Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Lrrr said:

It’s 100% rovers, apparently they were less than a minute over and didn’t bother submitting the 15 minute extension 

Wrong. The extension needs to be submitted 15 minutes before the deadline. Wish it was true but someone’s lying to you.

Edited by Marcus Aurelius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Marcus Aurelius said:

Wrong. The extension needs to be submitted 15 minutes before the deadline. Wish it was true but someone’s lying to you.

They may not have applied for the extension, 15 minutes before the deadline, but then may have overrun the deadline, albeit by less than one minute. That being the case, I put it to you that @Lrrr  is speaking the truth m'lud.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marcus Aurelius said:

Wrong. The extension needs to be submitted 15 minutes before the deadline. Wish it was true but someone’s lying to you.

Yeah as rudolph explained it, the point being if you thought you might be tight on the deadline why not submit the request anyway, to then be over the deadline by less than a minute and having not bothered to request the extension is just incompetence 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, redsquirrel said:

i think its just another of those big wooly hats they keep pulling over the fans eyes. no way on this earth would they at least double their transfer record on one player. they just dont spend more than a tenner in one go

Exactly this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

It makes you wonder if they thought it was a midnight deadline. What were they doing for those few hours? Was there something good on TV?

They didn't apply for an extension until 23.20, which is 20 minutes after the deadline.

Either they didn't realise it was a 23.00 deadline and were working on a midnight deadline or they were just totally incompetent.

Or both, which is probably correct.

Whatever, another tinpot cock up, the latest in a very long line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered if they were still working on their conspiracy theories over there, but seem to be busy trying to persuade themselves that playing goal shy Cheltenham in the Papa Smurfs trophy is a big game.

I notice they don't play their "guess the crowd" game for this one eh @Rudolf Hucker? Didn't they have under 1000 for one of these games last season, and then tried to pretend it was because they were boycotting it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/09/2023 at 19:45, petehinton said:

this is very damning and shows just how amateur they really are over there. Embarrasssing

Unlucky da Gas.

The crafty owner pulls the Wael over the gullible Fewers' eyes again.

He was never going to shell out three Tillsons, even though he claims to be a Tillsonaire.

"Now be a good man and fetch my clubs, Al Qadi.

Fore ! "

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I wondered if they were still working on their conspiracy theories over there, but seem to be busy trying to persuade themselves that playing goal shy Cheltenham in the Papa Smurfs trophy is a big game.

I notice they don't play their "guess the crowd" game for this one eh @Rudolf Hucker? Didn't they have under 1000 for one of these games last season, and then tried to pretend it was because they were boycotting it. 

Yer but no but, yer we was boycottin it or summat !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Maybe someone left a zero off the text to Wally - ‘JCH for £80,000 ‘.

Wally - ‘Great sign him’

22:48, signature going on document Wally notices the extra zero added in £800,000 and wages that would cost him the best part of a very nice watch a week…… suddenly his pen runs out of ink!

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I wondered if they were still working on their conspiracy theories over there, but seem to be busy trying to persuade themselves that playing goal shy Cheltenham in the Papa Smurfs trophy is a big game.

I notice they don't play their "guess the crowd" game for this one eh @Rudolf Hucker? Didn't they have under 1000 for one of these games last season, and then tried to pretend it was because they were boycotting it. 

Yeah, boycotting the tournament because of the presence of Premier League U21 teams. Of course, it matters not that they try to loan as many Premier League U21’s as possible, so as to reduce the average age of their first team to the low 30’s. 
 

They’re playing Cheltenham who haven’t yet scored a goal this season. Let’s hope that run ends tonight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

Yeah, boycotting the tournament because of the presence of Premier League U21 teams. Of course, it matters not that they try to loan as many Premier League U21’s as possible, so as to reduce the average age of their first team to the low 30’s. 
 

They’re playing Cheltenham who haven’t yet scored a goal this season. Let’s hope that run ends tonight!

15 quid to stand on a decrepit stand or 20 quid to sit on a patio chair. Unbelievable prices

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Red Army 75 said:

15 quid to stand on a decrepit stand or 20 quid to sit on a patio chair. Unbelievable prices

Yes, my brother is coming up for the Plymouth game and his senior ticket in the Lansdown was £36 which took me back a little, but when you compare it to those prices it suddenly looks quite reasonable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

They do seem to have a problem with dates and times. Planning permission - months late. Transfer registration - they had all summer.

I thought Wael had a nice watch?

Reminds me of the episode of Porridge, when Judge Rawley gave Fletch his expensive wristwatch and Harris had nicked the works out of it...?

Perhaps Jailbird Joe has done the same to Wally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I have any sympathy but they do accept some rubbish from their club.

