Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread

42nite

By 42nite
in Football Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Swede

Swede

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Silvio Dante said:

Keith, Keith, Keith.

People in tented houses shouldn’t throw stones.

 

Typical cheap patronising quip from someone who ought to know better. What a mug. This shows everybody exactly what they are. A total lack of respect for everyone.Tinpot.

  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swede

Swede

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BS3City said:

Keith "Roverssshhh" Brookman...

That's the dick who summarises on Radio Bristol. Got the most ill fitting false teeth since John Craven...?

He'll never beat Colin "a large contingent from rovers" Howlett

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RedLionLad

RedLionLad

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BS3City said:

Keith "Roverssshhh" Brookman...

That's the dick who summarises on Radio Bristol. Got the most ill fitting false teeth since John Craven...?

First time I heard him talking like that I thought he was having a stroke or something

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS3City

BS3City

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Ronnie Sinclair said:

"a large contingent behind the goal", then you'd watch the goals on Monday night's HTV News and there were about 50 people behind said goal 

Colin "sizable contingent" Howlett must go back around 40 years. Just further emphasises that Sag economy with the truth is not a recent trait...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bar BS3

Bar BS3

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, slartibartfast said:

You mean ...a shtroke !

The bloke is a typical deluded, gashed nause - but I think we can do better than to mock him so a speech impediment. 

There are plenty of things to pick on them about - I don't think a guy who can forge a career on the Radio, despite such an obstical is really the way to go with this.

Fair play to him (or anyone) who can overcome the odds in life.

If he was in a wheel chair or blind I'd hope we wouldn't see that targeted as a weak point, so let's leave the speech impediment digs out - I know you are better than that ?

  • Like 16
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Open End Numb Legs

Open End Numb Legs

Posted
Posted

Meanwhile, the objections are lining up to the bus shelter. Some good points made here:-

Comment:As a neighbour living close to the site of the proposed stand I have the following objections:


There has been no consultation with the neighbours in the community about the proposals.
Looking at the plans there are no measurements so that you can make a direct comparison between the size of the old stand and the new one but visually it looks to be about twice the height and about a third longer than the old stand.
This would cause direct impact on the amount of light coming to my house and garden and be a lot more overbearing than the old stand.
The new stand looks to be built directly at the boundary of the rovers property which is quite a bit closer than the old stand was.
Also aesthetically it will look like the back of a warehouse and since the trees which had grown between the old stand and our gardens have been removed by the contractors - there is nothing visually attractive to break up the view.
It is claimed that there will be less noise from the stand but there is nothing in the plans that evidences this.
As the stand will be bigger, closer, and include toilet and refreshment facilities it seems unlikely.

On match days the constant swearing and sometimes racist and homophobic commentary is pretty offensive for the neighbouring families so it would be great if the noise could be properly
dampened.
Construction work has started with pile driving very close to the boundaries of neighbouring properties. Knowing that the foundations of the old terraced houses are very shallow has there
been any assessment of potential subsidence in neighbouring homes as a consequence?
Parking on match days has always been a problem - what additional parking facilities will rovers
be including to ensure that the neighbours in the local areas aren't even more badly affected by
the additional fans that may come?
Rovers seems to pride itself on being part of the community but in the years I have been a neighbour has never really engaged with the neighbours. Why not?
Lastly I know that in the plans for a new stadium previously approved this stand would have been
bigger but those out-of-date plans relate to a time when Rovers owned the homes (including mine)
directly neighbouring the area and so there would have not been the direct and damaging impact
on the neighbours that there is now.

  • Like 7
  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
slartibartfast

slartibartfast

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Bar BS3 said:

The bloke is a typical deluded, gashed nause - but I think we can do better than to mock him so a speech impediment. 

There are plenty of things to pick on them about - I don't think a guy who can forge a career on the Radio, despite such an obstical is really the way to go with this.

Fair play to him (or anyone) who can overcome the odds in life.

If he was in a wheel chair or blind I'd hope we wouldn't see that targeted as a weak point, so let's leave the speech impediment digs out - I know you are better than that ?

