Jump to content
IGNORED

Eliasson next season


Recommended Posts

Champions league footy next season for Niclas. AEK have won the Greek super league by 5 points,, despite having been 10 points behind Panathinaikos around Christmas. Having spent many a good time with the Gate 21 crew back in my Athens days, I'm well chuffed for him, the team and the fans. Not city related, I know but will be an opportunity to have a glance at one of our old boys in the Champions league though. 

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, JackofromSanJavier said:

Champions league footy next season for Niclas. AEK have won the Greek super league by 5 points,, despite having been 10 points behind Panathinaikos around Christmas. Having spent many a good time with the Gate 21 crew back in my Athens days, I'm well chuffed for him, the team and the fans. Not city related, I know but will be an opportunity to have a glance at one of our old boys in the Champions league though. 

Do you know if that gets them straight into the group stage, or do they have to go through a qualifier?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nongazeuse said:

I was hoping he was coming back to us - really good player and never worked out why we let him go.

Because his positional awareness was awful and never showed any signs of progression. Could cross a good ball, but very little outside of that - people bring up his tackle stats but that’s because he was in the wrong place to start with and had to make the tackle. 
 

He left us for a relegated Ligue 1 side, and has subsequently gone to Greece, where the standard is below that of the Championship.

I’m confident if you asked Nige he wouldn’t have him back here - he’s genuinely not that good in the round despite a very good natural attribute. It’s probably why he hasn’t kicked on into the Sweden squad. 

  • Like 16
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, petehinton said:

Holden played him CM in a 3, never forget ????????

Played him as a no8. If you’re playing 3142 without wingers, you have to play somewhere else. Seem to recall him setting up a couple against Cheltenham in a PSF

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nongazeuse said:

But he was quite young and in a foreign country - he was a bloody sight better than Massengo turned out to become. 

Ooooh a bit of controversy! 
 

Talking with QPR fans, who all asked about Massengo, they could not fathom how the kid was not a superstar already. My point was Massengo was doing the same little drag backs and dummies at 18 as he was at 21 and didn’t develop as a team player . 
 

I agree with you Eliasson was a better player and provided more, his goal and assist stats will support that!

Elliasson here was one of the many toys LJ threw out of his pram! 
 

I have no idea how good or bad the Greek league is, but I’m glad for the lad he has an opportunity to play on the big stage. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

Because his positional awareness was awful and never showed any signs of progression. Could cross a good ball, but very little outside of that - people bring up his tackle stats but that’s because he was in the wrong place to start with and had to make the tackle. 
 

He left us for a relegated Ligue 1 side, and has subsequently gone to Greece, where the standard is below that of the Championship.

I’m confident if you asked Nige he wouldn’t have him back here - he’s genuinely not that good in the round despite a very good natural attribute. It’s probably why he hasn’t kicked on into the Sweden squad. 

I believe he also only had 1 year left on his contract and wasn't going to sign a new one so was actually a sensible decision from the club!

Always felt he was a player who we missed when he wasn't playing, but then didn't consistently deliver enough when he did!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO Elliason was an excellent footballer who was poorly utilised.....he would have been a success here .....if he had been managed correctly.   Anyhow he is going to be playing Champions League football, which is a million miles from where we operate...........so good luck to him, I wish him well

Edited by maxjak
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Ooooh a bit of controversy! 
 

Talking with QPR fans, who all asked about Massengo, they could not fathom how the kid was not a superstar already. My point was Massengo was doing the same little drag backs and dummies at 18 as he was at 21 and didn’t develop as a team player . 
 

I agree with you Eliasson was a better player and provided more, his goal and assist stats will support that!

Elliasson here was one of the many toys LJ threw out of his pram! 
 

I have no idea how good or bad the Greek league is, but I’m glad for the lad he has an opportunity to play on the big stage. 

The Greek league wasn't overly taxing when I was AEKs token English idiot in the crowd in the. 90s, probably improved now with the Greek economy having recovered (remember Grexit, anyone?). Maybe at our championship level now. I liked Elisson as a raw youngster who had potential. But if you're looking like not signing a new contract, then it's a 'yassas' from me. Good luck to the bloke though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JackofromSanJavier said:

I think Panathinaikos came in at the second qualifying round last year, so probably the same for AEK

Third qualifying. Greece 15th on coefficient but get bumped slightly due to Russia exclusion. Would need to get through two rounds to reach group stage

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, David Brent said:

Another LJ vanity project. Signed without a plan for him in the team.

