Jump to content
IGNORED

Pen / Dive / looking for it . Quest.


1960maaan

Recommended Posts

Their version had Semenyo sticking his leg out to get a Pen. A player who is on fire and getting his first run of goals. A player, by their words, who has been involved in 9 goals in last 8 appearances. A player that has the legs of the defender and running non Goal.  Personally I don't think so.
TBF I get why they are trying to say that, Semenyo's foot hits the back of the guy's leg, but it's because he's running across AS's line, IMO any way.

Here you go.

 

For me, he try to do exactly what Dean Ashton says he would do, the defender trips him. Semenyo doesn't reach his leg out to get tripped , he goes for the ball.  You just know, our next Pen, due about 2025, will be a soft one after having 3 actual assaults turned down.
Anyway, screen shot below. For me shows he is just running towards the ball. The other I thought was a Pen, on HNM, I guess we will have to wait to see if they publish the full 90 to see it.

310049691_Screenshot2022-01-30at09_11_57.png.cb6ac5637f6b92eceac0732362f71f3c.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott v QPR & Forest, the one in the opening minutes at Coventry that should have seen their keeper sent off, Dasilva at Fulham.

Something doesn’t add up, you can be unlucky once or twice but we consistently don’t get clear penalties awarded.

For what it’s worth I think on the balance of probability you get one of these two (the push for me is the stronger one) but in isolation I can see why neither were awarded more than I can the 4 I mentioned above.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1960maaan said:

Their version had Semenyo sticking his leg out to get a Pen. A player who is on fire and getting his first run of goals. A player, by their words, who has been involved in 9 goals in last 8 appearances. A player that has the legs of the defender and running non Goal.  Personally I don't think so.
TBF I get why they are trying to say that, Semenyo's foot hits the back of the guy's leg, but it's because he's running across AS's line, IMO any way.

Here you go.

 

For me, he try to do exactly what Dean Ashton says he would do, the defender trips him. Semenyo doesn't reach his leg out to get tripped , he goes for the ball.  You just know, our next Pen, due about 2025, will be a soft one after having 3 actual assaults turned down.
Anyway, screen shot below. For me shows he is just running towards the ball. The other I thought was a Pen, on HNM, I guess we will have to wait to see if they publish the full 90 to see it.

310049691_Screenshot2022-01-30at09_11_57.png.cb6ac5637f6b92eceac0732362f71f3c.png

It's clever play from Semenyo, it's what you do as a forward in that situation. Play it across the defenders path...they either have to pull out of the tackle, or do what's happened here.

It's a penalty all day long. 

Semenyo was too strong and fast for him...

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, spudski said:

It's clever play from Semenyo, it's what you do as a forward in that situation. Play it across the defenders path...they either have to pull out of the tackle, or do what's happened here.

It's a penalty all day long. 

Semenyo was too strong and fast for him...

I think he is trying to go past their player and at the same time is looking for it, if that makes any sense.

I don’t think it ‘should’ be a penalty, but in the modern game almost certainly is. Sterling has made a career of getting penalties like that. If it’s given it’s a ‘forward has done the defender there’.

Equally, not the sort of penalty we are being given.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IAmNick said:

Check out the clip I posted yesterday: https://streamja.com/29M0k

First angle for me he's mid dive when he gets clipped, or at least a pretty unnatural leg movement

The opponent does not have to concede space there as he is in playable distance of the ball. Semenyo can't play the ball into the opponents path and then clip his opponent to gain a penalty. 

Edited by Cowshed
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cityexile said:

I think he is trying to go past their player and at the same time is looking for it, if that makes any sense.

I don’t think it ‘should’ be a penalty, but in the modern game almost certainly is. Sterling has made a career of getting penalties like that. If it’s given it’s a ‘forward has done the defender there’.

Equally, not the sort of penalty we are being given.

100% looking for it like all strikers would. As said, he changed the angle to cut across the defender. It is the defenders responsibility to pull out of the challenge or give away the foul. You can say that is a no win for the defender but is the price he pays for allowing AS to go past him in the first place. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JoeAman08 said:

100% looking for it like all strikers would. As said, he changed the angle to cut across the defender. It is the defenders responsibility to pull out of the challenge or give away the foul. You can say that is a no win for the defender but is the price he pays for allowing AS to go past him in the first place. 

It is not defenders responsibilty to alter his path. Semenyo has to run around him and fails to do so.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cowshed said:

It is not defenders responsibilty to alter his path. Semenyo has to run around him and fails to do so.  

That is the case for the defence.

I think Sem plays it too much in to the defenders path. At that stage the defender is ahead of Sem, closer to the ball and ‘in possession’. In the refs view then Sem essentially clips him from behind.

Its fractional in truth, but not one like the QPR one which was stonewall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cowshed said:

It is not defenders responsibilty to alter his path. Semenyo has to run around him and fails to do so.  

