Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Gert Mare said:

There are so many gifts in this photo that I just don’t know where to begin? ?

They dig more holes for their reputation than they do for a stand.

Absolutely priceless. Complete and utter laughing stock tinpot shambles.

IMG_3330.thumb.jpeg.60c4751cab5f33e05dcc3da83ee2edbb.jpeg

I’m normally all for having a go at them, but I believe that unicorn is part of a trail raising money for leukaemia research. That it’s rovers themed makes sense considering where it is. (There’s also one at AG). Not sure with all else they give us to laugh at that this is really something to go for.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

I’m normally all for having a go at them, but I believe that unicorn is part of a trail raising money for leukaemia research. That it’s rovers themed makes sense considering where it is. (There’s also one at AG). Not sure with all else they give us to laugh at that this is really something to go for.

No idea of the relevance of what it is for and in no way mocking the charity, it’s just so unfortunate with what is going on at Rovers at the moment that they have a unicorn in a Rovers shirt. 
 

IMG_3333.thumb.jpeg.18a5eb24e2fdb73b111090f65bbdead4.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Gert Mare said:

There are so many gifts in this photo that I just don’t know where to begin? ?
 

(EDIT: Not knocking the charity by the way….just an unfortunate choice of character)

They dig more holes for their reputation than they do for a stand.

Absolutely priceless. Complete and utter laughing stock tinpot shambles.

IMG_3330.thumb.jpeg.60c4751cab5f33e05dcc3da83ee2edbb.jpeg

Sit a police woman on it and you have Barbie 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Andy082005 said:

I’m really out of the loop on the latest shenanigans north of Bristol 

so - without trawling through all the posts , are we saying they started a development without the appropriate planning permission? And now even though they have sold tickets for this stand - it won’t be ready in time for the start of the season? 
 

 

Who would be so stupid to do that , oh hang on ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said:

That appears to be the case….and it’s all our fault, definitely not Rovers fault but ours.

 …and the Greens

 …and Wycombe

 

A Gash spokesman said: “It’s all your fault, Garner, you bald-headed c***!”

  • Haha 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, elhombrecito said:

I do find the difference between our two sets of fans to be quite fascinating. The smallest thing happens at City and you'll get people on here claiming that the club are an absolute shambles and that somebody needs to be held accountable.

However, up north, the 15ers have managed to sell season tickets for a stand that doesn't exist, and if it ever will exist, will not be ready for several months at best, but there's barely any criticism of the club at all.

Brainwashing is the word that springs to mind. Or maybe Stockholm Syndrome is more accurate... 

Aint that the truth.

This quote from a mug on their forum sums it up in response to one of the very few people on there who dared to say the situation and the way the club have acted is embarrassing;

"Not embarrassed in the slightest. Not sure why I should be.
As always it’s no doubt all in hand by those that matter & the rest is a ridiculous forum frenzy born out of “I think/I reckon/I heard”

They have their heads in the sands, others blaming BCC, a lot saying nothing to worry about, a couple calling out the club but being shouted down.

Good stuff :yawn:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BCFC11 said:

According to this Sag their new ‘stand’ is genuinely labelled A-H like an IKEA flat pack ???

IMG_0441.jpeg.a127a97c6dbd39d75899ffdda930ac02.jpeg

Well that's lucky that its the units marked A to H. For a moment there I thought it was the seat rows, so missing Row M again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

It speaks volumes that no-one official from their club has made any sort of statement one way or the other since this news broke in the media.

They are ****** and they know they are. Crisis mode in Wally`s office tomorrow no doubt.

I think it just goes to show how sleazy and amateurish they really are. I wouldn't trust their chelsea supporting owner to run a bath let alone run that tinpot outfit. They run roughshod over the local residents without a care in the world and seemingly flout the local planning laws yet their dwindling band of six fingered webbed feet lemmings lap it all up and never ask questions. He could pi55 in their pockets and get away with it. This is the same bloke who would sell them tomorrow if he could and is openly looking to sell the dump they currently just about own to a speculator on a promise of yet another new ground with no indication of what it will consist of or how big it will be and more importantly something they will not own. They are a complete laughing stock.

