Jump to content
IGNORED

World Cup 2022 thread (football only)


Super

Recommended Posts

Just now, Rossi the Robin said:

No panic, USA sat back with good shape and was a predictable outcome, we should learn to not get over hyped.

Will draw v Wales and avoid France in the quarters 

You make it sound like USA were playing for 0-0 when they were far more positive than us.

As soon as I saw the endless passing between Maguire and Stones at the start I concluded we were playing not to lose and hoping we might nick a goal.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chinapig said:

You make it sound like USA were playing for 0-0 when they were far more positive than us.

As soon as I saw the endless passing between Maguire and Stones at the start I concluded we were playing not to lose and hoping we might nick a goal.

Yep the last paragraph 

Edited by Rossi the Robin
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's typical England to put in an unde par performance when it wasn't needed. USA tidy and hard working but we're better than that.

We should of course still get out of the group but we are going nowhere special with that kind of performance.

Again, just so typical England.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wanderingred said:

Am I right I’m thinking that Wales are effectively out? They can’t overtake both Iran and USA and they’d need to beat us by four clear goals to go above us.

Not if Iran and USA draw. Beat us and they would be ahead of Iran on GD. Otherwise its bye bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

England will go through unless they lose to Wales by at least 4. 


Wales have to win… but if USA v Iran isn’t a draw, Wales have to win by at least 4 to qualify. 


USA can only go through if they beat Iran. 


Iran only need a draw to qualify, unless Wales beat England

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad.

Thought we’d really changed our mentality in the first game. Thought, ok all those shite England games I’ve watched leading us to this tournament have been worthwhile, and we’re turning up and playing a new tune.

Nope, back to Southgate-ball.

Yes, difficult opponents but we were appallingly negative. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, deadredfred said:

Outplayed everywhere. Which just shouldn’t happen given the calibre of players. 

Bringing on Henderson and not Foden speaks volumes about Southgates negative tactics. 

This is it,, he set us up to try and not lose,,, and just about got away with it… whst happens when we play someone actually good is a whole different matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Globe Trotter said:

One of the best young players England have ever had, yet Jordan Henderson is the answer when we need a goal. Wilson, Maddison too ignored 

But we didn't especially need a goal at that point, we needed to be more solid because they were all over us. Henderson did that.

Maddison is injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve never been Southgate out, based on what he’s achieved in the last two tournaments coming from where we were under Hodgson, but he is infuriatingly slow at making changes. Let’s be honest the whole team could have been subbed tonight but how Mount stayed on is mental. Kane was also a passenger for the last 35 minutes 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RedRock said:

Sad.

Thought we’d really changed our mentality in the first game. Thought, ok all those shite England games I’ve watched leading us to this tournament have been worthwhile, and we’re turning up and playing a new tune.

Nope, back to Southgate-ball.

Yes, difficult opponents but we were appallingly negative. 

 

Iran sat back, we scored an early goal and therefore smashed them

Iran sit back we don't score an early and its a totally different game maybe 0-0 maybe a 1-0 win or even worse they get us on the break

USA fantastic at pressing, poor at scoring. Score early we probably smash them. Don't score early and they get confidence to make it a difficult game

I dunno what is rocket science about the above

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dredd said:

I’ve never been Southgate out, based on what he’s achieved in the last two tournaments coming from where we were under Hodgson, but he is infuriatingly slow at making changes. Let’s be honest the whole team could have been subbed tonight but how Mount stayed on is mental. Kane was also a passenger for the last 35 minutes 

Only 35 minutes. I didn't notice him at all in the first half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RedRock said:

Sad.

Thought we’d really changed our mentality in the first game. Thought, ok all those shite England games I’ve watched leading us to this tournament have been worthwhile, and we’re turning up and playing a new tune.

Nope, back to Southgate-ball.

Yes, difficult opponents but we were appallingly negative. 

