Jump to content
IGNORED

Alex Scott - £25m to Bournemouth- Confirmed


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Can't see Bournemouth spending that kind of money on him. 

Spent about that on the Kyiv lad in January & he’s rarely featured..

Pretty sure they spent circa £50m in total during the January window.

I don’t see him ending up there, still think he’s destined for Wolves myself but all guesswork at present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Spent about that on the Kyiv lad in January & he’s rarely featured..

Pretty sure they spent circa £50m in total during the January window.

I don’t see him ending up there, still think he’s destined for Wolves myself but all guesswork at present.

Exactly that. Without a big money outgoing I don't see how they have enough cash remaining to spend on one player. Anything over £25m would be a club record fee for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to work out what we realistically will it can get for Scott tbis summer is quite difficult.

Few on this forum mention Borussia Dortmund.

Alvarez, Ajax midfield- linked for €35m. 6 years older than Scott. About £30.1m. Is 25 and will turn 26 in October.

Nmecha, Wolfsburg also midfield- linked with both Borussia Dortmund and Man United. Is 22 and will turn 23 in October. Seen him suggested at £15m.

Alvarez also linked with West Ham. Palhinha £50-60m a key priority for West Ham- 27 and turns 28 in July. 8 years older than Scott.

Benchmarking with players is very difficult but does this give us any indicator?

Scott btw having just checked is ahead of all of them in terms of first team gametime at their respective ages.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Trying to work out what we realistically will it can get for Scott tbis summer is quite difficult.

Few on this forum mention Borussia Dortmund.

Alvarez, Ajax midfield- linked for €35m. 6 years older than Scott. About £30.1m. Is 25 and will turn 26 in October.

Nmecha, Wolfsburg also midfield- linked with both Borussia Dortmund and Man United. Is 22 and will turn 23 in October. Seen him suggested at £15m.

Alvarez also linked with West Ham. Palhinha £50-60m a key priority for West Ham- 27 and turns 28 in July. 8 years older than Scott.

Benchmarking with players is very difficult but does this give us any indicator?

Scott btw having just checked is ahead of all of them in terms of first team gametime at their respective ages.

We are not obliged to or need to sell Scott as he has 2 years left on his contract, let’s not push the lad out the door just yet. Another year in the Championship with us will not do him or us any harm and could enhance his reputation and value 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, INCRED said:

We are not obliged to or need to sell Scott as he has 2 years left on his contract, let’s not push the lad out the door just yet. Another year in the Championship with us will not do him or us any harm and could enhance his reputation and value 

True and yes for footballing reasons it would be excellent to keep him and have him develop for another year but it tends to be that when the final year of the deal entered the value can fall precipitously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, INCRED said:

We are not obliged to or need to sell Scott as he has 2 years left on his contract, let’s not push the lad out the door just yet. Another year in the Championship with us will not do him or us any harm and could enhance his reputation and value 

It wouldn't harm us on the pitch but would in terms of fee we can expect next summer. Another way of looking at it would we be happy to spend £10m to have him here for one season?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

True and yes for footballing reasons it would be excellent to keep him and have him develop for another year but it tends to be that when the final year of the deal entered the value can fall precipitously.

Prolonging his contract for a season *may* reduce his value, but, then again, it may not - it’s certainly one for conjecture.

Should AS stay on for another season and take us to the playoffs or even promotion, his value will surely increase to the extent the time remaining on his contract becomes somewhat academic as teams enter a bidding war.

This is certainly my hope, if not necessarily a prediction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

Prolonging his contract for a season *may* reduce his value, but, then again, it may not - it’s certainly one for conjecture.

Should AS stay on for another season and take us to the playoffs or even promotion, his value will surely increase to the extent the time remaining on his contract becomes somewhat academic as teams enter a bidding war.

This is certainly my hope, if not necessarily a prediction.

