Jump to content
IGNORED

It’s going to bad a interesting league next season


sticks 1969

Recommended Posts

Just now, Midred said:

Nigel won't just have Leicester to play but maybe also Sheffield Wednesday? 

And Middlesbrough, Hull, Southampton & Watford.

Ties with almost 25% of the Championship.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good friend of mine is an Ipswich fan, He still thinks playoffs is a minimum and auto promotion is realistic.

'Bring bring bring bring'

Thats his alarm clock waking him up..

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing guarantees the ‘big’ clubs are great, could be unstable summers of upheaval. Equally, nothing to say the ‘shit’ teams don’t nail the summer tactically and are flying next season. Take each game as it comes.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rocky said:

Need a f*cking good summer transfer wise ?

See this is just what we did with Ashton and it nearly cost us a points deduction and possible relegation. The club is developing a  great crop of youngsters that are already first team regulars, with Bryan and a a couple of others coming in I expect us to really improve next season.

We were hit hard by injuries last season in key areas, I really think we have already a good enough squad with a bit of magic dust sprinkled we can get top 6.

Not sure if I could endure another play off misery though, so just win the league eh?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cotswoldred2 said:

It really is and far more interesting than the the dullards that are the Prems whipping boys. In this league literally anyone can beat anyone.

Would still like us to be up there giving it a go, who knows what might happen, quite a few teams that have gone up in the past few seasons have not done too badly I would like to think of us as being like them rather than whipping boys.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don’t understand why there’s so much hype up around next season. It’ll be the same as any other. Over achievers, under achievers, surprise packages, everyone beating everyone. 
 

There’s always big teams coming down. But this is no season coming up that had sides like Newcastle the two times they’ve come down. People thought Watford and West Brom would be nailed on to go back up. Same with Sunderland when they came down. 
 

Southampton are in turmoil. Leeds have lost all identity too and Leicester will have their side picked apart. We will be a better side next season too. 
 

I’m really excited for it already. You have to beat good teams if you want to get out of this league, no matter the make up of it. 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Percy Pig said:

Yep, Plymouth sound like they're not investing too much following promotion, Wednesday are a massive club but their team isn't that great so if they come up I don't think they'll be all that strong. 

I can see Stoke, Watford and Millwall improving significantly, I can see Birmingham, WBA, Swansea and Cardiff feeling some financial pain and struggling. 

Cov will lose Hamer and Gyokeres for sure. Will they attract sufficiently good replacements? 

I don't actually buy that the past season was "weak". Nor do I buy that the coming season will be "strong". 

So what are you saying then perc....... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, petehinton said:

I really don’t understand why there’s so much hype up around next season. It’ll be the same as any other. Over achievers, under achievers, surprise packages, everyone beating everyone. 

Something that is going to be interesting is the potential impact of the new agent regs. We have the FIFA ones published and the FA ones coming in a fortnight or so which should mirror and implement those FIFA regs, but may have some English quirks as well.

Amongst other things they're going to end the practice of clubs paying fees on behalf of players as a benefit in kind. Instead players (who earn more than USD200,000 per year - so almost all our main players) have to pay their agent out of their net income.

Also ending is the practice of those fees being paid out in a one off block lump sum. Rather agents will take their fees quarterly across the life of the contract.

These rules come into effect in October, and so this window is the last one under "old" rules. 

Expect a lot of agent pressure to get a high number of transfers done this summer, attempting to siphon as much money out of clubs before their clients start holding them accountable as they pay personally from the autumn.

It might mean we see a bit more churn this summer, and so it's probably even harder than usual to predict who will and won't be strong come September. Just a little quirk of bueracracy impacting the "real" world.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Something that is going to be interesting is the potential impact of the new agent regs. We have the FIFA ones published and the FA ones coming in a fortnight or so which should mirror and implement those FIFA regs, but may have some English quirks as well.

Amongst other things they're going to end the practice of clubs paying fees on behalf of players as a benefit in kind. Instead players (who earn more than USD200,000 per year - so almost all our main players) have to pay their agent out of their net income.

Also ending is the practice of those fees being paid out in a one off block lump sum. Rather agents will take their fees quarterly across the life of the contract.

