Jump to content
IGNORED

Here he is. The Messiah is to blame


BigAl&Toby

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Well, well, well.

Here we are again. Wasn’t long ago that Korey smacked it home, we were deliriously delighted and Bobby scored from the spot.

Now we’re ****** over by the boys in Lincoln green. The call goes out. Nige is a clown. He has to go.

But all’s well in Planet Lansdown. The Messiah has deep pockets. We shall be grateful. We have a lovely stadium - I’ll grant ‘ee Steve - The Killers were superb.

He’s got his medal - services to sport? His home city? Making us proud?

He’s had to contend with Covid. And all that brought with it. Was there an opportunity to offer up AG for immunisation jabs? Did he do so out of the goodness of his heart? Anyone know?

He’s had to endure the issues around FFP. And for a professional investor he’s done that very well…. He let Ashton in and **** us over. He let Junior take up the reins and **** it up.

And now we have good old Tinman in a new role…. Who remembers the sorry state of Swansea affairs when “the legend” sat in the dug out as the lights were turned off?

Job for the boys? Don’t challenge me. Go now Nige. Go now. Self preservation. Like Mr Coppell…..

But it’s ok. We are grateful. Steve is doing a great job. For Steve and his merry, proud gang…..

Am I grateful? Am I bollocks. The only one who’s done well out of this debacle whilst Capn Steve has had his hands on the udders of the cash cow in BS3 is the Messiah himself.

Freeholds in Ashton Vale anyone?

032BA508-3481-44AE-B488-5272F5ABE2A7.jpeg

Not a fan then? 

  • Haha 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:

Not a fan then? 

@Major Isewaternope. Never have been. 

As you’d know if you paid attention! ? I’ve always had that view. And expressed it.

There’s none so blind and all that. If he’d run HL in the same way he’s run BCFC - sorry, Bristol Sport - sorry Pula - then he’d not be living it up on Guernsey.

He’d be living in Lundy……

He’s only got one interest at the forefront of his mind. Self interest….

But hey. It’s lovely to have a shiny stadium…… and shit football…….

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 3
  • Hmmm 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Steve Lansdown has personally committed over £214m of his own money to ensure Bristol City FC remain trading such we may occasionally have an afternoon of fun at AG.

And you, what have you contributed to keep City trading?

There were other ways to run Bristol City. ??‍♂️

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Hmmm 1
  • Flames 2
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Steve Lansdown has personally committed over £214m of his own money to ensure Bristol City FC remain trading such we may occasionally have an afternoon of fun at AG.

And you, what have you contributed to keep City trading?

Most of that was spunked by him to make up for mistakes made by............ Him! 

  • Like 8
  • Confused 2
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Steve Lansdown has personally committed over £214m of his own money to ensure Bristol City FC remain trading such we may occasionally have an afternoon of fun at AG.

And you, what have you contributed to keep City trading?

Why bother answering that drivel? 

 

10 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

There were other ways to run Bristol City. ??‍♂️

Ok Dave I’ll bite. To what are you referring?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Steve Lansdown has personally committed over £214m of his own money to ensure Bristol City FC remain trading such we may occasionally have an afternoon of fun at AG.

And you, what have you contributed to keep City trading?

His time and money which, pro rata, represents a greater percentage of his disposable resources than £214M does of Lansdown's, I'd imagine.  For starters. 

Edited by Merrick's Marvels
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BigAl&Toby said:

If he’d run HL in the same way he’s run BCFC - sorry, Bristol Sport - sorry Pula - then he’d not be living it up on Guernsey.

He’d be living in Lundy……

How many out of the other 91 clubs owners are making it pay from their football clubs alone please? I mean SL must be the only one, or one of a few that has their football club running at a loss going by your posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Steve Lansdown has personally committed over £214m of his own money to ensure Bristol City FC remain trading such we may occasionally have an afternoon of fun at AG.

And you, what have you contributed to keep City trading?

@BTRFTG I guess you’re in the “there’s none so blind camp”…..

Me? Season ticket payments for more years than I can remember. For several of us.

Oh and shares. From 1982. When Steve and his mate Pete were planning how they’d make billions in their bedrooms….. When Steve didn’t see the merits of putting his money in…..

Ha I hear you say. **** all then….

As a proportion of wealth and income? Don’t know…..

But hey. If you’re happy with the decisions that The Messiah has made and the week in, week out inconsistent shit show then carry on.

I expect more. Steve’s only interest is Steve.

How do you see his “investment”? A success?

 

  • Like 5
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Why bother answering that drivel? 

