Jump to content
IGNORED

£15.3 million


Jerseybean

Recommended Posts

It is sign of commitment and stability, but also could be a sign of divestment- when clearing the decks for a takeover or external investment tidying the balance sheet is a must.

Plus it helps us to spend/absorb losses that go up to the max...£39m in 3 years (complicated via Covid) with the equity injections, £15m without...it means we can hit that £39m, obviously if the equity is between £1 and £24m in any given 3 year period then the Upper Loss limit for us will fall between £15m and £39m.

To put it in its simplest terms, in FFP terms if an owner injected say £10m in equity or other secure funding in a 3 year period, a club could make an FFP loss at this level of £25m..

In our case if we look at the accounting losses- that equity enables us to make a 3 year accounting loss of £54m...Covid has complicated it majorly but this is a starting point.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

It is sign of commitment and stability, but also could be a sign of divestment- when clearing the decks for a takeover or external investment tidying the balance sheet is a must.

Plus it helps us to spend/absorb losses that go up to the max...£39m in 3 years (complicated via Covid) with the equity injections, £15m without...it means we can hit that £39m, obviously if the equity is between £1 and £24m in any given 3 year period then the Upper Loss limit for us will fall between £15m and £39m.

To put it in its simplest terms, in FFP terms if an owner injected say £10m in equity or other secure funding in a 3 year period, a club could make an FFP loss at this level of £25m..

In our case if we look at the accounting losses- that equity enables us to make a 3 year accounting loss of £54m...Covid has complicated it majorly but this is a starting point.

He does it every year. It's a conversion of debt into equity. He likely has always held that debt via a convertible loan note - ie it would be converted at the point he sold or earlier if he wants to, so it doesn't really matter when it is converted. Honestly, it's really nothing to see here imo. It's done for accounting purposes and nothing else.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ExiledAjax said:

He does it every year. It's a conversion of debt into equity. He likely has always held that debt via a convertible loan note - ie it would be converted at the point he sold or earlier if he wants to, so it doesn't really matter when it is converted. Honestly, it's really nothing to see here imo. It's done for accounting purposes and nothing else.

Of course- accounting purposes too as you say an annual event in recent times, it's regular but it also enables us to spend to the max FFP wise.

Convertible loan note?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Of course- accounting purposes too as you say an annual event in recent times, it's regular but it also enables us to spend to the max FFP wise.

Convertible loan note?

A convertible loan note is way of recording a loan made to a company. In return the lender is not only owed the loan, but are also given a "Note" that gives the holder the right to convert that loan into equity at a fixed price per share. The "Note" can usually be sold or given to someone else as well. It's essentially a way for a company to get cash through a debt instrument, but simultaneously the lender gets the next best thing to shares, and knows that when they convert (usually when a company is sold) they'll get the shares for price X, then immediately sell them for price Y, so they usually make money. It might not be how SL does it - you can convert any debt into equity if you like - but it's possibly how it is done as it anticipates a conversion at some point.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

A convertible loan note is way of recording a loan made to a company. In return the lender is not only owed the loan, but are also given a "Note" that gives the holder the right to convert that loan into equity at a fixed price per share. The "Note" can usually be sold or given to someone else as well. It's essentially a way for a company to get cash through a debt instrument, but simultaneously the lender gets the next best thing to shares, and knows that when they convert (usually when a company is sold) they'll get the shares for price X, then immediately sell them for price Y, so they usually make money. It might not be how SL does it - you can convert any debt into equity if you like - but it's possibly how it is done as it anticipates a conversion at some point.

@ExiledAjax Many thanks for this.

Do you know what the loan repayments to Lansdown shown on our accounts covers then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve always found thanking him for this stuff odd. I’m not doubting how much money he’s put in, and how lucky we are to not have an owner like Morris. 
 

But…. is him clearing his own mess, no? He owns the club, he signs everything off, so this is surely is that should be expected. No one forced him to buy the club, this is part of the gig. It’s like he’s doing us a favour or something 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, petehinton said:

I’ve always found thanking him for this stuff odd. I’m not doubting how much money he’s put in, and how lucky we are to not have an owner like Morris. 
 

But…. is him clearing his own mess, no? He owns the club, he signs everything off, so this is surely is that should be expected. No one forced him to buy the club, this is part of the gig. It’s like he’s doing us a favour or something 

So if you lend a mate a tenner, when he pays it back to you snatch it off him or say thanks?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, grifty said:

So if you lend a mate a tenner, when he pays it back to you snatch it off him or say thanks?