Semenyo is past him. The defender bungling into him is unlucky but it is clumsy. He also doesn’t try to play the ball. He just runs into him. It is a pen and one you’d expected given 90% of the time. It is given even more a division higher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Slippin cider said:

For me, the ref wasn’t in a good enough position to not give it and with no VAR it’s a pen . 

Which is a different issue. How can you expect good decisions from blokes in their mid 40s or older to keep up with the likes of Semenyo and Pring after running around for 90 min himself. Lino on the other side for both incidents too. I don’t think he was good but not an easy task. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JoeAman08 said:

Which is a different issue. How can you expect good decisions from blokes in their mid 40s or older to keep up with the likes of Semenyo and Pring after running around for 90 min himself. Lino on the other side for both incidents too. I don’t think he was good but not an easy task. 

Very good point , not an easy task at all , I wouldn’t want the job .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Maltshoveller said:

VAR would not have changed it As it was not an obvious mistake 

On another day it might have been given but it wasn’t so doesn’t make any difference. NP saw it as a pen .Very difficult for the guy in the middle and assistants ,as we know, some are better than others at making the correct calls. Can only give what they see etc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

The defender didn't commit a foul so no penalty. It really should be that simple. 

It’s one of those. From the clip, watching the knees of the defender he catches him. Watching Sems right leg his last step is certainly unnatural.

Alongside this, 

https://streamja.com/KLr5v

Sem plays the ball wide knowing he is then going to get clattered. Cynically, you get one of those if you are near the top it seems. To be clear, I think the ref got both just about right, but he is being given a decision to make.

Edited by cityexile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MC RISK77 said:

Definitely not a penalty- diving to gain an unfair advantage is absolutely part of the game and a skill in itself.

What do you mean by diving? There was no dive in this scenario. I can see why people say it is or it isn’t. I can’t see why anyone would think semenyo dived

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, cityexile said:

It’s one of those. From the clip, watching the knees of the defender he catches him. Watching Sems right leg his last step is certainly unnatural.

Alongside this, 

https://streamja.com/KLr5v

Sem plays the ball wide knowing he is then going to get clattered. Cynically, you get one of those if you are near the top it seems. To be clear, I think the ref got both just about right, but he is being given a decision to make.

Didn’t get it right though because he gave PNE a free kick. Either pen or nothing at all surely, how has Semenyo conceded a free kick there?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

His leg only looks in an "unnatural position" because he is changing direction.  He hasn't left it hanging like a Ronaldo type of challenge. A penalty. The other challenge on him on the other side of the box was a great tackle.

Yeah, I agree, had a great view of the other one, deffo no penalty. The tackle on Pring was a fk all day long, the guy did play the ball but it was a tackle from behind. Had a great view of both incidents. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Slippin cider said:

For me, the ref wasn’t in a good enough position to not give it and with no VAR it’s a pen . 

Whether he was in a good position or not is debateable. But if you’re saying he wasn’t in a good enough position to see it properly, then he’s not going to give it, is he? He should only give it if he’s certain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 1960maaan said:

Their version had Semenyo sticking his leg out to get a Pen. A player who is on fire and getting his first run of goals. A player, by their words, who has been involved in 9 goals in last 8 appearances. A player that has the legs of the defender and running non Goal.  Personally I don't think so.
TBF I get why they are trying to say that, Semenyo's foot hits the back of the guy's leg, but it's because he's running across AS's line, IMO any way.

Here you go.

 

For me, he try to do exactly what Dean Ashton says he would do, the defender trips him. Semenyo doesn't reach his leg out to get tripped , he goes for the ball.  You just know, our next Pen, due about 2025, will be a soft one after having 3 actual assaults turned down.
Anyway, screen shot below. For me shows he is just running towards the ball. The other I thought was a Pen, on HNM, I guess we will have to wait to see if they publish the full 90 to see it.

310049691_Screenshot2022-01-30at09_11_57.png.cb6ac5637f6b92eceac0732362f71f3c.png

Have to say that pretty much confirms the view I had of it at the time yesterday.

Probably not a pen. But how it’s a foul by Semenyo is beyond me.

No way it was a dive, and I don’t think he was ‘looking for it’ either - he was just trying to make it difficult for the defender to track his run - what any decent forward would do. 

Edited by italian dave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why Var is flawed, so many different opinions/perspectives of the same footage. No one is necessarily right or wrong either.

I think it’s a pen, clever play from Semenyo exactly what he should be doing there, drive across the defender and he either has to let you go or foul you.

That said, in slow mo I don’t think he’s quite got ahead or across the defender in time to “perfect” it there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a defender (many moons ago), often the attacker would cut across your path so, as was pointed out by a number of people, the defender has a choice to pull out or clatter into the BACK of the defender. Thankfully I had a turn of foot in those days (we are talking during the last century here!!) and more often than not I could remain in front of the attacker. I would have been more than a little miffed if a penalty had been given in these circumstances.

