Major Isewater Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 8 hours ago, Maesknoll Red said: I’ve got several, wore one instead of a school blazer in the 70’s You wascally webel . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somered Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 4 hours ago, Vincent Vega said: Sag Porn, knock ( one ) yourself out lads Best player to ever wear that shirt 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Hucker Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 4 hours ago, Vincent Vega said: Sag Porn, knock ( one ) yourself out lads Notice Scott has to wear something underneath the jester outfit in order to prevent it from making contact with his skin. Wash well Scotty. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CotswoldRed Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, Vincent Vega said: Sag Porn, knock ( one ) yourself out lads Ha. I have a 2013 Rovers ball in my loft. Signed by all the players. One day I'll get around to passing it on to the sags so they can auction it for a good cause, else I'd sling it. Edited October 18, 2019 by CotswoldRed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS15_RED Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 14 hours ago, Kodjias Wrist said: A lot of fans mention that rovers were dominant in that era but looking at stats we beat them more than they beat us in the 90's. From what i can see we had a spell of four seasons without beating them between 87 and 91. Were they finishing higher in the league tbetween 80's and 90's (other than 90 and 91) ? Maybe not dominant, but certainly a lot more competitive than what they’ve been in the last 20 years. In that 90’s era, we had a couple of drubbings from them that were particularly hard to take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Geoff Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 Skeletel man on Talk shite just now......asked by either Hawksbee or Jacobs about Bristol City being in the play off places......I thought he was going to choke. He did manage a few good words about us and the stadium before stating that Bristol needs a club in the Premier league as City were there for only one season before plummeting down to the 4th division. Gas logic turning 4 into 1 ?... and on national radio 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, Sir Geoff said: Skeletel man on Talk shite just now......asked by either Hawksbee or Jacobs about Bristol City being in the play off places......I thought he was going to choke. He did manage a few good words about us and the stadium before stating that Bristol needs a club in the Premier league as City were there for only one season before plummeting down to the 4th division. Gas logic turning 4 into 1 ?... and on national radio Typical bitter nob head. Knows the truth but has to lie. Its like a chronic disease they all suffer from. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said: Typical bitter nob head. Knows the truth but has to lie. Its like a chronic disease they all suffer from. Fullofshitism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackofromSanJavier Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 21 hours ago, Rich said: You try and get an original design nowadays. They all have these stupid slanted pockets in the side and are called truckers jackets, or so I was told yesterday by the salesman in Dulay. Two buttons done up on the chest and left to flair open. Sadly @Rich that's how ALL of my jackets are worn these days. Whilst a button or two at chest height are just about do-able for me, anything further South has the obstruction of a gut that shows years of investment in apple pickers and sangria harvesters! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinmans Love Child Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22A Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 21 hours ago, Rich said: Two buttons done up on the chest and left to flair open. What do the blokes wear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 14 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said: Fullofshitism. Fullofshititis. Chronic lifelong disease. Symptoms: Feelings of Inferiority, Dislike of Horses, tendency to spout utter bullshit on a regular basis, Sexual Deviancy, Horrendous B.O. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22A Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said: They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it That's would be the only and i repeat only, positive from them in the same division as us; everyone could see how poor their support is compared to ours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archie andrews Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said: They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it our average this season over 22000 theres say 8000...…leaves 14000 don't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slacker Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said: They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it In all fairness he is actually correct on both counts.Twisted logic but unusually a Fewer being accurate for once. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said: They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it Last time they actually averaged a more than 10K attendance was in 1976. http://european-football-statistics.co.uk/attnclub/league/brir.htm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InCyder Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said: They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it Over 15,000 . They're right to be fair - we get their entire home attendance over 15,000! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Hucker Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 hour ago, CotswoldRed said: Ha. I have a 2013 Rovers ball in my loft. Signed by all the players. The crayon may have become illegible by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 9 minutes ago, archie andrews said: our average this season over 22000 theres say 8000...…leaves 14000 don't it? From the Sky bet pages. A difference of 14,851 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pride of the west Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, Port Said Red said: From the Sky bet pages. A difference of 14,851 Coming for us mind! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmite Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Port Said Red said: From the Sky bet pages. A difference of 14,851 Blimey over 3 times their average. Mind the chasm. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, marmite said: Blimey over 3 times their average. Mind the chasm. Also 2 of our games have been televised which is supposed to effect attendances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinmans Love Child Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 30 minutes ago, archie andrews said: our average this season over 22000 theres say 8000...…leaves 14000 don't it? I wasn’t sure so played safe with 20,000! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said: They just can’t help themselves, he says that they (City) get over 15,000 (its actually over 20,000) and Rovers get under 10,000 (it’s actually under 8,000) so the gap is actually 12,000 on an average home game, not 5,000 as implied in order to give the impression that there’s not much in it Just can’t bring themselves to say “over 20,000” can they? Desperate to make the gap in attendances seem much closer than it is to protect their ickle feelings and not highlight how shit their support is. They’re 4th in L1, best start to the season in donkeys years and they’ve been getting crowds of 7k and below. Just let that sink in.... But of course, they’ve always got excuses...bike rides, summer holidays, too close to Christmas, can’t just turn up with a pocket full of shrapnel and pay at the turnstiles, Champions League on the TV, Darrells gone....DARRELLS GONE Edited October 18, 2019 by Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinmans Love Child Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 30 minutes ago, Slacker said: In all fairness he is actually correct on both counts.Twisted logic but unusually a Fewer being accurate for once. Surprised he didn’t say they (Rovers) get under 30,000 and we (City) get over 5,000, both factually correct! 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 35 minutes ago, Slacker said: In all fairness he is actually correct on both counts.Twisted logic but unusually a Fewer being accurate for once. No, his comment is correct but not accurate. The correct made in the post is far more accurate as it is nearer to the known values. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isawjonshaw Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 They are a proper joke outfit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 hour ago, 22A said: What do the blokes wear? They wear their wives out, talking shyte all day long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledAjax Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 45 minutes ago, Port Said Red said: From the Sky bet pages. A difference of 14,851 7,202 x 3 = 21,606 We get treble their average with 447 to spare. For absolute fairness though we should probably take a look at what our average was in the last season that we were in a similar position to where they currently are. The last time we were high up in L1 was obviously the season we won it - 2014/15. Looking around at a few sources, including those already used it looks as though we averaged 12,056 at home in the league over the whole season. Highest attendance was over 13,700 for Yeovil on Boxing Day. There's an argument that we could have had a higher gate as at the start of that season the Wedlock was demolished - although our max capacity was still around 16,000 at that stage so realistically this probably didn't have a huge affect on our attendances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted October 18, 2019 Report Share Posted October 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Red-Robbo said: Last time they actually averaged a more than 10K attendance was in 1976. http://european-football-statistics.co.uk/attnclub/league/brir.htm But that was only by 22 and that was including the players of both teams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.