Foreign clubs can sign from 6 months form end of deal so this is also a factor- pre-contract, see Brereton-Diaz to Villarreal so it might not just be low balling but if say in 18 months time he was in the final 6 months, January 2024, he was really smashing it...and Borussia Dortmund or someone came in! Clubs in 12 months maybe eyeing up a Bosman addition a year from then or perhaps his agent a nice juicy commission.

Many ways it could go. Although we would get compensation if he left on a free as under 24.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

….broken record from me.

If Alex Scott is still here next season it will alongside an extended deal to protect us (and probably him too in the shape of a release clause).

1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Although we would get compensation if he left on a free as under 24.

It’s 23 if he goes abroad.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Foreign clubs can sign from 6 months form end of deal so this is also a factor- pre-contract, see Brereton-Diaz so it might not just be low balling but if say in 18 months time he was in the final 6 months, January 2024, he was really smashing it...and Borussia Dortmund or someone came in! Clubs in 12 months maybe eyeing up a Bosman addition a year from then or perhaps his agent a nice juicy commission.

Many ways it could go. Although we would get compensation if he left on a free as under 24.

Perhaps, but that still wouldn’t preclude a ‘bidding war’.

I have just seen @Davefevs’s response.

Yes, of course, a contract extension would certainly suit City and, to a certain extent, AS also.

I do wonder, though, what role his agent has, and whether he/she would be amenable to an extension.

Edited by PHILINFRANCE
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can still see him going to Man City. Pep has seen the potential and apparently complimentary remarks from his players.

His age makes him perfect for Pep to mould. He won’t get much game time for a season or so, but it would be a great move for Alex,learning from the best will really enhance his game.

  • Haha 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

Perhaps, but that still wouldn’t preclude a ‘bidding war’.

I have just seen @Davefevs’s response.

Yes, of course, a contract extension would certainly suit City and, to a certain extent, AS also.

I do wonder, though, what role his agent has, and whether he/she would be amenable to an extension.

Isn’t his dad his agent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ScottishRed said:

I can still see him going to Man City. Pep has seen the potential and apparently complimentary remarks from his players.

His age makes him perfect for Pep to mould. He won’t get much game time for a season or so, but it would be a great move for Alex,learning from the best will really enhance his game.

I sort of agree with all of that, but wonder whether AS would be happy ‘not getting much game time for a season or two’.

Somehow, I just can’t see it, which brings me back to my desire to see him stay here for another season, at the end of which he may have to decide for which Premier League team he wishes to play.

Manchester City or the City that introduced him to the wider footballing world.

  • Like 1
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ScottishRed said:

His age makes him perfect for Pep to mould. He won’t get much game time for a season or so, but it would be a great move for Alex,learning from the best will really enhance his game.

Absolutely. Didn’t do Foden any harm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

Perhaps, but that still wouldn’t preclude a ‘bidding war’.

I have just seen @Davefevs’s response.

Yes, of course, a contract extension would certainly suit City and, to a certain extent, AS also.

I do wonder, though, what role his agent has, and whether he/she would be amenable to an extension.

A bidding war this summer or at a push January 2024 is most likely. IMO. Next summer, Brereton-Diaz a good example Blackburn certainly priced him out of a move at that point. Different ages, different players I know.

Nor sure he will sign a contract extension however to add one year wirh a proviso that he can definitely go next summer might be a good compromise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, RUSSEL85 said:

Absolutely. Didn’t do Foden any harm.

Yes, you would have to be seriously high level player to make it in that team… on the other hand, de bruyne mahrez and gundogan arent spring chickens anymore, over the next few years they will be slowing down and moving on, so the next generation will have to be found!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScottishRed said:

I can still see him going to Man City. Pep has seen the potential and apparently complimentary remarks from his players.

His age makes him perfect for Pep to mould. He won’t get much game time for a season or so, but it would be a great move for Alex,learning from the best will really enhance his game.

One or two on here think it’s out of the question. Personally I don’t. 
 

