Jump to content
IGNORED

Jon Lansdown


E.G.Red

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Mendip City said:

Thought he came across well. He’s right to acknowledge that he expected us to be doing better.  Can’t remember whether he said that on the Radio or the Post article. 

We dont hear from the chairman in months when we know hes been in bermuda, but he expects us to be doing better??!! Talk about do as i say not as i do.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 5
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

Is he chairman of just BCFC or B Sports ? He only seems to Tweet (or whatever) on the other BS teams, you know "well done Flyers" or "Hard luck Bears", never the City......does he even go to City matches ?

To be fair he is around more often than most people think.

Not sure about games though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why people expect to hear from JL so much? Gould is CEO of Bristol City Football Club Limited, and he regularly makes statements and comments. JL might be on the board as director, and is on the board of the Holdco, but he's just a director - same as Doug Harman and no one calls him the 'invisible man'.

If it's because JL is referred to as the 'Chairman' well that's not automatically a reason to expect him to speak. If he's just chairman of the board of directors then he's got no reason to make statements, if it's 'Chairman' in the historic sense, well that role is now filled by the CEO and the 'Chairman' job title is a historic anachronism. It would be good for the club to clarify his role, and explain exactly what they mean by 'Chairman'.

4 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

Is he chairman of just BCFC or B Sports ? He only seems to Tweet (or whatever) on the other BS teams, you know "well done Flyers" or "Hard luck Bears", never the City......does he even go to City matches ?

He's a director of almost every company in the Group. City, Bears, Flyers, Bristol Sport itself, he's on the board of every company bar the Women's football and Rugby teams.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

Is he chairman of just BCFC or B Sports ? He only seems to Tweet (or whatever) on the other BS teams, you know "well done Flyers" or "Hard luck Bears", never the City......does he even go to City matches ?

He's certainly been at some City Women matches recently and I'd pretty confidently say he'd have been at the men's games too.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think he spoke well about our finances, always appreciate hearing from the big wigs at the club. It’s good to hear that selling players isn’t the only string to our bow when it comes to fighting FFP, with the possibility of selling naming rights and pushing for tweaks to FFP rules in light of Covid also going on. Fwiw, I think we’re going to avoid any deductions, we’ve got options.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BCFCGav said:

Think he spoke well about our finances, always appreciate hearing from the big wigs at the club. It’s good to hear that selling players isn’t the only string to our bow when it comes to fighting FFP, with the possibility of selling naming rights and pushing for tweaks to FFP rules in light of Covid also going on. Fwiw, I think we’re going to avoid any deductions, we’ve got options.

Shame it was an “eggs in one basket” approach previously, and that we thought paying higher wages was fine too.

Talk about riding the gravy train and never considering it might end.  If numpties like me thought it was risky what are the experts doing?

  • Like 9
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

I still don't understand why people expect to hear from JL so much? Gould is CEO of Bristol City Football Club Limited, and he regularly makes statements and comments. JL might be on the board as director, and is on the board of the Holdco, but he's just a director - same as Doug Harman and no one calls him the 'invisible man'.

If it's because JL is referred to as the 'Chairman' well that's not automatically a reason to expect him to speak. If he's just chairman of the board of directors then he's got no reason to make statements, if it's 'Chairman' in the historic sense, well that role is now filled by the CEO and the 'Chairman' job title is a historic anachronism. It would be good for the club to clarify his role, and explain exactly what they mean by 'Chairman'.

He's a director of almost every company in the Group. City, Bears, Flyers, Bristol Sport itself, he's on the board of every company bar the Women's football and Rugby teams.

How often do you hear from kronke at arsenal, the glazers at man u the chuckle brothers at West ham, in fact how often do you hear from the majority of chairman in the football league.......you dont

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

How often do you hear from kronke at arsenal, the glazers at man u the chuckle brothers at West ham, in fact how often do you hear from the majority of chairman in the football league.......you dont

Of course not, and I'd not expect us to. Honestly I reckon we actually hear from Lansdown senior far more often than those owners that you mention in this post.

I have no problem with the set up really, although I'd like some clarification on exactly what JL's role is, and exactly why he has the title of "chairman". Just to clear it up as imo it's confusing to people as it is, and this thread demonstrates that. I will not get such confirmation though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Of course not, and I'd not expect us to. Honestly I reckon we actually hear from Lansdown senior far more often than those owners that you mention in this post.