 

Ok Dave I’ll bite. To what are you referring?

Aha. @REDOXO

Another disciple of the Lansdown is the Messiah.

Tell me. You happy with where we are?

Where once as a club we had supporters who had a financial interest in “our club”. Where generations had supported “our club” through thick and thin. Where once - as a club - we owned our our own ground.

But hey. If you’re happy with where we are now under Mr, Mrs and Junior then who am I to question it.

**** me. The bloke’s doing a great job……

If we’re really lucky we might - just might - still be out of the relegation zone come Saturday ??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Why bother answering that drivel? 

 

Ok Dave I’ll bite. To what are you referring?

Dave is clearly referring to how poorly SL has ran the footballing side of the club over the years.

I genuinely think the best footballing decision he has ever made at the club is appointing GJ in 2005, everything else footballing wise he has authorised has been an absolutely disaster and he rarely learns.

Id genuinely like you or somebody else to name me some other good footballing decisions he has made in the 20 odd years he has been in charge of the club? Cotts wasn’t even his choice FFS.

How many countless teams up and down the country have we seen overtake us over the last 15-20 years..

I’m just looking at the Prem table and Brighton ******* Brighton are 6th! They are probably the best example of a club that have done everything right over the last 10–15 years with a man in Tony Bloom (not as rich as Lansdown mind you) who clearly knows how to run a football club.

Edited by Bris Red
  • Like 10
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Why bother answering that drivel? 

 

Ok Dave I’ll bite. To what are you referring?

⬇️⬇️⬇️

15 minutes ago, frenchred said:

I'll take a guess at the continual fu k ups made by lansdown

And…⬇️⬇️⬇️

3 minutes ago, Bris Red said:

Dave is clearly referring to how poorly SL has ran the footballing side of the club over the years.

I genuinely think the best footballing decision he has ever made at the club is appointing GJ in 2005, everything else footballing wise he has authorised has been an absolutely disaster and he rarely learns.

Id genuinely like you or somebody else to name me some other good footballing decisions he has made in the 20 odd years he has been in charge of the club? Cotts wasn’t even his choice FFS.

How many countless teams up and down the country have we seen overtake us over the last 15-20 years..

I’m just looking at the Prem table and Brighton ******* Brighton are 6th! They are probably the best example of a club that have done everything right over the last 10–15 years with a man in Tony Bloom (not as rich as Lansdown mind you) who clearly knows how to run a football club.

Yep…I am talking about making poor decisions throughout his time here.

Appreciate his investment into infrastructure, don’t really think he should be praised for the other millions he’s wasted / allowed others to waste.

He could’ve kept tighter reigns / reins / rains on the budgets / spending.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine this.

Last or “lastish” game of the season.

We’re away to Crewe. One of only a few teams that have an X in their name.

It’s a sunny, balmy night. We need to win. We have a big forward up front - let’s say it’s Antoine - it wasn’t then…..

Where would Steve be? In the away end with the faithful?

Would he ****. He’d be in his tax haven. Thinking his next step. Mrs L might even be “licking his wounds”…

In the name of his love child - Little Lee - we’ll come again…

Lundy Island? Love Island? Denny ******* island…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Imagine this.

Last or “lastish” game of the season.

We’re away to Crewe. One of only a few teams that have an X in their name.

It’s a sunny, balmy night. We need to win. We have a big forward up front - let’s say it’s Antoine - it wasn’t then…..

Where would Steve be? In the away end with the faithful?

Would he ****. He’d be in his tax haven. Thinking his next step. Mrs L might even be “licking his wounds”…

In the name of his love child - Little Lee - we’ll come again…

Lundy Island? Love Island? Denny ******* island…..

Getting a bit weird now...

  • Like 12
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Imagine this.

Last or “lastish” game of the season.

We’re away to Crewe. One of only a few teams that have an X in their name.

It’s a sunny, balmy night. We need to win. We have a big forward up front - let’s say it’s Antoine - it wasn’t then…..

Where would Steve be? In the away end with the faithful?

Would he ****. He’d be in his tax haven. Thinking his next step. Mrs L might even be “licking his wounds”…

In the name of his love child - Little Lee - we’ll come again…

Lundy Island? Love Island? Denny ******* island…..

Someone's started on the wine gums early today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Bris Red said:

Dave is clearly referring to how poorly SL has ran the footballing side of the club over the years.

I genuinely think the best footballing decision he has ever made at the club is appointing GJ in 2005, everything else footballing wise he has authorised has been an absolutely disaster and he rarely learns.

