Bristol R*vers dustbin thread

[BetterRedthanBlue]

Here's the challenge btw. Yellow was lucky imo. Bad first touch, never winning the ball, out of control.

 

[chinapig]

1 minute ago, BetterRedThanBlue said:

Here's the challenge btw. Yellow was lucky imo. Bad first touch, never winning the ball, out of control.

 

If that's a yellow we should appeal Sykes' red card.

[frenchred]

31 minutes ago, Gazred said:

First question on RB post match. "...bar the result, some positives today?"

14 seconds later, blaming the officials 

Amazing isn't it, nige does it after every game and he is some sort of hero god like man, barton does it and he's a satan.

Bit childish I think

[Super]

Quite funny after they laughed at Pearson moaning about the refs the other night. 

[Kodjias Wrist]

3 minutes ago, TomF said:

Yes am fine. Was heading down to Dorset in car with family when suddenly a Mercedes’ appeared on wrong side of road doing 60mph. Am not sure how I swerved out of a head on collision but thankfully did as not sure would be typing this otherwise.   I’ve no idea how the trailer I was pulling didn’t tip over but the coupler is a bit twisted.. 

Geeze well done for the reaction. Do you have a dashcam? I am considering getting one because these dick heads need to be taken off the road.

[Gazred]

4 minutes ago, frenchred said:

Amazing isn't it, nige does it after every game and he is some sort of hero god like man, barton does it and he's a satan.

Bit childish I think

Personally was more about me predicting he would be straight on the officials. Take your point though, it's fair.

[grifty]

13 minutes ago, BetterRedThanBlue said:

Here's the challenge btw. Yellow was lucky imo. Bad first touch, never winning the ball, out of control.

 

Barton applauding a broken leg!

[petehinton]

[Ronnie Sinclair]

9 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Bloke is an absolute mess 

[Rudolf Hucker]

25 minutes ago, BetterRedThanBlue said:

Here's the challenge btw. Yellow was lucky imo. Bad first touch, never winning the ball, out of control.

 

From Sky:

”Joe Piggott and Connor Ogilvie were also on target for the home side but the victory was overshadowed by a suspected broken leg for midfielder Louis Thompson.

Thompson was taken to hospital by ambulance after falling victim to a reckless 18th-minute challenge from Glenn Whelan, who was lucky to escape with just a yellow card.”

[Numero Uno]

Apparently the Fewers bench were calling the Cowley’s Fraud PE Teachers……

[Lanterne Rouge]

5 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

Apparently the Fewers bench were calling the Cowley’s Fraud PE Teachers……

He`s so classy isn`t he? 

[Rudolf Hucker]

6 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

Apparently the Fewers bench were calling the Cowley’s Fraud PE Teachers……

… but you just know that he was thinking “frawd”

[steviestevieneville]

The bloke beats up women . That’s all you need to know . Scum 

[Son of Fred]

1 hour ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

They still coming for us? I can`t keep up.

Nor can they.

[GrahamC]

2 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

He`s so classy isn`t he? 

Totally.

There was only one bench there that included a manager who hadn’t been in prison & that was Portsmouth’s.

[Rich]

6 hours ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

The former Bristol Rugby Club chairman effectively did. 

And received a life presidency for services to BRFC for his troubles, along with the £2m owed to him and, I have it on good advice tha a plot of land in Filton, also changed hands with AH and the rugby directors receiving that land, to agree the original deal.

[TheReds]

9 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

Apparently the Fewers bench were calling the Cowley’s Fraud PE Teachers……

Must be great to be a football coach, who has played the game at the top flight, then take the pee out of other managers who haven't, and call them PE Teachers. But to then get schooled by said PE Teachers takes some sort of special football coach. What does that say about Bartons ability? 

Still, a load of the poor sags will love all that sort of talk from him.

[In the Net]

41 minutes ago, Gazred said:

Personally was more about me predicting he would be straight on the officials. Take your point though, it's fair.

Both of them are right though - a lot of the refs are awful.

[In the Net]

15 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

The bloke beats up women . That’s all you need to know . Scum 

 I must have missed the Court case.

[Ronnie Sinclair]

Looking forward to the day he has a go at the wrong bench and comes unstuck, bound to happen sooner or later 

[GrahamC]

1 minute ago, Ronnie Sinclair said:

Looking forward to the day he has a go at the wrong bench and comes unstuck, bound to happen sooner or later 

He then gets an expensive lawyer to get him off, like he did with the former Barnsley bloke.

[Crackers Corner]

which will come first - 

Rovers closing the Gap?

