why you're surprised people are laughing and chipping in?!

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Hate seeing their name anywhere - but as 29AR alluded to, it's been one hell of a piss take the past few years!!

 

For those of us around for many years, will remember being on the end of stick (1990's) so it's nice to enjoy their current demise

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate seeing their name anywhere - but as 29AR alluded to, it's been one hell of a piss take the past few years!!

 

For those of us around for many years, will remember being on the end of stick (1990's) so it's nice to enjoy their current demise

 

Indeed, for anyone at school in the late 80s early 90s it was a bloody nightmare and I attended one in north Bristol.

 

This is where my utter dislike for them stems from even though they continue to be pretty much irrelevant to us these days.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shoot me down if you wish, but will there ever be a day when rovers aren't discussed in so much detail on this forum?  I can't be the only one who feels sick of seeing their name seemingly glued to the pages of OTIB for almost 2 years now.  Sorry, I just had to say it and get it off my chest!!!

I like to think that I can learn something everyday, I don't close my mind off to many things. This thread has been a piss take yes, but for me has been an education about law, courts, business etc. Yes it happens to be about our lesser neighbours but could apply to any business, but as it has been about them I've taken an interest and people have answered the dumb questions I've asked with good grace, thank you.

It's your right not to be interested about them, but we really have tried to put all the threads in this one and people have posted in here too. Basically it's easy to avoid if you don't want to read or contribute, just don't click on it!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it's likely to drag-on for months and months?

 

Again probably too many uncertainties to say anything is likely, for example internally both might not have any appetite to appeal any further or they may not even get leave to. But it doesn't take much creative thinking to see that this could rumble on as Monkeh says for significantly longer than months and months...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again probably too many uncertainties to say anything is likely, for example internally both might not have any appetite to appeal any further or they may not even get leave to. But it doesn't take much creative thinking to see that this could rumble on as Monkeh says for significantly longer than months and months...

I would have thought this was unlikely though purely down to the fact that the gas are unlikely to be able to afford anymore litigation or take out any more Wonga loans. Unless you know of any lawyers prepared to do it pro bono :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to think that I can learn something everyday, I don't close my mind off to many things. This thread has been a piss take yes, but for me has been an education about law, courts, business etc. Yes it happens to be about our lesser neighbours but could apply to any business, but as it has been about them I've taken an interest and people have answered the dumb questions I've asked with good grace, thank you.

It's your right not to be interested about them, but we really have tried to put all the threads in this one and people have posted in here too. Basically it's easy to avoid if you don't want to read or contribute, just don't click on it!

 

Come on though, don't you get fed up with seeing the words Basement ' ROVERS' in the first page every day???

 

I loathe them so much, I'd much prefer they didn't even exist.

Edited by reddogkev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think I've made one prediction throughout, that we get a decision this week based upon the Guardian article, and that was wrong!

 

Not listed for tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have thought this was unlikely though purely down to the fact that the gas are unlikely to be able to afford anymore litigation or take out any more Wonga loans. Unless you know of any lawyers prepared to do it pro bono :)

 

I know he loves charity but not even Bono would help the Gas. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if Bonio has found what he's looking for yet?

No but he's hoping it will find him. He's at a place called Vertigo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, for anyone at school in the late 80s early 90s it was a bloody nightmare and I attended one in north Bristol.

 

This is where my utter dislike for them stems from even though they continue to be pretty much irrelevant to us these days.

Bang on, if you don't know why we take the p*ss out of Rovers you are either too young to remember when they hand the upper hand in the derbies or you are so old you remember going to Ashton one week and Eastville the next. I went to school in East Bristol in the mid 80s to early 90s and it was relentless until the tide started to turn.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bang on, if you don't know why we take the p*ss out of Rovers you are either too young to remember when they hand the upper hand in the derbies or you are so old you remember going to Ashton one week and Eastville the next. I went to school in East Bristol in the mid 80s to early 90s and it was relentless until the tide started to turn.

 

I am that old, and I love taking the piss out the the Gas. Doesn't mean I hate them though - I'm a grownup.

Edited by Aizoon
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My boss is a gashead and earlier in the year he was talking to somebody about NLBR (as they were then) and I heard him mention that "I shouldn't talk about Rovers should I, BS2 Red hates them", quick as a flash I replied "I don't hate Rovers, I just feel sorry for them".

 

The look of pain on his face when he realised I pitied them was far better than saying I hated them.  :rofl2br:

 

And yes he refers to me by my forum username. ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My boss is a gashead and earlier in the year he was talking to somebody about NLBR (as they were then) and I heard him mention that "I shouldn't talk about Rovers should I, BS2 Red hates them", quick as a flash I replied "I don't hate Rovers, I just feel sorry for them".