The key word here is 'BACK' and Semenyo's foot clearly hits the BACK of the defenders leg, before he tumbles. Therefore the defender was (marginally) in front and entitled to follow his path - no penalty. Ironically, Semenyo clearly has the legs of the defender and the same manoeuvre but one step later and he will have got past the defender or got the penalty shout!

Mind you its about time a referee got one wrong in our favour and awarded a penalty!!

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JoeAman08 said:

Semenyo is past him. The defender bungling into him is unlucky but it is clumsy. He also doesn’t try to play the ball. He just runs into him. It is a pen and one you’d expected given 90% of the time. It is given even more a division higher. 

If you are interested in referees views the incident is discussed on the referees site refs chat. The full house is so far is no foul. 

PNE -BCFC | RefChat - The Refereeing Forum

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cowshed said:

If you are interested in referees views the incident is discussed on the referees site refs chat. The full house is so far is no foul. 

PNE -BCFC | RefChat - The Refereeing Forum

 

Confirmation bias though isn’t it?  All we see is a Penalty, all PNE fans see is no penalty, all referees see is “Ref got it right”. Fact is, you see those given in the EPL every week. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Southport Red said:

Confirmation bias though isn’t it?  

Its qualified referees interpreting a decision using rules that omit bias.

48 minutes ago, Southport Red said:

  All we see is a Penlaty

Several posters above your post have differing views. I see a foul on the PNE player.

Edited by Cowshed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Cowshed said:

If you are interested in referees views the incident is discussed on the referees site refs chat. The full house is so far is no foul. 

PNE -BCFC | RefChat - The Refereeing Forum

 

Thanks for posting: interesting. 

Funny how even a bunch of refs can’t completely agree. And one has to rely on the freeze frame slow motion reverse angle before reaching a conclusion - hopefully s/he’s a bit more spontaneous when reffing a game! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mad Cyril said:

There is a reason that (fact incoming) since 2018/19, of all the 31 leagues in Europe, Bristol City have been awarded less penalties than any other club.

I just need to work out what that reason is. I do know it hacks me right off though...

We didn't create much for a lot of 2019/20, 2020/21 and parts of 2018/19 and the present- that's one aspect although with slight recency bias it gets worse.

1st November 2020 to 31st January 2022, in the League one that's one penalty only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen the posts on here, and that "Refs" forum thing, and I have a question.

The defender is crossing Semenyo's line, he puts his leg in front of AS as he runs. Exactly as you would if you were trying to trip someone. AS is not waving his leg out like Vardy has done to force contact. It looks like he kicks the blokes leg because the defender has crossed his line.
Obviously it isn't nailed on, as there seems to be differing thoughts, but Pen all day for me. Maybe one day. 50p on us missing it when it comes.

780813938_Screenshot2022-01-30at09_11_57.png.5787b378e26a396bcd37562b29e33046.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, 1960maaan said:

I've seen the posts on here, and that "Refs" forum thing, and I have a question.

The defender is crossing Semenyo's line, he puts his leg in front of AS as he runs. Exactly as you would if you were trying to trip someone. AS is not waving his leg out like Vardy has done to force contact. It looks like he kicks the blokes leg because the defender has crossed his line.
Obviously it isn't nailed on, as there seems to be differing thoughts, but Pen all day for me. Maybe one day. 50p on us missing it when it comes.

780813938_Screenshot2022-01-30at09_11_57.png.5787b378e26a396bcd37562b29e33046.png

 

What was your question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that happens in city’s box ? penalty. 
Samenyo doesn’t take a drive there is contact so a pen. 
GBH on Scott against QPR a stonewall pen yet once again not given. The general standard of officials in the EFL is not that good so what do we expect 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Leveller said:

If the attacker initiates the contact - ie sticks his leg out to make the defender run into it, as AS did - then that shouldn’t be a foul, for me. It’s basically the same as diving.

I don’t think he did stick his leg out, he had changed the direction of his run to cut across towards goal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I don’t think he did stick his leg out, he had changed the direction of his run to cut across towards goal.

That's obviously the point that's near impossible to be certain about, and why the Ref's job is so hard. To me, he extended his leg out wider than he would have simply to change direction.

https://streamja.com/29M0k

Edited by Leveller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Leveller said:

That's obviously the point that's near impossible to be certain about, and why the Ref's job is so hard. To me, he extended his leg out wider than he would have simply to change direction.

https://streamja.com/29M0k

Pressumably part of the reason for doing that would be to get as much of your body in front of the defender to help shield the ball? Sounds plausible to me anyway ...

Edited by Sleepy1968
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically we have no idea what the correct decision is/was. Although the refs forum indicates the correct decision was made so perhaps a lot of fans are blinkered. I think refs have a near impossible job and actually they don't do badly considering the speed of the game, the players going down easily etc.

  • Like 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...