Us getting a Pen?

[Ronnie Sinclair]

things you like to see on the highlights, Pack shithousery with that bottle when the first goal goes in

[Mattyisared]

41 minutes ago, TheReds said:

Must be great to be a football coach, who has played the game at the top flight, then take the pee out of other managers who haven't, and call them PE Teachers. But to then get schooled by said PE Teachers takes some sort of special football coach. What does that say about Bartons ability? 

Still, a load of the poor sags will love all that sort of talk from him.

I mean tbf there's only so much you can do. Portsmouth are clearly a far better team than the sags; so Barton could be better than them and still lose simply due to quality of the team.

[Mattyisared]

1 hour ago, GrahamC said:

Unsurprisingly the bloke who reports for them in the Post said Whelan’s challenge wasn’t a red.

The BBC report says he was very lucky to avoid one, it’s basically North Korean reporting from him.

This is a silly comment, Frost said at first glance it doesn't seem like a red, which seems a fair comment to make as he doesn't go in studs up

[TheReds]

3 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

I mean tbf there's only so much you can do. Portsmouth are clearly a far better team than the sags; so Barton could be better than them and still lose simply due to quality of the team.

It doesn't matter. Has Barton said Portsmouth have a superior team? He has called them PE Teachers, which quite frankly is pathetic.

He said Rovers will finish above them if they play 442. Now assuming they played 442 today and it was such a bad formation, then how did they manage 23 shots and 12 corners? Just better players, or set up better? Better management?

Who has managed at the highest level? Are there clubs queuing up after Barton? Didn't Barton say he had one of the biggest budgets in the League - so where are the signings? I am sure everyone in football would love to play for him....

The bloke is a cock, and got well and truly shown up today, so has gone for the deflection tactics with stupid comments.

Shame Cowley didn't say after that it wasn't bad for a PE Teacher, and if he wanted to know how to set up a team he could give him a ring for some advice.

[Lanterne Rouge]

Six new signings this week apparently. Any guesses on how many will actually happen?

I`m going 0.

Edited August 20, 2022 by Lanterne Rouge

[TheReds]

1 minute ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Six new signings this week apparently. Any guesses on how many will actually happen?

I`m going 0.

I wonder if they will finally break their record, or will it be some loans who they give back at the end f the season which generates them a total of eff all when they leave. 

[Bizyer]

17 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Six new signings this week apparently. Any guesses on how many will actually happen?

I`m going 0.

Too high

[Taz]

2 hours ago, harrys said:

Some bitter comments from Barton about the Crowley brothers along the lines of ‘they’ve never played the game so don’t know what they’re on about”

Yet still beat a team managed by a former Premier League player. 

That's awkward 

[Son of Fred]

39 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Six new signings this week apparently. Any guesses on how many will actually happen?

I`m going 0.

As many as that ???

[Sweeneys Penalties]

2 hours ago, Kodjias Wrist said:

Geeze well done for the reaction. Do you have a dashcam? I am considering getting one because these dick heads need to be taken off the road.

Absolutely essential piece of equipment. A Doctor complained I was in the wrong lane once (when they T Boned me). I was dragged down to court in Southampton and her barrister apologised to me forwasting my time....but he was acting under instruction. Still. Day out eh. Never been to court before. I have now. Ridiculously she went off muttering that the road markings were wrong. 

Edited August 20, 2022 by Sweeneys Penalties

[petehinton]

1 hour ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Six new signings this week apparently. Any guesses on how many will actually happen?

I`m going 0.

Barton, all giddy, said after Oxford win they were far down the line with a handful. Now suddenly he’s turned and saying he’s not sure if anything will happen. 
 

Opportunist at its finest. 

[WessexPest]

Sharton’s bitter remarks tonight merely underline how utterly detached from reality the Gastards are when they narcissistically boast about how universally adored they are.

So long as he is their manager, they will continue to be the most reviled team in the lower divisions. 

[chinapig]

1 hour ago, Mattyisared said:

This is a silly comment, Frost said at first glance it doesn't seem like a red, which seems a fair comment to make as he doesn't go in studs up

Studs up is a red herring. The tackle was reckless, out of control and endangered an opponent. That's a red card.

[petehinton]

 

is this what they’re playing victim over? Not exactly ‘stonewall’ and official relegation defining is it….

[GrahamC]

11 minutes ago, petehinton said:

 

is this what they’re playing victim over? Not exactly ‘stonewall’ and official relegation defining is it….

They did this a lot last season, their player initiates contact by moving his leg towards the defender & goes down very easily.