Id genuinely like you or somebody else to name me some other good footballing decisions he has made in the 20 odd years he has been in charge of the club? Cotts wasn’t even his choice FFS.

How many countless teams up and down the country have we seen overtake us over the last 15-20 years..

I’m just looking at the Prem table and Brighton ******* Brighton are 6th! They are probably the best example of a club that have done everything right over the last 10–15 years with a man in Tony Bloom (not as rich as Lansdown mind you) who clearly knows how to run a football club.

Great post, on the football side he can’t even take credit for Cotts, as everyone knows that was Keith Dawe’s choice.

With that success rate I think he should definitely get him on the interview panel next time.

Bet that he wouldn’t have picked the previous bloke’s assistant after an “exhaustive” 6 week search. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Merrick's Marvels said:

His time and money which, pro rata, represents a greater percentage of his disposable resources than £214M does of Lansdown's, I'd imagine.  For starters. 

But pro rata does not pay the bills unless you are in administration, which could have been if we did not have an owner with such deep pockets.

So sure you will say paying for his mistakes, if that is putting money in to back managers etc who purchase and pick the team. But it's easy with hind sight to say it was all wrong.

Bit like you being able to provide last weeks lottery  numbers, easy after the event

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Imagine this.

Last or “lastish” game of the season.

We’re away to Crewe. One of only a few teams that have an X in their name.

It’s a sunny, balmy night. We need to win. We have a big forward up front - let’s say it’s Antoine - it wasn’t then…..

Where would Steve be? In the away end with the faithful?

Would he ****. He’d be in his tax haven. Thinking his next step. Mrs L might even be “licking his wounds”…

In the name of his love child - Little Lee - we’ll come again…

Lundy Island? Love Island? Denny ******* island…..

I’m not his biggest fan but what on earth are you talking about? You getting stuck in ??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

But pro rata does not pay the bills unless you are in administration, which could have been if we did not have an owner with such deep pockets.

So sure you will say paying for his mistakes, if that is putting money in to back managers etc who purchase and pick the team. But it's easy with hind sight to say it was all wrong.

Bit like you being able to provide last weeks lottery  numbers, easy after the event

You've misunderstood my point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical OTIB. It's either black. Or it's white.

He's done OK. He could have done better. He could have done worse. We could have had better owners (tho I cant think of too many). We could have had (a lot) worse.

He's not the messiah, but he's not a naughty boy either. (Second time I've posted that recently!)

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, italian dave said:

Typical OTIB. It's either black. Or it's white.

He's done OK. He could have done better. He could have done worse. We could have had better owners (tho I cant think of too many). We could have had (a lot) worse.

He's not the messiah, but he's not a naughty boy either. (Second time I've posted that recently!)

*I could be wrong, I could be right..."

  • Like 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He done very well in terms of infrastructure ( whether that’s for his own gain or the football clubs is up for discussion) but he’s been awful at making the decisions on the footballing side of things , the clubs that have overtaken us prove that . 
 

This city has huge potential if one of the teams ever get to the prem and being honest it’s mind blowing that Someone with his wealth and business background hasn’t managed to get it done . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Aha. @REDOXO

Another disciple of the Lansdown is the Messiah.

Tell me. You happy with where we are?

Where once as a club we had supporters who had a financial interest in “our club”. Where generations had supported “our club” through thick and thin. Where once - as a club - we owned our our own ground.

But hey. If you’re happy with where we are now under Mr, Mrs and Junior then who am I to question it.

**** me. The bloke’s doing a great job……

If we’re really lucky we might - just might - still be out of the relegation zone come Saturday ??

I refer to my response to BTRFTG!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, underhanded said:

What if I don't think he's a messiah, but also don't think he's self-interested and single-handedly ruining the club?

 

Then there is no place for your balanced opinion on this or any other forum, get thee from hence 

Edited by Porto Red
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, underhanded said:

What if I don't think he's a messiah, but also don't think he's self-interested and single-handedly ruining the club?

 

That would make you….

FRANCIS: Whatever happened to the Popular Front, Reg? 

REG: He's over there.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when SL finally hands over the club to the new owners and reflects on his tenure he will readily admit that he has got somethings right and somethings very wrong.

Whatever the % of his wealth large or small, he has provided funds to the club in terms of loans or share capital and that has kept us afloat,  that is beyond question.

The infrastructure that is in place and is to be further enhanced represents a huge improvement on that which he originally bought, that is beyond question.

Where I believe he is found wanting is the thing that is or should be most important to us fans, success on the football field, his tenure hasn’t been a complete failure, but I’m certain he would agree that some horrendous mistakes have been made, however well meaning they were intended to be.

