Bristol R*vers dustbin thread

[Guest]

Exactly - if this has happened the person who done the crime needs punishing!

[Bristol Rob]

2 minutes ago, glynriley said:

Here come the deputies...... 
If of course Henbury is able to provide the evidence and parties concerned to substantiate his claim I'm not sure how OTIB will ever be able to live this down. It would be a case where you engineered your own downfall and put you own club to shame once again. 

 

So according to at least one gAsshole, trying to identify a thug who knocks vulnerable people's teeth out is something we'd never live down..?!

I suppose if the shoe was on the other foot, they'd all close ranks and protect the perpetrator.

 

Are you suggesting that 99% of Catholic priests are Gashead?

[Guest]

JulieH

Just wondering how you can investigate in an official capacity when:

(a) No official complaint has been made by the person who was allegedly assaulted?

You do not need the actual 'victim' to make a complaint - I assume you have heard of prosecutions for Assaults/ABH/GBH etc where the victims do not wish to press any charges at all haven't you?

A police officer can not investigate in an official capacity unless any of the criteria of points a-e have been met.

Well point A has not been met but it can still be investigated - that is a certainty

Ps - idiot

[SimonR]

2 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

A persons word is evidence if he has actually witnessed a crime or offense or the lead up or aftermath to an offense. 

But if there is no complainant then there is nothing to investigate further. 

If it was immeasurably witnessed at the scene then the person can be arrested, interviewed and then cautioned, the injured party could then choose not to press charges and then no further action would be taken.

 

Well at last we will find out the Truth. Which is most likely that the serial liar henbury is now caught up in a web of his own making, and may be cautioned or worse for wasting police time.

[GrahamC]

When can we go back to laughing at the fact Wael is a fraud?

[glynriley]

1 minute ago, GrahamC said:

When can we go back to laughing at the fact Wael is a fraud?

We never stopped mate...

[GreedyHarry]

13 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

A persons word is evidence if he has actually witnessed a crime or offense or the lead up or aftermath to an offense. 

But if there is no complainant then there is nothing to investigate further. 

If it was immeasurably witnessed at the scene then the person can be arrested, interviewed and then cautioned, the injured party could then choose not to press charges and then no further action would be taken.

 

Offence is spelt with a C love.

[Bristol Rob]

Just now, Gashead1981 said:

JulieH

I am a mod on gaschat and I have seen no application for you to join our forum. I have spoken with the other mods and no one has denied you access. 

So if you mean gaschat is unhappy to have you because of a couple of posters saying you aren’t wanted because of your red persuasion, then your post here is distorted and misleading. 

Come and join us, I’ll verify you, and you can receive your own welcome every ted gets over there. And it will be nothing to do with you being a police officer!! 

It is one of the sad things about your forum that you don't allow us to register and have some banter. It's almost as if you are embarrassed to be Gas.

[BCFC11]

7 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

a) only if it was witnessed by a third party or a police officer which led to a direct arrest or with hard digital evidence which could substantiate the arrest and subsequent caution given pre interview and the charge post interview. 

The police also do not press the charge, the crime prosecution service do. The police merely report the facts and present the evidence. 

In this instance it would be down to the force districts inspector or lead Sargent to decide whether there is something to be officially investigated, but that can only be done if an official complaint is made as it would be considered a historic allegation and that would need a statement from the complainant.

I take it idiot is a term of acknowledgement around here, so it would be rude not to join in. Idiot.

 

Atleast your welcome on here, unlike your sad excuse of a forum who ban anyone for being a 'ted'

[Guest]

Someone has said they have had their teeth knocked out, this has then been reported on numerous forums.

"The hard digital evidence" will or can be looked at once the facts have been revealed - hence the point of investigation in the first place. How do you know there isn't a complainant now as fact, who may also have made some sort of statement (if indeed what you are saying is true)?? There may well be a statement and complainant now due to all the pathetic mud slinging - and that would not need to be the victim either.

Ps - the idiot comment was redirected due to you calling someone on here one beforehand:

Umm..