These rules come into effect in October, and so this window is the last one under "old" rules. 

Expect a lot of agent pressure to get a high number of transfers done this summer, attempting to siphon as much money out of clubs before their clients start holding them accountable as they pay personally from the autumn.

It might mean we see a bit more churn this summer, and so it's probably even harder than usual to predict who will and won't be strong come September. Just a little quirk of bueracracy impacting the "real" world.

Very interesting many thanks 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, cotswoldred2 said:

It really is and far more interesting than the the dullards that are the Prems whipping boys. In this league literally anyone can beat anyone.

Far more interesting? I know which league I'd rather be in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Something that is going to be interesting is the potential impact of the new agent regs. We have the FIFA ones published and the FA ones coming in a fortnight or so which should mirror and implement those FIFA regs, but may have some English quirks as well.

Amongst other things they're going to end the practice of clubs paying fees on behalf of players as a benefit in kind. Instead players (who earn more than USD200,000 per year - so almost all our main players) have to pay their agent out of their net income.

Also ending is the practice of those fees being paid out in a one off block lump sum. Rather agents will take their fees quarterly across the life of the contract.

These rules come into effect in October, and so this window is the last one under "old" rules. 

Expect a lot of agent pressure to get a high number of transfers done this summer, attempting to siphon as much money out of clubs before their clients start holding them accountable as they pay personally from the autumn.

It might mean we see a bit more churn this summer, and so it's probably even harder than usual to predict who will and won't be strong come September. Just a little quirk of bueracracy impacting the "real" world.

Interesting, thanks for that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sticks 1969 said:

I’m going to be honest I pinched this picture of Facebook 

some big teams again next season 

IMG_8737.png

Define what is a big team?

We had a play off final yesterday of Luton and Coventry.

Are either of those bigger than City?

The Championship is such a crazy league, anything could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Bard said:

A ludicrous price.  There is no way in this world they have a 20% chance of winning the league.  More like 5%.

It’s 4-1 for promotion, not champs….although Ipswich fans probably think that’s too high!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jimbo123 said:

Bookies odds don’t change for football ante post from money in the market, they’re all put up as starting price and the only way they’ll be amended is if they’re adjusted.

They’re that price as they play fantastic football, McKenna is a good coach and they have lots of good young players.

They're that price because the bookies think they will get a decent amount of interest at that price.  They couldn't give a **** about their style of football - Luton just got promoted which just shows that the only thing that matters is how effective you are. If loads of people back them, their odds will shorten.  If there is no interest, their odds will lengthen.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The Bard said:

They're that price because the bookies think they will get a decent amount of interest at that price.  They couldn't give a **** about their style of football - Luton just got promoted which just shows that the only thing that matters is how effective you are. If loads of people back them, their odds will shorten.  If there is no interest, their odds will lengthen.  

And you have to remember that there are a lot of people in Suffolk who haven’t ever gone very far outside Suffolk and/or whose family tree is rather tightly tangled on itself, so being one-eyed in relation to their football outlook might be the least of their anatomical challenges!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jimbo123 said:

Wouldn’t disagree with a few signings for them, McKenna got them playing great football. Lots of their young players will step up with ease too.

Which ones out of interest do you think will step up with ease?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Percy Pig said:

Yep, Plymouth sound like they're not investing too much following promotion, Wednesday are a massive club but their team isn't that great so if they come up I don't think they'll be all that strong. 

I can see Stoke, Watford and Millwall improving significantly, I can see Birmingham, WBA, Swansea and Cardiff feeling some financial pain and struggling. 

Cov will lose Hamer and Gyokeres for sure. Will they attract sufficiently good replacements? 

I don't actually buy that the past season was "weak". Nor do I buy that the coming season will be "strong". 

I disagree, last season was a poor division and was an opportunity had we been a season further forward. I think this season will be tougher but I’m hoping for some real progress on the pitch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, M.D said:

A good friend of mine is an Ipswich fan, He still thinks playoffs is a minimum and auto promotion is realistic.

'Bring bring bring bring'

Thats his alarm clock waking him up..

I had a look at their forum earlier and someone had posted a list of the teams in the Championship for next season clearly in alphabetical order.