Demolished a tent structure (whatever was there) didn't sort out the planning permission for a promised new stand ready for the new season. Only building a glorified bus stop and the paperwork isn't through.

Their manager has self imposed a ban on local media for apparent bias conveniently after he sets up a paywall subscription to release sensitive club information i.e transfers himself.

They make out they are going to break their record fee to apparently not get the admin through on time.

It's a circus over there and I love it!

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had some sad Sag who I hadn't seen for a while in work today ask me how Bournemouth reserves are doing.

I started with circa 50 million banked thanks before moving on to the JCH fiasco, the "stand", details of my objection to the planning proposal, their geriatric defence, 5 loanees with no future planning, and a training facility that looks like somewhere you'd go to weigh in a car that's dismally failed the MOT. 

I'd only just got started when he got up and left, which was a shame as I still had plenty of material for him.

I think he went to console himself with his sister...

Edited by BS3City
Additional content
  • Haha 14
  • Flames 1
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BS3City said:

Had some sad Sag who I hadn't seen for a while in work today ask me how Bournemouth reserves are doing.

I started with circa 50 million banked thanks before moving on to the JCH fiasco, the "stand", details of my objection to the planning proposal, their geriatric defence, 5 loanees with no future planning, and a training facility that looks like somewhere you'd go to weigh in a car that's dismally failed the MOT. 

I'd only just got started when he got up and left, which was a shame as I still had plenty of material for him.

I think he went to console himself with his sister...

A Gashead giving a Gashead head ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marcus Aurelius said:

Can’t fault them in this cup

I agree. I would not watch City if they ever  played in this comp in the current format.

1,100 plus is disappointingly high in my opinion.

They showed a lot more solidarity in the EFL cup v Ipswich. Despite being drawn at a club in a higher division and I assume tickets being a lot cheaper with it being a cup match, all but 123 of them boycotted that one. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/09/2023 at 10:19, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said:

“We’ve got our staydiyum we’ve got our staydiyum” ?

After the game they were practically claiming a victory because they only lost 2-1 ignoring the fact that we were dross at the time ourselves.

”see yew nex year SHITHEADS” they proudly posted on Facebook…. 
How did that go d1ckheads?

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

And that from 1965!

9CEB4018-B8C8-4B19-8223-BE7B63F2F5C3.jpeg

 

58 years and counting now...

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, OneCity said:

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

And that from 1965!

9CEB4018-B8C8-4B19-8223-BE7B63F2F5C3.jpeg

 

58 years and counting now...

Even then, "hoping to raise money for a half share". That's a half share of a ground that they owned before they slyly sold it to the Greyhound Company while everyone else was at war. 

Nothing to do with the fact that the two companies shared the same directors of course.

Edited by Port Said Red
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, OneCity said:

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

And that from 1965!

9CEB4018-B8C8-4B19-8223-BE7B63F2F5C3.jpeg

 

58 years and counting now...

 

Who do you think you are kidding, Mr Hitler-lookalike....

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneCity said:

"There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

... or an IKEA

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CiderJar said:

As bus stops go it is awesome, as football stands go it is awful

image.thumb.png.b8f470061c1589be70e91de2a6d2c9d9.png

Supporters and Radio Bristol saying how dark it was in that corner due to the lights being partially obscured by the roof of the stand...

 

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OneCity said:

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

And that from 1965!

9CEB4018-B8C8-4B19-8223-BE7B63F2F5C3.jpeg

 

58 years and counting now...

Funnily enough I'm old enough to remember this sort of pie in the sky nonsense (well, I was 13) We laughed at it then !

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OneCity said:

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

And that from 1965!

9CEB4018-B8C8-4B19-8223-BE7B63F2F5C3.jpeg

 

58 years and counting now...

 

Even then the owners and the supporters club were daggers drawn.

If it's a family club then the family to which they refer must be the Borgias.

 

MV5BNmI0MWM4NjEtM2M5OS00ZTFkLWI1ZDEtZTM2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

 

Even then the owners and the supporters club were daggers drawn.

If it's a family club then the family to which they refer must be the Borgias.

 

MV5BNmI0MWM4NjEtM2M5OS00ZTFkLWI1ZDEtZTM2

 

Yes, nearly 60 years ago and still basically asking everybody to pay for it, the Supporters Club, local businesses, no mention of what the board would put in, and of course no mention of the fact that they would be buying back half of what they gave away only 20 years earlier.

Flim Flam artists, charlatans and hustlers, that's all they have ever had, probably learned their trade selling shares in the Suspension Bridge to passers by.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

DOH...........who forgot about the lights ? Another cock-up !