If it was cyber crime it would have a digital footprint. Therefore evidence.  

Idiot. 

[glynriley]

4 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

JulieH

I am a mod on gaschat and I have seen no application for you to join our forum. I have spoken with the other mods and no one has denied you access. 

So if you mean gaschat is unhappy to have you because of a couple of posters saying you aren’t wanted because of your red persuasion, then your post here is distorted and misleading. 

Come and join us, I’ll verify you, and you can receive your own welcome every ted gets over there. And it will be nothing to do with you being a police officer!! 

Hugo the Elder Moderator     Posts: 7,854   Posting Level

yesterday at 9:26am via mobile manorfarmgas, philbemmygas, and 10 more like this Quote   Post by Hugo the Elder on yesterday at 9:26am 1) BRFC cannot, does not and has never sought to control this forum. 2)We are open to conversation with the club at all times. 3) Anyone is welcome to make an account on this forum provided they follow the rules. 4) Shitheads will continue to be banned from this forum regardless if they work for the Police or not. 5) Anyone making an account deliberately to stir up trouble or to score points with Bristol Sport Men's Soccer Division will be banned. 6) As you were.

[redcityman]

Gashead1981 I would'nt botther getting offended when being called an idiot, afterall at least you get the chance to air you oppinion on our forum, whereas the opposite cannot be said of a forum where such allegations have been gleefully discussed without any proof or debate from those that are being castigated as the villians.

But hey as Hugo says anyone is welcome! 

[chinapig]

15 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

A persons word is evidence if he has actually witnessed a crime or offense or the lead up or aftermath to an offense. 

But if there is no complainant then there is nothing to investigate further. 

If it was immeasurably witnessed at the scene then the person can be arrested, interviewed and then cautioned, the injured party could then choose not to press charges and then no further action would be taken.

 

In a sense we may be violently agreeing. 

I'm not talking here about the standard required for the police to refer to the CPS or the latter to proceed to prosecution, least of all to be acceptable to a court. None of those is met by what is in the public domain imo.

Rather I mean evidence sufficient for the police to investigate. I have been in the position of knowing a crime had been committed in the absence of a complainant and felt it  my duty to report it. The police investigated, though it went no further because they could not gather the kind of evidence to which you refer.

[chinapig]

14 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

JulieH

I am a mod on gaschat and I have seen no application for you to join our forum. I have spoken with the other mods and no one has denied you access. 

So if you mean gaschat is unhappy to have you because of a couple of posters saying you aren’t wanted because of your red persuasion, then your post here is distorted and misleading. 

Come and join us, I’ll verify you, and you can receive your own welcome every ted gets over there. And it will be nothing to do with you being a police officer!! 

Julie doesn't say she was denied access, she says her presence was not welcomed by forum users.

No point in her being there if she's just going to get abuse. Perhaps if the mods put a stop to that a constructive relationship could be established?

[Red Army 75]

5 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

Because this is a historic crime, with no complainant any allegations must have foundation. 

The allegation is someone being assaulted.

There are no witnesses that I know of. 

What is the evidence to proceed this allegation? 

In this case it needs to be digital. Henburys  statement would only then support the allegation. But he only knows the events based on the one who was assaulted. It doesn’t amount to evidence as he didn’t see the assault. 

The evidence would have to be the cctv to arrest anyone in connection with or on the suspicion of.  

But as there is no complaint, nor any evidence that has been found there is nothing further to investigate.

 

Do you not think that Henbury ass has brought this on his own. Trying to point score by putting this out on a public forum. Rather than go to the police in the first place and get the ***** who done it . Also do you believe that all teds ( what the **** is that by the way ) would stand by and let a vulnerable person get his teeth knocked out . 

No problem with gas on this forum. Got a couple of very good posters . But that Henbury ass is partial to a bit off bullshit isn’t he . Besides this .

If it’s true every city fan I know will condone this . And the people who done it are the lowest.

But If

[chinapig]

Just now, Gashead1981 said:

It would appear so! 

The police also need it to warrant an investigation. 

