Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, slartibartfast said:

5809 out, v poor !

Was listening to RB before the KO and the poor attendance was blamed by the commentator on the proximity to Christmas! What a load of Bowlox

They also commented that Stevenage had brought a mascot...... it's a Bear the gas guy said..... must have something to do with Stevenage!

No Sh!t Sherlock!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ForeverRed said:

Was listening to RB before the KO and the poor attendance was blamed by the commentator on the proximity to Christmas! What a load of Bowlox

They also commented that Stevenage had brought a mascot...... it's a Bear the gas guy said..... must have something to do with Stevenage!

No Sh!t Sherlock!

Was the bear included in the 5809 attendance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Iron Man said:

Losing to Crawley and Stevenage in 3 days? Chortle. And only 5800 there as well? Re-arrange the words: Giving the gift on keeps that

Oh, come on............let's be fair.

They put up a really heroic fight against Chesham!!!!!   

  :rofl2br:

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bristol Rovers: Dopey Darrell rues finishing after Stevenage loss

Bristol Rovers manager Dopey Darrell was unhappy with his side's finishing following the 2-1 home defeat by Stevenage in League Two.

Chris Whelpdale scored a 60th-minute winner to give Boro boss Teddy Sheringham his first away win.

"At the minute we seem to need five or six chances, but the opposition are taking their chances," 37-year-old Clarke told BBC Radio Bristol .

"If things are not quite dropping for them, they have to keep working hard."

He handed new signing Paris Cowan-Hall a full debut, and the Millwall loanee created Rovers' goal for Matt Taylor.

Clarke believes his side, who have now lost eight home games this season, will learn from two consecutive defeats.

"It was never going to be a bed of roses this year and this a low - but we will stay strong," he added.

"Coming up a division we are going to get a few kicks along the way and people do forget we are new to this league the Football League.

"It is a group that is learning and people forget that we have actually gone up a division this year ." No they don't forget Darrell because you only mentioned it in your previous breath and to be precise, you haven't "gone up a division" because there aren't five divisions ... you've come up from the Vanarama Conference to become the newest member of the Football League.

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or have the gas just given us too many gifts over the last couple of years?  The pleasure gained going to work to give the gashead work colleagues some stick after a poor result is just gone.  They just shrug their shoulders and accept it and some even say the don't go anymore and have lost interest. Can't believe they just accept tripe year after year.  Having given us relegation on the last day of the season after claiming they were pushing for playoffs, punching horses, struggling in the vanarama,  Stadium plans down the toilet,  wonga loans and loosing in the fa cup to Chesham what could they actually do next to properly surprise us?

I will start with selling out to a new board and realising the chairman is Sepp Blatter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BCFC Jordan said:

So the consortium doesn't exist. Who'd have thought it?

 

 

 

15 hours ago, Drew Peacock said:

I like that phrase

I have always been amused (my puerile sense of humour) by your user name and also that of Rudolf Hucker.

There was another similarly 'rude' user name who used to post, but I cannot recall seeing him on here for months now and, for the life of me, I have forgotten his user name - it was sort of Greek and, if I remember correctly, he once explained/justified himself to TMOR by saying that his father was Greek and had a wicked sense of humour.

Any ideas?

Edited by PHILINFRANCE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

 

I have always been amused (my puerile sense of humour) by your user name and also that of Rudolf Hucker.

There was another similarly 'rude' user name who used to post, but I cannot recall seeing him on here for months now and, for the life of me, I have forgotten his user name - it was sort of Greek and, if I remember correctly, he once explained/justified himself to TMOR by saying that his father was Greek and had a wicked sense of humour.

Any ideas?

Mike Litoiris

I also liked Whale Eye Beef Hooked.

Although ideally everybody would just use their real name as I do.

Edited by Eddie Hitler
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

Mike Litoiris

I also liked Whale Eye Beef Hooked.

Although ideally everybody would just use their real name as I do.