Talented individual so not surprised he’s had a decent career thus far.

Agreed.

In one of Lee’s infamous ‘ throw a player under the bus episodes’, he stated that he would be a great 7-side player!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, maxjak said:

IMHO Elliason was an excellent footballer who was poorly utilised.....he would have been a success here .....if he had been managed correctly.   Anyhow he is going to be playing Champions League football, which is a million miles from where we operate...........so good luck to him, I wish him well

 

2 minutes ago, Searles said:

Overly harsh. 

I’m not sure either post here is correct. If NE was an excellent footballer poorly utilised, then other clubs would have seen that, taken him on, and made him a success at a decent level of football. The Greek league, as noted, is 15th in UEFA standings - it’s below the Championship in relative strength and also below Ligue 1. He’s gone down the ladder to a level where he appears to be doing well and fair play to him (although he’s not guaranteed to be playing champions league any more than Celtic are - Scotland being a higher coefficient incidentally). So I don’t agree he’s a million miles from us in a good way - he’s got a title at a lower level and a chance of playing Champ League, but so do Czech Republic and Norwegian champions who are next to Greece on the UEFA list!

However, if he was a championship footballer (or even a footballer at a level or two below championship), he’d be at a higher level at 27, or around the national team. It can’t be everyone in football not seeing it or using him badly.

Great crosser. Signed via stats IIRC (I believe he was LJs “Knockaert”). But one we were right to sell and who didn’t show a sign of improvement - or most key football intelligence - in his time here and the move down the levels bears that out.

  • Like 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, David Brent said:

Another LJ vanity project. Signed without a plan for him in the team.

Talented individual so not surprised he’s had a decent career thus far.

 

Got to agree, DB. 

We didn't really improve his game other than making him a bit more physically robust, and age probably took care of most of that, but I always thought he might've done better elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wouldn't have fitted into Holden's preferred system and it was the final year of his contract so that was that in respect of the sale. That aside, some of the critique seems harsh.

He clearly had something, 2nd or 3rd highest Championship assist provider in 2019-20 despite being in and out of the team. He had certain flaws in his game too but would havs been better suited to a genuine 4-3-3 IMO. As would a lot of our players of that era.

I maintain that e.g. Brentford would have got more out of him than we did and same could go for a number of other players, because if you look at their tactical set-up in 2019-20 and a number of their players they are of a similar profile to some we had, of a similar background League wise etc.

His goals v QPR and Bolton in 2nd half of 2018-19 were great too.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

Played him as a no8. If you’re playing 3142 without wingers, you have to play somewhere else. Seem to recall him setting up a couple against Cheltenham in a PSF

Or just play the system that suits the players. Him and Co’D as 8s….**** me dead. 
 

Made even worse by rejecting a huge fee for eliasson not too long before then selling him for sweet fa in relative terms.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Or just play the system that suits the players. Him and Co’D as 8s….**** me dead. 
 

Made even worse by rejecting a huge fee for eliasson not too long before then selling him for sweet fa in relative terms.  

Interesting, a rejected bid- by whom and how much? Dont remember that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ScottishRed said:

Agreed.

In one of Lee’s infamous ‘ throw a player under the bus episodes’, he stated that he would be a great 7-side player!

As I remember it, the idea that he had only played 5 and 7 aside football was started on here and put to bed by our swedish contingent. If you could point me to the LJ quote I'll be more than happy to accept that's what he said, but I don't think it is.

 

45 minutes ago, Simon bristol said:

Lee johnson is such an idiot!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Or just play the system that suits the players. Him and Co’D as 8s….**** me dead. 
 

Made even worse by rejecting a huge fee for eliasson not too long before then selling him for sweet fa in relative terms.  

I’m sure this is the guy you used to gush over on the podcast. Deano’s chinos wasn’t it?

I think he played a handful of games as a 8 under Holden.

Johnson signed wingers but had no idea how to use them. I’m sure he’d only instruct Elliasson high and wide, to pump balls in, but never with Fam. He should have been coached how to come infield and link play, not just from out wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Henry said:

I’m sure this is the guy you used to gush over on the podcast. Deano’s chinos wasn’t it?

I think he played a handful of games as a 8 under Holden.

Johnson signed wingers but had no idea how to use them. I’m sure he’d only instruct Elliasson high and wide, to pump balls in, but never with Fam. He should have been coached how to come infield and link play, not just from out wide.