I say thanks, but he owed me it….so I’m not gonna call him the greatest friend in history for paying me back ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

You could still have repayments under a CLN.

So you end up loaning yourself money, then charging interest back from the club to repay your own investment?

This is why the rich are rich.......?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, petehinton said:

I’ve always found thanking him for this stuff odd. I’m not doubting how much money he’s put in, and how lucky we are to not have an owner like Morris. 
 

But…. is him clearing his own mess, no? He owns the club, he signs everything off, so this is surely is that should be expected. No one forced him to buy the club, this is part of the gig. It’s like he’s doing us a favour or something 

Personally I think we can only judge his entire reign when he sells as it will depend how and when he sells. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other side of the coin of course, yes some of this is clearing up his own errors, perhaps a reasonable chunk of it.

However a counterfactual is that if not for SL or an equally wealthy owner- scenario 1 is that we would have to run breakeven- could we sustain a Championship club at running breakeven? Doubt it- not without being a yoyo club with Parachutes etc.

Secondly, yes it can be taken for granted but if he put no equity in all we would as I said need to spend not in excess of £15m FFP losses in 3 years- again could we sustain a Championship club on that? Well it is possible but challenging.

Of course this isn't City specific, can go for many clubs.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
  • Like 2
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

The other side of the coin of course, yes some of this is clearing up his own errors, perhaps a reasonable chunk of it.

However a counterfactual is that if not for SL or an equally wealthy owner- scenario 1 is that we would have to run breakeven- could we sustain a Championship club at running breakeven? Doubt it- not without being a yoyo club with Parachutes etc.

Secondly, yes it can be taken for granted but if he put no equity in all we would as I said need to spend not in excess of £15m FFP losses in 3 years- again could we sustain a Championship club on that? Well it is possible but challenging.

Of course this isn't City specific, can go for many clubs.

But he knows all that. In fact he has done since the day he joined the Board, when we were a loss making League 1 side never mind a Championship one. Didn't stop him deciding to accept the position of Chairman or deciding to increase his stake to that of majority shareholder.

He's had his eyes wide open all along. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, petehinton said:

I’ve always found thanking him for this stuff odd. I’m not doubting how much money he’s put in, and how lucky we are to not have an owner like Morris. 
 

But…. is him clearing his own mess, no? He owns the club, he signs everything off, so this is surely is that should be expected. No one forced him to buy the club, this is part of the gig. It’s like he’s doing us a favour or something 

This has always been my opinion . Plus , if he’d made better footballing decisions or taken better footballing advice , he wouldn’t have spent so much in the first place . 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His naivety about running a football club has got the club into debt we’re in.

Any other club could have spent the same as he has done & i bet they would been in the prem for at least 1 season…  & had parachute payments.

He only has himself to blame for his debts. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accounting made simple. Equity is a good thing to have. It represents the amount by which assets exceed liabilities. Debt is the opposite, it is a liability to be repaid at a future date. Depending on the interest rate the club can find itself in a debt trap (think Man United) that enriches the owners. SL owns the club because he cares about it with a passion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Be careful what you wish for. Owners that convert debt to equity are fine by me.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Leveller said:

Yes, he can’t force you to sell up. But if he sells to someone else, they could!

Oh yes. Had a long conversation with his people about that. If I’m legally forced to then so be it. Otherwise not a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

The other side of the coin of course, yes some of this is clearing up his own errors, perhaps a reasonable chunk of it.

However a counterfactual is that if not for SL or an equally wealthy owner- scenario 1 is that we would have to run breakeven- could we sustain a Championship club at running breakeven? Doubt it- not without being a yoyo club with Parachutes etc.

Secondly, yes it can be taken for granted but if he put no equity in all we would as I said need to spend not in excess of £15m FFP losses in 3 years- again could we sustain a Championship club on that? Well it is possible but challenging.

Of course this isn't City specific, can go for many clubs.

I think it’s possible to have revenues of £35m (2019 levels) and compete on a cost base of £35m too (wages, amortisation and other costs). Other clubs in this division have budgets lower or around this figure.

Transfer fee and wage strategy dictates.