 

Spot on. Plus Mount must have something on GS. WTF was he not off at HT, let alone still there at the end. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cidercity1987 said:

Iran sat back, we scored an early goal and therefore smashed them

Iran sit back we don't score an early and its a totally different game maybe 0-0 maybe a 1-0 win or even worse they get us on the break

USA fantastic at pressing, poor at scoring. Score early we probably smash them. Don't score early and they get confidence to make it a difficult game

I dunno what is rocket science about the above

35 minutes is not an early goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Iran, I'll admit it would be hard to drop anyone , I still would have but ok.

We were 2nd best for most of the game, but that changed slightly when he made the subs.
And that's my problem, he could be more proactive. 
I've no problem him bringing on Henderson, they were running through our Midfield and Bellingham, Mount and Specially Rice were nowhere to be seen. I thought we were better after. 
We didn't need to do too much, but not lose. It is not in Southgate's make-up to take risks so we can't be surprised with that game. Come the Wales game I see a similar performance, safety first and hope one of those breaks fall for us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disappointed we didn't finish the job off today. 

We didn't ever really give it a go. 

It concerns me that we were just happy to settle for a point. Nah that's not for me. 

We were lacklustre, unimaginative, passionless and looked really leggy. 

Ideally we would have won tonight so that against Wales we could have fielded players like Walker etc that need some game time if we want to call upon them deeper in the competition.

But this is Southgate, the same manager that let players take pens having not touched the ball. He doesn't have the ability to think ahead. 

We now have to probably play the same lineup against Wales just in case. Wales won't roll over against us like people expect. 

What Grealish has to do to get a start I don't know. He seemed like the only one likely to make something happen today. 

It's criminal how Foden doesn't appear to be a part of Southgates plans. He is one of the most talented English players we've ever had but Southgate just doesn't rate him. 

Foden can play the role that Mount plays but for some reason Southgate sees something in Mount that none of us can see.

After that performance, from both players and management, I'm worried about our chances. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the basis that we go through, far better to get a performance like that out of the way in the group stage 

Imagine going through with 3 sparkling performances only to hit the buffers with such a flat performance in the knock out stage.

 

Edited by downendcity
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If England are pleased with a point then the USA will be ecstatic. Dest or Adams were the overall MOM for me.

I think in a tournament you need to use your squad, and here Southgate didn't do that. Kane, Saka, Mount, all a little flat. If Southgate is happy with his decisions and with the result then so be it. 

I think the starting XI v Wales may say differently though. Changes should be made, and we'll win that game to go through comfortably.

Group A hasn't shown much to be feared, so QFs are every doable from here.

Edited by ExiledAjax
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tournament football…4 Pts from 2 games…through to the last 16 with a game to go (bar a 4 goal defeat to Wales), after a disappointing performance.  That’s ok.

A draw was about the right result.

I wouldn’t say we are as good as our FIFA Ranking (5th), so I don’t expect us to roll over a team ranked 16th, who showed first half v Wales how hard they are to play against, especially their press.  Perhaps Southgate might’ve looked at that and saw how Wales countered it, by playing off of Moore, but we don’t have anyone like that.  You could argue we ought to have a “big-man” in our 26 to cover that base.

Maguire played well, hopefully finding some form, Pickford didn’t really have a save to make (Pulisic hit the bar but he had it covered if it was on target.  We held firm and stopped putting ourselves into an awkward position in the group.  Completely in control of our destiny.

Perhaps Monday took a bit more out of some players?  Lessons to be learned, re freshening it up???

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

I'm disappointed we didn't finish the job off today. 

We didn't ever really give it a go. 

It concerns me that we were just happy to settle for a point. Nah that's not for me. 

We were lacklustre, unimaginative, passionless and looked really leggy. 

Ideally we would have won tonight so that against Wales we could have fielded players like Walker etc that need some game time if we want to call upon them deeper in the competition.