The eliasson Fam double sub, or at least some kind of double/triple sub with eliasson in was LJ’s ace card over his last year. Saved his bacon imo. 
 

long live deanos chinos, and the crèche that the club/HPC became in his dying embers!

Edited by petehinton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Silvio Dante said:

 

I’m not sure either post here is correct. If NE was an excellent footballer poorly utilised, then other clubs would have seen that, taken him on, and made him a success at a decent level of football. The Greek league, as noted, is 15th in UEFA standings - it’s below the Championship in relative strength and also below Ligue 1. He’s gone down the ladder to a level where he appears to be doing well and fair play to him (although he’s not guaranteed to be playing champions league any more than Celtic are - Scotland being a higher coefficient incidentally). So I don’t agree he’s a million miles from us in a good way - he’s got a title at a lower level and a chance of playing Champ League, but so do Czech Republic and Norwegian champions who are next to Greece on the UEFA list!

However, if he was a championship footballer (or even a footballer at a level or two below championship), he’d be at a higher level at 27, or around the national team. It can’t be everyone in football not seeing it or using him badly.

Great crosser. Signed via stats IIRC (I believe he was LJs “Knockaert”). But one we were right to sell and who didn’t show a sign of improvement - or most key football intelligence - in his time here and the move down the levels bears that out.

? effing ? 

1 hour ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

Got to agree, DB. 

We didn't really improve his game other than making him a bit more physically robust, and age probably took care of most of that, but I always thought he might've done better elsewhere. 

Those Judo lessons! ???

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spudski said:

He's played one game all season where he lasted 90 mins. Either subbed every game or came on as a sub. 

No where good enough for the Championship. 

I have to agree with you.

I always remember when we were chasing a game and LJ would bring him on, and my falsely placed optimism that he would do something to create a golden chance for a striker to equalize or get us the winner.

As I said my naive optimism was ill placed.

I think that those of my generation tend to get excited when a wide player is introduced in the hope that something could be created against a tiring defense - it was the same scenario with Wes Burns for example.

It rarely worked out that way for us.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Searles said:

I mean there are so many flaws here but let’s just focus on one area of complete nonsense. “Didn’t show a sign of improvement”.

17/18 - 13 games 0 goals 0 assists

18/19 - 33 games 2 goals 6 assists

19/20 - 37 games 3 goals 12 assists 

I mean it’s just rubbish and factually incorrect, if you’re going to try and go to so much effort to slate an ex player at least focus on someone who was useless. 

So, which parts are flawed and factually incorrect?

- Greeces coefficient?

- The fact he’s gone down the levels?

- The fact he’s not guaranteed champions league?

- The proximity of Czech Republic and Norway?

Nope. All factually correct. All you have is an opinion. And anyone who knows football will tell you that goals/assists aren’t the full story. Hell, there has been a lot of debate on here (and wider) over Scott’s lack of goals/assists but that doesn’t reflect what he brings to the team.

I watched Eliasson for three years. He left as positionally naive as the day he arrived (which in turn impacted the team negatively). And whether you think he was a good player or not at this level, it’s totally factually correct to say he’s now playing - and not even starting every week  at a level ranked below where we are now, so I’d suggest more established football judges than you or me share my opinion.

But, y’know. Facts. Innit.
 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Searles said:

I mean there are so many flaws here but let’s just focus on one area of complete nonsense. “Didn’t show a sign of improvement”.

17/18 - 13 games 0 goals 0 assists

18/19 - 33 games 2 goals 6 assists

19/20 - 37 games 3 goals 12 assists 

I mean it’s just rubbish and factually incorrect, if you’re going to try and go to so much effort to slate an ex player at least focus on someone who was useless. 

I don’t think he was as good as those numbers actually play out in terms of team impact.  He was tactically naive, left his full-back exposed, and when you hear players like Jack Hunt say he’d rather have Marley Watkins in front of him, because at least he put effort in and tried to help out, then you get an appreciation of the rounded (or not so rounded) player in front of him.

Eliasson was a lot of oohs and aahs, the player a crowd likes, but who’s teammates are hugely frustrated by.

How many times did he assist Diedhiou in his time here?  Partly Fam’s fault too admittedly.

