Never to the dark side Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 https://m.allfootballapp.com/news/EPL/Burnley-face-EFL-investigation-over-claims-that-clubs-American-ownership-are-not-actually-in-charge/2903520 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exAtyeoMax Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 18 minutes ago, Never to the dark side said: https://m.allfootballapp.com/news/EPL/Burnley-face-EFL-investigation-over-claims-that-clubs-American-ownership-are-not-actually-in-charge/2903520 Hmm. Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 That could cause a significant punishment if true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Red Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 This is the point where some tryhard pops up to declare "who cares?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 5 minutes ago, Northern Red said: This is the point where some tryhard pops up to declare "who cares?" Who cares? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brady bunch Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 We care if we end up 3rd in the table with Burnley in the top two, but facing a massive points deduction! then it will matter..... I know that is a lot of "ifs" but it could happen... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj77 Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 Not reported by any major news outlet as far as I can tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 In homage to those who moaned about the Sunderland injury thread, I’m assuming we’ll have to now have a separate thread for every piece of financial news for clubs in our division? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinapig Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 1 minute ago, jj77 said: Not reported by any major news outlet as far as I can tell. It's not the Premier League so they aren't interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashton_fan Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 This is the sort of thing that could happen to us if SL has trouble in finding a buyer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 Birmingham are also under investigation for something similar iirc although in their mitigation fans have been encouraging them for years to look into BSH (their owners- Birmingham Sports Holdings) but the EFL did bugger all. Al Majir in particular has, he raiser the alarm as far back as 2017 but the Football League under Harvey did nothing. Under Parry too for a while presumably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted September 9, 2022 Admin Share Posted September 9, 2022 22 minutes ago, jj77 said: Not reported by any major news outlet as far as I can tell. NOW ON DAILY MAIL SITE But I would bet that story has been taken off that website linked in the OP THREAD ON BURNLEY FORUM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 1 hour ago, chinapig said: It's not the Premier League so they aren't interested. The story is still on the Mails website. Tbh - it’s no real surprise to me anyway that ‘dodgy’ deals in football are under scrutiny. This story is slightly different in as much its about high finance and buying an entire club and just a little above motorway services meetings and grubby brown envelopes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 Skimread the last couple of pages, the accounts actually seem to show on Note 24 that the ultimate owners are based in Jersey I thought? If it's disclosed in the correct manner then where is the issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILINFRANCE Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 There appears to be some suggestion this is the Daily Mail or, more specifically, Matt Hughes (he has form) making mischief. Burnley stated that ALK are unequivocally the Championship club's true owners The EFL are investigating claims that the ownership is actually based in Jersey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 Note 27 in BCH accounts, anyway yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 31 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said: There appears to be some suggestion this is the Daily Mail or, more specifically, Matt Hughes (he has form) making mischief. Burnley stated that ALK are unequivocally the Championship club's true owners The EFL are investigating claims that the ownership is actually based in Jersey How does this differ from BCFC being part of BC Holdings and owned by Pula based in Guernsey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILINFRANCE Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 3 minutes ago, Davefevs said: How does this differ from BCFC being part of BC Holdings and owned by Pula based in Guernsey? I'm not sure it does, and that is my point. I wonder whether Matt Hughes might like to answer your question, but doubt it frankly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey Fox Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 Is one potential problem that the “actual “ owners, if different, have not submitted to any suitability test? Also, if not known, money laundering legislation? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hxj Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Davefevs said: How does this differ from BCFC being part of BC Holdings and owned by Pula based in Guernsey? Compare the use of 'considered' and 'an' with the BCFC Holdings disclosure: Edited September 9, 2022 by Hxj 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Davefevs said: How does this differ from BCFC being part of BC Holdings and owned by Pula based in Guernsey? Massively, city never once tried to hide the true ownership of the club 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinapig Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 40 minutes ago, Hxj said: Compare the use of 'considered' and 'an' with the BCFC Holdings disclosure: Indeed. There is a big difference between saying somebody is the ultimate controller and saying they are considered to be. Considered by whom exactly? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hxj Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 3 minutes ago, chinapig said: Considered by whom exactly? That would be by the director who signed off the accounts, a certain Mr A Pace. Nothing to worry about there then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Hxj said: Compare the use of 'considered' and 'an' with the BCFC Holdings disclosure: Ta, knew you’d break it down for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveInSA Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 7 hours ago, Monkeh said: Who cares? why are you posting on threads that you don't care about 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 4 hours ago, Hxj said: Compare the use of 'considered' and 'an' with the BCFC Holdings disclosure: Crikey the full (Mr & Mrs) SP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 3 hours ago, Monkeh said: Massively, city never once tried to hide the true ownership of the club Is that Peppa pig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 48 minutes ago, Rocking Red Cyril said: Is that Peppa pig Mr Ben I think 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midred Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 Am I mistaken or was there an announcement on the OS that our match with Burnley next weekend was postponed - since disappeared? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted September 10, 2022 Admin Share Posted September 10, 2022 11 hours ago, Midred said: Am I mistaken or was there an announcement on the OS that our match with Burnley next weekend was postponed - since disappeared? I didn't see that, and looking through old headlines nothing appears at any time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 2 hours ago, phantom said: I didn't see that, and looking through old headlines nothing appears at any time Maybe just someone pressing a submit button incorrectly after writing a draft piece and subsequently removing it? We do have previous! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 21 hours ago, Grey Fox said: Is one potential problem that the “actual “ owners, if different, have not submitted to any suitability test? Also, if not known, money laundering legislation? It's certainly the case for ML, and also could potentially hide owners from places such as Russia. The changes in legislation occured a few years back and caused huge headaches for my wife in her then role as a Company Secretary Administrator. They were supposed to follow the money back to the actual owners for every new company they took on. It's fine in principal but in practice it's almost impossible. Once you get to countries that are outside our legislation or control, you can ask for details, but you can't demand and anything that is offered has to be taken at face value. In the end she was making decisions on a gut instinct, her main ploy if she had doubts was to charge exorbitant fees. This was used a bit like the witch trials, if they agreed to pay without question, she knew they were dodgy and withdrew her services. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.