But this is Southgate, the same manager that let players take pens having not touched the ball. He doesn't have the ability to think ahead. 

We now have to probably play the same lineup against Wales just in case. Wales won't roll over against us like people expect. 

What Grealish has to do to get a start I don't know. He seemed like the only one likely to make something happen today. 

It's criminal how Foden doesn't appear to be a part of Southgates plans. He is one of the most talented English players we've ever had but Southgate just doesn't rate him. 

Foden can play the role that Mount plays but for some reason Southgate sees something in Mount that none of us can see.

After that performance, from both players and management, I'm worried about our chances. 

I thought you were boycotting?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, collier said:

Southgate is the only person in England who though that the slow passing between the 2 centre half's was a positive thing. Maguire was our best player in terms of doing his job tonight but we wasted so much time with an extra 5 passes between him and Stones.

Yep If we were gonna do that all of the 2nd half we might aswell gone 3 at the back bring Walker or trent and trippier as 3rd cb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing captain hindsight tonight, for me we could have done with highly technical players up top that you can rely on receiving the ball in tight situations, having close control on the half turn and that is Grealish and Foden over Sterling and Saka. The latter have very average close ball control for me and are more suited to running at defences into space rather than picking a lock like tonights game needed. May have even considered playing Rashomon up top instead of Kane.

Edited by jaydee=inspiration
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disappointing from England tonight. Very flat and lacklustre, and no intensity.  I wanted Southgate to make changes earlier to get a grip on the game.

But we are still in control of our group and on course to progress to the knockout stage, so in terms of the tournament so far so good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Tournament football…4 Pts from 2 games…through to the last 16 with a game to go (bar a 4 goal defeat to Wales), after a disappointing performance.  That’s ok.

A draw was about the right result.

I wouldn’t say we are as good as our FIFA Ranking (5th), so I don’t expect us to roll over a team ranked 16th, who showed first half v Wales how hard they are to play against, especially their press.  Perhaps Southgate might’ve looked at that and saw how Wales countered it, by playing off of Moore, but we don’t have anyone like that.  You could argue we ought to have a “big-man” in our 26 to cover that base.

Maguire played well, hopefully finding some form, Pickford didn’t really have a save to make (Pulisic hit the bar but he had it covered if it was on target.  We held firm and stopped putting ourselves into an awkward position in the group.  Completely in control of our destiny.

Perhaps Monday took a bit more out of some players?  Lessons to be learned, re freshening it up???

 

Yes, a Crouch type would be handy now and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fed up with people making excuses for Southgate and shouting that those of us who want him gone only shout when we are losing. No we don't. The bloke is the most negative coach to have held the role, his substitutions and game management are pathetic. To keep selecting his favourites is wrong. If the muppet concentrated on football instead of all the peripheral crap we might actually win something.

To actually claim after the game he enjoyed how we created from the back sums him up!

The quicker he is gone the quicker we can move forward

 

 

  • Like 9
  • Haha 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frenchred said:

I'm fed up with people making excuses for Southgate and shouting that those of us who want him gone only shout when we are losing. No we don't. The bloke is the most negative coach to have held the role, his substitutions and game management are pathetic. To keep selecting his favourites is wrong. If the muppet concentrated on football instead of all the peripheral crap we might actually win something.

To actually claim after the game he enjoyed how we created from the back sums him up!

The quicker he is gone the quicker we can move forward

 

 

His negativity cost England Euro 2020.

I simply do not understand why Phil Foden does not start every game if fit. He is a generational talent, ask Pep, yet he goes with Mason Mount.

Sorry, I just don’t get it.

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Northern Red said:

Performative outrage competition is in full flow. Some strong entries so far.

It’s genuinely hilarious how much some people lose their stuff over a draw. Not just on here but everywhere.  Like we have some divine right to win every game.  ‘Ing embarrassing.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Northern Red said:

Doesn't help when ITV News are making out that England's qualification is in far more peril than is actually the case.