He wasn’t crap, he wasn’t great either.  He’s potentially gonna play in the Champions League because he’s at a club in an inferior league.  Ben Wright anyone? ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of blame being put of LJ for signing Eliasson as a vanity project without knowing where to play him.   I'm not convinced it was LJ that instigated a lot of this. 

My reckoning is that it was MA treating the club and a hothouse for turning promising young players into expensive sales a few years down the line without any DoF or philosophy of the type of football or system we wanted to play.  (MA's contract maybe incentivised this or it was pure vanity, I'm not sure which).  The irony being that without such a system players aren't able to develop and realise their potential to achieve those sales. 

I'd have loved to see CO'D and Eliasson in a front three with someone like Conway through the middle.  Both players I feel had all the freedom of playing expansive attacking football coached out of them at a critical stage in their development.  

 

Edited by Red Skin
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Davefevs said:

I don’t think he was as good as those numbers actually play out in terms of team impact.  He was tactically naive, left his full-back exposed, and when you hear players like Jack Hunt say he’d rather have Marley Watkins in front of him, because at least he put effort in and tried to help out, then you get an appreciation of the rounded (or not so rounded) player in front of him.

Eliasson was a lot of oohs and aahs, the player a crowd likes, but who’s teammates are hugely frustrated by.

How many times did he assist Diedhiou in his time here?  Partly Fam’s fault too admittedly.

He wasn’t crap, he wasn’t great either.  He’s potentially gonna play in the Champions League because he’s at a club in an inferior league.  Ben Wright anyone? ?

I had to look it up, but I see that ex-City player Ben Wright (I am pretty sure I have no recollection whatsoever of him being at the club) joined his former manager, Benny L, to play for Viking, and scored against Chelsea in the UEFA Cup.

Google is amazing, isn’t it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Red Skin said:

A lot of blame being put of LJ for signing Eliasson as a vanity project without knowing where to play him.   I'm not convinced it was LJ that instigated a lot of this. 

My reckoning is that it was MA treating the club and a hothouse for turning promising young players into expensive sales a few years down the line without any DoF or philosophy of the type of football or system we wanted to play.  (MA's contract maybe incentivised this or it was pure vanity, I'm not sure which).  The irony being that without such a system players aren't able to develop and realise their potential to achieve those sales. 

I'd have loved to see CO'D and Eliasson in a front three with someone like Conway through the middle.  Both players I feel had all the freedom of playing expansive attacking football coached out of them at a critical stage in their development.  

 

I’m sure his bonus was linked to financial performance, which isn’t unsurprising really for a CEO, but can of course be a conflict of interests too, ie in his vested interest to sell players to keep losses lower than for the benefit of squad development.

It just so happens that I have a spreadsheet of his Director Salary vs Player Trading / Transfer Profit. ?

image.png.e99ce6b582d40d1fa25d0505ebc8d25a.png

You can make of it what you will!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I’m sure his bonus was linked to financial performance, which isn’t unsurprising really for a CEO, but can of course be a conflict of interests too, ie in his vested interest to sell players to keep losses lower than for the benefit of squad development.

It just so happens that I have a spreadsheet of his Director Salary vs Player Trading / Transfer Profit. ?

image.png.e99ce6b582d40d1fa25d0505ebc8d25a.png

You can make of it what you will!

Blimey those figures for 2018/19 & 2019/20 are stark aren't they @Davefevs?

Somewhat potential conflict of interest in driving transfers isn't there?

Edited by NcnsBcfc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Red Skin said:

A lot of blame being put of LJ for signing Eliasson as a vanity project without knowing where to play him.   

 

 

While I agree with your post, I'm not sure I'd call the signing a "vanity project" - Eliasson was unknown in England - more of a symptom of the Mark Ashton initiated scattergun "trawl everything up" approach to recruitment.

Someone who is a natural winger brought in to a team that mainly did not play wingers. 

And as has been pointed on, we didn't coach to improve this young player. It was just accepted that 100% of his game was crosses from near the touch-line. If he was limited, we certainly didn't do much to improve his skill-set. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exception or rule but Eliasson assist to Weimann opening day v Leeds 2019 was definitely not a cross from out wide. He drifted in a bit there. Little bit  before had a more conventional cutting inside and cross. He also won a free kick in a dangerous position , again centrally in these highlights.

We could probably have developed and utilised him better.

08:56-09:33

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red Skin said:

A lot of blame being put of LJ for signing Eliasson as a vanity project without knowing where to play him.   I'm not convinced it was LJ that instigated a lot of this. 

