Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Just getting rid of the portaloos would be a win for the locals you would imagine. What must they smell like in August?

not as bad as a football ground backing onto a stinking sweaty river avon bank mixed with the stench from those huge refuse dumps that are also on the back of the land

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Like Leyton Orient with the flats in the corners?

Brisbane Road has a capacity of 9.2k. Much better suited to Rovers given their current gates. Model it on Brisbane road and they might be able to squeeze a tidy little 9-10k seater in amongst the flats and commercial use stuff.

For a bit of fun, I just had a look at the site on Google Maps and copied and pasted aerial shots of the Mem (also from Google Maps, same scale) onto it.

As you can see, the site is actually quite large (assuming my yellow lines correctly demaracate the boundaries), with space to spare even if you put two Mem stadiums onto it.

Fruit market site BRFC.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Blagdon red said:

For a bit of fun, I just had a look at the site on Google Maps and copied and pasted aerial shots of the Mem (also from Google Maps, same scale) onto it.

As you can see, the site is actually quite large (assuming my yellow lines correctly demaracate the boundaries), with space to spare even if you put two Mem stadiums onto it.

Fruit market site BRFC.jpg

It is a large area, however by the time you build a car park you will lose a fair bit. Then you take away space for what the developers need to build to actually make money and there isn't a lot left. If money is tight they could build with canvas, sure I have seen that done before somewhere? ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, petehinton said:

Try and claim the Sandringham too which is full of city attire on any day of the week you go in there. The more you think about the whole thing the funnier it is 

The Sandringham is RED through and through. If you is a gas head, not good idea.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Blagdon red said:

For a bit of fun, I just had a look at the site on Google Maps and copied and pasted aerial shots of the Mem (also from Google Maps, same scale) onto it.

As you can see, the site is actually quite large (assuming my yellow lines correctly demaracate the boundaries), with space to spare even if you put two Mem stadiums onto it.

Fruit market site BRFC.jpg

How many Brisbane Roads can you fit on the site?

I presume that any new stadium would be intended to have full all seater stands, fully roofed and with integrated concourses. I also presume that takes a bigger footprint than tents and temporary bleacher seating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Blagdon red said:

For a bit of fun, I just had a look at the site on Google Maps and copied and pasted aerial shots of the Mem (also from Google Maps, same scale) onto it.

As you can see, the site is actually quite large (assuming my yellow lines correctly demaracate the boundaries), with space to spare even if you put two Mem stadiums onto it.

Fruit market site BRFC.jpg

Is that the whole development site or the bit set aside for the stadium?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said:

Is that the whole development site or the bit set aside for the stadium?

 

11 minutes ago, old parkender said:

I’m intrigued about that! If that’s the whole site,rovers would require approx 60% of it to build a 20k stadium. 

It will be a squeeze for any development, with or without a stadium, by the time access roads are added. I wonder if the 1 year option Conygar have taken is to see if they can persuade some of those satellite businesses to sell up as well. e.g. those on Albert Rd at the bottom of that picture?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Fruit Market site is not totality of the development- which amongst other things has had things like a cinema proposed (strange, as showcase is only up the road) 

Getting planning permission to build houses on the Mem will be an absolute doddle, so I can certainly see this happening, though ownership, and whose taking what from any stadium revenue streams will probably be very interesting. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blagdon red said:

For a bit of fun, I just had a look at the site on Google Maps and copied and pasted aerial shots of the Mem (also from Google Maps, same scale) onto it.

As you can see, the site is actually quite large (assuming my yellow lines correctly demaracate the boundaries), with space to spare even if you put two Mem stadiums onto it.

Fruit market site BRFC.jpg

Do the same with our ground over the fruit market land. Include the car parks. Be interesting to see as they are looking at a stadium with the same footprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blagdon red said:

For a bit of fun, I just had a look at the site on Google Maps and copied and pasted aerial shots of the Mem (also from Google Maps, same scale) onto it.

As you can see, the site is actually quite large (assuming my yellow lines correctly demaracate the boundaries), with space to spare even if you put two Mem stadiums onto it.

Fruit market site BRFC.jpg

Is this a projection onto the fruit market site or the Leyton Orient site? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ExiledAjax said:

How many Brisbane Roads can you fit on the site?

I presume that any new stadium would be intended to have full all seater stands, fully roofed and with integrated concourses. I also presume that takes a bigger footprint than tents and temporary bleacher seating?

Two.

Brisbane Road, including flats, x2 on the fruit market site.

Fruit market site BRFC 2.jpg

21 minutes ago, pride of the west said:

Do the same with our ground over the fruit market land. Include the car parks. Be interesting to see as they are looking at a stadium with the same footprint. 