£14m amortisation peak is not sustainable, now being managed at half of that (£6-7m), and by 23/24 projection is less than £1m.  That will of course change if we extend the likes of Kalas and Massengo, but even then we are talking £3m max, £11m less than peak!!

So it’s doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Oh yes. Had a long conversation with his people about that. If I’m legally forced to then so be it. Otherwise not a chance. 

I've kept my shares as well.

But i'm pretty sure when Pula sports wrote to all the shareholders a while ago; it was with a one off offer of £10 per share on some sort of compulsory purchase order thing?

I'll have to dig out the paperwork, but if we didn't sell, the club would still consider the shares worthless; and donate £10 to a charity, or the academy (or something like that).

So I'm not sure technically our shares are actually worth anything anymore.

Still the certificate looks nice in a frame of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Barrs Court Red said:

Unless I’ve missed it, he’s been extremely quiet so it does seem like things are moving behind the scenes. 

It’s well known that he’s looking for a buyer. The less amount of debt there is at the time of sale, I guess the more value he can sell it for? Don’t know? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harry said:

It’s well known that he’s looking for a buyer. The less amount of debt there is at the time of sale, I guess the more value he can sell it for? Don’t know? 

I guess. Will be very interesting to find out what is actually up for grabs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lewisdabaron said:

His naivety about running a football club has got the club into debt we’re in.

Any other club could have spent the same as he has done & i bet they would been in the prem for at least 1 season…  & had parachute payments.

He only has himself to blame for his debts. 

You just hit the nail on the head , although a lot still worship him like he’s a religion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Barrs Court Red said:

I guess. Will be very interesting to find out what is actually up for grabs. 

The million dollar question.

It sure as hell won't be the old brownsite land that will be worth a fortune in new housing. Purchased for a 'new stadium'.

I still don't understand why so many people cannot separate the 'sport' from the 'real estate'

A loss on the sporting side will be dwarfed by profit on the housing / office side.

I'm sure some people still think he's building an indoor centre for Basketball only...........

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Leveller said:

Yes, he can’t force you to sell up. But if he sells to someone else, they could!

I’ve got some shares but the club doesn’t know how to contact me. Don’t tell him @Leveller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, NcnsBcfc said:

I've kept my shares as well.

But i'm pretty sure when Pula sports wrote to all the shareholders a while ago; it was with a one off offer of £10 per share on some sort of compulsory purchase order thing?

I'll have to dig out the paperwork, but if we didn't sell, the club would still consider the shares worthless; and donate £10 to a charity, or the academy (or something like that).

So I'm not sure technically our shares are actually worth anything anymore.

Still the certificate looks nice in a frame of course.

Their people told me it was not a forced sale/purchase, if that is not true I’ll be surprised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jerseybean said:

SL has, yet again, put his hand in his pocket and purchased £15.3 m worth of shares…..https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/football/bristol-city-owner-steve-lansdown-7158256

 

and we go round again.

Sl is bailing out the losses he has created entirely by himself over a significant period of time.

He has been at the helm solely, Having squeezed out all other shareholders and effectively removed a functioning board,  so it's his decision making that has taken us into debt (Covid circumstance withstanding)

Whilst it's great (?) to have what appears to be a benevolant owner, lets not  all tug our forelocks at this largesse too much :)

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I always said that if I won the lotto or euromillions I would think about investing in the club.

I won on Wednesday, but my wife assures me that she knows exactly how to spend that £30. :(

I`ve often thought that investing your winnings in BCFC would be far too stressful a thing to so I would buy the s*gs and thoroughly enjoy running them into the ground. Pay £2m for some awful players, anyone who shows a bit of promise gets shunted off to FGR on a free - the possibilities are endless and imagine the kudos of being the one person that put them out of business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, petehinton said:

I’ve always found thanking him for this stuff odd. I’m not doubting how much money he’s put in, and how lucky we are to not have an owner like Morris. 
 

But…. is him clearing his own mess, no? He owns the club, he signs everything off, so this is surely is that should be expected. No one forced him to buy the club, this is part of the gig. It’s like he’s doing us a favour or something 

Agreed we are lucky SL not like Morris.

When you say “mess” do you mean ambition that didn’t play out as expected?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Antman said:

and we go round again.

Sl is bailing out the losses he has created entirely by himself over a significant period of time.