From the BBC today ... but I can't remember any of this guy's posts on OTIB ...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-34918491

Phuc Dat Bich admits hoax in Facebook name battle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Aizoon said:

I was expecting there to be Sags on the 10 past 10 bus from Nevil Road to the Centre. There weren't. I reckon even that crowd figure was exaggerated. 

They caught the later bus due to being at a lock in with dopey Darrell,after a few renditions of good night irene they all felt a lot happier about things and were soon talking about the play offs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ForeverRed said:

Was listening to RB before the KO and the poor attendance was blamed by the commentator on the proximity to Christmas! What a load of Bowlox

They also commented that Stevenage had brought a mascot...... it's a Bear the gas guy said..... must have something to do with Stevenage!

No Sh!t Sherlock!

https://www.justgiving.com/BoroBearKenya2013/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ForeverRed said:

Was listening to RB before the KO and the poor attendance was blamed by the commentator on the proximity to Christmas! What a load of Bowlox

They also commented that Stevenage had brought a mascot...... it's a Bear the gas guy said..... must have something to do with Stevenage!

No Sh!t Sherlock!

Unbelievably desperate for RB to blame Xmas for a low crowd a full month before the day! I must have missed it but did Dopey get bolloxed in a Gloucester Rd boozer after the game and demand that the local Stevenage paper "print that b@stard?".....

And did the Crawley paper "print that b@stard" too?! Or did the Chesham rag beat them to it?!

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Eddie Hitler said:

They are really good captures of the game and atmosphere; would be great if there was a City equivalent.

Goodnight Irene is as dreary as ever; what a rubbish song to pick as your club song.

 

His videos are great, especially after a loss. Have to credit the lad for following them up and down the country most weeks too.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give the saggy credit for doing his blogs, no one (as far as I know does the same at our place??).

I assume he's doing some sort of 'media' thing at college. If he is. the occasional 'oh **** they've scored' probably isn't the best advert for his 'skills.

As for the 'Let's all do the steward', really?  As the blogger says ' we were brilliant in the 2nd half' yet they spent most of it joking with the steward? I would have been watching the cough 'brilliant' football myself. Actually, I wouldn't as it's the r**ers and I would rather have teeth pulled than watch them!

Edited by ciderup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CotswoldRed said:

Is there an easy way to drill down to the reasons for the banning orders?  I wouldn't mind betting most at BCFC are for things most people would be surprised actually warrant an order at all.

Looking at the Hedllu in an intimidating manner? Being English in Cardiff without a permit? Saying `ouch` when being hit by a baton? Getting off a train at Bristol Temple Meads having spent a day in Cardiff?

Take your pick.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst the sags are panicking over what it means to their future now that the minimal has been designated an Asset of Community Value, the ever so knowledgeable Finnish Gas came up with ...

"At least we have the consolation that no-one in Bristol (including the Greens) thinks Ashton Gate is an Asset of Community Value."

http://gaschat.co.uk/post/135232/thread

Let me just Google that for you  .... http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Ashton+Gate+is+an+Asset+of+Community+Value

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SirColinOfMansfield said:

Whilst the sags are panicking over what it means to their future now that the minimal has been designated an Asset of Community Value, the ever so knowledgeable Finnish Gas came up with ...

"At least we have the consolation that no-one in Bristol (including the Greens) thinks Ashton Gate is an Asset of Community Value."

http://gaschat.co.uk/post/135232/thread

Let me just Google that for you  .... http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Ashton+Gate+is+an+Asset+of+Community+Value

 

 

Aww, poor bastard. He can't even have the 'consolation' that their ground has got a title that Ashton Gate supposedly hasn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago via mobile 
Quote  
Post by Peter Parker on 3 hours ago
From.FB