Oh ,lighten up a bit, it's NOT a speech impediment, it's just the way he talks, I did n't even think about it till the previous poster mentioned it. I'm pretty sure he'd be upset if someone told him he had a speech defect, and I sure as hell wouldn't have mentioned it on here !

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bcfc01

bcfc01

Posted
Posted

Anyone know what happened with that Pikey coach (Mangan) who allegedly made homophobic comments to a member of the Plymouth staff ?

Also, Barton has been banned from football stadiums for the first 3 games of the season. Just reading their little forum and it appears the majority are defending him. A few are rightly calling him out, but only two or three. I see one of them who posts on here is defending him.

On 22 February 2021, Mangan followed Barton and Clint Hill from Fleetwood to Bristol Rovers, taking on the role as a first-team coach. On 14 December 2022, Mangan was charged by the FA over an alleged homophobic comment during a League One 2–2 draw with Plymouth Argyle two months prior.

Also, Barton has been banned from football stadiums for the first 3 games of the season. Just reading their little forum and it appears the majority are defending him. A few are rightly calling him out, but only two or three. I see one of them who posts on here is defending him.

What an outfit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Selred

Selred

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, bcfc01 said:

Pikey coach (Mangan) who allegedly made homophobic comments to a member of the Plymouth staff ?

Maybe don't use a slur to talk about another man making inappropriate comments...

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
myol'man

myol'man

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Meanwhile, the objections are lining up to the bus shelter. Some good points made here:-

Comment:As a neighbour living close to the site of the proposed stand I have the following objections:


There has been no consultation with the neighbours in the community about the proposals.
Looking at the plans there are no measurements so that you can make a direct comparison between the size of the old stand and the new one but visually it looks to be about twice the height and about a third longer than the old stand.
This would cause direct impact on the amount of light coming to my house and garden and be a lot more overbearing than the old stand.
The new stand looks to be built directly at the boundary of the rovers property which is quite a bit closer than the old stand was.
Also aesthetically it will look like the back of a warehouse and since the trees which had grown between the old stand and our gardens have been removed by the contractors - there is nothing visually attractive to break up the view.
It is claimed that there will be less noise from the stand but there is nothing in the plans that evidences this.
As the stand will be bigger, closer, and include toilet and refreshment facilities it seems unlikely.

On match days the constant swearing and sometimes racist and homophobic commentary is pretty offensive for the neighbouring families so it would be great if the noise could be properly
dampened.
Construction work has started with pile driving very close to the boundaries of neighbouring properties. Knowing that the foundations of the old terraced houses are very shallow has there
been any assessment of potential subsidence in neighbouring homes as a consequence?
Parking on match days has always been a problem - what additional parking facilities will rovers
be including to ensure that the neighbours in the local areas aren't even more badly affected by
the additional fans that may come?
Rovers seems to pride itself on being part of the community but in the years I have been a neighbour has never really engaged with the neighbours. Why not?
Lastly I know that in the plans for a new stadium previously approved this stand would have been
bigger but those out-of-date plans relate to a time when Rovers owned the homes (including mine)
directly neighbouring the area and so there would have not been the direct and damaging impact
on the neighbours that there is now.

But the comments in support are generally short and poorly worded;

Da Roverz are part of North Bristol history innit.

Dunno what they're moaning about, back of a warehouse looks better that a tent.

After Eastville & Twerton we're now at home in North Bristol, council should help us out.

It's on a bus route so parking ain't an issue.

etc. etc. 

Edited by myol'man
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gazred

Gazred

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

So, it looks like they used to own the houses that are affected but presumably sold them off at some time in the past - probably to finance one of their many promotion pushes.

Bet they wish they hadn`t now.

Yep, you can only sell them once.

Flogged the family silver there and for what?

I'd laugh out loud if the new owners objections put a stop to their new shed.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lanterne Rouge

Lanterne Rouge

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Gazred said:

Yep, you can only sell them once.

Flogged the family silver there and for what?

