Jump to content
IGNORED

Sunderland at home match day thread


Jerseybean

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Bodiesaffer said:

One the winner away can’t remember the team.  He’s not the problem others are.  

That game no one can ever remember! He is absolutely the problem because he's a player we pay ******* mad money to play for this club who do absolutely **** all and get injured having a jog warming up. Wasters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was pathetic

We deserved the lead when it came and I thought we would go on to win by 2 or 3 against a fairly limited, 5th best side in L1.

Absolutely folded thereafter, they had far better team spirit and what a concern our defence remains. 

Pearson was wrong to say we only lost to individual errors, they did not help but Sunderland were on top for all of the second half

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Good first half today but disappeared a bit second half. Didn’t give the ball away at all though. I think he is quick with the ball at his feet over 10-20 yards. He has a burst of energy there. I think he’s better in a 3, pressing higher up. He has tricks to beat people as well. 

HNM took a knock at about 42 minutes, could see he was struggling but just trying to get to half time. 2nd half could not seem to get going again, up to the injury thought he was one if our better players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

HNM took a knock at about 42 minutes, could see he was struggling but just trying to get to half time. 2nd half could not seem to get going again, up to the injury thought he was one if our better players.

Didn’t spot that. Fair play. I think if he was a player who came through our youth system and didn’t cost us anything, the general consensus of him would be a lot different 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

HNM took a knock at about 42 minutes, could see he was struggling but just trying to get to half time. 2nd half could not seem to get going again, up to the injury thought he was one if our better players.

Pritchard smashed him after about 30 seconds and was rightly booked. 

I'm not going into meltdown, Sunderland deserved to win.

However, its highlighted, again, that if you don't have a functioning central midfield and are unable to make like for like changes, there's a whole world of trouble ahead.

Can we bring in reinforcements with the spectre of FFP looming?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

I’m not debating what they contribute. I just think judging them on goals and thinking that’s the only way they can contribute is wrong 

Marvin Elliot with a 50p head got a few goals, Steven Pearson the most useless Scottish footballer bar Richard Foster still bagged a few. Why is it so hard to find a box to box midfielder with a finish? I think johnson mugging off Sammy Smozich of however you say his name was a big mistake.

Anyway I think our midfield is shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Curr Avon said:

Pritchard smashed him after about 30 seconds and was rightly booked. 

I'm not going into meltdown, Sunderland deserved to win.

However, its highlighted, again, that if you don't have a functioning central midfield and are unable to make like for like changes, there's a whole world of trouble ahead.

Can we bring in reinforcements with the spectre of FFP looming?

 

 

Need to see it again, but at the time thought Pritchard was lucky to stay on the pitch, maybe later in the game he would have seen red.

Not sure if the knock took just before half time compounded the original knock or another, but he just stopped moving after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jeez said:

The reluctance to use the loan market is killing us. Or maybe stubbornness no to use it.

Just look at Simms today, he made huge impact for them and Clark who started as a loan then perm was excellent too.

Might just be that we can’t afford the loan market either, there is a loan fee and salary contributions, unless perhaps a loan with an eventual purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cidercity1987 said:

He was bought in as a £3m investment to make us money in future

Project gone well wrong

I know that.  Not his fault. People say he’s poor etc etc but I’m saying they wouldn’t say that he was from our youth system. His price tag and history is irrelevant to his performances really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, bexhill reds said:

Not really a defensive minded midfielder, a nasty bastard is required in there

I thought that is what William's was meant to be? I understand that he hasn't been fit almost from the moment he arrived here, but I've not seen a lot to suggest he is the controlling midfield player with a nasty streak people were raving about?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RedM said:

I thought that is what William's was meant to be? I understand that he hasn't been fit almost from the moment he arrived here, but I've not seen a lot to suggest he is the controlling midfield player with a nasty streak people were raving about?

No I don’t think that’s his game, I think he’s more of an offensive minded midfielder. It’s something we’ve not had for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Pearson really needs to have a look at the way we set up. There is so much pressure on the wingbacks playing so high leaving three not overly quick central defenders exposed. Playing that same three central defenders means that we are overrun in midfield and as a consequence Sunderland had a stranglehold in midfield in the second half and we just crumbled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedM said:

I thought that is what William's was meant to be? I understand that he hasn't been fit almost from the moment he arrived here, but I've not seen a lot to suggest he is the controlling midfield player with a nasty streak people were raving about?