However, as I have said, there has been no complaint or any hard evidence, and in any case, the official channel should be for JulieH to report it to her superior first and not take it upon herself to do so. Just because she is a police officer, it doesn’t give her free licence not to follow procedure. 

If the evidence was so little, they wouldn’t waste a police officers time. They would use a pcso or a non policing investigation officer to gather some basic statements from any individuals concerned. 

Police wont attend a theft now unless you have detained the person trying to thieve yourself. They the above persons to collect the statements and evidence to see whether it’s worth pursuing first. 

My experience is historic, a time when the police had more resources, and might not happen now.

I don't think for a moment Julie would investigate without the agreement of a superior officer though.

Let's face it, given the persistence of the allegation the police would be accused of bias if they did not investigate. Bit of a no win for them.

[chinapig]

5 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

As a mod I would happily do that if I was available on line. And so would the others mods. 

Good, you come across as a reasonable person. So invite Julie to register and clamp down on any abuse. Not special treatment just the respect any forum user ought to be entitled to.

I seem to recall she also offered to act as police liaison for Rovers. It would be a positive step if club took her up on that too.

[Red Army 75]

2 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

Whether it has or has not happened means very little to me in terms of who’s right and wrong. This incident is isolated to a few that actually care, the wider fan base doesn’t is my general feeling. 

If it has happened, I feel very sorry for the person who was assaulted. 

If it hasn’t happened, well we have a very sad attention seeking gashead. 

I don’t know Henbury other than from gaschat so have no real preference as to who is right or wrong. I’ve just stepped in a bit because I’m a mod on the other side and I know the law also, so I took a wider interest in this saga from both sides.

Either way, it’s pretty low from a human decency standpoint and crosses the line of football banter regardless of the colour of strip involved. 

Fair enough. 

[Ska Junkie]

Didn't HG say, at one time, that this was reported to Bristol sport and the local constabulary plus he had photographic evidence of said assault?

This should be interesting. 

[Bristol Rob]

1 minute ago, Ska Junkie said:

Didn't HG say, at one time, that this was reported to Bristol sport and the local constabulary plus he had photographic evidence of said assault?

This should be interesting. 

He did indeed say it was reported and the club did nothing.

It was then confirmed by Adam (then SLO) And Julie that no complaint had been made.

Given the alleged victim was previously a season ticket holder at Ashton Gate (an all seater stadium) they should be able to identify the exact area where this took place.

[Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan]

1 hour ago, glynriley said:

Here come the deputies...... 
If of course Henbury is able to provide the evidence and parties concerned to substantiate his claim I'm not sure how OTIB will ever be able to live this down. It would be a case where you engineered your own downfall and put you own club to shame once again. 

 

So according to at least one gAsshole, trying to identify a thug who knocks vulnerable people's teeth out is something we'd never live down..?!

I suppose if the shoe was on the other foot, they'd all close ranks and protect the perpetrator.

 

Gas logic at its finest there. We’re the ones asking for the accusations to be investigated. What a moron!

 

1 hour ago, Bristol Rob said:

It is one of the sad things about your forum that you don't allow us to register and have some banter. It's almost as if you are embarrassed to be Gas.

Yeah funny that.

Wonder what they’re scared of? 

Edited July 7, 2018 by Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan

[Guest]

28 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said:

Didn't HG say, at one time, that this was reported to Bristol sport and the local constabulary plus he had photographic evidence of said assault?

This should be interesting. 

Yes he did, along with what match it happened at - even though he is now asking how we know what match it was.

 

[Super]

10 minutes ago, wood_red said:

Yes he did, along with what match it happened at - even though he is now asking how we know what match it was.

 

Funny that......

[Guest]

Henbury should have told her to do one, none of this is to do with anyone but the person or persons involved in the incident.
They may not want any of this and it's their business not Henbury's or some city fans.

NAIL ON HEAD - it should never have been put out there in the first place by Henbury Gas himself. It also should never had been brought back up by Old Gas.

