Jump to content
IGNORED

Stoke sack O'Neill


CyderInACan

Recommended Posts

I bet @TomF Sunderland counterpart is having fun on the their forum, the meltdown on twitter from their fans has been huge. Cancelling season card direct debits, swearing never to set foot in the ground again while those in charge are there.

Something must be going quite wrong behind the scenes for him to make that move, surely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Just looked at the Sunderland forum and they don't seem at all surprised. Something about a power struggle with the DOF?

Is that the one who insisted they sign Defoe when LJ didn't want him? That went well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ralphindevon said:

I bet @TomF Sunderland counterpart is having fun on the their forum, the meltdown on twitter from their fans has been huge. Cancelling season card direct debits, swearing never to set foot in the ground again while those in charge are there.

Something must be going quite wrong behind the scenes for him to make that move, surely.

Are they really that stupid ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Leveller said:

Apart from the stadium/support side, I suppose the teams have similar potential and of course Stoke’s owners are loaded and genuine local supporters.

And if home life is important that is a lot better than a long distance commute.

So why take the job in the first place ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Sounds like it’s done. Crikey. Their board must be truly awful to deal with for him to jump ship so easily!

Got to be much more to this than meets the eye, wanted to sign players they refused, chairman repeatedly meddles, that sort of thing.

Stoke has chewed up & spat out plenty of managers who have been successful before (& after) being with them, a brave move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Just looked at the Sunderland forum and they don't seem at all surprised. Something about a power struggle with the DOF?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

37 minutes ago, chinapig said:

Is that the one who insisted they sign Defoe when LJ didn't want him? That went well.

Put it this way Macca and LJ had no idea they were getting the boot, came as a complete surprise. (Source: Macca)

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did mention back in January that LJ wasn’t happy with some of the ‘influences’ within Sunderland. That they sacked him when comfortably in the playoff zone said a lot. Now Neil, who gained success, is clearly finding those ‘influences’ difficult to work under.

As I’d mentioned before, there are people making decisions at Sunderland who aren’t the so-called owner.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Got to be much more to this than meets the eye, wanted to sign players they refused, chairman repeatedly meddles, that sort of thing.

Stoke has chewed up & spat out plenty of managers who have been successful before (& after) being with them, a brave move.

Plus if the hefty salary of £1.5m per year is to be believed then no surprise he has left.. without doubt would be a massive increase on his wage at Sunderland I’d have thought.

Edited by bris red
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Got to be much more to this than meets the eye, wanted to sign players they refused, chairman repeatedly meddles, that sort of thing.

Stoke has chewed up & spat out plenty of managers who have been successful before (& after) being with them, a brave move.

He’s said he wasn’t backed, which is just a mega cop out imo. Same as when a new manager comes in and says players aren’t fit enough or something. They’ve signed 8(?) players this window with another one incoming today by all accounts. Hardly feeding off 1 or 2 free transfer is he 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kodjias Wrist said:

I find this truly bizzare must have been some bad goings on at Sunderland for Neil to leave. I wonder who would take over at Sunderland? Dyche? Cook? A return for Roy Keane? 

Dyche would be a good fit to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, petehinton said:

He’s said he wasn’t backed, which is just a mega cop out imo. Same as when a new manager comes in and says players aren’t fit enough or something. They’ve signed 8(?) players this window with another one incoming today by all accounts. Hardly feeding off 1 or 2 free transfer is he 

Absolutely, sounds either like he didn’t get on with the owners or it was the location.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, petehinton said:

He’s said he wasn’t backed, which is just a mega cop out imo. Same as when a new manager comes in and says players aren’t fit enough or something. They’ve signed 8(?) players this window with another one incoming today by all accounts. Hardly feeding off 1 or 2 free transfer is he 

That may depend on whether the players signed were the ones he wanted perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Harry said:

I did mention back in January that LJ wasn’t happy with some of the ‘influences’ within Sunderland. That they sacked him when comfortably in the playoff zone said a lot. Now Neil, who gained success, is clearly finding those ‘influences’ difficult to work under.

As I’d mentioned before, there are people making decisions at Sunderland who aren’t the so-called owner.  

That'll be the man who claims to have a controlling stake but only owns 41% of the shares with the rest held by the deeply unpopular Madrox group I take it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

⬇️⬇️⬇️

Put it this way Macca and LJ had no idea they were getting the boot, came as a complete surprise. (Source: Macca)

Yes indeed. He said exactly the same to someone I know at the club, it was completely out of the blue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, chinapig said:

That'll be the man who claims to have a controlling stake but only owns 41% of the shares with the rest held by the deeply unpopular Madrox group I take it.

Correct. I was made aware of this ownership issue before it becoming public knowledge (which occurred after LJ left). I was informed that LJ was finding it increasingly frustrating and of course things came to a head with the Defoe debacle. 
Neil did well to get them up but obviously once the next window opened he’s clearly seen the same issues. 
Shame really. The invisible board interference could ruin what should be a prem club. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harry said:

Correct. I was made aware of this ownership issue before it becoming public knowledge (which occurred after LJ left). I was informed that LJ was finding it increasingly frustrating and of course things came to a head with the Defoe debacle. 
Neil did well to get them up but obviously once the next window opened he’s clearly seen the same issues. 
Shame really. The invisible board interference could ruin what should be a prem club. 