I have no problem with the set up really, although I'd like some clarification on exactly what JL's role is, and exactly why he has the title of "chairman". Just to clear it up as imo it's confusing to people as it is, and this thread demonstrates that. I will not get such confirmation though.

Because he is the chairman of Bristol city football club, like John Laycock and Colin sexton, were

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BCFCGav said:

Think he spoke well about our finances, always appreciate hearing from the big wigs at the club. It’s good to hear that selling players isn’t the only string to our bow when it comes to fighting FFP, with the possibility of selling naming rights and pushing for tweaks to FFP rules in light of Covid also going on. Fwiw, I think we’re going to avoid any deductions, we’ve got options.

What I would like to hear is an admission that we screwed up our finances ourselves before Covid had its impact. But that would require admitting that the Chairman failed to hold the Chief Executive to account.

And if we are demanding retrospective changes to FFP to suit our ends I assume Derby will be allowed to restate their accounts for the relevant period again on the same basis.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chinapig said:

What I would like to hear is an admission that we screwed up our finances ourselves before Covid had its impact. But that would require admitting that the Chairman failed to hold the Chief Executive to account.

And if we are demanding retrospective changes to FFP to suit our ends I assume Derby will be allowed to restate their accounts for the relevant period again on the same basis.

Yep, was hoping to hear that…although what we got was exactly what I expected.

By the end of the summer we will start to see the influence of Richard Gould, and this time next year we will see the first year”s accounts with him as CEO.

He is very interested in improving the club, not his ego.  That’s not a throwaway comment, that’s from others who’ve had dealings with him.

  • Like 5
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Of course not, and I'd not expect us to. Honestly I reckon we actually hear from Lansdown senior far more often than those owners that you mention in this post.

I have no problem with the set up really, although I'd like some clarification on exactly what JL's role is, and exactly why he has the title of "chairman". Just to clear it up as imo it's confusing to people as it is, and this thread demonstrates that. I will not get such confirmation though.

Think of him as figurehead.

It's a bit like the queen and government relationship with the JL being the queen (don't go there, your better than that) and CEO being the prime minister - you hear from the prime minister regularly about the direction of the country and policies, you hear from the queen once a year to reflect on how the year has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mendip City said:

Thought he came across well. He’s right to acknowledge that he expected us to be doing better.  Can’t remember whether he said that on the Radio or the Post article. 

I would love to hear his explanation of why or how he thought he expected us to do better. With the quality of the squad some of which was recruited under his reign and the current injuries and the lack of any serious investment in the squad. Due to FFP and poor expensive purchases made before Pearson arrived. Just what was he doing when Ashton was being allowed to do what he wanted and plan his new career at Ipswich instead of looking out for the best interests of Bristol City.He should go back and play with his crayons and design some more club badges.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Pezo said:

Think of him as figurehead.

It's a bit like the queen and government relationship with the JL being the queen (don't go there, your better than that) and CEO being the prime minister - you hear from the prime minister regularly about the direction of the country and policies, you hear from the queen once a year to reflect on how the year has been.

Yep, I understand what a "chairman" means in normal Corp governance speak. But that doesn't seem to be how some fans expect him to behave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Yep, I understand what a "chairman" means in normal Corp governance speak. But that doesn't seem to be how some fans expect him to behave.

Yeah some fans seem to want him to come out every time we've lost a few on the trot and say we're either going to buy the best 3 players in the world and **** FFP we don't need to worry about that or that he accepts all blame for losing a few in a row and is giving up his position.

I would prefer it if we heard from him once a year to talk about the benefits he/the board sees in the CEOs strategy. Anything more than that and he is either encroaching on the CEOs job or the managers job and that causes confusion.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pezo said:

Yeah some fans seem to want him to come out every time we've lost a few on the trot and say we're either going to buy the best 3 players in the world and **** FFP we don't need to worry about that or that he accepts all blame for losing a few in a row and is giving up his position.

I would prefer it if we heard from him once a year to talk about the benefits he/the board sees in the CEOs strategy. Anything more than that and he is either encroaching on the CEOs job or the managers job and that causes confusion.

Yep agree completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pezo said:

Think of him as figurehead.

It's a bit like the queen and government relationship with the JL being the queen (don't go there, your better than that) and CEO being the prime minister - you hear from the prime minister regularly about the direction of the country and policies, you hear from the queen once a year to reflect on how the year has been.