Strange as it may seem I think he may have learnt his lesson, maybe, just maybe, NP will sow the seeds that grow into the possibility of a promotion push in the near future.

Evidence you say? Not much I have to admit, but a feeling that after some years of seeming lost in the wilderness I feel that there is the beginnings of a plan to take the club forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

⬇️⬇️⬇️

And…⬇️⬇️⬇️

Yep…I am talking about making poor decisions throughout his time here.

Appreciate his investment into infrastructure, don’t really think he should be praised for the other millions he’s wasted / allowed others to waste.

He could’ve kept tighter reigns / reins / rains on the budgets / spending.

I don’t think he should be praised for a number of things and most sensible people would say the same thing

Including 

Poor management selections over all, however the club is more than one man. But yes the bloke at the top Carry's the can. 
 

We could go through a few

Brian Tinnion

SOD an appointment that was universally supported Here 

Lee Johnson 

Dean Holden

And The fact the bloke who won us two trophies was not supported with proper finance when the utter nonsense of a man got multi millions
 

Also crappy decisions regarding those around the club. Including Mr Ashton, Mr Lansdown jr, Mr Gould etc etc (Gould no matter what some believe was not very good the first time and the idea he wasn’t waiting for the job at The ECB or something else is laughable) 

His continued support of Johnson, a bloke with no experience spending money was idiocy.
 

Johnson stupidly spent the clubs money while Mr Lansdown was underwriting the debt with stock purchases, this was always going to lead to a problem. However Covid buggered up the model faster than it otherwise would with a half wit running the team bringing us to the FFP issue we have discussed a thousand times 

So…. I have said personally all of this many times on this forum (my dislike of The Johnson era in my own head is pretty legendary) and Lansdown himself now knows the Johnson thing was nuts  

The biggest issue right now is we have a manager that is trying to make something of the Lansdown built training facilities and build/cobble together a team from that. So yes Lansdown is definitely culpable in that as he is responsible for our FFP ISSUES

….So we continue to not make it to the top flight, but being we are a club that have spent 4 years in it over the last 110 it is not really that big news 

The consistent failure of this club goes much much deeper. A couple of comments I’ve made on that recently are around. We always end up being a nice club that fails while shifting in and out of total nut baggery 

However we are in a position to maintain premier league football and like it or not are now an established Championship club and being as about half of my 60 years I’ve watched us in divvy 3/4 

The fact is yes massive mistakes have been made but the idea of failure in a historical context is nonsense. we are in a better position as a club than we have been throughout our history. God pray that the bloke he gets in for Gould is not another knob. 
 

Anyway all this is academic as the club is still actively looking for investment, (this means a sale, no matter what some think) I’m looking forward to how that plays out as we get toward a quarter of the 21st century under our belt!
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

I don’t think he should be praised for a number of things and most sensible people would say the same thing

Including 

Poor management selections over all, however the club is more than one man. But yes the bloke at the top Carry's the can. 
 

We could go through a few

Brian Tinnion

SOD an appointment that was universally supported Here 

Lee Johnson 

Dean Holden

And The fact the bloke who won us two trophies was not supported with proper finance when the utter nonsense of a man got multi millions
 

Also crappy decisions regarding those around the club. Including Mr Ashton, Mr Lansdown jr, Mr Gould etc etc (Gould no matter what some believe was not very good the first time and the idea he wasn’t waiting for the job at The ECB or something else is laughable) 

His continued support of Johnson, a bloke with no experience spending money was idiocy.
 

Johnson stupidly spent the clubs money while Mr Lansdown was underwriting the debt with stock purchases, this was always going to lead to a problem. However Covid buggered up the model faster than it otherwise would with a half wit running the team bringing us to the FFP issue we have discussed a thousand times 

So…. I have said personally all of this many times on this forum (my dislike of The Johnson era in my own head is pretty legendary) and Lansdown himself now knows the Johnson thing was nuts  

The biggest issue right now is we have a manager that is trying to make something of the Lansdown built training facilities and build/cobble together a team from that. So yes Lansdown is definitely culpable in that as he is responsible for our FFP ISSUES

….So we continue to not make it to the top flight, but being we are a club that have spent 4 years in it over the last 110 it is not really that big news 

The consistent failure of this club goes much much deeper. A couple of comments I’ve made on that recently are around. We always end up being a nice club that fails while shifting in and out of total nut baggery 

However we are in a position to maintain premier league football and like it or not are now an established Championship club and being as about half of my 60 years I’ve watched us in divvy 3/4 

The fact is yes massive mistakes have been made but the idea of failure in a historical context is nonsense. we are in a better position as a club than we have been throughout our history. God pray that the bloke he gets in for Gould is not another knob. 
 