Coming up shortly...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, pride of the west said:

Do the same with our ground over the fruit market land. Include the car parks. Be interesting to see as they are looking at a stadium with the same footprint. 

Here you go. AG fits nicely, with plenty of space for parking (if that's what they wanted to use the space for).

Fruit market site BRFC 3.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eye eye gash has won a game again , new stadium , biggest team in Bristol ( 9000 today ) going come for city :laugh: and still Andy tilson record signing £350 thousand haha get real camel cruncher you cannot build a team on loan signings GET YOUR OWN PLAYERS  -bottom half of division 3 :laugh:

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Blagdon red said:

Here you go. AG fits nicely, with plenty of space for parking (if that's what they wanted to use the space for).

Fruit market site BRFC 3.jpg

That’s approx 50% of the fruit market site. Add in parking and misc roads and there’s not much left for all the other housing, shops etc stuff that will make money for the developers. This just doesn’t add up. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, NcnsBcfc said:

Exactly @Eddie Hitler

Really strange way of funding a new stadium.

Both City, and Luton as another good example have secured the other areas of land that can be used through development to fund a new stadium (in City's case the AV and subsequent Sports Village).

Why Wael isn't looking to do the Fruit Market proposal himself is indicative of the complete lack of funds he actually has available. 

If all of this comes to fruition, the Gas will end up with absolutely no fixed assets at all (similar to Coventry's nightmare), and will be beholden to whoever their landlord is.

At some stage that landlord will change, and they will find themselves at a huge disadvantage trying to renegotiate new terms. It's got disaster written all over it.

Why give up your ownership of your own ground? Why haven't Rovers done a planning application for the Memorial ground themselves for either ground redevelopment or housing. If the housing was granted (like Lansdown' s was for the Sports village) you could always sell the proposal to another developer or do it yourself.

Just seems like a really lazy option that they've taken, allied to in financial terms a massive premium being paid to being part of the Fruit Market development (which in essence they are piggybacking on).

Exactly this. In reality Wally is just a speculator. This is Sainsburys Round 2. He hasn't the inclination or funding to buy the land himself. If he had he could've developed what he already owns. I think one of the numerous empty announcements was "we will rebuild it stand by stand".

I can't see it getting off the ground as the transport links alone are horrendous and the council in their infinite wisdom have already made Cattle Market Road one way.

Then there is the congestion charge which I believe runs along Cattle Market Road in any case.

Then there is the added pollution created.

It is all fraught with problems leaving your main asset in the hands of a developer but basically boils down to why he bought the club in the first place which was for a quick way to sell the ageing high maintenance asset and finance the new stadium with it which in turn will make it easier for him to sell it on the open market.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ronnie Sinclair said:

9,613 there today, but they need a 50,000 stadium :facepalm:

1,159 away fans

So about 8,400 blue few,  yet they bang on about selling out every game. Is the Memorial Ground getting smaller? 

Or is Dave letting more in? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, myol'man said:

1,159 away fans

So about 8,400 blue few,  yet they bang on about selling out every game. Is the Memorial Ground getting smaller? 

Or is Dave letting more in? 

 

37,000 locked out, waiting for the 45K-seater Field of Plums Stadium to be built. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

Am I missing something? 

I've heard many people say they have secured land for a new stadium yet I see it as some company has paid 450k for an option to buy the site (if conditions are met) nothing more and nothing less than that.

No, you aren’t missing anything.

Just standard delusion from the blue few & their mates at Bristol Live & Radio Bristol.

They do have an asset that could help to fund some of this but we’re a million miles away from that even potentially happening.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, one of the blue few phoned into 20mans show last night specifically to say how the club and local media were misrepresenting the stadium situation. He said it was typical Rovers, shouting about a new stadium and supporters lapping it up. Him and 20man were spot on in saying nothing at all has happened re a stadium, just that the developer has a 12 month option to explore options.

It is no closer today than it was 3 or 4 years ago when all this was first mooted.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

37,000 locked out, waiting for the 45K-seater Field of Plums Stadium to be built. 

Ah, think you have stumbled on something there. The extra land space of the fruit market will be needed to accommodate those outside the ground. 8k inside (sell out), 40k in the car park. Has anyone told the developers they won't be able to build the flats and retail?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Ah, think you have stumbled on something there. The extra land space of the fruit market will be needed to accommodate those outside the ground. 8k inside (sell out), 40k in the car park. Has anyone told the developers they won't be able to build the flats and retail?