I guess we will see. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Simon bristol said:

Yes, you would have to be seriously high level player to make it in that team… on the other hand, de bruyne mahrez and gundogan arent spring chickens anymore, over the next few years they will be slowing down and moving on, so the next generation will have to be found!

Mahrez, Gundogun and Bernardo could all be on the move this summer, it would be a surprise if they were interested but wouldn't be out if this world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was having a quick browse of the Wolves forum. One post, indeed thread suggested a £50m FFP hole??

If true they won't be signing Scott any time soon, that kind of Projected breach sounds like sell first then buy.

http://www.molineuxmix.co.uk/forum/index.php?threads/filling-a-£50m-ffp-hole.718365/

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

£25m mentioned again- weren't West Ham and Wolves also expressing reservations about this or reportedly anyway.

That aside, what size bids do we think we will get?

I’d been told in January West Ham considered themselves out of the race due to bigger clubs being interested. Whether that’s still the case I don’t know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Was having a quick browse of the Wolves forum. One post, indeed thread suggested a £50m FFP hole??

If true they won't be signing Scott any time soon, that kind of Projected breach sounds like sell first then buy.

http://www.molineuxmix.co.uk/forum/index.php?threads/filling-a-£50m-ffp-hole.718365/

They do need to sell, but Ruben Neves would probably cover that on his own.

Lopetegui said in his recent conversation with their board that he accepts the FFP situation is difficult so wants to sign “young, Championship players” fairly obvious who he has in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KegCity said:

I’d been told in January West Ham considered themselves out of the race due to bigger clubs being interested. Whether that’s still the case I don’t know.

I'd say for West Ham it all depends on Declan Rice if he does go as many suspect I think they'll be in for him.

I do think Man City are keeping an eye on it but their hands are tied with the 115 charges. Spurs may step up their interest given they are not going to get Maddison (heading to Newcastle supposedly). Wolves can't afford it. Newcastle won't need him. I think there are definitely a few interes clubs we don't know about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, KegCity said:

I’d been told in January West Ham considered themselves out of the race due to bigger clubs being interested. Whether that’s still the case I don’t know.

Yet they carried on scouting him right up until the end of the season. As far as I am aware they are the club that has shown the most interest during the season. It will be a club of West Ham's size or bigger I think. No way will it be a Bournemouth.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of at least one very interested club that hasn't been mentioned in the press as of yet. Whether or not a formal bid materialises remains to be seen but more clubs are putting feelers out there for him.

Gut feel with Scott is he stays this summer, I'm not sure people will be willing to pay what we want currently. I wouldn't be surprised if he stays for now but then there be a lot more interest in January. 

The January window is a weird one, but if he's playing well a club may gamble to get him before a 'bidding war' in the summer.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've a feeling (more hope that anything) that he'll stay this season.

If it's true that he has 2  years left on his contract, that puts the club in a tricky position next summer if a) we don't get promotion, or b) a bidding war doesn't happen.

I hear there's a contract offer on the table at the moment, but I wonder if the contract says "we'll up your wages for the next 2 years, but only if you commit to stay for one further year afterwards."

Basically, a 3 years contract from this exact time might benefit both parties.

Overall, I think it depends on how stung AS felt after being released by Southampton and Bournemouth, compared with knowing what he has here, compared with potentially sitting in the reserves or being loaned out at a massive club.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Simon bristol said:

Yes, you would have to be seriously high level player to make it in that team… on the other hand, de bruyne mahrez and gundogan arent spring chickens anymore, over the next few years they will be slowing down and moving on, so the next generation will have to be found!

Agreed. That is part of my thought process. If Pep sees Alex as potentially part of that next generation it would be a great move for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

I sort of agree with all of that, but wonder whether AS would be happy ‘not getting much game time for a season or two’.

Somehow, I just can’t see it, which brings me back to my desire to see him stay here for another season, at the end of which he may have to decide for which Premier League team he wishes to play.

Manchester City or the City that introduced him to the wider footballing world.