[GrahamC]

26 minutes ago, chinapig said:

Studs up is a red herring. The tackle was reckless, out of control and endangered an opponent. That's a red card.

I’ve watched it, it is a clear red, horrible challenge by a player with a history of them.

Frost says it isn’t because he’s about as one eyed as anyone I have seen report on that lot.

 

[TheReds]

25 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

They did this a lot last season, their player initiates contact by moving his leg towards the defender & goes down very easily.

Exactly what I said earlier, it's actually a great decision by the ref.

[slartibartfast]

4 hours ago, frenchred said:

Amazing isn't it, nige does it after every game and he is some sort of hero god like man, barton does it and he's a satan.

Bit childish I think

Who the ****'s asking you ?

[steviestevieneville]

3 hours ago, In the Net said:

 I must have missed the Court case.

Am I right in thinking you’re a woman ? The cps thinks there was enough to take him to court . Typical gas backing a scum bag like Barton. If he’d got the job here , he would of been hounded out as soon as the rumours surfaced. No ******* morals you blue few 

[TV Tom]

24 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

Am I right in thinking you’re a woman ? The cps thinks there was enough to take him to court . Typical gas backing a scum bag like Barton. If he’d got the job here , he would of been hounded out as soon as the rumours surfaced. No ******* morals you blue few 

I’m surprised at her as well, whether found guilty or not the recording and her facial bruising says it all

[Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan]

6 hours ago, cityal said:

This was the vanarama playoff final in 2015 right?

This "figure" is growing over the years as we all suspected it would. At this rate (growing 3K in 7 years) they will have taken more than the actual attendance in 20 years time!

 

Waaay back in the this thread i looked into this in more detail - My conclusion based on local newspaper reports of ticket sales one week before the final (presumably these figure informed by the clubs) and some investighation into the method of neutral ticket sales made my figure of dribbling lunatics in attendance closer to 32K

We took 42,000

[Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan]

32 minutes ago, harrys said:

I’m surprised at her as well, whether found guilty or not the recording and her facial bruising says it all

A lot of Gasheads on Social Media have managed to convince themselves that the fact Mrs Barton changed her story at a later date means that poor misunderstood Joey is definitely innocent.

I’ve got some magic beans for sell, beanstalk guaranteed. 

Wonder if they’d be so quick to disbelieve their own daughter if she turned up with a golf ball sized lump on her head saying they’d been assaulted? Suppose it depends if hubby was ‘Gas fer life’…

Edited August 20, 2022 by Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan

[Swede]

28 minutes ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said:

We took 42,000

The mere fact that the sags drone on obsessively about attendances tells you all you need to know about that pathetic little club. Very needy and weird.

[Mattyisared]

5 hours ago, grifty said:

Barton applauding a broken leg!

Wasn't Barton

[Mattyisared]

5 hours ago, Super said:

Quite funny after they laughed at Pearson moaning about the refs the other night. 

Quite interesting, Barton actually said Pearson was completely right with regards to the quality of officials here at 2:00: 

 

[Rudolf Hucker]

4 hours ago, Mattyisared said:

I mean tbf there's only so much you can do. Portsmouth are clearly a far better team than the sags; so Barton could be better than them and still lose simply due to quality of the team.

 

4 hours ago, Mattyisared said:

This is a silly comment, Frost said at first glance it doesn't seem like a red, which seems a fair comment to make as he doesn't go in studs up

 

6 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

Wasn't Barton

 

4 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

Quite interesting, Barton actually said Pearson was completely right with regards to the quality of officials here at 2:00: 

 

You sure you’re a red, Matty?

[In the Net]

1 hour ago, steviestevieneville said:

Am I right in thinking you’re a woman ? The cps thinks there was enough to take him to court . Typical gas backing a scum bag like Barton. If he’d got the job here , he would of been hounded out as soon as the rumours surfaced. No ******* morals you blue few 

The CPS obviously have some strong evidence, get it into Court, and get it sorted properly.

[cidercity]

12 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

 

 

 

You sure you’re a red, Matty?

I think he might not be……

[fgrsimon]

1 hour ago, In the Net said:

The CPS obviously have some strong evidence, get it into Court, and get it sorted properly.

As I remember it, his wife called the police saying her husband had assaulted her, the police arrive and find her with head injuries. It's fairly damning BUT circumstantial and there is no evidence apart from his and hers, unless some  friends who I think were present, also are prepared to testify. 

The interesting thing is what happens if she has to give evidence because if he has hit her and he she says he didn't, she's committing perjury. Of course the judge will have to allow that he's coerced her into changing her story and of course coercion and controlling behaviour are so much more widely recognised these days.