I'd laugh out loud if the new owners objections put a stop to their new shed.

Mind you, I wouldn`t want to be identified as a neighbour who objects given what their dribbling morons are likely to do if they find out who you are.

Remember when the most deluded one of all of them, Henbury Sag suggested they take a crap in the freezers at Sainsbury`s for revenge for the UWE falling through?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gazred

Gazred

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Mind you, I wouldn`t want to be identified as a neighbour who objects given what their dribbling morons are likely to do if they find out who you are.

Remember when the most deluded one of all of them, Henbury Sag suggested they take a crap in the freezers at Sainsbury`s for revenge for the UWE falling through?

I wouldn’t rule out anything at this point with the current incumbents  through the club.

They are a pox on many things.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Gasbuster

The Gasbuster

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Magger1 said:

Is Tilson still their record signing ? I think £350 k :laugh: their trying 20 years later to buy a striker for £250k and Questioning if they can afford it ffs :laugh:

30 years now, I think, Magger ! :rofl2br:

Edited by The Gasbuster
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1960maaan

1960maaan

Posted
Posted

Can someone more ITK than me say if I have this right.

Google says you usually have 21 days to object once plans are made public.
They applied on the 29th of June , so 21 days takes it to around the 20th of July.
The planning committee meet once a month, and met on 27th April . Would that mean around 27th of July for the next one ?
They have their first home game on August 12th. Though Google has them home Vs Chesterfield in a friendly on the 29th July.

If I have that right and if the plans are passed with no problems, it gives them just over a week to build, test and get the new stand passed. If I'm anywhere near right, that is a very tight schedule for a permanent building and fitting out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sir Geoff

Sir Geoff

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

Can someone more ITK than me say if I have this right.

Google says you usually have 21 days to object once plans are made public.
They applied on the 29th of June , so 21 days takes it to around the 20th of July.
The planning committee meet once a month, and met on 27th April . Would that mean around 27th of July for the next one ?
They have their first home game on August 12th. Though Google has them home Vs Chesterfield in a friendly on the 29th July.

If I have that right and if the plans are passed with no problems, it gives them just over a week to build, test and get the new stand passed. If I'm anywhere near right, that is a very tight schedule for a permanent building and fitting out. 

Don't forget the safety certificate once it's been constructed. Can't imagine the old bill, fire and local council just popping over for a quick look. That could be another couple of weeks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monkeh

Monkeh

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

Can someone more ITK than me say if I have this right.

Google says you usually have 21 days to object once plans are made public.
They applied on the 29th of June , so 21 days takes it to around the 20th of July.
The planning committee meet once a month, and met on 27th April . Would that mean around 27th of July for the next one ?
They have their first home game on August 12th. Though Google has them home Vs Chesterfield in a friendly on the 29th July.

If I have that right and if the plans are passed with no problems, it gives them just over a week to build, test and get the new stand passed. If I'm anywhere near right, that is a very tight schedule for a permanent building and fitting out. 

Well if some.of the comments are to be believed, rovers have been building it without planning permission,

Haven't they sold season tickets for it already? It's not going to be ready or open for August 12th 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Army 75

Red Army 75

Posted
Posted (edited)

Rovers fans more worried about objections to their new shitty little stand. Than one of their players kicking the shit out of his Mrs. And there cretin of a manager.

Lost their moral compass ? over on the blue side 

Edited by Red Army 75
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Admin
phantom

phantom

Posted
  • Admin
Posted
54 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

Can someone more ITK than me say if I have this right.

Google says you usually have 21 days to object once plans are made public.
They applied on the 29th of June , so 21 days takes it to around the 20th of July.
The planning committee meet once a month, and met on 27th April . Would that mean around 27th of July for the next one ?
They have their first home game on August 12th. Though Google has them home Vs Chesterfield in a friendly on the 29th July.

If I have that right and if the plans are passed with no problems, it gives them just over a week to build, test and get the new stand passed. If I'm anywhere near right, that is a very tight schedule for a permanent building and fitting out. 