Strange how OTIB, BCFC, Bristol Sport and JulieH are getting pelters for it though. Let the truth come out and either some lowlife City fan gets a life ban and prosecuted or some lowlife Rovers fan can explain himself to everyone.

[Super]

2 minutes ago, wood_red said:

Henbury should have told her to do one, none of this is to do with anyone but the person or persons involved in the incident.
They may not want any of this and it's their business not Henbury's or some city fans.

NAIL ON HEAD - it should never have been put out there in the first place by Henbury Gas himself. It also should never had been brought back up by Old Gas.

Strange how OTIB, BCFC, Bristol Sport and JulieH are getting pelters for it though. Let the truth come out and either some lowlife City fan gets a life ban and prosecuted or some lowlife Rovers fan can explain himself to everyone.

He was attention seeking. He is famous for it on that forum.

[Eddie Hitler]

Just now, Super said:

He was attention seeking. He is famous for it on that forum.

Exactly.  He is their forum prat who most of them are embarrassed about.

We have had posters who are nearly or even as bad but they don't last very long for whatever reason; maybe sheer weight of numbers calling them out.

[Coombsy]

1 hour ago, Red Army 75 said:

Fair enough. 

Gashead 1981

you come on here to speak your mind 

but when any one from here  goes on gas chat you ban them  straight away

same old double standers 

 

[Monkeh]

They ban you as they don’t like the truth being told about their club,

weal is on a land bank, in the next 5 years the men will be sold for housing and they will be homeless again

[Rich]

What an absolute load of bullshyte over an allegation, for that's all it is, an allegation. Old gas refers to "the incident" not an alleged incident. Billy bullshitter, otherwise known as Henbury Gas, alleges an incident with photographic evidence, I suppose that means, a close up of a fist going into the poor chaps face and the face of the City fan, if not, it's not evidence of an actual assault, just an injury, which could have occurred anywhere, but hey! we'll say it was a City supporter anyway.

This incident might well have happened, but what a way to get some points scored, by using a vulnerable person, who might or might not have got things wrong in the first case. I think this say's more about the person peddling the story for personal gratification, than it does about some alleged incident that there is no record of. Many a vulnerable person has decided to support BRFC for numerous reasons, none of which are understandable.

While we're at it, a great friend of mine, who doesn't want his name mentioned (neddy), complained about getting hit in the snout by a dirty gashead when all he was doing was trotting along the road. I do have photographic evidence of the horse/sorry, friend.

[CiderJar]

2 hours ago, Gashead1981 said:

I haven’t banned anyone of GC for being a city fan....I’ve banned a few for being total bellends though...

Strange then, that you haven't banned HenburyGas

[Red Army 75]

2 hours ago, Gashead1981 said:

I haven’t banned anyone of GC for being a city fan....I’ve banned a few for being total bellends though...

So how many City fans currently post on your forum 

[Rich]

4 minutes ago, CiderJar said:

Strange then, that you haven't banned HenburyGas

Any City fan is a bell end in the mind of a gashead, that's why they're always removed from their forum.

[SirColinOfMansfield]

8 hours ago, Gashead1981 said:

If yes to any of those then the case will be assigned to a police officer by a Sargent or an Inspector in the force district local to the complainant. 

If you are such an expert at UK law, why can't you spell sergeant correctly? 

Is it because you did your law degree at the University of Wembly?

[SirColinOfMansfield]

This is the original posting ... and he "knows it to be true"

 

...and he managed to get his own thread on here ...

https://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/topic/187280-henbury-gas-and-the-imaginary-incident/&

 

...and maybe Julie could also ask HG about his incitement to commit disgusting and possibly illegal acts in Sainsbury's ...

[RedM]

9 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said:

Because I’m posting on my phone and autocorrect changed it most likely. 

I guess you are this forums grammar police? Is your name Julie too? 

Bless you for noticing. X

As others have pointed out, you are welcome on this forum unlike any of us on yours. You are our guest and as such should behave like one please. At the moment you are free to post. But I’m sure if your forum is as as well run as this one, you will be aware of its moderation options which I wouldn’t hesitate to use. 