We can't really take the high-ground BCFC having employed Danny Simpson and I have no particular hatred of JB but all I can say that if he did lay even a finger on his wife, he deserves to go down and to lose his job.

 

 

[Unan]

6 minutes ago, fgrsimon said:

As I remember it, his wife called the police saying her husband had assaulted her, the police arrive and find her with head injuries. It's fairly damning BUT circumstantial and there is no evidence apart from his and hers, unless some  friends who I think were present, also are prepared to testify. 

The interesting thing is what happens if she has to give evidence because if he has hit her and he she says he didn't, she's committing perjury. Of course the judge will have to allow that he's coerced her into changing her story and of course coercion and controlling behaviour are so much more widely recognised these days.

We can't really take the high-ground BCFC having employed Danny Simpson and I have no particular hatred of JB but all I can say that if he did lay even a finger on his wife, he deserves to go down and to lose his job.

 

 

The main difference being there was near total unanimous uproar when he signed for us

[Nuno Gomes]

6 hours ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

 

 

 

You sure you’re a red, Matty?

>95% of his posts are on the Gas thread. Shame we can’t highlight certain members in blue @TomF?

[Rudolf Hucker]

1 hour ago, Nuno Gomes said:

>95% of his posts are on the Gas thread. Shame we can’t highlight certain members in blue @TomF?

I have absolutely no problem at all with 15ers posting on here - there are several who do that are very welcome, but it should be done in plain sight - without any attempt at deception.  

[Port Said Red]

48 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

I have absolutely no problem at all with 15ers posting on here - there are several who do that are very welcome, but it should be done in plain sight - without any attempt at deception.  

Perhaps we could change his username to "Mattyisaredherring"?

[frenchred]

11 hours ago, slartibartfast said:

Who the ****'s asking you ?

well thought out intelligent response. must have taken an age to come up with that

[Mattyisared]

9 hours ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

 

 

 

You sure you’re a red, Matty?

Ah yes pointing out that at first glance in real time it's possible someone could think their midfielder didn't deserve a red and it didn't make it "like North Korea" makes me automatically a ****** sag doesn't it. I watched the post-match interview cus everyone was going on about what Barton said, and I noticed he's in black and the guy's in white there so it's obvs not Barton.

[Mattyisared]

1 hour ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

I have absolutely no problem at all with 15ers posting on here - there are several who do that are very welcome, but it should be done in plain sight - without any attempt at deception.  

If you go back through my posts you'll see I've mentioned numerous times why I comment mainly on this thread, I mainly use Not606 for regular City posting. But course saying "oh the bloke clapping the tackle can't have been Barton" or "Barton actually talks about Pearson positively here" it's met with "WELL U MUST BE A SAG." Numerous City fans have pointed out their issues with this thread, I don't particularly care about it but I think, as I've explained numerous times, that I try to be a bit of a devil's advocate and give them credit where it's due. Mean this fully and sincerely, maybe grow up a bit? 

It's kinda funny, took a break from this server cus the last time I got accused of being a sag simply because I said "hey, maybe Joey Barton and Wael aren't engaged in full-scale corruption and maybe they won their game against Scunthorpe fairly" and the response was that I was obviously a dirty sag who was undercover, which is obviously silly

Edited August 21, 2022 by Mattyisared

[Port Said Red]

2 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

If you go back through my posts you'll see I've mentioned numerous times why I comment mainly on this thread, I mainly use Not606 for regular City posting. But course saying "oh the bloke clapping the tackle can't have been Barton" or "Barton actually talks about Pearson positively here" it's met with "WELL U MUST BE A SAG." Numerous City fans have pointed out their issues with this thread, I don't particularly care about it but I think, as I've explained numerous times, that I try to be a bit of a devil's advocate and give them credit where it's due. Mean this fully and sincerely, maybe grow up a bit?

I think you have been caught out, I always think that people who put Red in their username are immediately suspicious and err......... 

 

 

As you were 

[elhombrecito]

4 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

I try to be a bit of a devil's advocate and give them credit where it's due.

You don't really get the point of this thread do you? 

[Mattyisared]

7 hours ago, fgrsimon said:

As I remember it, his wife called the police saying her husband had assaulted her, the police arrive and find her with head injuries. It's fairly damning BUT circumstantial and there is no evidence apart from his and hers, unless some  friends who I think were present, also are prepared to testify. 