Cole Palmer seemed pretty happy on Saturday night with a Champions League medal round his neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BetterRedthanBlue said:

I'd say for West Ham it all depends on Declan Rice if he does go as many suspect I think they'll be in for him.

I do think Man City are keeping an eye on it but their hands are tied with the 115 charges. Spurs may step up their interest given they are not going to get Maddison (heading to Newcastle supposedly). Wolves can't afford it. Newcastle won't need him. I think there are definitely a few interes clubs we don't know about

Not sure how Man City’s hands are tied. They face charges but they are currently under no transfer restrictions.

As an aside, I read yesterday that their revenue from winning the CL was £180m in total.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ScottishRed said:

Not sure how Man City’s hands are tied. They face charges but they are currently under no transfer restrictions.

As an aside, I read yesterday that their revenue from winning the CL was £180m in total.

We don't know what the charges will amount to. They could be placed under am embargo which would ban them from registering anyone they signed in the summer it's just a bit of a cloud over their heads at the moment.

I personally think Man City and Pep would be the best place for him just look at how he dealt with Foden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ScottishRed said:

Agreed. That is part of my thought process. If Pep sees Alex as potentially part of that next generation it would be a great move for him.

 

11 minutes ago, Roger Red Hat said:

Yep, Pep, undeniably improves players, often not seen until their second season under him.

The bit that’s being missed here is that Pep has confirmed he’s only doing two more years at Man City. If AS did move there for Pep (in part) then he’s looking at season one on the sidelines and then in season two how much will Pep want to integrate youngsters and how much will he just want to win for a legacy?

Peps long term plan makes Man City a far less attractive option for Alex I’d say. He could quite easily waste two years up there.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, hinsleburg said:

I know of at least one very interested club that hasn't been mentioned in the press as of yet. Whether or not a formal bid materialises remains to be seen but more clubs are putting feelers out there for him.

Gut feel with Scott is he stays this summer, I'm not sure people will be willing to pay what we want currently. I wouldn't be surprised if he stays for now but then there be a lot more interest in January. 

The January window is a weird one, but if he's playing well a club may gamble to get him before a 'bidding war' in the summer.

Do you know if price is a sticking point for said club? Seen it a few times in media reports and fans of said clubs or some fans of said clubs saying "Hmm, £25m a bit steep" etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GrahamC said:

They do need to sell, but Ruben Neves would probably cover that on his own.

Lopetegui said in his recent conversation with their board that he accepts the FFP situation is difficult so wants to sign “young, Championship players” fairly obvious who he has in mind.

Ah yeah £50m hole can be taken a raw ways.

It could mean on track to fail by £50m or it could mean needing a £50m transfer profit. If it is the former then that would need to be filled just to get back to parity then thereafter £1 in £1 out kinda thing.

Also seen it suggested that they won't be going for fees of £25m this summer but it's still early. Plenty can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty relaxed about AS. Ask 25m maybe go as low as 22m. If not, we get another season of him. We’d still possibly fetch 12-15m for him next summer if he has a good season again. 25m helps more but don’t think FFP is much of an issue anymore. So 8 10 12 15 next summer will still go quite a ways. We don’t seem to be a club that will push FFP to the limit going forward anyway. 
 

I think if he can take another step forward in his game, then we can be a top 6 contender this season with the current squad(another 1-2 in as well). It may be more worth it to us having him play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Do you know if price is a sticking point for said club? Seen it a few times in media reports and fans of said clubs or some fans of said clubs saying "Hmm, £25m a bit steep" etc.

Sadly I do not!

I think it's the structure of the deal that is making clubs wary at the moment. We want 'x' amount plus add on's whereas I think post COVID clubs are relying more and more on add ons to finance deals over a longer period of time. If he goes this summer it'll be on terms we are happy with and unless Scott throws toys out (unlikely) we won't sell for the sake of selling

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, hinsleburg said:

I know of at least one very interested club that hasn't been mentioned in the press as of yet. Whether or not a formal bid materialises remains to be seen but more clubs are putting feelers out there for him.