No you're not correct 

They can build it without planning permission, but if it gets refused they'd have to tear it down PDQ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bristol Rob

Bristol Rob

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, phantom said:

No you're not correct 

They can build it without planning permission, but if it gets refused they'd have to tear it down PDQ 

This is all starting to sound a lot like that Captain Tom charity thing. 

I wonder if they have a captain called Tom and that was their plan all along, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Open End Numb Legs

Open End Numb Legs

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, phantom said:

No you're not correct 

They can build it without planning permission, but if it gets refused they'd have to tear it down PDQ 

As many have said then, they will build it without permission and try to bully the council into approval.

I wouldn't throw away the assembly instructions if I were them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malago

Malago

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

As many have said then, they will build it without permission and try to bully the council into approval.

I wouldn't throw away the assembly instructions if I were them.

Or throw away the correct fitting Allen keys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sir Geoff

Sir Geoff

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

As many have said then, they will build it without permission and try to bully the council into approval.

I wouldn't throw away the assembly instructions if I were them.

Better keep the boxes and receipt too, just in case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1960maaan

1960maaan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, phantom said:

No you're not correct 

They can build it without planning permission, but if it gets refused they'd have to tear it down PDQ 

Of course I did mean for someone following the rules, or doing it how normal people would approach these things.

If they build without permission how would they get a SAG sign off to actually use it. It took us a few events to get our stands signed off for full use.

It would be the funniest thing ever if they tried to bully the Council only for them to have to take it apart again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pongo88

pongo88

Posted
Posted

 

It’s usual for building inspectors to inspect the the work during key stages of construction to ensure each stage complies with building regulations. (This even happened when I built a small terrace at my house that was only about 5 feet high). If Rovers build the stand without the relevant inspections it may be difficult to get retrospective planning permission. From the council website:

“To make sure your building works comply with building regulations, you must give us notice when your work reaches a particular stage, we’ll then carry out an inspection.

You're legally required under the building regulations to tell us when you'll start your building works.  We'll tell you of other stages of your project that you're required to let us know to inspect, up to and including the completed works.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WinterstokeRoad

WinterstokeRoad

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, pongo88 said:

 

It’s usual for building inspectors to inspect the the work during key stages of construction to ensure each stage complies with building regulations. (This even happened when I built a small terrace at my house that was only about 5 feet high). If Rovers build the stand without the relevant inspections it may be difficult to get retrospective planning permission. From the council website:

“To make sure your building works comply with building regulations, you must give us notice when your work reaches a particular stage, we’ll then carry out an inspection.

You're legally required under the building regulations to tell us when you'll start your building works.  We'll tell you of other stages of your project that you're required to let us know to inspect, up to and including the completed works.”

You can get a private safety inspector to do those checks mate, we had the option for our extension. They cost about the same either way too in the domestic side of things so guessing the same commercially?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan

Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Red Army 75 said:

Rovers fans more worried about objections to their new shitty little stand. Than one of their players kicking the shit out of his Mrs. And there cretin of a manager.

Lost their moral compass ? over on the blue side 

Most of them wouldn’t care if it was their own daughters getting their heads kicked in as long as the bloke doing it was employed by the club or was just a ‘regular’ Gashead. 

Edited by Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BetterRedthanBlue

BetterRedthanBlue

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

Whilst I'd love all this speculation about planning, regs etc.to be true, I can't believe that they would be so stupid to proceed without any assurances of it being passed. But still, it helps to pass the boring summer days !

Yeah that was my thought as well.

Considering it's quite a dramatic change from what they currently have I would imagine there's been some discussions to say "yeah we'll start building it by this date and put in planning permission retrospectively otherwise it won't be done in time for the new season."

I really hope I'm wrong and they have to tear it down.