Nick Higgs on the Stadium at last night's Supporters Club AGM: The hearing at the Court of Appeal is about holding Sainsbury's to the original terms of the contract, £30.05 million. It is not about compensation although he did add the club will be seeking an extra £5 million to compensate them for delays, rising costs etc. The hearing will be heard by a panel of three judges who will listen to the solicitors arguments. If we win Sainsbury's do technically have the right to appeal to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights but they are not certain to get a hearing and probably wouldn't go that far because of the negative PR. Interestingly he added that there around 20-30 other organisations who are suffering from a Sainsbury's change of mind who are waiting to see how our appeal goes before commencing their own action against them.
I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of [br]I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of personality
Jon the Stripe

 


Joined: June 2014
Posts: 268

Supporters Club AGM 3 hours ago Igitur likes this.
Quote  
Post by Jon the Stripe on 3 hours ago

Off top of my head so don't be hard on me!

NH - Court case either 26/27th Jan with 3 judges
NH - All or nothing case - Win - get circa £35 (inc costs etc) Lose - Get fukk all
NH - Confident of winning
NH - If lose there is a Plan B but will not go into details
NH - The AVG thingy shouldnt be a problem
NH - The contract with UWE has elapsed
NH - Have been approached by at least 12 interested parties 
BB - Shop takings well up 
BB - we're going to Sabadell and fun shall be had by all

DC -GK position is a massive concern
DC -2 players have deals for next season
DC -Rotation of squad will continue as its his way
DC - Still demanding his players get top 7 finish
DC - 154 corners 1 goal  I'm gutted!
DC - Lines gets drawn back too often/Ellis just needs a clip round ear now and again/New lad (ginger) could do well/We're so close to being a good side/Fine margins/ Get the bloody beers in!

Goodnight and UTG - JTS

 

Read more: http://gasheads.org/thread/4245/supporters-club-agm#ixzz3sjGvp2GH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Following the Rovers supporters club AGM it has been announced that revised UWE Stadium plans include a 100 foot statue of Nicholas outside the main gate.

I am not sure whether there will also be 100 hands, 100 elbows or 100 other parts of his anatomy but, if built to scale, the statue will be 100 feet wide and therefore the biggest pre-crass structure in the South West of England.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Coombsy said:

If we win Sainsbury's do technically have the right to appeal to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights but they are not certain to get a hearing and probably wouldn't go that far because of the negative PR. Interestingly he added that there around 20-30 other organisations who are suffering from a Sainsbury's change of mind who are waiting to see how our appeal goes before commencing their own action against them.

A fair bit of nonsense in there. ECHR - probably want a human rights issue then. Supreme Court would seem the last step. 

'It wont go that far because of negative PR'... What with 20-30 litigants supposedly preparing their own action and this one instance being a £30m+ issue? As if. Besides if there's 20-30 others looking in to this as claimants you can bet there are a number of interested companies watching who are in Sainsburys position who may want to support them and see them win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


20 hours ago severncider said:
Before the AGM, NH arrived and came straight over to three of us and had a wide ranging discussion and answered all the questions we asked, we did not ask him the questions we had prepared. After the AGM he came up to me and spent about 10 mins answering some more questions, nothing appeared to be off limits. He said:-

1 – The MSP loan is not being repaid in instalments. The interest is being added to the capital sum and will be repaid at the latest by the third quarter day of 2016 which I take to be 29th September 2016. So you work out the total cost, £2.6m @ 1.2% per month over a maximum period of 21 months. He did say that if the sale of The Mem went through earlier it would be repaid immediately and the balance of the sale would be used to build UWE. 

2 – The takeover/consortium talks are advanced and going well. I have no idea if the investors NH is talking about is the Consortium that several of us have been talking about. They may be or maybe not separate entities.

3 – As and when the investment/takeover takes place he did say that although he wasn’t sure, he didn’t believe any shares would be available to fans. I find that difficult to accept if true, as it would bar fans from buying shares and attending any AGM. Also, BRSC would have no stake in BRFC.