The look of pain on his face when he realised I pitied them was far better than saying I hated them. :rofl2br:

And yes he refers to me by my forum username. ;)

Whenever I get asked if I support City or Rovers, I used to say 'I think I remember a club called Rovers, didn't they used to play in the football league?' however now I just say 'I support City, I've never heard of Bristol Rovers' and that usually gets the response I'm after!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BRISTOL ROVERS: Jermaine Easter is 'gold dust' - Stuart Sinclair

Read more: http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/BRISTOL-ROVERS-Jermaine-Easter-gold-dust-Stuart/story-26871905-detail/story.html#ixzz3fUJBHdPZ

Follow us: @BristolPost on Twitter | bristolpost on Facebook

They may need to strike gold to keep afloat

I suppose he is broken down, shattered and available to the highest bidder Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should do a duet with Lisa Stansfield.

 

Was in the pipeline apparently but Piggs already booked him to duet on 'With or Without You' at Dunford's leaving do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

D-Day for the sags is Monday...

 

You little git.

 

36 posts in and you break the Gem. Good spot :D

 

Monday, Court 16, 10:30am for anyone local and interested. Decision should appear on www.bailii.org , hopefully asap but it can take minutes, hours, or even days to appear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chances are your leader already knows

 

Might be worth adding that if anyone claims to be 'ITK' between now and Monday it's probably a very safe assumption that they are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will be a draw. Sainsburys did things Rovers didn't like and Rovers did things Sainsburys didnt like. Cant see either of them winning.

 

Don't think it works like that does it? Sainsburys have brought the case asking the court to confirm that the contract has lapsed. Presumably the judge can either rule that it has lapsed, or that it is still binding. A 'not sure' ruling wouldn't really cut it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think it works like that does it? Sainsburys have brought the case asking the court to confirm that the contract has lapsed. Presumably the judge can either rule that it has lapsed, or that it is still binding. A 'not sure' ruling wouldn't really cut it!

 

It certainly won't be a 'not sure' that's a given, but it might not be as cut and dried as a yes or no.

 

You are quite right if you look at it black and white, based upon reports, Sainsburys brought the case and asked the court to confirm the contract has lapsed. But I thought I read that Rovers have launched a counter claim for damages in the instance that the contract is not binding. If that is the case then it brings in the wider issues around conduct in the instance the contract doesn't exist.  

 

That's why I'm not sure there is too much really in Sainsburys taking the case and not Rovers. All that really means is Sainsburys filed their papers before Rovers did, not to be confused with Rovers not suing Sainsbury's. Why Sainsbury's filed first might be something of interest...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly won't be a 'not sure' that's a given, but it might not be as cut and dried as a yes or no.

 

You are quite right if you look at it black and white, based upon reports, Sainsburys brought the case and asked the court to confirm the contract has lapsed. But I thought I read that Rovers have launched a counter claim for damages in the instance that the contract is not binding. If that is the case then it brings in the wider issues around conduct in the instance the contract doesn't exist.  

 

That's why I'm not sure there is too much really in Sainsburys taking the case and not Rovers. All that really means is Sainsburys filed their papers before Rovers did, not to be confused with Rovers not suing Sainsbury's. Why Sainsbury's filed first might be something of interest...

I wouldn't read too much into rovers counter claim after the whole Wycombe fiasco
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly won't be a 'not sure' that's a given, but it might not be as cut and dried as a yes or no.

 

You are quite right if you look at it black and white, based upon reports, Sainsburys brought the case and asked the court to confirm the contract has lapsed. But I thought I read that Rovers have launched a counter claim for damages in the instance that the contract is not binding. If that is the case then it brings in the wider issues around conduct in the instance the contract doesn't exist.  

 

That's why I'm not sure there is too much really in Sainsburys taking the case and not Rovers. All that really means is Sainsburys filed their papers before Rovers did, not to be confused with Rovers not suing Sainsbury's. Why Sainsbury's filed first might be something of interest...

 

Ah OK, I didn't realise there was a counter claim, although it makes sense in the circumstances. So it turns out the law isn't all that straightforward then. Who knew?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any local pubs showing the game live?

Gut feel on this one will be some compensation to Rovers, but way below the cost of the ground.

Complete guess, and we will see!

 

I am pretty sure that under contract law you can only claim your losses so it will be all or nothing for Rovers and if it's nothing then Sainsburys will have won and can claim their losses in court costs against Rovers and they don't come cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...