Jump to content
IGNORED

Joe Williams


Sir Geoff

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TonyTonyTony said:

His fitness is such that i dont think you will ever see consistency from him. He can't play 2 games in a week, so he will forever be in and out of the side. 

When he is on it, he is very good though. 

Complete lie. Has done so multiple times this season. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Percy Pig said:

Looked good off the bench recently. Obviously still question marks on his fitness and durability and I can't remember a more one footed central midfielder in my time watching football.

 

There's a player there. A proper one. Just got to keep him fit and motivated. 

Erm, Tinman. Literally had a right leg just for standing on. ?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Percy Pig said:

Looked good off the bench recently. Obviously still question marks on his fitness and durability and I can't remember a more one footed central midfielder in my time watching football.

 

There's a player there. A proper one. Just got to keep him fit and motivated. 

Oh, I don't know.....Tins moved central in his advancing years.....  Now that right peg was only ever used for standing on.

1 minute ago, nickolas said:

Erm, Tinman. Literally had a right leg just for standing on. ?

Great minds! ?

Edited by Steve Watts
Merged when quoting!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Percy Pig said:

I'm talking about even controlling the ball with his back foot when receiving from the right, it's something I drummed into 8 year old's and it infuriates me when I watch him. Its not minor either, as when play goes through him it takes an extra touch and extra second for him to move around the ball and continue the process of rotating the ball across the midfield which allows the defenders time to recover/respond and block the next pass. 

I'm not asking him to have the passing range of Paul Scholes with both feet, just control the ball with the correct foot and play a second faster.

 

 

The one thing our under 11's captain lacked was the confidence to use his left peg.  I kept on at him for ages about using it and the penny finally dropped when he scored a daisycutter with it from just outside the area.  Adds another dimension to his game and like you say it allows the ball to be moved out a lot quicker.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Steve Watts said:

The one thing our under 11's captain lacked was the confidence to use his left peg.  I kept on at him for ages about using it and the penny finally dropped when he scored a daisycutter with it from just outside the area.  Adds another dimension to his game and like you say it allows the ball to be moved out a lot quicker.

Job for Watts?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nickolas said:

Erm, Tinman. Literally had a right leg just for standing on. ?

Indeed, I remember when Tony Thorpe set him up against Swindon with a chance on his right foot. He had to take it first time and had to use his right foot. He nearly fell over!!! Did score though. 07.40

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Sir Geoff said:

Made a huge difference when he came on last night. More like the Joe Williams we all hoped to see. Shame he didn't pass to Sam Bell instead of trying to chip the keeper, but otherwise an excellent  display.

Looked really good when he came on last Saturday as well. I particularly liked it when he came from nowhere at speed to win a tackle - he looked really sharp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Super said:

Best used as a sub not sure he has the fitness to play 90 mins these days.

I have been told that he feels he is the fittest he has been in his career, the programme our medical team put him on has been instrumental in that. He is apparently fuming that he isn't starting games, which made me wonder if it's part of Pearson's plan, because he seems to be taking it out on opponents with some of his tackles lately. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/01/2023 at 14:18, TonyTonyTony said:

His fitness is such that i dont think you will ever see consistency from him. He can't play 2 games in a week, so he will forever be in and out of the side. 

When he is on it, he is very good though. 

Strange he can’t condition his body to play two games a week , maybe it won’t let him .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Williams I saw play for Bolton then Wigan was a proper central midfielder. He could even take quality corners, too.  I don’t think he’s the same player now after all the injuries. He can still do a job, just not as effectively IMO. Courtesy of Andy Rolls and Dean Holden. 

  • Like 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mightyreds89 said:

Ok, was confused by the part when you said despite his goals? He has 2 I think read it as though his goals meant he’d had a scoring spree that I’d missed ?

This is a spree for him…never got more than 1 per season before.

2 hours ago, tin said:

The Williams I saw play for Bolton then Wigan was a proper central midfielder. He could even take quality corners, too.  I don’t think he’s the same player now after all the injuries. He can still do a job, just not as effectively IMO. Courtesy of Andy Rolls and Dean Holden. 

Yep!

  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

This is a spree for him…never got more than 1 per season before.

Yep!

I do like the fact that he is very vocal when he comes on . Lots of player positional shouts going on. I do feel he is not the same player he was, due to fitness . Which is a real pity. Top midfielder at Wigan. But he does do a good job from the bench. Or is his fitness still a work in progress ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams may well get more gametime with us playing 4 3 3. Firstly purely due to numbers but it suits him far better.

 

Anyone thinking he's better than James needs to get off the crack though. James is the new Dave Rennie clearly. Underappreciated by a lot of supporters but not his team mates and manager.

I also think later in a game suits William's. His all action style is do able for 25 minutes and with games more stretched. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mightyreds89 said:

Ok, was confused by the part when you said despite his goals? He has 2 I think read it as though his goals meant he’d had a scoring spree that I’d missed ?