4 – The funding will be in place, no matter what decision is made by the Appeal Court AND that the stadium will be for 21,700 as originally planned and fully fitted out

5 – He indicated that as and when the talks are successfully concluded, that a start date for building UWE could be between February and June 2016. The first date seems very ambitious, even if an investment/takeover is completed by the end of December 2015. I have said many times, quoting dates is a nonsense as it tends to “bit you on the bum” when the date quoted fails to materialise.

6 – We asked “what if two offers are received and they both met the financial requirements, ie £40+ million in a bank account acceptable to BRFC, would an EGM be called to enable Shareholders to consider both offers and give their views?”. NH said not necessarily. I found this answer amazing, yes NH holds around 54% of the voting shares so will always win in a “card vote”. However does he not owe a duty to all the Shareholders to let them know what has been offered and for them to have their say. NH seems to think not.

I think that covers everything else.

Takeover talks are going well?! I though he denied it very recently?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Coombsy said:


4 – The funding will be in place, no matter what decision is made by the Appeal Court AND that the stadium will be for 21,700 as originally planned and fully fitted out

5 – He indicated that as and when the talks are successfully concluded, that a start date for building UWE could be between February and June 2016. 

 

 

Come on now Cityites you have to admit my boy Nicholas done good.

A cast iron guarantee from a local hero who's integrity is beyond question.

Rejoice Rejoice ...

 

 

Void where prohibited. No representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the completeness, accuracy, fitness for a particular purpose, or utility of this stadium or any information or opinion contained herein. Actual mileage may vary. Prices slightly higher west of Avonmouth. All models over 18 years of age. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Any resemblance to actual people, living or dead, or events, past, present or future, is purely coincidental. This product not to be construed as an endorsement of any product or company, nor as the adoption or promulgation of any guidelines, standards or recommendations. Some names have been changed to protect the innocent. This product is meant for educational purposes only. Some assembly required. Batteries not included. Package sold by weight, not volume. Contents may settle during shipment. No user-serviceable parts inside. Use only as directed.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So not only did they have to shun (or were shunned by?) conventional lenders, they are now seemingly paying interest on interest on a loan of an amount which is tiny in footballing terms. 

Consider that they are seemingly taking an expensive approach to this loan alongside only 2 players signed up for next year... 

 

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, bert tann said:

 

Come on now Cityites you have to admit my boy Nicholas done good.

A cast iron guarantee from a local hero who's integrity is beyond question.

Rejoice Rejoice ...

 

 

Void where prohibited. No representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the completeness, accuracy, fitness for a particular purpose, or utility of this stadium or any information or opinion contained herein. Actual mileage may vary. Prices slightly higher west of Avonmouth. All models over 18 years of age. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Any resemblance to actual people, living or dead, or events, past, present or future, is purely coincidental. This product not to be construed as an endorsement of any product or company, nor as the adoption or promulgation of any guidelines, standards or recommendations. Some names have been changed to protect the innocent. This product is meant for educational purposes only. Some assembly required. Batteries not included. Package sold by weight, not volume. Contents may settle during shipment. No user-serviceable parts inside. Use only as directed.

Serving suggestion only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Red Bill said:

Don't forget "Act of God"

This is not a toy. It contains small parts that may cause choking and and is unsuitable for persons under 99 years of age. Not available in Northern Ireland, Isle of Man or the Channel Islands.

WARNING: May contain nuts.