He has been at the helm solely, Having squeezed out all other shareholders and effectively removed a functioning board,  so it's his decision making that has taken us into debt (Covid circumstance withstanding)

Whilst it's great (?) to have what appears to be a benevolant owner, lets not  all tug our forelocks at this largesse too much :)

 

Yes there is something in what you say, however he is bank rolling his previous decisions unlike Mel Morris and many many others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Beni71 said:

When you say “mess” do you mean ambition that didn’t play out as expected?

Alternatively, giving a charlatan of a Chief Executive total freedom to spend as much as he fancied and massively increase the wage bill while leaving us with a bloated and unbalanced squad.

This from an owner who preaches sustainability and has always been in favour of a wage cap. So by his own standards it is rather a mess.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Harry said:

Preparing to sell? 

Or making to more attractive for other investors to join?

I cannot ever see the Lansdown's giving up entirely,  & I do not really grasp the finer details of finances and wheeler dealings.. If another 'Investor' is found and put in say £30M for example would that be above and not counted in FFP.

 I for one am  enjoying the Transfer window activity and watching the playing side develop.

Try not to get too involved in  understanding the financial side of things..leave that to better qualified people.  All I want to know is hat we are not going to be docked points !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DT The Optimist said:

I cannot ever see the Lansdown's giving up entirely,  & I do not really grasp the finer details of finances and wheeler dealings.. If another 'Investor' is found and put in say £30M for example would that be above and not counted in FFP.

Would count towards the overall number I believe, the overall pot...equity limits remain much the same, how could it be classed as revenue otherwise? Perhaps there is a way but unsure if it is compatible with FFP regs.

Put another way, if SL had put in say £10m in a 3 year period equity wise and £14m had been put in by a fresh investor yes it makes it up to £24m...but it doesn't extend a club's financial leeway, headroom afaik.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Davefevs said:

I think it’s possible to have revenues of £35m (2019 levels) and compete on a cost base of £35m too (wages, amortisation and other costs). Other clubs in this division have budgets lower or around this figure.

Transfer fee and wage strategy dictates.

£14m amortisation peak is not sustainable, now being managed at half of that (£6-7m), and by 23/24 projection is less than £1m.  That will of course change if we extend the likes of Kalas and Massengo, but even then we are talking £3m max, £11m less than peak!!

So it’s doable.

This is fair, good point. Think it can be done but also think what with the Parachute issue which will hopefully be resolved sooner rather than later, the biggest budget within the rules/sustainability is needed to give us the best chance of competing.

Barnsley and Luton are two excellent examples- but one lost the talisman, manager and CEO the following season- and went down- the second? Time will tell.

I totally agree that the amortisation and wages got out of hand! Interesting to know what NP could have done with the budget that LJ was fortunate enough to be afforded- and indeed which players he would have got more out of.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Beni71 said:

Agreed we are lucky SL not like Morris.

When you say “mess” do you mean ambition that didn’t play out as expected?

Yeah but if you read OTIB, with so many experts not even privy to a small part of the facts, would have made different decisions in hindsight and been in the prem making millions

Easy this football owning lark, cant understand why every clubs not in the prem

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, chinapig said:

Alternatively, giving a charlatan of a Chief Executive total freedom to spend as much as he fancied and massively increase the wage bill while leaving us with a bloated and unbalanced squad.

This from an owner who preaches sustainability and has always been in favour of a wage cap. So by his own standards it is rather a mess.

Don’t disagree with any of that and the board never challenged or held Ashton to account and that has SLs finger prints all over it.

But my point is that you can’t question SLs ambition towards the club.
 

But it does make me roll my eyes when you see some fans question him given his level of investment/commitment to the club and city. Oh and yes he’s made some mistakes, it’s almost like he’s human……

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Glen hump said:

Think he’s been preparing to sell for a while.

Indeed. But I think it’s been a 5-set tennis match and this move signifies we’re entering the final set. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/06/2022 at 20:17, NcnsBcfc said:

I've kept my shares as well.

But i'm pretty sure when Pula sports wrote to all the shareholders a while ago; it was with a one off offer of £10 per share on some sort of compulsory purchase order thing?

I'll have to dig out the paperwork, but if we didn't sell, the club would still consider the shares worthless; and donate £10 to a charity, or the academy (or something like that).

So I'm not sure technically our shares are actually worth anything anymore.

Still the certificate looks nice in a frame of course.

 

They are effectively worthless - he owns 97% of the club - but I don't think you can "cancel" shares legitimately purchased. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...