That is a scoring spree for Joe! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

I thought we should have brought him on post the red card. Naismith and James were working fine, but Blackburn sat deep and we needed the extra speed/energy/impetus. 

I wondered about whether we could have simply freshened it up, both James & Naismith (who were both excellent today) played over 100 minutes at Swansea & we were up against a side that had no game in midweek, thought he was worth the last 10 to try something different.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

I wondered about whether we could have simply freshened it up, both James & Naismith (who were both excellent today) played over 100 minutes at Swansea & we were up against a side that had no game in midweek, thought he was worth the last 10 to try something different.

Yeah that’s kind of my thinking. Kal for me lost the runner on their goal but was generally good and Matty was the usual - decent, metronomic. I just felt when they went to 10 all those ten sat very deep and Kal/Matty naturally play quite slow. Joe isn’t as good or consistent a passer but is a disruptor and I felt we needed that in view of how they set up

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Percy Pig said:

Like Pack and Skuse before him, midfielders who we desperately miss when they're not there, but get zero credit whilst they are.

 

 

9 hours ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

Add Khalifa Cisse to that list.

Or even, dare I say it, a certain Lee Johnson.

And, of course, as I believe was already mentioned here, Dave Rennie, who deserves an extra mention for his moustache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GrahamC said:

I wondered about whether we could have simply freshened it up, both James & Naismith (who were both excellent today) played over 100 minutes at Swansea & we were up against a side that had no game in midweek, thought he was worth the last 10 to try something different.

I wondered if when it gets to that stage, Rennie might say “it’s not worth him getting stretched, warm, etc”???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I wondered if when it gets to that stage, Rennie might say “it’s not worth him getting stretched, warm, etc”???

Maybe, but he seems to have made a decent impact as a sub in recent games & so I thought it was worth a try.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, GlastonburyRed said:

Skusey even scored a goal last week, a collectors item, he must be on about 1000 career appearances by now (and probably about 10 goals).

652 career appearances and 12 goals.

(Transfermkt)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Silvio Dante said:

I thought we should have brought him on post the red card. Naismith and James were working fine, but Blackburn sat deep and we needed the extra speed/energy/impetus. 

Interesting one. From Nige's perspective with 20 mins ish left we still had to not concede on the break, which trading Williams for James/Naismith increases the risk of, particularly where both were having great games and bossing the midfield. 

In a way the "plan" did work, as Naismith produced the killer pass.. Unfortunately Bell was marginally off (allegedly).

Maybe I'm too conservative but I thought it wasn't the right scenario for Williams.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, georgebcfc said:

Interesting one. From Nige's perspective with 20 mins ish left we still had to not concede on the break, which trading Williams for James/Naismith increases the risk of, particularly where both were having great games and bossing the midfield. 

In a way the "plan" did work, as Naismith produced the killer pass.. Unfortunately Bell was marginally off (allegedly).

Maybe I'm too conservative but I thought it wasn't the right scenario for Williams.

I agree, we were in the ascendency and I think the axis between Naismith and James was a big part of that. I think Nigel didn't want to upset the momentum too much.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, georgebcfc said:

Interesting one. From Nige's perspective with 20 mins ish left we still had to not concede on the break, which trading Williams for James/Naismith increases the risk of, particularly where both were having great games and bossing the midfield. 

In a way the "plan" did work, as Naismith produced the killer pass.. Unfortunately Bell was marginally off (allegedly).

Maybe I'm too conservative but I thought it wasn't the right scenario for Williams.

I agree too.  Think we need to give Blackburn’s defenders a lot of credit for playing as well as they did.  Nor did they resort to cynical cheating / time-wasting, at least not to the blatant degree other teams do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I agree too.  Think we need to give Blackburn’s defenders a lot of credit for playing as well as they did.  Nor did they resort to cynical cheating / time-wasting, at least not to the blatant degree other teams do.

I thought they were very well organised and their full backs in particular looked very good.

Rankin-Costello also sounds like a Ska version of my favourite music artist. ?

Edited by Port Said Red
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I thought they were very well organised and their full backs in particular looked very good.

Rankin-Costello also sounds like a Ska version of my favourite music artist. ?

 

Rankin-Costello was aptly named. He couldn't stand up for falling down, whenever he lost the ball.

Thought both he, Morton and Hedges were unpleasant whinging cheats to be honest.

Blackburn were a fairly average, but quite cynical, side. It amused me what crybabies they were when Scott began to take tumbles as easily as their players did. 

I'll be pleased when they fail to go up, to be honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

Rankin-Costello was aptly named. He couldn't stand up for falling down, whenever he lost the ball.

Thought both he, Morton and Hedges were unpleasant whinging cheats to be honest.

Blackburn were a fairly average, but quite cynical, side. It amused me what crybabies they were when Scott began to take tumbles as easily as their players did. 

I'll be pleased when they fail to go up, to be honest. 

Hedges was the worst of the lot for me. Kept going down, moaning etc

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...