Sensationalist nonsense that only feeds the overreaction.

I thought the same

It's almost impossible that we don't go through and they are making out it's on a knife edge 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kane ain’t fit, one of the best young players in the world is getting splinters in his arse sat on the bench, an in-form Rashford gets 12 minutes to make an impact. 

Southgate’s clueless. We have the players to make an impact at this World Cup, but he doesn’t have a clue what to do with them. That's the issue we had at the Euro final and it's still an issue now. This 'just don't lose tactic' is exactly what lost us the Euros final.

Having followed England home and away for years, I feel gutted for anyone who went out to watch that dross tonight. 

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, frenchred said:

I'm fed up with people making excuses for Southgate and shouting that those of us who want him gone only shout when we are losing. No we don't. The bloke is the most negative coach to have held the role, his substitutions and game management are pathetic. To keep selecting his favourites is wrong. If the muppet concentrated on football instead of all the peripheral crap we might actually win something.

To actually claim after the game he enjoyed how we created from the back sums him up!

The quicker he is gone the quicker we can move forward

 

 

You’re not going to get rid of your manager mid-tournament though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScottishRed said:

His negativity cost England Euro 2020.

I simply do not understand why Phil Foden does not start every game if fit. He is a generational talent, ask Pep, yet he goes with Mason Mount.

Sorry, I just don’t get it.

Said it before the game on Monday. Why the hell is Mount starting? For me he isn't even as good as Maddison let alone Foden and Grealish. Average player at a good team in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to international tournament football lads. Tbh, it’s shite. That was basically Scotland 0-0 in the euros all over again. But guess what, basically cements us finishing top of the group. You don’t get special treatment for battering every team in your group games. You get 8 games every 2 years that really matter as a national team head coach, just don’t lose as many as you can and you’ll be fine. Thems the brakes

  • Like 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cidercity1987 said:

Iran sat back, we scored an early goal and therefore smashed them

Iran sit back we don't score an early and its a totally different game maybe 0-0 maybe a 1-0 win or even worse they get us on the break

USA fantastic at pressing, poor at scoring. Score early we probably smash them. Don't score early and they get confidence to make it a difficult game

I dunno what is rocket science about the above

As a summing up not sure I could better that, really in football confidence is key and tonight we lacked that and well we all saw what happened, let's hope that the penny finally drops and they realise that they don't have to just turn up against teams that are so called below them because Argentina and Germany found out to there cost that it can be fatal to under estimate the opposition.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

 

Perhaps Monday took a bit more out of some players?  Lessons to be learned, re freshening it up???

 

We did not press the USA at all so started to sit deeper and deeper, especially second half.

I get the Henderson sub. I don't get Rashford over Foden. Grealish with his technical ability caused USA problems. Maybe Foden on for Mount?

I would have taken Kane off and put Wilson on. TAA for Trippier.

I still don't get why Ben White did not come on against Iran but hey ho.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

I thought the England team were going to use this tournament to highlight the human right violations in Qatar? 

Oh come on, really? admit it you knew that was a empty gesture and have given in to your natural instincts to watch the games.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 2015 said:

Said it before the game on Monday. Why the hell is Mount starting? For me he isn't even as good as Maddison let alone Foden and Grealish. Average player at a good team in my opinion.

And always seems to go missing in big games for club and country. 

I don't watch many Chelsea games but I've not heard any hype about him this season so doesn't look like he's pulling up trees for then currently. 

Foden however...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lenred said:

It’s genuinely hilarious how much some people lose their stuff over a draw. Not just on here but everywhere.  Like we have some divine right to win every game.  ‘Ing embarrassing.  

So a team that got to the semi finals of the last world cup and the FINAL of the euro only last year is not by the fans expected to beat a team many places below us in the world rankings is embarrassing really? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pillred said:

So a team that got to the semi finals of the last world cup and the FINAL of the euro only last year is not by the fans expected to beat a team many places below us in the world rankings is embarrassing really? 