How lucky we are that our managers have never had any interference from above.?

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Bouncearoundtheground said:

Believe it or not, it is the first day of filming today for a new season of Sunderland Till I Die

This news has obviously got out as Charlie "turn the music up" Methven is 6/4 favourite to be new manager with Skybet.

image.png.35c259766e7fb090dcfece66a8671d32.png

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

I truly apologise for the extremely bad language in the following Tweet and invite the mods to delete it if they are concerned that it will cause offence - but it did make me laugh!

F9E3F618-7BD2-4851-8919-0AD58641E5DA.png

Best quote I saw on their forum was ‘it’s like you have just found out your lass has ran off with Peter Beardsley’.

  • Haha 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Major Isewater said:

A twelve rolling contract is a good and proper deal. As an employee you always have twelve months security.

 

A 12 month rolling contract at Stoke means he gets a year's pay when he's sacked at Christmas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, billywedlock said:

But they spend the money . Not like Derby . The Coates family pay the bills . For me , that is a. Big difference . 

That's absolutely true and of they course they are light years ahead of Mel Morris as he was towards the end, but FFP and finance aside, football wise they have become a bit sack happy in recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary Bennett, Sunderland legend (& proper hard bastard defender in his day) apparently said on local radio last night that the signing the previous day of a Costa Rican international that Neil knew absolutely nothing about, was rumoured to be the final straw.

Kristjaan Speakman seems to be their Mark Ashton equivalent up there, & whilst location or salary could well have been a factor, this appears to be the background to the problems up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Gary Bennett, Sunderland legend (& proper hard bastard defender in his day) apparently said on local radio last night that the signing the previous day of a Costa Rican international that Neil knew absolutely nothing about, was rumoured to be the final straw.

Kristjaan Speakman seems to be their Mark Ashton equivalent up there, & whilst location or salary could well have been a factor, this appears to be the background to the problems up there.

Who in their right mind thinks this will work at any club longterm? If it's true I don't blame him for walking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheReds said:

Who in their right mind thinks this will work at any club longterm? If it's true I don't blame him for walking.

The higher you go though, how much say does a manager get over signings?

It's hard to find a happy medium between the manager/head coach running the show and getting the full say, and players picked and the guy in charge told to coach them, organise them etc.

Downside of giving the manager carte blanche is that he can spend his budget, or beyond- leave the club hamstrung or worse in breach of FFP on departure, or failing that just leave the budget blown when he quite or is sacked leaving the replacement with little room for change.

Which can leave the new boss inheriting lots of players who are underperforming, unhappy and ultimately not gelling or simply unwanted, don't fit the system whatever..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Gary Bennett, Sunderland legend (& proper hard bastard defender in his day) apparently said on local radio last night that the signing the previous day of a Costa Rican international that Neil knew absolutely nothing about, was rumoured to be the final straw.

Kristjaan Speakman seems to be their Mark Ashton equivalent up there, & whilst location or salary could well have been a factor, this appears to be the background to the problems up there.

Neil seemed very positive about the signing though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

The higher you go though, how much say does a manager get over signings?

It's hard to find a happy medium between the manager/head coach running the show and getting the full say, and players picked and the guy in charge told to coach them, organise them etc.

Downside of giving the manager carte blanche is that he can spend his budget, or beyond- leave the club hamstrung or worse in breach of FFP on departure, or failing that just leave the budget blown when he quite or is sacked leaving the replacement with little room for change.

Which can leave the new boss inheriting lots of players who are underperforming, unhappy and ultimately not gelling or simply unwanted, don't fit the system whatever..

Having someone show up and being told he's your new player is completely different to any happy medium, getting carte blanche, or trying to get your own players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheReds said:

Having someone show up and being told he's your new player is completely different to any happy medium, getting carte blanche, or trying to get your own players. 

What's Mystic Meg and Dierdre's Mum from Corrie got to do with Sunderland?:)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, WarksRobin said:

Sunderland fans already suggesting either Dyche or Allerdyce as their next manager. As if Stoke would take O’Neil over either of them if they were interested in a Championship job

But Sunderland are by far the bigger draw IMO hence the shock surrounding this. Stoke are in a similar financial situation to us and Sunderland have the ability to pull crowds that dwarf that of Stokes. I don't think the names you mentioned would choose Stoke City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/08/2022 at 17:29, Port Said Red said:

There are people with scruples out there. My friend follows Yate Town and said he was chatting to 4 guys who were gasheads and have become season ticket holders there instead. There maybe more. Was it @Seventeenwho said on here that he hasn't been down since Barton came in?

Correct ?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Sheltons Army said:

Stelling just said Stole asked Holden to take charge today , which he did , and they win 1-0 at Blackburn

Immediately after the game he loses his job !

 

 

He made 5 changes and changed the formation.

Wins 1-0 and immediately gets the elbow.

Brutal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...