[The Gasbuster]

23 minutes ago, SirColinOfMansfield said:

This is the original posting ... and he "knows it to be true"

 

...and he managed to get his own thread on here ...

https://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/topic/187280-henbury-gas-and-the-imaginary-incident/&

 

...and maybe Julie could also ask HG about his incitement to commit disgusting and possibly illegal acts in Sainsbury's ...

Well done Sir Colin.

Let's see 2015 wriggle out of this now !

[glynriley]

Could we all stop talking about this now? Because despite the fact a city fan was beaten up inside our stadium, its actually none of our business according to oldgas. The fairytale accurate account was solely for viewing by gAssholes...

What a ******* weapon....

I also recall that Henbury originally posted on this forum with regards this unfortunate incident. He posted it solely for the consumption of Gasheads. It was some Shithead who was snooping around on our forum who copied it over onto One Turd. We all know what happened next.

If those Shitheads don't like what we say about them on OUR forum then the answer is for them to keep their sniffy little noses out. This whole fuss is a result of them involving themselves in our business, and as a result of their tame copper involving herself in something that is none of her business, taking sides and being unprofessional.

It now needs to be put to bed. If this has come to the notice of her supervisors I have the feeling it will be closed down with regard to anyPolice involvement, and I wouldn't be surprised if she no longer appears on their forum.

[BS4 on Tour...]

9 hours ago, Gashead1981 said:

We don’t ban reds for being teds. 

We ban them if they come over and stir trouble and provoke. Nothing wrong with banter. I actually enjoy it. Half my family are teds we give it both barrels most of the time, although the World Cup has United us currently.  

We used to have a couple of you red lot on there that used to post some well balanced stuff. 

Personally, if I posted football banter stuff here, I would expect some hazing treatment in return, it’s part of the game!! 

Absolute rubbish - I was on there for a while because I was the only Red in the male half of my family, I discussed Bristol football in general and never ‘stirred trouble’ but was banned because another poster said ‘they didn’t want that sh*thead on here’ ..... utter tosh to suggest otherwise....

[BS4 on Tour...]

1 hour ago, Gashead1981 said:

Because I’m posting on my phone and autocorrect changed it most likely. 

I guess you are this forums grammar police? Is your name Julie too? 

Bless you for noticing. X

*forum’s 

[Super]

6 minutes ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

Absolute rubbish - I was on there for a while because I was the only Red in the male half of my family, I discussed Bristol football in general and never ‘stirred trouble’ but was banned because another poster said ‘they didn’t want that sh*thead on here’ ..... utter tosh to suggest otherwise....

Spot on. Another Liar.

[Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan]

24 minutes ago, glynriley said:

Could we all stop talking about this now? Because despite the fact a city fan was beaten up inside our stadium, its actually none of our business according to oldgas. The fairytale accurate account was solely for viewing by gAssholes...

What a ******* weapon....

I also recall that Henbury originally posted on this forum with regards this unfortunate incident. He posted it solely for the consumption of Gasheads. It was some Shithead who was snooping around on our forum who copied it over onto One Turd. We all know what happened next.

If those Shitheads don't like what we say about them on OUR forum then the answer is for them to keep their sniffy little noses out. This whole fuss is a result of them involving themselves in our business, and as a result of their tame copper involving herself in something that is none of her business, taking sides and being unprofessional.
 

This is incredibly hypocritical coming from a Saghead who clearly spends most of his time snooping around this thread and then bitching and crying about it on his own forum.

...and just for the record, this whole ‘fuss’ is a result of him dragging it back up. What an absolute belter.

[chinapig]

1 minute ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said:

This is incredibly hypocritical coming from a Saghead who clearly spends most of his time snooping around this thread and then bitching and crying about it on his own forum.

...and just for the record, this whole ‘fuss’ is a result of him dragging it back up. What an absolute belter.

I also fail to follow the logic that an accusation on a public forum that a disabled person was seriously assaulted in our stadium is none of our business. If I were to make a similar claim about an incident in their stadium would they ignore it with a shrug on the grounds that it was a private matter for OTIB?