  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kodjias Wrist

Kodjias Wrist

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, BS30 City said:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/bristol-rovers-jevani-brown-spat-8582884

Rovers lot already making excuses for him as they did with JB. Not quite sure about the Danny Simpson case but any footballer pleading guilty or found guilty of assault shouldn't be able to play professional football again. If i was found guilty for it I would lose my job instantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rudolf Hucker

Rudolf Hucker

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Kodjias Wrist said:

Rovers lot already making excuses for him as they did with JB. Not quite sure about the Danny Simpson case but any footballer pleading guilty or found guilty of assault shouldn't be able to play professional football again. If i was found guilty for it I would lose my job instantly.

The judge said "This will be a blemish on your previous good character," he added. "As a professional footballer you are a role model to many thousands of young people with a great influence on their decisions and lives.”

Has he seen the age profile of their crowd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bert tann

bert tann

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

Typical something for nothing philosophy !

Slarti you are living in a byegone era.

I yearn for a return to 1950's values just as you do.

But this is 1993 and violence towards women is now perfectly acceptable so long as you are an employee of Bristol Rovers FC.

Edited by bert tann
  • Haha 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Watts

Steve Watts

Posted
Posted
On 06/07/2023 at 11:57, Open End Numb Legs said:

Meanwhile, the objections are lining up to the bus shelter. Some good points made here:-

Comment:As a neighbour living close to the site of the proposed stand I have the following objections:


There has been no consultation with the neighbours in the community about the proposals.
Looking at the plans there are no measurements so that you can make a direct comparison between the size of the old stand and the new one but visually it looks to be about twice the height and about a third longer than the old stand.
This would cause direct impact on the amount of light coming to my house and garden and be a lot more overbearing than the old stand.
The new stand looks to be built directly at the boundary of the rovers property which is quite a bit closer than the old stand was.
Also aesthetically it will look like the back of a warehouse and since the trees which had grown between the old stand and our gardens have been removed by the contractors - there is nothing visually attractive to break up the view.
It is claimed that there will be less noise from the stand but there is nothing in the plans that evidences this.
As the stand will be bigger, closer, and include toilet and refreshment facilities it seems unlikely.

On match days the constant swearing and sometimes racist and homophobic commentary is pretty offensive for the neighbouring families so it would be great if the noise could be properly
dampened.
Construction work has started with pile driving very close to the boundaries of neighbouring properties. Knowing that the foundations of the old terraced houses are very shallow has there
been any assessment of potential subsidence in neighbouring homes as a consequence?
Parking on match days has always been a problem - what additional parking facilities will rovers
be including to ensure that the neighbours in the local areas aren't even more badly affected by
the additional fans that may come?
Rovers seems to pride itself on being part of the community but in the years I have been a neighbour has never really engaged with the neighbours. Why not?
Lastly I know that in the plans for a new stadium previously approved this stand would have been
bigger but those out-of-date plans relate to a time when Rovers owned the homes (including mine)
directly neighbouring the area and so there would have not been the direct and damaging impact
on the neighbours that there is now.

Imagine they have to tear it down and they're left with a full view of the pitch!  They think now there's nothing visually attractive....!

On 05/07/2023 at 18:55, Silvio Dante said:

Keith, Keith, Keith.

People in tented houses shouldn’t throw stones.

 

Oh I don't mind Keith posting reminders of that lot recently playing league matches against Eastleigh!

5 hours ago, Monkeh said:

More then rovers fans ?

Silly little monkey Monkeh.... All the Rovers fans are locked out of the city so of course there's more City fans.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unan

Unan

Posted
Posted (edited)

“Not defending him but think people are overlooking the part where she has pulled his hair after he'd spat but before he slaps her. 

He doesn't deserve to be kicked out of football for the offence committed so we move on and let him rehabilitate. If it happens again it's game over for him.”

 

Absolutely mental club, happens again? That’s two guilty pleases in 3 months.

Edited by Marcus Aurelius
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bert tann

bert tann

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Marcus Aurelius said:

“Not defending him but think people are overlooking the part where she has pulled his hair after he'd spat but before he slaps her. 
 

I shuffled over to the corner of the room curled myself up into a ball and started to slobber.

Usually this happens to me at five pm on a Saturday afternoon but that comment has brought it on early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...