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BCFC11 said:

According to this Sag their new ‘stand’ is genuinely labelled A-H like an IKEA flat pack ???

IMG_0441.jpeg.a127a97c6dbd39d75899ffdda930ac02.jpeg

So, it’s a stand with a few bits of metal that can be bolted together, in no time at all, and just plonked on the ground. A few weeks ago they were comparing it to the Atyeo stand! The Atyeo, which is a proper stand, took months to build. It’s neatly 30 years old but obviously futuristic compared to the Rovers latest effort 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BS13 Robin said:

But the concrete foundations need time to cure dont they?unless they will be on cut up scaffold planks!

Ah, but have they not put in the foundations, which has triggered the ‘commencement of development’ claims. According to some Sags they have done this work, but others claim they haven’t, refuting such scurrilous suggestions made by their ‘enemies’. 

The truth is out there, somewhere ??
 


 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RedRock said:

Ah, but have they not put in the foundations, which has triggered the ‘commencement of development’ claims. According to some Sags they have done this work, but others claim they haven’t, refuting such scurrilous suggestions made by their ‘enemies’. 

The truth is out there, somewhere ??
 


 

perhaps the foundations are hidden from view in row m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/efl-regulations/section-5--fixtures/

Quote

35.3 Facilities for visiting supporters

 35.3.1  Each Club must make provision for at least 2,000 visiting supporters at every home match or such number as represents 10% of the Club’s certified capacity, if less than 2,000. The League may, on the prior written application of a Club, suspend this Regulation or reduce the figure either for a particular League Match or for a period of time. Each Club shall, subject to any dispensations granted by the Board, make provision for at least 200 of the visiting supporters (of which not less than 100 must be seats) to be accommodated under cover. Any Club which fails to meet the requirement of 200 visiting supporters being accommodated under cover and which does not have a dispensation granted by the Board shall have such amounts as the Board shall determine (in its absolute discretion) withheld from that Club’s central distributions from the Pool Account until such time as the Club can meet the requirement.

Note the part that says "The League may, on the prior written application of a Club, suspend this Regulation"  - I wonder if they have done this or were hoping to do it after the first half dozen games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

If the league have it in their power wave some regs they might, for example, take into account exceptional circumstances that are unlucky or outside a clubs control.

Taking down existing stands before even getting planning permission for a replacement build doesn't qualify as unlucky does it? It's self inflicted chaos.

Quite. 

If the old stand had been damaged in some way - for example a fire, or a bad storm (maybe blowing it away ?) then I'm pretty sure that the league, and maybe even Barnsley would look at it sympathetically. Fact is as you say, they knocked down the old one before the planning permission had been granted. They haven't got a leg to stand on. 

They can be next seasons laughing stock of the EFL for a different reason now...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BCFC11 said:

According to this Sag their new ‘stand’ is genuinely labelled A-H like an IKEA flat pack ???

IMG_0441.jpeg.a127a97c6dbd39d75899ffdda930ac02.jpeg

But it's meant to be better then the Atyeo! It's not meant to be some Meccano stand that's what the great and powerful super rich and famous Wally told the fans!

Also if it is a clip together stand I thought there was meant to be a concourse or is this just going to be a portacabin and portaloo?

Edited by BetterRedthanBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BetterRedthanBlue said:

But it's meant to be better then the Atyeo! It's not meant to be some Meccano stand that's what the great and powerful super rich and famous Wally told the fans!

Also if it is a clip together stand I thought there was meant to be a concourse or is this just going to be a portacabin and portaloo?

Its odds on that it will be done on the cheap, so portacabins and portaloos are almost guaranteed.

IF it gets built assembled, it will be shite - as per normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, pongo88 said:

So, it’s a stand with a few bits of metal that can be bolted together, in no time at all, and just plonked on the ground. A few weeks ago they were comparing it to the Atyeo stand! The Atyeo, which is a proper stand, took months to build. It’s neatly 30 years old but obviously futuristic compared to the Rovers latest effort 

 

One thing about this is that if they eventually manage to build/assemble this thing, when it comes to redeveloping the Atyeo, we can just knock it down and start building whenever SL wants. No need for any of this Planning Permission malarkey, I'm sure our friends from Horfield will be fully behind us...