Gut feel with Scott is he stays this summer, I'm not sure people will be willing to pay what we want currently. I wouldn't be surprised if he stays for now but then there be a lot more interest in January. 

The January window is a weird one, but if he's playing well a club may gamble to get him before a 'bidding war' in the summer.

So who is this "alleged" club then ?  Hardly going to be a state secret ,is it .

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hinsleburg said:

Sadly I do not!

I think it's the structure of the deal that is making clubs wary at the moment. We want 'x' amount plus add on's whereas I think post COVID clubs are relying more and more on add ons to finance deals over a longer period of time. If he goes this summer it'll be on terms we are happy with and unless Scott throws toys out (unlikely) we won't sell for the sake of selling

Thanks, a crucial point I think. For instance I understand that Palace were prepared to meet our price for Semenyo but not the payment terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hinsleburg said:

Sadly I do not!

I think it's the structure of the deal that is making clubs wary at the moment. We want 'x' amount plus add on's whereas I think post COVID clubs are relying more and more on add ons to finance deals over a longer period of time. If he goes this summer it'll be on terms we are happy with and unless Scott throws toys out (unlikely) we won't sell for the sake of selling

Thanks. So we want more in the bank now whereas some clubs may want a greater percentage in add-ons, targets hit etc?

Bellingham is an interesting case study for this. Think Borussia Dortmund were certainly wanting some £130m plus add-ons according to a report in March.

He went for £88.5m- but add-ons push it closer to that target fee. The remainder ie the further £29-30m seems to be linked to add-ons etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, slartibartfast said:

So who is this "alleged" club then ?  Hardly going to be a state secret ,is it .

Without wishing to be cryptic, I was told in good faith and don't feel comfortable sharing currently. The person that told me has been a good friend for a long time and works at the club in question so whilst unlikely to impact them I don't wish to take that chance.

I only posted as there's been a few comments that it seems really quiet currently on the AS front but think there's more happening than is currently being reported. 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, JoeAman08 said:

I am pretty relaxed about AS. Ask 25m maybe go as low as 22m. If not, we get another season of him. We’d still possibly fetch 12-15m for him next summer if he has a good season again. 25m helps more but don’t think FFP is much of an issue anymore. So 8 10 12 15 next summer will still go quite a ways. We don’t seem to be a club that will push FFP to the limit going forward anyway. 
 

I think if he can take another step forward in his game, then we can be a top 6 contender this season with the current squad(another 1-2 in as well). It may be more worth it to us having him play. 

FFP wise okay there will be some unknowns maybe if accepted Covid losses for 2021-22 exceed £2.5m but otherwise I would say best guess would be an allowable FFP loss not exceeding £13-14m this upcoming season. Which in accounting terms is £20-21m probably pre tax.

Will he interesting to see how much more we can spend independent of sales or sell on windfalls.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sir Geoff said:

Cole Palmer seemed pretty happy on Saturday night with a Champions League medal round his neck.

I didn't see that, but I'm sure he was, as, no doubt, was Kalvin Phillips; not forgetting Scott Carson, of course, who won his second Champions League medal following his part in Liverpool's victory - amazingly, his previous medal was also won in Istanbul.

Re. Kalvin Phillips, I am aware he suffered serious injury, but he has gone from being virtually ever-present in Leeds' team, and playing regularly for England, to very much a bit part player for Manchester City.

As I said, I am not sure whether Alex Scott would prefer medals or playing - preumably both, but unlikely at this stage of his career I would suggest.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is if you're a board in the PL, such is the pull of the PL for a few reasons.

You can get Scott who while hugely promising and we know how good he can be and may well shoot up further. However what percentage of that is potential and growth.

Scott or an established International top flight albeit elsewhere midfielder with CL experience from a European League for a similar price? You might be inclined to play it a bit safer. This is the concern I have with the £25m price tag vs the global pull of the PL.

PL clubs can very much afford Scott but will they play it safer at that price at this stage I wonder.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Percy Pig said:

Risk and reward though. The English player premium means it is more likely than not that his value will double or treble in a very short space of time.