Two posters were then somehow arguing about Birmingham winning it and West Brom finishing bottom, so I'd take what their fans say with a pinch of salt...

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming we strengthen our defence and replace Scotty (if necessary) I fancy our chances next season of finishing in the top 8, hopefully top 6. Having watched City over the years we have a habit of doing well against big name teams when they're having some problems, it's the little clubs with well organised teams that we struggle against and although on paper it looks a strong division because of the many big name clubs most of them have they're problems (a bit like WBA did).

Leeds have a mish-mash of a squad after a succession of managers (a bit like we did last time we were relegated), they can't score goals and have a leaky defence. Leicester will have to sell their best players as their wage bill is in the top 10 in the Prem so we'll have to wait and see how that works out. Wednesday will need to strengthen considerable to challenge near the top, Sunderland might find it more difficult in their second season, and WBA still have ownership and financial issues. Having said that I expect Southampton to be near the top, Ipswich may be a bit like Sunderland last season but are a bit of an unknown quantity.

As for us, as well as new additions our younger players will be a bit older and more experienced (like Conway last season) and the January signings can get a pre-season with us to be fully settled in. All in all, a lot to look forward to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jimbo123 said:

Which they should do - they were so comfortably the best team performance wise in L1 after the turn of the year, have a look at the stats in their games.

Clarke, Woolfenden, Leif Davis (will be a PL left back before long), Chaplin (if I can still class him as a young player, think he's 25), Broadhead, Hirst if he resigns... off the top of my head.

If we played Ipswich at a neutral ground currently they'd be favourites with the bookies, and the bookies usually know what they're doing hence the amount of money they make.

I would suggest that before you get too carried away with Ipswich storming the Championship that you remember what happened to the runaway League 1 Champions and JPT winners in 2014/15, when they made the step up. They lost only 1 player to retirement and brought in a French forward who scored 20 league goals that season, but by halfway through the season were in the bottom 3 and about to sack their manager. The number of clubs who do what Sunderland and ourselves previously managed in 2007/8 of going successively from promotion from League 1 to making the top 6 in the Championship the next season is small for a reason, because it’s really difficult. I would suggest that a club needs the right style of play, a relatively experienced and successful manager and a large dollop of good luck. I have no idea if Ipswich have the first 2 and the latter is out of anyone’s hands!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, IAmNick said:

I had a look at their forum earlier and someone had posted a list of the teams in the Championship for next season clearly in alphabetical order.

Two posters were then somehow arguing about Birmingham winning it and West Brom finishing bottom, so I'd take what their fans say with a pinch of salt...

That’s what comes of being able to count all the Championship teams on your fingers and toes…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Jimbo123 said:

Which they should do - they were so comfortably the best team performance wise in L1 after the turn of the year, have a look at the stats in their games.

Clarke, Woolfenden, Leif Davis (will be a PL left back before long), Chaplin (if I can still class him as a young player, think he's 25), Broadhead, Hirst if he resigns... off the top of my head.

If we played Ipswich at a neutral ground currently they'd be favourites with the bookies, and the bookies usually know what they're doing hence the amount of money they make.

Clarke and Davis have good potential, will be interesting to see how they both do.  Woolfenden I’m less convinced about against Championship level forwards.

Chaplin was a surprise he dropped down to Lg1, a decent enough Champ player, but unlikely he’ll score as freely, he didn’t at Barnsley, even in their play-off season.

Broadhead looks a clever striker, if his hamstrings hold out, he’ll do well.

Hirst, as much as him being a willing, running, physical forward, I’m not sure he has goals in him at this level, based on Rotherham and Blackburn loans….although when Ipswich can’t play their pretty football, they’ll need someone like him as an option.

My view is that they’ve built a squad to get out of Lg1, rather than one to take them forward, but we will have to wait to see how much they do this summer.

Some fans think their current squad is good enough to mount a promotion push, and then some think they’ll be buying Adam Armstrong (or Alex Scott)!  I’d be quite happy if their ambitions are centred around the level of quality of George Hirst, because I don’t think he’ll get them anywhere near where they think.