Seriously though, if roles had been reversed and we had done this, imagine the outrage from their side.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WessexPest said:

What does a Gash “Fun Day” consist of? ?

Stick one on the donkey?

Musical Chairboys?

WheelBARROW race?

White elephant stand?

Goal shy?

?

I  haven't heard "Barrow" or "Farleigh" used as an insult for yonks. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gert Mare said:

They’re threatening each other now on AssChat like a pack of feral dogs and still blaming anyone other than their shambolic club ownership.

Tinpot

 

I do find it unbelievable that "nice man" Wael has appointed Barton and then let him sign that Exeter striker.

This has totally divided their fanbase and the rows keep flaring up between them, the damage from bringing those scumbags to Rovers is going to cast a long shadow.

I wouldn't be surprised to see some scrapping between their own fans this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intresting comment in bristol live. I suppose you could argue they packed the tent away..

 

"There has been no demolition work, a previous structure has been dismantled and the ground on which it stood has been levelled and prepared and a few bushes (not trees) have been removed."

 

 

Edited by Crackers Corner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Crackers Corner said:

Intresting comment in bristol live. I suppose you could argue they packed the tent away..

 

"There has been no demolition work, a previous structure has been dismantled and the ground on which it stood has been levelled and prepared and a few bushes (not trees) have been removed."

 

 

Excellent, well I’m sure the law people will be all over it and hope they ask for the survey that proves no birds were killed or injured, no birds eggs were damaged and no birds nests were damaged or destroyed during nesting season (nesting season being exactly when they pulled the trees/bushes/shrubs down).

When they work this out I’m sure the trees that became just bushes will become Bonzai instead.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GreedyHarry said:

Excellent, well I’m sure the law people will be all over it and hope they ask for the survey that proves no birds were killed or injured, no birds eggs were damaged and no birds nests were damaged or destroyed during nesting season (nesting season being exactly when they pulled the trees/bushes/shrubs down).

When they work this out I’m sure the trees that became just bushes will become Bonzai instead.

It's from a deluded fan, I think they are are trying Jedi mind tricks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an interesting thing, a temporary stand. I was up at an open day at Brum Uni, just before the Commonwealth Games. The Uni was hosting the hockey, IIRC, and they had a huge temporary stand in place. It looked perfectly fine and was obviously OK to use.

However, it had no roof, no facilities, and was pretty ugly.

So it should fit right in at the Mem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

The letters of support have flooded in.

https://pa.bristol.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=RSQK1RDNKSY00

In unrelated news...

Did #HerGameToo ever clarify their position on the Fewers after they signed that bloke?

None of them include a name or address and this one provides a really convincing argument despite claiming they live in Oxford 

IMG_2017.png

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, petehinton said:

25EF22D5-DF03-40B9-87EA-2DB442242994.jpeg

Not quite sure The Saggies have got a full understanding of this planning malarkey.

Valid grounds in support of an application doesn’t include ‘give us a break for god sake’.

Does the Sag Official in charge of this project live in Oxford by any chance?


 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RedRock said:

Not quite sure The Saggies have got a full understanding of this planning malarkey.

Valid grounds in support of an application doesn’t include ‘give us a break for god sake’.

Does the Sag Official in charge of this project live in Oxford by any chance?


 

Great for Bristol mind ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one too that seems to have forgotten that if you do your homework, take your time and follow the process you can build/rebuild a stadium in Bristol.

Screenshot_2023-07-31-08-31-40-99_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg.333b5230fff62d1e960e6e42cba9702e.jpg

The other thing is they keep referring to this as being a "temporary" structure, but that is presumably assuming that all will go well at the FM project, otherwise it will be as temporary as that flyover that used to be in front of St Mary Redcliffe church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 hour ago, Port Said Red said:

This one too that seems to have forgotten that if you do your homework, take your time and follow the process you can build/rebuild a stadium in Bristol.