Nor indeed do I see how such an allegation of a serious offence, one that has not only not been withdrawn but has been revived, is no business of the police.

I can only speculate that there are other reasons for them wanting discussion to be shut down.

[54-46]

47 minutes ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

Absolute rubbish - I was on there for a while because I was the only Red in the male half of my family, I discussed Bristol football in general and never ‘stirred trouble’ but was banned because another poster said ‘they didn’t want that sh*thead on here’ ..... utter tosh to suggest otherwise....

Something similar happened with me. As soon as someone claims you a dirty ted you’re banned.  Pathetic really

[Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan]

14 minutes ago, chinapig said:

I also fail to follow the logic that an accusation on a public forum that a disabled person was seriously assaulted in our stadium is none of our business. If I were to make a similar claim about an incident in their stadium would they ignore it with a shrug on the grounds that it was a private matter for OTIB?

Nor indeed do I see how such an allegation of a serious offence, one that has not only not been withdrawn but has been revived, is no business of the police.

I can only speculate that there are other reasons for them wanting discussion to be shut down.

It’s almost like they don’t want to find out what actually happened. You’d think they would be desperate to see some thuggish ‘shithead’ brought to justice after attacking a disabled man?

I wonder why they don’t seem so keen to get the truth as we do? Maybe the Saghead who’s been posting on here today can tell us...

[myol'man]

On to another subject;

Where were all the R*Vers fans in town today? 

[Cider_boy]

33 minutes ago, chinapig said:

I can only speculate that there are other reasons for them wanting discussion to be shut down.

It is noticeable how some gasheads, especially the newbie on here, are so certain that the police are acting outside their remit by investigating these accusations of a serious, violent crime, and really shouldn't be doing so.

Slight panic setting in Henbury Gas? What are the odds Julie will turn up at his shop at 3pm as agreed, to find it shut for the day?

[HoldenBall]

38 minutes ago, myol'man said:

On to another subject;

Where were all the R*Vers fans in town today? 

Maybe they had a beam back today in one of their tents?

[1960maaan]

1 hour ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

*forum’s 

forums' ? 

[reddoh]

5 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

forums' ? 

Ouch.

[BS4 on Tour...]

1 hour ago, 1960maaan said:

forums' ? 

No, he was talking about one forum, this one, so it’s ‘forum’s...’ - as in ‘this forum’s grammar police’ - which is what he said (albeit with the error) .....sorry your attempt to correct me fell flat.....ouch! 

Edited July 7, 2018 by BS4 on Tour...

[BS4 on Tour...]

41 minutes ago, reddoh said:

Ouch.

Nope cos I was right - see above....

Edited July 7, 2018 by BS4 on Tour...

[reddoh]

4 minutes ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

Nope cos I was right - see above....

In modern terms you may be right but you put an asterisk in front of it which negates your point. on the old style typewriters the * was next to the back space (top right) above the - you would have needed the shift key (bottom left) people would not have used the * unless they absolutely had to.

[TV Tom]

1 hour ago, myol'man said:

On to another subject;

Where were all the R*Vers fans in town today? 

Probably too worried that they’d bump into the “Boogie Squad” again

[BS4 on Tour...]

1 minute ago, reddoh said:

In modern terms you may be right but you put an asterisk in front of it which negates your point. on the old style typewriters the * was next to the back space (top right) above the - you would have needed the shift key (bottom left) people would not have used the * unless they absolutely had to.

The asterisk is what people use now to highlight an error - and ‘On’ needs a capital ‘O’ at the start of your second sentence....

[1960maaan]

20 minutes ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

No, he was talking about one forum, this one, so it’s ‘forum’s...’ - as in ‘this forum’s grammar police’ - which is what he said (albeit with the error) .....sorry your attempt to correct me fell flat.....ouch! 