Anyway all this is academic as the club is still actively looking for investment, (this means a sale, no matter what some think) I’m looking forward to how that plays out as we get toward a quarter of the 21st century under our belt!
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@Silvio Dantedoes a far better job of explaining / mirroring my thoughts.

I don’t think it’s been bad but I don’t get the “he’s put £214m he’s beyond criticism” stuff. That’s what I’m trying to convey. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BigAl&Toby said:

Well, well, well.

Here we are again. Wasn’t long ago that Korey smacked it home, we were deliriously delighted and Bobby scored from the spot.

Now we’re ****** over by the boys in Lincoln green. The call goes out. Nige is a clown. He has to go.

But all’s well in Planet Lansdown. The Messiah has deep pockets. We shall be grateful. We have a lovely stadium - I’ll grant ‘ee Steve - The Killers were superb.

He’s got his medal - services to sport? His home city? Making us proud?

He’s had to contend with Covid. And all that brought with it. Was there an opportunity to offer up AG for immunisation jabs? Did he do so out of the goodness of his heart? Anyone know?

He’s had to endure the issues around FFP. And for a professional investor he’s done that very well…. He let Ashton in and **** us over. He let Junior take up the reins and **** it up.

And now we have good old Tinman in a new role…. Who remembers the sorry state of Swansea affairs when “the legend” sat in the dug out as the lights were turned off?

Job for the boys? Don’t challenge me. Go now Nige. Go now. Self preservation. Like Mr Coppell…..

But it’s ok. We are grateful. Steve is doing a great job. For Steve and his merry, proud gang…..

Am I grateful? Am I bollocks. The only one who’s done well out of this debacle whilst Capn Steve has had his hands on the udders of the cash cow in BS3 is the Messiah himself.

Freeholds in Ashton Vale anyone?

032BA508-3481-44AE-B488-5272F5ABE2A7.jpeg

What an ungrateful ***.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve is essentially at least culpable for allowing the finances to get to the point where we are so tight to FFP limits that we can’t go out and sign anyone without selling. I say that because someone gave LJ and MA permission to go sign and load of expensive players on high wages who haven’t provided the expected return on the investment. A gamble that has backfired. 
 

On the flip side Steve deserves credit for us going from a team stuck in League One with crowds of 12k in a stadium on its last legs, to being an established Championship side (for now!) with an average crowd of 18k in a modern stadium and a top end training facility. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you have very short memories.  Does anyone remember the disasters that were Robert Hobbs, that mob of jokers who took over in the early 80s, Scott Davison and John Laycock?  And if you’re talking awful managerial appointments, then there’s always Bobby Houghton, Jimmy Lumsden, Denis Smith, the second coming of Joe Jordan, Benny Lennartsson and Tony Pulis.

Be careful what you wish for.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Marina's Rolls Royce said:

So- the clamour from so very many posters on here for many many years has been for SL to get his chequebook out- SL a man rich enough but lacking ambition.

How many times have I read about how we must buy a striker and that SL has just got to put his hand in his pocket.

The threat of revolution if SL didn't step up to purchase Lee Tomlin and fans speaking of the consequences if he didnt. Similar about Nigel Pearson.

Trouble is with football fans is that we only sing when we're winning.

Steve Lansdown- Mr Bristol City, legend, benefactor, refreshingly British, self made but not beyond mistakes. 

He's been a good and honest owner and I'm grateful for that but I guess I don't feel so self entitled as others who have forgotten 1982, forgotten the years in Div 4 and Div 3. I'm not enjoying being a BCFC fan at the moment but all I have to do is remember games like Aldershot etc and the bogs in the Dolman and seeing the gas ahead of us. to bring me back to present day and a much better club.

Brilliant!…Seriously. 
 

If only we still had Matt Smith. 

But exactly how I see it!

  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Marina's Rolls Royce said:

So- the clamour from so very many posters on here for many many years has been for SL to get his chequebook out- SL a man rich enough but lacking ambition.

How many times have I read about how we must buy a striker and that SL has just got to put his hand in his pocket.

The threat of revolution if SL didn't step up to purchase Lee Tomlin and fans speaking of the consequences if he didnt. Similar about Nigel Pearson.

Trouble is with football fans is that we only sing when we're winning.

Steve Lansdown- Mr Bristol City, legend, benefactor, refreshingly British, self made but not beyond mistakes. 