Yep.  You got it. That’s exactly what I’m saying.   
Ps how are the WINNERS of the Euros getting on? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, pillred said:

As a summing up not sure I could better that, really in football confidence is key and tonight we lacked that and well we all saw what happened, let's hope that the penny finally drops and they realise that they don't have to just turn up against teams that are so called below them because Argentina and Germany found out to there cost that it can be fatal to under estimate the opposition.   

As a previous England manager put it, in his own inimitable style......

image.png.56cedfafbdf87f617e1973a4727c37b1.png

 

:D

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, rednotblue said:

I would have taken Kane off and put Wilson on

The problem that is Harry Kane.  I’m long in the belief that when the team is playing well and creating chances, Kane is a phenomenal striker / finisher.  When we can’t get out of our half he offers nowhere near enough.  He couldn’t give us a Kieffer Moore option, so we constantly couldn’t get up the pitch.

I love Bellingham, but USA did a job on him tonight, very physical with him, and the ref let them.  Rice, who I’ve really grown to like too, didn’t take advantage of the space the attention on Bellingham gave him.  And the fluid rotations of Saka, Mount and Sterling against Iran, USA didn’t allow.  I didn’t like Mount’s positioning with USA in possession tonight…too often alongside Kane.

It was a below par performance, but maybe a bit of reality for fans who expect England to rock up and win every game.  We aren’t a great team.  We have good players, I’m not doubting that, but they are good players often playing with better players at club level…and without them it sometimes shows like it did tonight.

Gerrard had Torres at club level (as well as Alonso alongside him).

Lampard had Drogba.

Imho we are in that bracket of 8th-16th, so we should (on paper) get out of the group….which we will achieve (have virtually achieved).  Whether we go last 8, last 4, last 2, will ultimately require us to play better than we did tonight.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

The problem that is Harry Kane.  I’m long in the belief that when the team is playing well and creating chances, Kane is a phenomenal striker / finisher.  When we can’t get out of our half he offers nowhere near enough.  He couldn’t give us a Kieffer Moore option, so we constantly couldn’t get up the pitch.

I love Bellingham, but USA did a job on him tonight, very physical with him, and the ref let them.  Rice, who I’ve really grown to like too, didn’t take advantage of the space the attention on Bellingham gave him.  And the fluid rotations of Saka, Mount and Sterling against Iran, USA didn’t allow.  I didn’t like Mount’s positioning with USA in possession tonight…too often alongside Kane.

It was a below par performance, but maybe a bit of reality for fans who expect England to rock up and win every game.  We aren’t a great team.  We have good players, I’m not doubting that, but they are good players often playing with better players at club level…and without them it sometimes shows like it did tonight.

Gerrard had Torres at club level (as well as Alonso alongside him).

Lampard had Drogba.

Imho we are in that bracket of 8th-16th, so we should (on paper) get out of the group….which we will achieve (have virtually achieved).  Whether we go last 8, last 4, last 2, will ultimately require us to play better than we did tonight.

 

I watched this one - although I'm not going out of my way to watch the World Cup, I'm not weirding out and giving up my usual Friday night in the boozer!!!!

We were just too slow, too ponderous and - as has often happened with England - by the time we got the ball in the final third, they had 8 bodies back. Compare and contrast with the panic caused when the USA broke with speed.

We sat on the ball, thinking about the "ideal" pass, when just advancing with it would've been the best option. 

We also seemed happy to allow the Americans to have unchallenged possession in their half from goal kicks. The fact they could literally walk it up to the halfway line then launch it to whoever had found some space, caused us all sorts of problems. England were pressed high whenever they were on the ball in our half. We never got a free pass. 

And I don't particularly blame any England player - although I'd have made subs at half-time and brought Foden on - I blame Southgate for his relentless caution, which means we cannot break through against any club that is well-drilled and not going gung ho. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...