You are correct, belonging to the forum, so forum's 

My grammar is usually shit, my piss taking is usually better, sorry 

 

 

In my defence I did add a ? incase I was talking bollox 

Edited July 7, 2018 by 1960maaan

[reddoh]

1 minute ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

The asterisk is what people use now to highlight an error - and ‘On’ needs a capital ‘O’ at the start of your second sentence....

I do apologise. I will now go and ask the wife to beat me with a stick.

[HoldenBall]

4 hours ago, SirColinOfMansfield said:

This is the original posting ... and he "knows it to be true"

 

...and he managed to get his own thread on here ...

https://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/topic/187280-henbury-gas-and-the-imaginary-incident/&

 

...and maybe Julie could also ask HG about his incitement to commit disgusting and possibly illegal acts in Sainsbury's …

Thoughts Oldsag on your mate planning to vandalise, inciting hatred and illegal acts on a store for no reason whatsoever? 

Disgusting human being, how can anyone believe a single thing he says when he posts things like this. 

 

 

 

[GreedyHarry]

4 hours ago, myol'man said:

On to another subject;

Where were all the R*Vers fans in town today? 

Round HenburyGas'ssssss rehearsing their 'witness' statements. "Yer, filthy teddy bear copper, I was in the stand with seats, and a solid roof........."

[Mr Roper]

Did see some sags in the bus station ,four of them pissed up after the game ,taunting others there for not joining in with the dreadful dirge they were singing .The fact that it wasnt other England fans but mainly shoppers making their way home seemed to be missed by them .I knew they were sags when they started on some guy in the queue that they recognised as a City fan ,giving him abuse .He did give some back but was outnumbered 4 to 1 .They really did come across as young bully boys gobbing off  in front of women and kids .Probably asleep by 8 oclock back at Mummy and Daddies house .

[BCFC11]

6 hours ago, myol'man said:

On to another subject;

Where were all the R*Vers fans in town today? 

Few at the Dolphin, one imparticular for some strange reason kicked off towards a couple of City lads about 2mins after England had finished, got put in his place not once but twice.

****t

[Coombsy]

Jul 6, 2018 at 9:50pm  axegas said:

Jul 6, 2018 at 6:36pm  Topper Gas said:

But they  don't want to spend it on Rovers? It seems from DC's latest interviews that they aren't even prepared to give him any transfer funds this summer. It's becoming a real mystery why they ever got involved with Rovers. 

soon they will sale up and we will have to take over forest green ground.

 

 

Don't know what interview you were listening too then? He must have been offered funds to secure the signings of Rodman, Reilly and Upson. All of which had interest from other clubs. DC was more bemoaning the conditions of the market rather than his own budget.

 

Your confusing a wage budget with transfer funds i.e. the fund which paid for Sercombe and Nichols last season. Darrel clearly states in his BP interview the only money he gets is self generated from season ticket sells etc the ALQ's are not prepared to "donate" any money themselves.

should be able to buy any player we like as we generate millions each week you only have to see how menu fans are locked out of grounds every week

 

[JulieH]

23 hours ago, Gashead1981 said:

You misunderstand my post. 

A police officer can not investigate in an official capacity unless any of the criteria of points a-e have been met. 

You cannot introduce opinion into an investigation without having evidence or testimony in place first. And the only opinion you can have is whether You have enough evidence to invite person(s) for questioning or to make an arrest. 

You have enough evidence to investigate the complaint/offence in the first place. 

In this case:

Has there been a complaint by the injured party which can be substantiated.

Has there been a criminal offence committed which can be evidenced with witnesses or real time electronic data. 

If it is historic offence, there absolutely has to be a complainant and a name given of the person who committed the offence.

If yes to any of those then the case will be assigned to a police officer by a Sargent or an Inspector in the force district local to the complainant.  

No copper would get involved in an official capacity with the only evidence, if you can call it that, is a load of chat on an Internet forum which has escalated into an argument.

 

 

Thank you for this.

a “ copper” can get involved in an offcial capacity if they have honest belief that a criminal offence MAY have been committed.

as previously stated I have looked at cctv from the last game of the season and found no evidence of such an offence . However as this has now been resurrected by both sets of fans I will now speak to people who wish to give me evidence/ information about the offence. This happens a lot in the world of policing and is no different to neighbourhood disputes / harassment cases. 