He's been a good and honest owner and I'm grateful for that but I guess I don't feel so self entitled as others who have forgotten 1982, forgotten the years in Div 4 and Div 3. I'm not enjoying being a BCFC fan at the moment but all I have to do is remember games like Aldershot etc and the bogs in the Dolman and seeing the gas ahead of us. to bring me back to present day and a much better club.

Good post ??????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REDOXO said:

I don’t think he should be praised for a number of things and most sensible people would say the same thing

Including 

Poor management selections over all, however the club is more than one man. But yes the bloke at the top Carry's the can. 
 

We could go through a few

Brian Tinnion

SOD an appointment that was universally supported Here 

Lee Johnson 

Dean Holden

And The fact the bloke who won us two trophies was not supported with proper finance when the utter nonsense of a man got multi millions
 

Also crappy decisions regarding those around the club. Including Mr Ashton, Mr Lansdown jr, Mr Gould etc etc (Gould no matter what some believe was not very good the first time and the idea he wasn’t waiting for the job at The ECB or something else is laughable) 

His continued support of Johnson, a bloke with no experience spending money was idiocy.
 

Johnson stupidly spent the clubs money while Mr Lansdown was underwriting the debt with stock purchases, this was always going to lead to a problem. However Covid buggered up the model faster than it otherwise would with a half wit running the team bringing us to the FFP issue we have discussed a thousand times 

So…. I have said personally all of this many times on this forum (my dislike of The Johnson era in my own head is pretty legendary) and Lansdown himself now knows the Johnson thing was nuts  

The biggest issue right now is we have a manager that is trying to make something of the Lansdown built training facilities and build/cobble together a team from that. So yes Lansdown is definitely culpable in that as he is responsible for our FFP ISSUES

….So we continue to not make it to the top flight, but being we are a club that have spent 4 years in it over the last 110 it is not really that big news 

The consistent failure of this club goes much much deeper. A couple of comments I’ve made on that recently are around. We always end up being a nice club that fails while shifting in and out of total nut baggery 

However we are in a position to maintain premier league football and like it or not are now an established Championship club and being as about half of my 60 years I’ve watched us in divvy 3/4 

The fact is yes massive mistakes have been made but the idea of failure in a historical context is nonsense. we are in a better position as a club than we have been throughout our history. God pray that the bloke he gets in for Gould is not another knob. 
 

Anyway all this is academic as the club is still actively looking for investment, (this means a sale, no matter what some think) I’m looking forward to how that plays out as we get toward a quarter of the 21st century under our belt!
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So SL didn't reach for the ring binder marked "Available managers guaranteed to be successful". Silly man!

So many posters are dismissive of LJ, but in December 2017 I felt more optimistic about this club than I've done in the last 40 years (that includes Wembley 2008).  It didn't work out, but I still believe it was worth a try.  And LJ was definitely part of our progression from Championship-League One yo-yo to an established Championship club. 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t help thinking where we would be without SL’s millions:

a) in the Premier League with a far richer and more experienced owner

b) a lower / mid Championship club struggling to meet ends meet

c) languishing in League 1 with a shit stadium but regular derbies with the Gas

Having lived through the pre Lansdown decades, I’m not at all confident it would be a)!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, red panda said:

many posters are dismissive of LJ, but in December 2017 I felt more optimistic about this club than I've done in the last 40 years (that includes Wembley 2008).  It didn't work out, but I still believe it was worth a try.  And LJ was definitely part of our progression from Championship-League One yo-yo to an established Championship club. 

Getting off topic now, but I’ve always thought LJ over-delivered with the players he had. I can’t think of any other manager that has done this in my time (including Nige)

Edited by HitchinRed
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HitchinRed said:

Getting off topic now, but I’ve always thought LJ over-delivered with the players he had. I can’t think of any other manager that has done this in my time (including Nige)

Not being facetious, which of the various groups of players do you think he overachieved with?  If you wanna equate “groups” with seasons, e.g. the 17/18 group versus the 20/21 group as an example, that’s fine.  I’m just interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, REDOXO said:

I don’t think he should be praised for a number of things and most sensible people would say the same thing

Including 

Poor management selections over all, however the club is more than one man. But yes the bloke at the top Carry's the can. 
 