 

On an aside looking at the bookies predictions for the season just gone, they aren’t as clever as they think! ?

image.png.4713ce1ab59b5a5f93a651347bfa6526.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Clarke and Davis have good potential, will be interesting to see how they both do.  Woolfenden I’m less convinced about against Championship level forwards.

Chaplin was a surprise he dropped down to Lg1, a decent enough Champ player, but unlikely he’ll score as freely, he didn’t at Barnsley, even in their play-off season.

Broadhead looks a clever striker, if his hamstrings hold out, he’ll do well.

Hirst, as much as him being a willing, running, physical forward, I’m not sure he has goals in him at this level, based on Rotherham and Blackburn loans….although when Ipswich can’t play their pretty football, they’ll need someone like him as an option.

My view is that they’ve built a squad to get out of Lg1, rather than one to take them forward, but we will have to wait to see how much they do this summer.

Some fans think their current squad is good enough to mount a promotion push, and then some think they’ll be buying Adam Armstrong (or Alex Scott)!  I’d be quite happy if their ambitions are centred around the level of quality of George Hirst, because I don’t think he’ll get them anywhere near where they think.

 

On an aside looking at the bookies predictions for the season just gone, they aren’t as clever as they think! ?

image.png.4713ce1ab59b5a5f93a651347bfa6526.png

The bookmakers got 11 out of 12 of the top half correct, and the one they didn't were placed 13th.

When I look at that its only Norwich which they were really way off on predicting top and finishing 12th.

I'd say it's a stretch to say that the bookies prediction was poor or not clever for last season.

Edited by kit
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, kit said:

The bookmakers got 11 out of 12 of the top half correct, and the one they didn't were placed 13th.

When I look at that its only Norwich which they were really way off on predicting top and finishing 12th.

I'd say it's a stretch to say that the bookies prediction was poor or not clever for last season.

It's an average of 4.75 positions out. Round up to 5. Only 3 correct, 15 clubs 5 or more positions out. One of the correctly called clubs was Reading who without the points deduction would not have been correct.

Pretty loose, pretty poor really.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bookies are mostly rich because most people who bet place mug bets. Betting on the most likely outcome but at unfavourable odds.

This means they tend to offer poor odds on certain outcomes (Man Utd winning anything for example) but that means that the less favoured outcomes (Luton 40/1) are overpriced. 

What strikes me about next years odds is a direct comparison between us and Stoke. Almost identical in terms of crowds , we finished above them in the league yet we're 40/1 & they're 20/1.

Can only be explained by perception.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jimbo123 said:

I work for a bookmaker in a department that do odd calculation (admittedly not for football), but it's all done now through football for underlying data.

I don't have an xG table, but I would bet you that Stoke finished higher up in it than us. Or if they didn't, the period from where Alex Neil took over, they'd have been much better performance wise than us.

Stoke are a better performing side than us, even if their results don't necessarily show it. That's why they're lower odds.

Had a quick look at fbref and infogol. Stoke are slightly above us in xG stats. Not wildly so, but marginally better. That's whole season figures.

We finished pretty much bob on where xG reckoned we would have. We basically matched our xG and xGA, and our expected points is about on par in most tables. We were a mid-table side and we finished mid-table.

Most metrics I see suggest Stoke were probably a 7th - 10th placed side. So yeh they will have shorter odds than us. 

Edit: I have no idea how crowd numbers are supposed to fit into odds or into expected finishing positions.

Edited by ExiledAjax
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, The Bard said:

What strikes me about next years odds is a direct comparison between us and Stoke. Almost identical in terms of crowds , we finished above them in the league yet we're 40/1 & they're 20/1.

Can only be explained by perception.

Stoke have also intimated they will be spending or going big, that will help.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jimbo123 said:

Bookies odds don’t change for football ante post from money in the market, they’re all put up as starting price and the only way they’ll be amended is if they’re adjusted.

They’re that price as they play fantastic football, McKenna is a good coach and they have lots of good young players.