Fyi I am here on this forum in an offcial capacity, hence the police crown on my name I do not investigate offences based on opinions, just facts that can be proven in each individual case. I am not on this forum as a Bristol city fan, although it is a fact that I support them. 

I offerred the opportunity to go into the gashead forum in the same capacity however as you yourself may have noticed this does not appear to be something that Bristol rovers fans on that forum want at this time.

 

[Bar BS3]

23 hours ago, Bristol Rob said:

Are you suggesting that 99% of Catholic priests are Gashead?

My god, they wouldn’t sink to those depths..! 

[Bar BS3]

3 minutes ago, JamesBCFC said:

Gasheads or Catholic Priests?

Catholic priests. Everybody has their limits and being a gashead must fall beyond their (very) wide boundaries of what is acceptable..!

Edited July 8, 2018 by Bar BS3

[Port Said Red]

I notice in the post that Sir Colin has kindly reproduced, that Mr Henbury only mentions "one of" the last games of the season.

Did he ever get more specific, or have they been investigating the wrong game?

[BobBobSuperBob]

On 07/07/2018 at 09:26, Gashead1981 said:

JulieH

Just wondering how you can investigate in an official capacity when:

(a) No official complaint has been made by the person who was allegedly assaulted? 

(b) Have no evidence a crime has been committed either by independent witnesses or real time cctv?

(c) There is no evidence to suggest the event took place. 

(d) If the offence did take place the person has chosen not to report the incident and press charges. 

(e) The person you are planning to see was not party to, or witnessed the incident.

Beyond settling an argument on an Internet forum, there is nothing to investigate or settle. 

If you are a well meaning copper, and I’m sure you are, in my opinion you are acting outside of the jurisdiction your warrant card gives you and you certainly can not operate this as an official line of enquiry. So you cannot proport it as such.

You even previously commenting on this forum means you have a conflict of interest or bias, which, if there ever was an official complaint made, would eliminate you instantly from being an officer in charge of the investigation or risk any potential court case (if it went that far) collapsing. You even identifying yourself as a police officer outside of duty can cause a conflict of interest as you should well know.  

And you can comment on all of the above without alluding to the case, commenting on individuals or being specific to this particular case.  

 

For somebody who claims to know about the law

Your post is actually laughable and completely clueless 

 

Without ripping the post apart word by word 

Ill summarise for you to keep it simple

 

1 ’Henbury Gas has (repeatedly) claimed a criminal offence has taken place

2 The Police , with a bit more than ‘fancy getting involved’ or ‘sticking their noses in’ , actually have a duty to investigate the matter to a sufficient degree to firstly establish if a criminal offences has taken place 

 

Which is what they appear to be doing

 

Hope that’s explained simply for you

 

 

And May I suggest you keep your area of legal ‘expertise’ ( )  to your Gashead mates  

 

[TETBURY MASSIVE]

23 hours ago, Gashead1981 said:

JulieH

I am a mod on gaschat and I have seen no application for you to join our forum. I have spoken with the other mods and no one has denied you access.

Come and join us, I’ll verify you, and you can receive your own welcome every ted gets over there. And it will be nothing to do with you being a police officer!! 

@Gashead1981 If you really are a MOD... trust me when I say you don't want to let her on your forum. 

She has been proven to have lied over and over and again, and when gets caught out she ignores everything. 

Police should be banned from this forum.... so don't let her on yours. 

[Guest]

We got the police on here,what next? maybe a social worker? mental health expert or perhaps a legal expert.

World gone mad imo.

[TV Tom]

1 hour ago, Bar BS3 said:

My god, they wouldn’t sink to those depths..! 

Steady

[Malago]

1 hour ago, bobby kellard was go said:

We got the police on here,what next? maybe a social worker? mental health expert or perhaps a legal expert.

World gone mad imo.

Or even somebody who knows a thing or two about football.

Edited July 8, 2018 by Malago