Screenshot_2023-07-31-08-31-40-99_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg.333b5230fff62d1e960e6e42cba9702e.jpg

The other thing is they keep referring to this as being a "temporary" structure, but that is presumably assuming that all will go well at the FM project, otherwise it will be as temporary as that flyover that used to be in front of St Mary Redcliffe church.

That flyover is sadly missed……

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, petehinton said:

 

Interesting……you’d think that 5 days before the season starts that they’d be very happy to share a progress report with their loyal and prowd supporters.   The cover up is in full flow though it seems.  Lovely.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bristol Rob said:

The letters of support have flooded in.

https://pa.bristol.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=RSQK1RDNKSY00

In unrelated news...

Did #HerGameToo ever clarify their position on the Fewers after they signed that bloke?

I had a look at the planning application site.  It seems as though there has been a campaign by Rovers fans to bombard the council with letters of support.  Unfortunately, most of them have missed the point - i.e. you've got to comment on planning grounds.  Most of the letters of support just say it will be a good thing for Bristol Rovers, which is totally irrelevant for a planning application

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

One of our friendly Rovers visitors explained that the ground at the Mem was originally built up at the south end with waste from south wales coal mines and locals have complained of noise and vibration so maybe piling works have been going on or will be needed at some point.

Slags is apposite then…

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought these comments from the local councillor summed it up quite succinctly.

Stance: Customer made comments neither objecting to or supporting the Planning Application Comment Reasons: Comment:I am leaving my comment neutral as although I have grave concerns about this application, I believe that if the ground cease work as they have been advised by me and others, and spend time working on their application and proper community engagement and assessments, then they may be able to have an application worth granting. Like may residents have comment, there is no objection to a larger and improved stand, but there are many serious concerns about how the club has operated so far. Removing trees without an EIA, a poorly managed and unsafe building sight. Ignored calls to stop work while the proper impact assessments are carried out, not engaging with residents properly, not having the correct persons on sight, contractors working unsafely without PPE, concrete and detritus washing down residential streets. Working at antisocial hours. And not having the correct impact assessments and consultations in place before putting in the planning application or indeed starting work. I believe the club need time to sort all of this out and do this properly, If they can get this all in order and prove that they can build a safe stand with all considerations in mind then I will be supportive. However I must currently take into consideration what I have seen, and what residents in my ward have reported to me as well as their concerns. I believe this application is going to need a lot of attention from officers to make sure it is done correctly.

 

  • Like 6
  • Haha 6
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sir Geoff said:

Thought these comments from the local councillor summed it up quite succinctly.

Stance: Customer made comments neither objecting to or supporting the Planning Application Comment Reasons: Comment:I am leaving my comment neutral as although I have grave concerns about this application, I believe that if the ground cease work as they have been advised by me and others, and spend time working on their application and proper community engagement and assessments, then they may be able to have an application worth granting. Like may residents have comment, there is no objection to a larger and improved stand, but there are many serious concerns about how the club has operated so far. Removing trees without an EIA, a poorly managed and unsafe building sight. Ignored calls to stop work while the proper impact assessments are carried out, not engaging with residents properly, not having the correct persons on sight, contractors working unsafely without PPE, concrete and detritus washing down residential streets. Working at antisocial hours. And not having the correct impact assessments and consultations in place before putting in the planning application or indeed starting work. I believe the club need time to sort all of this out and do this properly, If they can get this all in order and prove that they can build a safe stand with all considerations in mind then I will be supportive. However I must currently take into consideration what I have seen, and what residents in my ward have reported to me as well as their concerns. I believe this application is going to need a lot of attention from officers to make sure it is done correctly.

 

That is pretty brutal.

I'm not saying 'no' but you have to convince me and until then, you'll be getting nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

That is pretty brutal.

I'm not saying 'no' but you have to convince me and until then, you'll be getting nothing.

Exactly and it needed saying.

How tinpot can they get ? Everything done on the cheap and they've been called out on it this time.

This could rumble on for some time :yawn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...