Actually we are all missing a trick here. They have said numerous times I'm the past that "we will watch them from the pavement/road" whatever, so maybe there is no stadium and the gas are going to play on one of the roads that will be cleared of parked cars every couple of weeks. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Port Said Red said:

Actually we are all missing a trick here. They have said numerous times I'm the past that "we will watch them from the pavement/road" whatever, so maybe there is no stadium and the gas are going to play on one of the roads that will be cleared of parked cars, scrap metal trucks, bin lorries and copious amounts of dog shit every couple of weeks. :)

Added a few extras for you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I, for one, have been walking my dog on the fruit market site  for over  twenty years ( poor blighter’s been dead for ten of them) to go and count the rare great breasted red newts who live there ( last count - nil) which just goes to show that this site needs protecting from Gas. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 11
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pommers65 said:

Just had a quick look, a very wide variety of opinion from 'it's happening, let's think of the new stadium name' right through to 'so many previous disappointments'.

Maybe that could be the stadium name then, the So Many Previous Disappointments Stadium.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Just had a quick look, a very wide variety of opinion from 'it's happening, let's think of the new stadium name' right through to 'so many previous disappointments'.

Maybe that could be the stadium name then, the So Many Previous Disappointments Stadium.

I prefer `The It Will Never Happen Ground`

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

I prefer `The It Will Never Happen Ground`

you can see the headlines.  'stalemate at never never land'  thats not a goalless draw at their new stadium,its the developer not building it for them because the fence wasnt extended at the mem

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, redsquirrel said:

you can see the headlines.  'stalemate at never never land'  thats not a goalless draw at their new stadium,its the developer not building it for them because the fence wasnt extended at the mem

“Stalemate” is the single word that kiosk operatives are ordered to respond when addressing a customer asking for a packet of crisps at the Mem. 

  • Haha 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Just had a quick look, a very wide variety of opinion from 'it's happening, let's think of the new stadium name' right through to 'so many previous disappointments'.

Maybe that could be the stadium name then, the So Many Previous Disappointments Stadium.

 

2 hours ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

I prefer `The It Will Never Happen Ground`

The Pie In The Sky Stadium.

Simply because it will never happen.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, bcfc01 said:

To be fair, one of the blue few phoned into 20mans show last night specifically to say how the club and local media were misrepresenting the stadium situation. He said it was typical Rovers, shouting about a new stadium and supporters lapping it up. Him and 20man were spot on in saying nothing at all has happened re a stadium, just that the developer has a 12 month option to explore options.

It is no closer today than it was 3 or 4 years ago when all this was first mooted.

 

 

I heard him too, very sensible for a sag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Just had a quick look, a very wide variety of opinion from 'it's happening, let's think of the new stadium name' right through to 'so many previous disappointments'.

Maybe that could be the stadium name then, the So Many Previous Disappointments Stadium.

The Shitehawk Pissporial - I know I've downed a bottle of Malbec,but I can't stop laughing ?

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Just had a quick look, a very wide variety of opinion from 'it's happening, let's think of the new stadium name' right through to 'so many previous disappointments'.

Maybe that could be the stadium name then, the So Many Previous Disappointments Stadium.

The stadium of shite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely if they are relying on the developer (who will want as large a margin as possible) to build a ground for them in exchange for land, they will be looking at a full on barebones stadium in the guise of the Kassam or New Meadow rather than anything better? Possibly something like Rotherham's at an absolute push?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

They`re all over there arguing about the best way to get there from North Bristol bless them!

It's hilarious. People saying the stadium isn't on a good location because there aren't many busses.

I wonder - before it was built - how many busses went to The Mall at Cribbs.

Well, given it didn't exist, you would have to say the answer is none.

Some of them are thick as mince, they really are. The fact a new service could be introduced is just beyond the tiny minds of a few. At least they have the odd sensible voice over there, but no doubt they'll probably get told to 'Get back to Trashton' by the end of the day, such are their insecurities.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

Not sure why a sports agent would be needed to pitch for an infrastructure project. Unless of course, a laptop repair man was invovled.

No, he will be the IT consultant for the entire project. He`s got a shed in his back garden he`s not using that will become his corporate HQ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

Not sure why a sports agent would be needed to pitch for an infrastructure project. Unless of course, a laptop repair man was invovled.

Strange isn't it, especially when the poster is questioned on it later he can't name the Agency, but apparently knows they are a "World's Top" one. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Prospective investors? Hang on, why are they needed? Are they saying that Wally hasn't got the money now? How can that be for the 6th richest club?

Well that's standard to be fair, SL is looking for additional investors for the Sporting Quarter, it's just a way of spreading the liabilities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...