Edited by Aizoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2015, 9:22:41, Coombsy said:

3 hours ago via mobile 
Quote  
Post by Peter Parker on 3 hours ago
From.FB

Nick Higgs on the Stadium at last night's Supporters Club AGM: The hearing at the Court of Appeal is about holding Sainsbury's to the original terms of the contract, £30.05 million. It is not about compensation although he did add the club will be seeking an extra £5 million to compensate them for delays, rising costs etc. The hearing will be heard by a panel of three judges who will listen to the solicitors arguments. If we win Sainsbury's do technically have the right to appeal to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights but they are not certain to get a hearing and probably wouldn't go that far because of the negative PR. Interestingly he added that there around 20-30 other organisations who are suffering from a Sainsbury's change of mind who are waiting to see how our appeal goes before commencing their own action against them.
I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of [br]I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of, I'm the cult of personality
Jon the Stripe

 


Joined: June 2014
Posts: 268

Supporters Club AGM 3 hours ago Igitur likes this.
Quote  
Post by Jon the Stripe on 3 hours ago

Off top of my head so don't be hard on me!

NH - Court case either 26/27th Jan with 3 judges
NH - All or nothing case - Win - get circa £35 (inc costs etc) Lose - Get fukk all
NH - Confident of winning
NH - If lose there is a Plan B but will not go into details
NH - The AVG thingy shouldnt be a problem
NH - The contract with UWE has elapsed
NH - Have been approached by at least 12 interested parties 
BB -Shop takings well up 
BB - we're going to Sabadell and fun shall be had by all

DC -GK position is a massive concern
DC -2 players have deals for next season
DC -Rotation of squad will continue as its his way
DC - Still demanding his players get top 7 finish
DC - 154 corners 1 goal  I'm gutted!
DC - Lines gets drawn back too often/Ellis just needs a clip round ear now and again/New lad (ginger) could do well/We're so close to being a good side/Fine margins/ Get the bloody beers in!

Goodnight and UTG - JTS

 

Read more: http://gasheads.org/thread/4245/supporters-club-agm#ixzz3sjGvp2GH

And why would they doubt anything Nick "Cast iron case" Higgs says?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yesterday at 1:52pm via mobile QuotePost by BishopstonBRFC on yesterday at 1:52pm

yesterday at 1:20pm severncider said:
Before the AGM, NH arrived and came straight over to three of us and had a wide ranging discussion and answered all the questions we asked, we did not ask him the questions we had prepared. After the AGM he came up to me and spent about 10 mins answering some more questions, nothing appeared to be off limits. He said:-

1 – The MSP loan is not being repaid in instalments. The interest is being added to the capital sum and will be repaid at the latest by the third quarter day of 2016 which I take to be 29th September 2016. So you work out the total cost, £2.6m @ 1.2% per month over a maximum period of 21 months. He did say that if the sale of The Mem went through earlier it would be repaid immediately and the balance of the sale would be used to build UWE. 

2 – The takeover/consortium talks are advanced and going well. I have no idea if the investors NH is talking about is the Consortium that several of us have been talking about. They may be or maybe not separate entities.

3 – As and when the investment/takeover takes place he did say that although he wasn’t sure, he didn’t believe any shares would be available to fans. I find that difficult to accept if true, as it would bar fans from buying shares and attending any AGM. Also, BRSC would have no stake in BRFC.

4 – The funding will be in place, no matter what decision is made by the Appeal Court AND that the stadium will be for 21,700 as originally planned and fully fitted out

5 – He indicated that as and when the talks are successfully concluded, that a start date for building UWE could be between February and June 2016. The first date seems very ambitious, even if an investment/takeover is completed by the end of December 2015. I have said many times, quoting dates is a nonsense as it tends to “bit you on the bum” when the date quoted fails to materialise.

6 – We asked “what if two offers are received and they both met the financial requirements, ie £40+ million in a bank account acceptable to BRFC, would an EGM be called to enable Shareholders to consider both offers and give their views?”. NH said not necessarily. I found this answer amazing, yes NH holds around 54% of the voting shares so will always win in a “card vote”. However does he not owe a duty to all the Shareholders to let them know what has been offered and for them to have their say. NH seems to think not.

I think that covers everything else.

Takeover talks are going well?! I though he denied it very recently?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Foreign investors so I've heard...