Counts towards the 8 homegrown players too.

£25m is a bargain. 

We should be getting £30m at least for what he is about to become. 

 

Liverpool!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Percy Pig said:

Risk and reward though. The English player premium means it is more likely than not that his value will double or treble in a very short space of time.

Counts towards the 8 homegrown players too.

£25m is a bargain. 

We should be getting £30m at least for what he is about to become. 

 

I'm not that convinced, not in terms of his ability but in terms of our ability to command the fee his ability and our development merits.

Ah yes the 8 home grown players rule. Just trying to extrapolate what we may get for him in this market, in theory he is optimum price time now.

2 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Liverpool!!!

McAllister and heavily linked with Kone and Thuram. Would they be looking to sign a 4th midfielder?

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the amount of top quality midfielders moving this summer I can easily see Alex moving late in the window. If they weren’t idiots he would be on the list for just about every prem team and some in Europe too. 
 

As a lot of teams (dortmund, Madrid, Man City, Brighton, Chelsea) are losing their best midfielders they will be looking at first replacing them with proven top flight talent. Doesn’t mean they don’t respect or have interest in Scott it just means they have a different priority. Once those deals are done they may then come in for him. 
 

Can easily see a Brighton/wolves/spurs wait it out and meet our demands late on. What’s the point in starting bidding so early when there are so many interested. Will just significantly drive up his price which no potential suitors will want.

Edited by George Rs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

My mate who is a PL fan but sees a range of Bristol City game was debating this with them on weekend, fee etc. He reckons £15-20m, £20m being top end of the bids we will get. How would £25-30m sit in terms of all-time record fees at this level.

Your mate is just a fan and knows no more than we do .

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

My mate who is a PL fan but sees a range of Bristol City game was debating this with them on weekend, fee etc. He reckons £15-20m, £20m being top end of the bids we will get. How would £25-30m sit in terms of all-time record fees at this level.

It depends if you count teams coming down from the prem. If you do he’s around the top ten, but personally I don’t think they should count.

If you don’t and he goes for any amount between 25-30 he’s 4th highest championship departure fee.

1st: Joao Pedro - €34,200,000

2nd: Ollie Watkins - €34,000,000

3rd: Jude Bellingham - €30,150,000

4th: Alex Scott - €25-30,000,000

5th: James Maddison- €25,000,000

22E26215-64C9-4892-818A-AF99CB7ED162.thumb.jpeg.e3fb617347d3f610491b8a8ff0ec975c.jpeg

(Fees according to TransferMarkt)

Edited by George Rs
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, George Rs said:

It depends if you count teams coming down from the prem. If you do he’s around the top ten, but personally I don’t think they should count.

If you don’t and he goes for any amount between 25-30 he’s 4th highest championship departure fee.

1st: Joao Pedro - £34,200,000

2nd: Ollie Watkins - £34,000,000

3rd: Jude Bellingham - £30,150,000

4th: Alex Scott - £25-30,000,000

5th: James Maddison- £25,000,000

22E26215-64C9-4892-818A-AF99CB7ED162.thumb.jpeg.e3fb617347d3f610491b8a8ff0ec975c.jpeg

(Fees according to TransferMarkt)

Those figures are in euros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, George Rs said:

It depends if you count teams coming down from the prem. If you do he’s around the top ten, but personally I don’t think they should count.

If you don’t and he goes for any amount between 25-30 he’s 4th highest championship departure fee.

1st: Joao Pedro - £34,200,000

2nd: Ollie Watkins - £34,000,000

3rd: Jude Bellingham - £30,150,000

4th: Alex Scott - £25-30,000,000

5th: James Maddison- £25,000,000

22E26215-64C9-4892-818A-AF99CB7ED162.thumb.jpeg.e3fb617347d3f610491b8a8ff0ec975c.jpeg

(Fees according to TransferMarkt)

Thanks. That appears to be in € however but yes can extrapolate from there. He would be up there as one of the top for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Percy Pig said:

Genuinely don't see the past or a fans perspective as relevant. How would he have any inclination of a clubs interest, valuation or where Alex sits on their recruitment priority list/squad depth chart? 