We could go through a few

Brian Tinnion

SOD an appointment that was universally supported Here 

Lee Johnson 

Dean Holden

And The fact the bloke who won us two trophies was not supported with proper finance when the utter nonsense of a man got multi millions
 

Also crappy decisions regarding those around the club. Including Mr Ashton, Mr Lansdown jr, Mr Gould etc etc (Gould no matter what some believe was not very good the first time and the idea he wasn’t waiting for the job at The ECB or something else is laughable) 

His continued support of Johnson, a bloke with no experience spending money was idiocy.
 

Johnson stupidly spent the clubs money while Mr Lansdown was underwriting the debt with stock purchases, this was always going to lead to a problem. However Covid buggered up the model faster than it otherwise would with a half wit running the team bringing us to the FFP issue we have discussed a thousand times 

So…. I have said personally all of this many times on this forum (my dislike of The Johnson era in my own head is pretty legendary) and Lansdown himself now knows the Johnson thing was nuts  

The biggest issue right now is we have a manager that is trying to make something of the Lansdown built training facilities and build/cobble together a team from that. So yes Lansdown is definitely culpable in that as he is responsible for our FFP ISSUES

….So we continue to not make it to the top flight, but being we are a club that have spent 4 years in it over the last 110 it is not really that big news 

The consistent failure of this club goes much much deeper. A couple of comments I’ve made on that recently are around. We always end up being a nice club that fails while shifting in and out of total nut baggery 

However we are in a position to maintain premier league football and like it or not are now an established Championship club and being as about half of my 60 years I’ve watched us in divvy 3/4 

The fact is yes massive mistakes have been made but the idea of failure in a historical context is nonsense. we are in a better position as a club than we have been throughout our history. God pray that the bloke he gets in for Gould is not another knob. 
 

Anyway all this is academic as the club is still actively looking for investment, (this means a sale, no matter what some think) I’m looking forward to how that plays out as we get toward a quarter of the 21st century under our belt!
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agree with most of what you say including the highlighted bit; SC was given no-where near enough time/backing after delivering what was the best times in recent history only eclipsed by the AD promo season to the top div.

It also seems we have been here for about the same time by the way.

SL has left his mark on this club forever in bricks and mortar and poor managerial selections.

The current selection is yes working under a tight budget but so would anyone else other than NP, who apart from at Leics has not a great record. After 2yrs nearly it cannot be doubted that we are on the slide, we are far from a decent team but have some decent players.

While we could beat Watford, as we surely must raise our game for it, it is more likely that we wont. That could leave us in the bottom 3 for the break, in which many seem to think we will come back stronger when past breaks have shown the opposite.

We can post a million threads/posts on here, will make no difference SL will do it his way, cause he can, as he always has done. This position we are in atm has however been ALL down to his choices therefore it is down to him, not managers or the players they have brought here.

My thoughts remain the same I 100% want us to win Sat but if we end up with no points I would be looking for another manager before we really get stuck in the brown stuff, even in the NW mold, till end of the season, to get us all back together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Not being facetious, which of the various groups of players do you think he overachieved with?  If you wanna equate “groups” with seasons, e.g. the 17/18 group versus the 20/21 group as an example, that’s fine.  I’m just interested.

The 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons stand out. During spells in those seasons we played exceptionally well. I know we had some classy players, but in my opinion we performed better as a team than the sum of the individual parts would indicate we should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, HitchinRed said:

Getting off topic now, but I’ve always thought LJ over-delivered with the players he had. I can’t think of any other manager that has done this in my time (including Nige)

How about his dad? Remarkable to get to a play off final with a squad that was nowhere near as good, as expensive or as big as the squads LJ had.

  • Like 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, HitchinRed said:

The 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons stand out. During spells in those seasons we played exceptionally well. I know we had some classy players, but in my opinion we performed better as a team than the sum of the individual parts would indicate we should.

I think if we look at the 17/18 team, several have gone on and played at a higher level / better clubs, or were from pedigree.

Flint - went to Boro who were bigger / better than us at the time

Baker - had come from PL pedigree Villa

Magnússon - went to CSKA Moscow (CL team)

Brownhill  - went to PL Burnley

Bryan - went to PL Fulham

Reid - went to PL Cardiff

I didn’t include Fielding / Steele, Wright, Pack, Smith and Paterson from the cup nor others like O’Dowda, Diedhiou, etc. But Paterson was a top player at that time too, so that’s 7 bloody good players.  Diedhiou had come from Lg1 in France.

When I look at this, we obviously over-achieved in the League Cup, and for a period we were flying in the Champ, but we finished 11th.  So, I wouldn’t say he over-achieved with that set of players.  That was the squad to get to the play-offs and sneak up with.  We blew it.