We are all happy to accept your statements on this KITR and I am not doubting what you have been told, but I am honestly amazed at this, which foreign investors would be prepared to clear the debts of a team languishing in league 2. I don't see the potential there, even if they got everything right and everything was already in place, it would take them at least 3 years to get to the promised land and earn some decent money. If they are being sold a pup by Higgs, surely when they do their due diligence they would discover that. Maybe, and it's a big maybe, if they had Bristol to themselves or we were the poor neighbours there would be more potential, but that is not the situation and is unlikely ever to be so.

I can't even see an asset stripping option, I can't imagine they could make enough money out of selling the ground, to make it worthwhile for the amount they would have to pay Higgs and co to shift out of the way. I could only really see a group of dedicated Gasheads with a bit of cash ever investing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comments
 robin 
12:43PM
Love the lightning. :laugh:!

Gassssss 
1:00PM
Your team is the most despised in the league. You cheat , play dire football , have a shitty ground in an ugly town. Your supporters are thugs.
We will whip your asses again.

The sooner your relagated and go out of business the better.

mooneyman 
1:04PM
Like you whipped our mighty non league neighbours Chesham United a couple of weeks ago!

floyd 
1:14PM
A Bristol Rovers fan accusing another club of cheating is almost unbelievable.

This is the Bristol Rovers who, following their relegation, cost our club thousands of pounds we could ill-afford to spend, on ridiculous, trumped-up, poorly written, nonsense claims. They would have happily seen us go out of business to save their own skin. Their actions were an embarrassment to the majority of their fan-base, and to lower league football in general.

The whole thing makes me sick.

EwanHoosaami 
1:20PM
Us, a shitty ground? That's rich coming from a Rovers fan! If that was the adjective you used for the access to our stadium, then you would at least have a valid point. By the way, which branch of Sainsburys do you use?

 robin 
1:24PM
Our supporters are thugs? Which grounds have we tried wrecking like the horse punching knuckle dragging neanderthals from the blue part of Bristol? At Plymouth eaerlier in the season they attacked families in a park after the game,stay classy gas!

 Ciderk1d 
1:44PM edited 1:47PM
@Gassssss, but it's my team. In fact a Fan's team.

MindlessDrugHoover 
2:40PM
Small town near Chesham / We're just a small town near Chesham.

fedup1980 
3:02PM edited 3:03PM
@Gassssss my only concern for tonight is when we win, will your chairman try and have the game declared void because we once changed our kit from quarters to halves?

 crabbie 
3:29PM
Are Brizzle still sulking that we wore the quarters first and they didn't get included in the top football shirt poll, I don't know thunder storm in a tea cup why don't they just oh I don't know maybe just 'Live Well for Less'

 bill_stickers 
3:43PM
@Gassssss

Most of your claims and opinions are purely subjective, even if I disagree with everything you have said.

However, to say our fans are thugs shows you really are blind in your views.

We probably have the best behaved fans in the football league. A solitary banning order last season, and no major crowd trouble incidents for two decades.

On the other hand, Bristol Rovers fans have regularly acted disgracefully in both the Football League and the Conference, whether its attacking goalkeepers, punching horses, invading pitches or fighting outside grounds.

niebieski 
5:03PM edited 5:08PM
2013/14 season, one club had 57 football related arrests, one had 0.
2014/15 season, one club had 15 football related arrests, one had 1.

I suppose on those stats, Bristol have had a 75% reduction in misbehavior, whereas we've had a 100% rise! Looks like I've got my Sun headline!

(Stats from https://data.gov.uk/dataset/football-banning-orders)

MindlessDrugHoover 
5:29PM
Drizzle Rovers' arrests only went down last season because so few of their fans could find Welling, Alfreton, Nuneaton or Telford on the map.

 BSE 
5:29PM edited 5:35PM
Ingram/Richardson injured maybe?


Edit:
Then again maybe not think I might have jumped to a conclusion a bit fast there, more than likely no games left during his loan period so might as well get him back.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...