He was an aggressive box to box player at Wigan. Injuries have essentially nullified his strengths. We are unlikely ever to see him at his best.

Still, we have Andy King ...?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chinapig said:

He was an aggressive box to box player at Wigan. Injuries have essentially nullified his strengths. We are unlikely ever to see him at his best.

Still, we have Andy King ...?

I think his yellow card nullified his strengths today. He was having to manage his game after that and was nowhere near as affective.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:

I think his yellow card nullified his strengths today. He was having to manage his game after that and was nowhere near as affective.

 

Sure, but the fact remains he is no longer the player he was at Wigan, which is both a shame for him and a problem for us given the other options we have in midfield.

We know Nigel wants a defensive midfielder but our chances of getting one are slim.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to sort the defence play otherwise it will be a very long season. My local team here in Sweden, second division, have conceded 16 goals in 17 games and are second in the table. They are not a fancy team but the defence is working and the points are coming in. It doesnt matter If we play good football If we concede 2-3 goals every game its Gonna be a long journey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, cidercity1987 said:

That was pathetic

We deserved the lead when it came and I thought we would go on to win by 2 or 3 against a fairly limited, 5th best side in L1.

Absolutely folded thereafter, they had far better team spirit and what a concern our defence remains. 

Pearson was wrong to say we only lost to individual errors, they did not help but Sunderland were on top for all of the second half

Every time Simms got the ball you could see him scoring

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK; last season I posted that the majority of players are right handed and therefore right footed which in turn suggests teams are stronger on their right.

The majority of goals conceded last season were scored by opponents coming in from their left, City's right. I thought that was the reason for signing Right Back George Tanner.

This season Hull's winner followed a throw in on City's right, their left and all three goals conceded yesterday came from moves down City's right.

If I as a fan can see this, why can't the Manager and Coaching staff as they are in a position to do something about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

Need to see it again, but at the time thought Pritchard was lucky to stay on the pitch, maybe later in the game he would have seen red.

Not sure if the knock took just before half time compounded the original knock or another, but he just stopped moving after.

It was Corry Evans that crocked Massengo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Pearson to do well and take us forward, but yesterday was a poor, inexcusable show. The many first-timers and invited mates won't be in a rush to come again after seeing that.

Yeah, we gifted goals but someone, presumably Pearson, is coaching them to play it out from the back, and particularly so close to our goal-line.. That would be fine but we clearly don't have the calibre of players with the skill and slickness to implement that.

Bar one or two exceptions, the players were slow, ponderous and predictable. We lost most of the 50/50's because the players are not physical or aggressive enough.

The fitness levels of certain players was embarrassing. Sunderland were much fitter and sharper. The fitness coach (Euell?) has some explaining to do. Let's hear what he's got to say.

For me, Martin is a waste of space. The guy just plods around the field, loses most heading duels and when he does win one, he nods the ball aimlessly. We're effectively playing with just ten me, when he's on the pitch.  Don't understand Pearsom's aversion to subbing or dropping him. That young Sims guy demonstrated how a good striker is supposed to play.

The mess needs to be sorted immediately.

Finally, on a completely different subject, the club is not geared up for handling large crowds. The rambling queues and length of time it took to get drinks and grub at half-time needs to be addressed. I reckon the club lost a lot of much-needed revenue from the many people around me (and others) who just gave up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say I enjoyed my weekend in Bristol and the match, but then again I'm realistic about the club, and football is a distraction from the rest of my life!

A couple of things to add - the stadium, my first visit, is brilliant, and with my FFP head on I was delighted to see the vast number of pints being downed!  Secondly whenever I return I am surprised about two things, firstly how wonderful the Floating Harbour area is compared to similar areas in most cities I have been to.  Secondly how c£%p the traffic, roadworks and parking is!

As far as City's current achievements go, fascinated to see what the two top results celebrated inside the stadium were.  That's not denigrating those results but does put the club in context.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...