I wonder if they need planning permission to move the floodlight, then there’s the cost of moving it and setting the lamps??????  Then, if they get planning permission for the stand surely the other floodlight will have to be moved as well?  Oh well, it would be nothing more than we have come to expect from them ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OneCity said:

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

Tut, tut.

Sounds like Milne could have done with some diversity and equality training.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OneCity said:

Oh, they've been saying the same thing for rather a long time. Far longer than ten years... ?

EASTVILLE Stadium Could become the West's Biggest Sports Centre...

..."There are 19½ acres of ground here [said Douglas Milne, Rovers' Director]. We could build a hall of sport, a running track and a multi-storey car park, and the stadium could cater for many sporting interests...not just soccer and greyhound racing. It could be a little White City..."

And that from 1965!

9CEB4018-B8C8-4B19-8223-BE7B63F2F5C3.jpeg

 

58 years and counting now...

These things take time.

Evolution not revolution 

1 hour ago, CiderJar said:

As bus stops go it is awesome, as football stands go it is awful

image.thumb.png.b8f470061c1589be70e91de2a6d2c9d9.png

Boat storage available in Horfield.

For details / enquiries please contact:-

Wally,
Da Gas,
BS7 FTG 
Tel: 0272 272 272 
or FAX: 0272 999 999 (Please wait 50 seconds before pressing the send button)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said:

Why are they carrying on 'building' when they still don't have permission? I thought they had to stop until permission was / might be granted?

Stinks of assumption and arrogance IMHO.

It would be their best cock up ever (NLBR apart) if they had to take it down again. 

Apparently, if they didn’t start the build the contractor was going to pull out to work on another job so in the words of The Beautiful South “Carry on regardless”

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said:

Why are they carrying on 'building' when they still don't have permission? I thought they had to stop until permission was / might be granted?

Stinks of assumption and arrogance IMHO.

It would be their best cock up ever (NLBR apart) if they had to take it down again. 

 

When I've read about similar with private individuals building unauthorised houses or extensions they are often ordered to tear them down.

Council planning officers really don't like arrogant people who totally ignore the rules and their guidance and usually give it to them with both barrels.

I think that there is a real possibility that Rovers will be ordered to tear it down with their only remaining option being to rebuild their old stand exactly as it was.

  • Like 2
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

 

When I've read about similar with private individuals building unauthorised houses or extensions they are often ordered to tear them down.

Council planning officers really don't like arrogant people who totally ignore the rules and their guidance and usually give it to them with both barrels.

I think that there is a real possibility that Rovers will be ordered to tear it down with their only remaining option being to rebuild their old stand exactly as it was.

That would be perfect. However, I suspect they will get away with this.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Gasbuster said:

That would be perfect. However, I suspect they will get away with this.

 

I'm not sure that they will.

Remember those trees they cut down without permission, Greens on the council are gunning for them.

If we behaved in the same way do you think that we would get away with it?

I don't and I don't think that they will either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Gert Mare said:

Apparently, if they didn’t start the build the contractor was going to pull out to work on another job so in the words of The Beautiful South “Carry on regardless”

Surely any selfrespecting decent building contractor wouldnt start building until planning has been given due to costs involved and the possibility of not getting paid for work already done!Unless it is someone keeping their hand in of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

 

When I've read about similar with private individuals building unauthorised houses or extensions they are often ordered to tear them down.

Council planning officers really don't like arrogant people who totally ignore the rules and their guidance and usually give it to them with both barrels.

I think that there is a real possibility that Rovers will be ordered to tear it down with their only remaining option being to rebuild their old stand exactly as it was.

I’ve said before, but I think they’ll get consent, but it will be subject to some amendments to the proposals. Which, if it’s already there, will be more than a little awkward. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

 

I'm not sure that they will.

Remember those trees they cut down without permission, Greens on the council are gunning for them.

If we behaved in the same way do you think that we would get away with it?

I don't and I don't think that they will either.

Is that “They gurt Shithead Greens?” 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BS13 Robin said:

Surely any selfrespecting decent building contractor wouldnt start building until planning has been given due to costs involved and the possibility of not getting paid for work already done!Unless it is someone keeping their hand in of course.

No, you'd go ahead and build,

And then you tear it down when ordered at an extra cost, and then rebuild it when pp is granted,

It's not the builders fault they are working as per their contract

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 hour ago, Ska Junkie said:

Why are they carrying on 'building' when they still don't have permission? I thought they had to stop until permission was / might be granted?

Stinks of assumption and arrogance IMHO.

It would be their best cock up ever (NLBR apart) if they had to take it down again. 

Are they actually still building?

The structures in the pictures from the game against Cheltenham were what was being put in a few weeks ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...