Jump to content
IGNORED

Huddersfield Town at home match day thread

Jerseybean

By Jerseybean
in Football Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Redinthehead

Redinthehead

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, bexhill reds said:

Quite, but then don’t create a situation where this happens, you get booked for celebrating in front of the opposition fans for a reason… Thomas was being a ***** and goading, then some reacted. 

Oh for gods sake. Fans gave him some earlier for an incident, he gives some back and then some precious little idiots decide to to throw things. Don’t give it out if you can’t take it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andy082005

Andy082005

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Ivorguy said:

Sounds more like Eastville than Ashton Gate.  Shan’t be coming for a very long time.  Sort the players out, sort the Chairman out, and sort the so-called fans out.

Feel, like others, totally let down by SL.  Never felt this way before even when we fell from old L1 to L4.

 

Spot on 

Hopefully Lansdown will sell up in the near future. The bloke is clueless 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigAl&Toby

BigAl&Toby

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, BS3_RED said:

I'm sure some of here will defend it as boys being boys. Not acceptable 

Not just boys being boys.

Boys being boys wearing Stone Island. Or those ******* hoodies with Mille Miglia driving googles built in.

My Christ. Their parents and grandparents will be so proud when they’re pulling their crackers on Christmas Day.

What’s it all become….

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthBris_Southstand

NorthBris_Southstand

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, bexhill reds said:

Quite, but then don’t create a situation where this happens, you get booked for celebrating in front of the opposition fans for a reason… Thomas was being a ***** and goading, then some reacted. 

What is wrong with you? Why are some people so keen to defend bellendary at every turn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crackers Corner

Crackers Corner

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Not just boys being boys.

Boys being boys wearing Stone Island. Or those ******* hoodies with Mille Miglia driving googles built in.

My Christ. Their parents and grandparents will be so proud when they’re pulling their crackers on Christmas Day.

What’s it all become….

Probably the same group of "superfans" who boo the rest of the ground for not bouncing when they say so.

Edited by Crackers Corner
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shaun Taylor

Shaun Taylor

Posted
Posted

Ask yourself the following, are you seeing any progression both tactically and with the style of football you are watching since Pearson took over as everything can't be blamed on the players you currently have in your squad aren't good enough as a younger manager with fresh ideas may get more out of the current bunch.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frenchred

frenchred

Posted
Posted
Just now, Shaun Taylor said:

Ask yourself the following, are you seeing any progression both tactically and with the style of football you are watching since Pearson took over as everything can't be blamed on the players you currently have in your squad aren't good enough as a younger manager with fresh ideas may get more out of the current bunch.

There has been zero progress since the dinosaur took over, some would even argue we are now worse

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bexhill reds

bexhill reds

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, NorthBris_Southstand said:

What is wrong with you? Why are some people so keen to defend bellendary at every turn. 

I’m not and I was not, my argument is that the referee allowed it to spiral out of control. If he’d have told the Huddersfield players to get on with it, the corner would have been taken and we’d have moved on. No, he’s been pandering to Huddersfield histrionics all afternoon, and allowed them **** about in the corner, allowing the ******** to react. My previous post described them as “mongs” so perhaps not that supportive.

Edited by bexhill reds
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cityexile

cityexile

Posted
Posted

Might get slaughtered for this…but thought overall we deserved something from that. Created much more, and they just had one of those 15 min patches were every shot went in. They also got a bit lucky with a tight offside.

Poor up front, but was far from awful.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jerseybean

Jerseybean

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thought we were very poor in the first half and at the start of the second. At 1-3 they were always going to use every trick in the book to waste time and slow it down. The ref was poor throughout. He didn’t intervene at all meaning their frustrating time wasting went unpunished. However, I’m not blaming the ref for our overall poor performance. 
We were second best and they deserved to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sh1t_ref_again

sh1t_ref_again

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Redinthehead said:

Oh for gods sake. Fans gave him some earlier for an incident, he gives some back and then some precious little idiots decide to to throw things. Don’t give it out if you can’t take it.

And played straight into their hands, took our momentum out the game and wasted a load of time. Brain dead idiots

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bexhill reds

bexhill reds

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jerseybean said:

Thought we were very poor in the first half and at the start of the second. At 1-3 they were always going to use every trick in the book to waste time and slow it down. The ref was poor throughout. He didn’t intervene at all meaning their frustrating time wasting went unpunished. However, I’m not blaming the ref for our overall poor performance. 
We were second best and they deserved to win. 

Perhaps a bit unfair, we were ok in the first half, arguably quite comfortable at times. Shit defending left us on the back foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HappyClapper

HappyClapper

Posted
Posted (edited)

image.thumb.jpeg.d04eb9f50df72f0018fe4f0c0c3b3011.jpeg
 Lots of knee jerk bed wetting on here as usual. There were a number of bright spots today. Go in at ht 1-1 no doubt Huddersfield deserved to be level. Quick goal after half time looked offside, Scott got caught out. Semenyo hits the post, they go down the other end and score with the help of a lucky deflection on the cross. We show some character and throw everything at them and get a deserved goal back but too late. 
Obviously some defensive errors but lots to be encouraged by. Semenyo probably had his best game in a city shirt. Benarous trying to drag us back into it at the end. Massengo with a committed all action performance.

Lots more attacking intent today. Obviously need to tighten up and no doubt that will be a frustration to Pearson and the coaching team as much as to anyone else.

No one wins every game, especially not us, but I think there was lots to build on in that performance.

 

 

Edited by HappyClapper
Double post
  • Like 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malago

Malago

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

Agreed, two kids at wing back and guess where Huddersfield destroyed us………..

The Scott at RWB experiment has definitely run its course.  Looks like he needs to be rested for a few games before coming back to play in midfield.  I though Benarous did okay but don’t understand why he was picked in front of Pring, who looked good when he came on.

I would prefer a felt back four with Tanner and Pring either side of Kalas and Atkinson.  I would drop both Martin and Vyner and play 5 across midfield with AS up front.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tin

tin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

So is Vyner the scapegoat when Bakinson is on the bench?

Vyner was back defending his box, you cant just go diving in and you can't prevent every pass. There was much worse defending for the goal than vyner.

Vyner’s no scapegoat; he’s just shit and nowhere near good enough for this level.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MelksRed

MelksRed

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, ralphindevon said:

Don't know if it's been mentioned but the pass checks getting in were a breeze. 

Don't think I broke stride, almost waived through and no security checks 

Agreed. Laughable....another group of employees taking SL for a ride.

Oh well....a fool and his money are easily parted.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ExiledAjax

ExiledAjax

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Curr Avon said:

Half time

image.thumb.png.aee348268f7c47878e5927cfbeb43ece.png

Full time

image.thumb.png.35d201f5a2a18cb1189cd2f84a2b41c2.png

We scored from 1 of our 13 shots in the second half. Huddersfield scored from 2 of their 4 in the same period.

17 shots and 6 on target shows our highest numbers for those stats this season. However, bar Weimanns 2nd minute goal, our shots were of pretty low quality, or were speculative.

Normally we have an xG per shot of about 0.125, so our average shot has about a 12.5% chance of scoring. Today it was 8.8%. A big drop.

We went for quantity over quality today, and the Terrier's 'keeper was just about good enough to deal with it.

Edited by ExiledAjax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...