Oh Gawd, is RG going to start lying to us, and "misleading" the board ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, chinapig said:

What I would like to hear is an admission that we screwed up our finances ourselves before Covid had its impact. But that would require admitting that the Chairman failed to hold the Chief Executive to account.

And if we are demanding retrospective changes to FFP to suit our ends I assume Derby will be allowed to restate their accounts for the relevant period again on the same basis.

I don’t disagree re the chairman failing to hold the previous CEO to account. I’m surprised he (ex CEO) didn’t spend the Pension Fund.

That said football in the championship (& in other divisions) like Financial Services back pre 2008, is/was very short term focused. 
 

For all the horror of COVID I do think it will bring some equilibrium (excluding parachute payments) back to Championship football and it’s much needed.

Player/Agent power was ridiculous and as we see Championship accounts released over the few months it is a clear opportunity to press the reset button for clubs and the EFL.

Will be interesting to see over the decade if Championship clubs revert back to pre COVID times. I personally hope doesn’t.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Redrascal2 said:

I would love to hear his explanation of why or how he thought he expected us to do better. With the quality of the squad some of which was recruited under his reign and the current injuries and the lack of any serious investment in the squad. Due to FFP and poor expensive purchases made before Pearson arrived. Just what was he doing when Ashton was being allowed to do what he wanted and plan his new career at Ipswich instead of looking out for the best interests of Bristol City.He should go back and play with his crayons and design some more club badges.

Twas all very grey,,thoughtless and uninspiring.

Like a wet weekend in Darlington.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Shame it was an “eggs in one basket” approach previously, and that we thought paying higher wages was fine too.

Talk about riding the gravy train and never considering it might end.  If numpties like me thought it was risky what are the experts doing?

They wouldn't be the first (or last) experts to take a short term view or not to see all the consequences of their actions. Look at all those companies that took "Pension Plan Holidays" during the market boom in the 80's only to find a big hole in their funding when Black Monday occurred. 

16 minutes ago, fatchers said:

According to some on here, all you have to do is shake a tree and a billionaire sheik will drop out and splash hundreds of millions over us. 

And they do so without understanding that it makes no difference to the team how much money your owner has as long as FFP remains in place.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

I think in 15 or so years of him being part of the club hierarchy, I can't recall a single interesting thing he's ever said.

The sooner him and his father sell the better imo.

Not long now. 

I wouldn't be too sure of that.

One of the potential parties has come a bit of a cropper. Lets just say the Ukraine situation isn't helping matters, re: financial freedom of funds movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Constant Rabbit said:

I wouldn't be too sure of that.

One of the potential parties has come a bit of a cropper. Lets just say the Ukraine situation isn't helping matters, re: financial freedom of funds movement.

Doesn't matter, there's serious interest from elsewhere now. Sporting Quarter approval should be April. Legal agreements will take a few months longer then the exit strategy is a step closer. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Doesn't matter, there's serious interest from elsewhere now. Sporting Quarter approval should be April. Legal agreements will take a few months longer then the exit strategy is a step closer. 

Good news. People will say be careful what you wish for, but happy to take that risk. New faces required at this club to progress I feel.

  • Like 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Doesn't matter, there's serious interest from elsewhere now. Sporting Quarter approval should be April. Legal agreements will take a few months longer then the exit strategy is a step closer. 

I know that, we all know that - it's public record - but 2 of the front runners will be hamstrung if fiscal limitations are imposed on overseas ownership, and transfer of funds.

Unless you are saying solely UK interests in new ownership are on the horizon now?

Is that what you are saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, slartibartfast said:

Ha, once again I had to Google  KR to find out who he is, thought he might be some mega rich head of a consortium looking to buy in, then I find.................he's from a ****** Netflicks series ! :grr:

I haven't a clue who Kendall Roy is. To my mind, JL is more a Forrest Gump.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/02/2022 at 23:58, Kid in the Riot said:

I think in 15 or so years of him being part of the club hierarchy, I can't recall a single interesting thing he's ever said.

The sooner him and his father sell the better imo.

Not long now. 

Agreed, would not be surprised if the Lansdownes will be gone in next 2 years. Obviously lost interest in the football club. It will all be about recouping there investment from now on. 

Edited by Tin Soldier
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...