The 18/19 side on a similar basis:

Webster - went to PL Brighton

Kalas - had come from PL Chelsea

Kelly - went to PL Bournemouth

Brownhill - went PL Burnley

Weimann - had come from PL pedigree

Add in Paterson, Baker and Diedhiou (as per 17/18).

We went closer, finishing 8th.

Id say that that was a better achievement than 17/18 in some respects…but it was starting to rack up in terms of £££s spent….and when we did lose Webster, Kelly and Brownhill eventually we used the money poorly, and are counting the cost now.  Although in 19/20 I though Johnson managed to get good results over performance, but that was the worrying sign, that it would catch up with us.

But those two sets of seasons and the players are chalk and cheese to what we have now imho.

It’s a good debate no less.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
14 hours ago, BTRFTG said:

Steve Lansdown has personally committed over £214m of his own money to ensure Bristol City FC remain trading such we may occasionally have an afternoon of fun at AG.

And you, what have you contributed to keep City trading?

This sort of comment always intrigues me

Of course the value of investment from SL can never be called out

But what would you say if SL has invested 10% of the money available to him, but a supporter has invested 90% of their money available -who has made the bigger commitment?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on. This is drifting off topic. It’s not meant to be about Nige. It’s all about the Lansdowns.

You remember them. They who can’t do a thing wrong. They who dig deep and put their own funds in. All out of an altruistic value.

Or they who’ve invested big time in an asset. A cash cow. They who’ve deliberately identified an under performing asset and who now own - lock, stock and barrel - some very valuable freeholds in BS3.

Ashton Vale anyone? How many acres did Steve ride his Trojan Horse into there?

Might seem extreme and provocative - and it is and it’s meant to be - but I don’t buy the vision. I don’t see it.

How can anyone be so successful in part of their life and make, what seems  to be, an almighty **** up in another.

Discuss….

Oh and twasn’t cider. Twas Elvis Juice and Hazy Jane….

564A5CE1-00BC-42F0-9935-EECFDB9B4B61.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, phantom said:

This sort of comment always intrigues me

Of course the value of investment from SL can never be called out

But what would you say if SL has invested 10% of the money available to him, but a supporter has invested 90% of their money available -who has made the bigger commitment?

@phantom that’s a flawed argument.

Flawed in so much as it doesn’t suit the argument. The one that The Ls are there only to be thanked.

They’ve made us proud. Not of course in football or dare I say it, sporting, terms.

Just proud that “the city” can attract the likes of Muse, Elton ******* John, the Killers et Al.

So much better these days than when the non-football highlights were Billy Graham and the Rolling Stones.

In Steve the blind believe. Onwards to the promised land….. ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, phantom said:

This sort of comment always intrigues me

Of course the value of investment from SL can never be called out

But what would you say if SL has invested 10% of the money available to him, but a supporter has invested 90% of their money available -who has made the bigger commitment?

 

I would be amazed if any supporter invested 90% of their disposable income. Who would that be? A tramp with an executive box and shirt sponsorship?  :laughcont:

I don't think Lansdown really has great judgement on football matters, but there are worse owners - and better ones - out there. I think the fact that he is based in Guernsey is irrelevant. Some highly successful clubs have owners based in different continents. My hope is he starts to takes advice from people with a sound knowledge of the game. But that hasn't happened so far.

There was nothing wrong with the Pearson appointment of course. Welcomed by the vast majority of supporters and even seen as something of a 'coup'.  It's some of the errors from before that have stymied Pearson.  That said, I honestly can't see losing to a L1 side in the League Cup as a reason to blame Lansdown, who had zero to do with the team selection, coaching or tactics. 

I'm with @italian dave on this one. We could have worse, but Lansdown's poor decisions have meant his PL aspirations remain as elusive as ever. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Merrick's Marvels said:

His time and money which, pro rata, represents a greater percentage of his disposable resources than £214M does of Lansdown's, I'd imagine.  For starters. 

Since when did a percentage of disposable resources fund a football club? That's the argument deployed by our wilderness brethren in explaining how they're the 6th biggest club in the country, tents and all...... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, phantom said:

This sort of comment always intrigues me

Of course the value of investment from SL can never be called out

But what would you say if SL has invested 10% of the money available to him, but a supporter has invested 90% of their money available -who has made the bigger commitment?

Not just that but the fact is most of the he money he’s had to put in is because he ran the club so badly .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
29 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

I would be amazed if any supporter invested 90% of their disposable income. Who would that be? A tramp with an executive box and shirt sponsorship?  :laughcont:

It wasn't a literal example, just a direction of that many of us make a bigger commitment financially from what we have available to us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...