My reckoning is that it was MA treating the club and a hothouse for turning promising young players into expensive sales a few years down the line without any DoF or philosophy of the type of football or system we wanted to play.  (MA's contract maybe incentivised this or it was pure vanity, I'm not sure which).  The irony being that without such a system players aren't able to develop and realise their potential to achieve those sales. 

I'd have loved to see CO'D and Eliasson in a front three with someone like Conway through the middle.  Both players I feel had all the freedom of playing expansive attacking football coached out of them at a critical stage in their development.  

 

LJ said at a fans forum at AG he found eliasson by wyscout (or something similar) whilst on his laptop lying on the sofa!! and think he was signed without anyone watching him live as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, petehinton said:

LJ said at a fans forum at AG he found eliasson by wyscout (or something similar) whilst on his laptop lying on the sofa!! and think he was signed without anyone watching him live as well

Was definitely found from a “data brief”…find me a player with similar stats to Knockaert.  I doubt LJ crunched the numbers himself though.

I’m not sure whether he was never watched live or not…there was definitely a tweet from Tins at a stadium in Sweden, a bit before he signed.  I think it was assumed he was watching Engvall on loan at Djurgarden, but Engvall didn’t play and there was a wink emoji added to “wasted trip”, which think alluded to him being out there to watch Eliasson.

Nagy was the one who wasn’t watched I think.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

I thought perhaps we did, against QPR.

Just a shame it didn’t happen more often.

We did in his first couple of games.

He then got injured literally 1.5 games into his time here. Well maybe nor literally 1.5 but around that.

You couldn't make it up. Building a new team including some existing loanees made percent and then some new players.

Within a month to 6 weeks:

Kalas, DaSilva, Nagy, Afobe especially all out medium to long term.

DaSilva injured between game 1 and game 2, missed half a season. Kalas injured in August out got a while, Nagy 1.5 games in.

Afobe, poor Afobe injured in training after a few weeks. The partnership with Weimann with Palmer behind was giving us an interesting dimension or two.

Knock on effects were that Rowe was less of a threat from LWB than DaSilva, Kalas possibly enabled us to play a slightly higher line, Nagy was just getting settled and Afobe injury reduced our overall threat as Palmer was only really useful behind that strike pair.

Also meant what with the ongoing injuries to Korey that Massengo had to be used more often than planned at that point.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a great signing but at the wrong time and that’s the frustrating thing as we would have got a lot more out of him in our current set up.

That being said, he was a decent signing, brought him in for £2m and sold him for £4m with plenty of assists from the bench.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

We did in his first couple of games.

He then got injured literally 1.5 games into his time here. Well maybe nor literally 1.5 but around that.

You couldn't make it up. Building a new team including some existing loanees made percent and then some new players.

Within a month to 6 weeks:

Kalas, DaSilva, Nagy, Afobe especially all out medium to long term.

DaSilva injured between game 1 and game 2, missed half a season. Kalas injured in August out got a while, Nagy 1.5 games in.

Afobe, poor Afobe injured in training after a few weeks. The partnership with Weimann with Palmer behind was giving us an interesting dimension or two.

Knock on effects were that Rowe was less of a threat from LWB than DaSilva, Kalas possibly enabled us to play a slightly higher line, Nagy was just getting settled and Afobe injury reduced our overall threat as Palmer was only really useful behind that strike pair.

Also meant what with the ongoing injuries to Korey that Massengo had to be used more often than planned at that point.

 

And we had "Dr Feelbad" leading the medical team that tried to get that lot fit.

Afobe was the real loss. His loss made a massive difference to where the team was going, it was too little, too late by the time he returned. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Searles said:

Shame we never saw the best of Nagy.

He seemed made to play in a system that Hungary play, a team that concede possession, set a deep block, and rely on counter-attacking play.  Was that was LJ was trying to evolve us into?  If so, I would never have guessed from recruitment and tactics.

I do think there was more to his game than that in fairness, but his lack of heart was so obvious, any opposing CM would be physical with him in the first challenges and that would be that 1:1 battle won.  Whether that was always there or came following his injury I don’t know.  There was no way he was dying for the City cause over Hungary caps.

He was also a master of getting rid of the ball to a teammate under pressure, rather than take responsibility himself.  A nice little 1 pass / 1 successful pass in the stats, but the receiver often had little chance to do anything with the pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

And we had "Dr Feelbad" leading the medical team that tried to get that lot fit.