The interesting thing is what happens if she has to give evidence because if he has hit her and he she says he didn't, she's committing perjury. Of course the judge will have to allow that he's coerced her into changing her story and of course coercion and controlling behaviour are so much more widely recognised these days.

We can't really take the high-ground BCFC having employed Danny Simpson and I have no particular hatred of JB but all I can say that if he did lay even a finger on his wife, he deserves to go down and to lose his job.

 

 

Sorry Simon mate this clearly makes you a Gashead in disguise can't be saying anything not entirely critical of them!

2 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I think you have been caught out, I always think that people who put Red in their username are immediately suspicious and err......... 

 

 

As you were 

Okay, if it helps you sleep at night "Port Said Red"

[Mattyisared]

1 minute ago, elhombrecito said:

You don't really get the point of this thread do you? 

If the point of this thread is you're more likely to say that the gas paid off the opposition and the referee and all the officials to rig a game than you are to say "they probably won fairly" then that seems a bit silly to me. Like I said I give them credit when they deserve it (rarely) and don't when they don't (most of the time)

[Port Said Red]

10 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

Sorry Simon mate this clearly makes you a Gashead in disguise can't be saying anything not entirely critical of them!

Okay, if it helps you sleep at night "Port Said Red"

I don't think I have ever used this before because I hate it but... "Whoosh"!

[elhombrecito]

9 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

If the point of this thread is you're more likely to say that the gas paid off the opposition and the referee and all the officials to rig a game than you are to say "they probably won fairly" then that seems a bit silly to me. Like I said I give them credit when they deserve it (rarely) and don't when they don't (most of the time)

No, the point of this thread is to mock and laugh at the 15ers. Certainly not to give them credit (whether it's due or not).

[Barrs Court Red]

The only way to solve this is to go back to the tried and trusted way of finding witches gas heads.  
 

Throw the witch gas head in a pond, and if they float they’re clearly guilty. 

[Rudolf Hucker]

22 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

If you go back through my posts you'll see I've mentioned numerous times why I comment mainly on this thread, I mainly use Not606 for regular City posting. But course saying "oh the bloke clapping the tackle can't have been Barton" or "Barton actually talks about Pearson positively here" it's met with "WELL U MUST BE A SAG." Numerous City fans have pointed out their issues with this thread, I don't particularly care about it but I think, as I've explained numerous times, that I try to be a bit of a devil's advocate and give them credit where it's due. Mean this fully and sincerely, maybe grow up a bit? 

It's kinda funny, took a break from this server cus the last time I got accused of being a sag simply because I said "hey, maybe Joey Barton and Wael aren't engaged in full-scale corruption and maybe they won their game against Scunthorpe fairly" and the response was that I was obviously a dirty sag who was undercover, which is obviously silly

Thou doth protest too much, methinks

[Mattyisared]

1 minute ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

Thou doth protest too much, methinks

Because it's just stupid, and everytime I post in here someone accuses me of it and eventually it gets very irritating

[BTRFTG]

15 hours ago, Rich said:

And received a life presidency for services to BRFC for his troubles, along with the £2m owed to him and, I have it on good advice tha a plot of land in Filton, also changed hands with AH and the rugby directors receiving that land, to agree the original deal.

If memory serves I'd be careful making such accusation. Didn't the rugby club directors and members consider raising a legal challenge given the deal that eventually saw them lose their asset was never put to the board or members, rather was approved by an individual tasked with running the club? The Rugby Club were done for by a lack of governance, as demonstrated throughout the stand construction fiasco.

Notwithstanding there was something very dodgy about the terms of the relationship with Gas directors, specifically the relatively small amount of investment required to obtain substantive 'step-in' rights plus the 'adjacency' of contract to 'step-in', I recall both rugby members and directors protesting that they'd been 'robbed'. Recall the 'Memorial Stadium Company' was established by 'The Milkman' and used as a conveyance when later issuing shares to the Rugby Club as cover for his investment in the stadium with the all important ability to buy those shares back at issue price should a 'relevant event' occur. That deal was recorded as having occured in the front room of a house in Thornbury, those present being directors of The Memorial Stadium Company, not Rugby Club. 

[TheReds]

10 minutes ago, Mattyisared said:

Because it's just stupid, and everytime I post in here someone accuses me of it and eventually it gets very irritating

Out of curiosity, why do you only seem to show up when you think it's time to give them credit? Or have I missed all of your posts mocking them?

I hate Man U, and I have Man U supporting mates, but I wouldn't go on a Man Citys fans forum to give them some sort of credit when it is due. 

Maybe just me, but it certainly seems bizarre.