He's done more than Bellingham did at Birmingham. He moved for over £30m after sell ons. 

A fee is dependent on a multitude of factors, none of which are necessarily reflective of market value. 

Potential, home grown, 2 years left on a contract, professionalism (won't go on strike to force a move) the sale of Semenyo and 2 years of austerity meaning we are under no obligation to sell below our valuation will all be factors in driving the price up. Semenyo was the opposite story, diminishing value/contract, promise to let him leave, slowing interest meant we had to accept arguably less than he was "worth" if you were applying value as a stand alone concept (which it absolutely isnt). 

 

Take two identical players and put them in different scenarios and the fee will be wildly different. Circumstances are the main driver of value. We are in a strong position for once.

And if nobody meets our valuation we have the best young player in the division/country at our disposal for another year. Can't be a bad thing 

I get that although I wonder, the lack of concrete speculation is interesting, I do worry a bit as to whether he maybe priced out of a move which can happen.

Agreed with most of this although net of sales I wonder how much exactly we can spend. Two years of austerity certainly will have helped, has helped and we definitely don't need to sell (I also believe we may have breached FFP had we not sold Semenyo by end of May but that's another debate).

Feels like this summer would be the optimum time to sell for the biggest price but ideally he stays and develops further here for another year, with an improving side around him thst should also bring more out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Trying to work out what we realistically will it can get for Scott tbis summer is quite difficult.

Few on this forum mention Borussia Dortmund.

Alvarez, Ajax midfield- linked for €35m. 6 years older than Scott. About £30.1m. Is 25 and will turn 26 in October.

Nmecha, Wolfsburg also midfield- linked with both Borussia Dortmund and Man United. Is 22 and will turn 23 in October. Seen him suggested at £15m.

Alvarez also linked with West Ham. Palhinha £50-60m a key priority for West Ham- 27 and turns 28 in July. 8 years older than Scott.

Benchmarking with players is very difficult but does this give us any indicator?

Scott btw having just checked is ahead of all of them in terms of first team gametime at their respective ages.

Players in their mid 20s are pretty well at, or hitting their peak.

Alex is 6/7 years from his peak years and given the level at which he currently performs ( even accepting that it's in the championship) I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that by his mid 20s he will be some player. If so, that is why clubs will be prepared to pay top dollar for him now.  The only question is whether their top dollar matches ours, but if enough clubs are genuinely interested in signing him then one will be prepared to pay at, or close to, our asking price so as not to miss out on him. 

If not, then by the next time he is available £25m might look like a steal.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

I get that although I wonder, the lack of concrete speculation is interesting, I do worry a bit as to whether he maybe priced out of a move which can happen.

Agreed with most of this although net of sales I wonder how much exactly we can spend. Two years of austerity certainly will have helped, has helped and we definitely don't need to sell (I also believe we may have breached FFP had we not sold Semenyo by end of May but that's another debate).

Feels like this summer would be the optimum time to sell for the biggest price but ideally he stays and develops further here for another year, with an improving side around him thst should also bring more out of him.

He’s just come back from U20 WC, he’s on holiday / back home in Guernsey.  Some deals have lots of speculation, some don’t.  Depends on club (buying and selling), agent, etc.  barely any PL clubs have used their Retained Lists yet.

“Priced out of a move?” - that might be our strategy! ??‍♂️

Chill…just like Alex is doing!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AshtonGreat said:

I think Bernardo may leave as he's said he wants a new challenge, but I reckon they could (and should) hang on to Gundogan.

He is an excellent player however maybe he feels it’s time to move on as he has won everything.

I have a strong impression that playing for Pep is immensely intense, looking at some articles on him, and there may come a time when a player needs to remove himself from that.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...