Afobe was the real loss. His loss made a massive difference to where the team was going, it was too little, too late by the time he returned. 

Yes, Afobe brought something different, another level. However not only individually but our threat fell drastically once he was out- but the knock on effect for Palmer to name but one.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, petehinton said:

LJ said at a fans forum at AG he found eliasson by wyscout (or something similar) whilst on his laptop lying on the sofa!! and think he was signed without anyone watching him live as well

Really?  Never knew that.  I still feel MA has generally been the main culprit.  LJ had far more investment in building a successful team, and more to lose if he wasn't successful in that.  I have no idea what incentives were driving MA, but making the club a financial success had got to more relevant for him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Searles said:

At the time I thought we had a real player on our hands, but in hindsight I think he was very limited. Very good at mopping up play and passing it on but other than that I think he offered very little. Probably why he is in Serie B. I think he had decent physical attributes in that he had energy and good fitness. Other than that not sure what he has about his game tbh.
 

 

Might have seen better in a genuine and consistent CM 3. Mop up and pass on can be limited in a two, whereas in a 3..there is a wider range, better balance.

Hypothetically:

              Bentley (Maenpaa)

 Hunt (Pereira) Kalas Baker DaSilva

            Smith Nagy(Massengo)

   Weimann  Brownhill Eliasson

                         Afobe

What may have been?

Okay O'Dowda sort of plummeted that year but the bench strength in theory of the other one out of Bentley/Maenpaa, Hunt/Pereira, Moore was possibly hard done by a bit, Rowe, pre sharp downward turn, first reserve out of Nagy and Massengo, O'Dowda, Palmer (In the right shape) Diedhiou. Forget when exactly Williams joined?

It's a little lopsided in parts but I do believe the shape might habe suited us better. Paterson was on loan at Derby of course.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Red Skin said:

A lot of blame being put of LJ for signing Eliasson as a vanity project without knowing where to play him.   I'm not convinced it was LJ that instigated a lot of this. 

My reckoning is that it was MA treating the club and a hothouse for turning promising young players into expensive sales a few years down the line without any DoF or philosophy of the type of football or system we wanted to play.  (MA's contract maybe incentivised this or it was pure vanity, I'm not sure which).  The irony being that without such a system players aren't able to develop and realise their potential to achieve those sales. 

I'd have loved to see CO'D and Eliasson in a front three with someone like Conway through the middle.  Both players I feel had all the freedom of playing expansive attacking football coached out of them at a critical stage in their development.  

 

Whoever was responsible for signing him, he was seemingly signed without a plan for how he would fit into our team.

It’s an era that I’m glad to see the back of. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, David Brent said:

Whoever was responsible for signing him, he was seemingly signed without a plan for how he would fit into our team.

It’s an era that I’m glad to see the back of. 

We went through three years of this. A squad full of decent/good players which would not or could not play together. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Niclas and AEK have only gone and won the Greek cup as well on Wednesday.

First season in their 'new' stadium.......built on the footprint of the old Nikos Goumas ground at Nea Filadelfia.  Can't wait to visit the ground next season to rekindle old friendships, especially wih my personal beer sponsors in Monastiraki  ? ?

So, when the G*s move into their brand spankng new 'Greengrocerstad' in a few weeks, we must be expecting similar achievements  ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/05/2023 at 13:38, Fammyfan said:

He was a great signing but at the wrong time and that’s the frustrating thing as we would have got a lot more out of him in our current set up.

That being said, he was a decent signing, brought him in for £2m and sold him for £4m with plenty of assists from the bench.

I thought we sold him for 2 million? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Eliasson and used to be frustrated and annoyed when LJ wouldn’t give him 90 minutes. 
One season he had the top assists in the Championship - despite only playing half the game as a sub. That is very impressive but obviously not to LJ. 
We wasted his talent imho. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bcfcredandwhite said:

I liked Eliasson and used to be frustrated and annoyed when LJ wouldn’t give him 90 minutes. 
One season he had the top assists in the Championship - despite only playing half the game as a sub. That is very impressive but obviously not to LJ. 
We wasted his talent imho. 

3rd highest behind Pereira and Wallace IIRC.

All the same that is pretty good, especially as you say with a relative lack of game time or consistent game time. Double figures assists at this level aren't so easy to come by in a 46 game League season (ie disregarding Cups or playoffs).

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...