My work has an office in Ipswich so I keep an eye on them for that reason. McKenna's a good coach granted but lots of young players? from tranfermarkt they had the third oldest average age in league 1 (27, ours is 25). Leif Davies, Wolfenden, Clarke and Broadhead would fall under that bracket and Walton should be a decent keeper. at this level  Chaplin,  Ladapo, Evans and Luongo have been average at best in the champ and are late 20's, early 30s. Morsey was decent but 32 this year. Burns, Donacien, Burgess, Harness do not have a lot of Champ experience and are late 20s. Hirst was a loan.

 

They are currently  reminding me a bit  of us in the summer for 15/16, done well in league one and think that will automatically transcribe into success at a higher level.  not realizing how much the champ has moved on in that time.  knlowing Ashton though I imagine it will be a busy summer for them anyway! 

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

Clarke and Davis have good potential, will be interesting to see how they both do.  Woolfenden I’m less convinced about against Championship level forwards.

Chaplin was a surprise he dropped down to Lg1, a decent enough Champ player, but unlikely he’ll score as freely, he didn’t at Barnsley, even in their play-off season.

Broadhead looks a clever striker, if his hamstrings hold out, he’ll do well.

Hirst, as much as him being a willing, running, physical forward, I’m not sure he has goals in him at this level, based on Rotherham and Blackburn loans….although when Ipswich can’t play their pretty football, they’ll need someone like him as an option.

My view is that they’ve built a squad to get out of Lg1, rather than one to take them forward, but we will have to wait to see how much they do this summer.

Some fans think their current squad is good enough to mount a promotion push, and then some think they’ll be buying Adam Armstrong (or Alex Scott)!  I’d be quite happy if their ambitions are centred around the level of quality of George Hirst, because I don’t think he’ll get them anywhere near where they think.

 

On an aside looking at the bookies predictions for the season just gone, they aren’t as clever as they think! ?

image.png.4713ce1ab59b5a5f93a651347bfa6526.png

agree with most though with  Wolfenden when I hasve seen him has impressed me think he could do well at this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

It's an average of 4.75 positions out. Round up to 5. Only 3 correct, 15 clubs 5 or more positions out. One of the correctly called clubs was Reading who without the points deduction would not have been correct.

Pretty loose, pretty poor really.

Here was my pre-season 1-24

image.png.b58b594f8be9910e8cc4c501dc272fc8.png

111 places out in total (bookies 114).  Sunderland I got massively wrong!

Lg1 FWIW.

image.png.a18edf379ac327d8f8697e0c0b71cc38.png
 

96 places out.  MK Dons….oops!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jimbo123 said:

Wouldn’t disagree with a few signings for them, McKenna got them playing great football. Lots of their young players will step up with ease too.

They actually really don't have a young squad to be honest. Harry Clarke is 22 and basically their youngest first teamer from last season. Average age of their midfield is around 28-29.

To contrast that, we have 6 players younger than that (Mehmeti, Bell, Conway, Scott, Taylor-Clarke, Benarous) we can expect play some first team minutes in the Championship this coming season.

Only balanced by the fact we have King, James, Weimann, and Wells in the squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Super said:

Far more interesting? I know which league I'd rather be in.

Give us a clue?;)

Depends what you think of as interesting. Unless we got the signings just right after promotion we'd be struggling all season, take some horrendous beatings, and almost certainly be relegated.

Life for newcomers in the top division is unrecognisable from our last promotion in 75-76 when we played our first game at Arsenal with no new signings at all, and won of course, but still only stayed up by the skin of our teeth.

Although there were the occasional highs much of it wasn't particularly interesting either - I remember home games v the likes of Leicester, QPR, Sunderland, Stoke, Middlesbro' etc that were pretty drab affairs with not much bigger crowds and no more atmosphere than Div.2 .

Entertainment factor too. If we go up we'll likely score 70+ goals, we could probably expect to see less than half of that in the top league (38 goals in 42 games in 76-77)

I should make it clear I'm only interested in City, I'm not that interested in watching the opposition, and I suspect if we do go up a lot of the crowd will be there for the occasion, the day out, and to see ( and possibly even support) the opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jimbo123 said:

I listed the young players I thought would do well, Chaplin's 26 so still probably not even reached his prime.

Sheffield Utd's team when they came up was full of players like Basham, Coutts, Fleck, Duffy, Leon Clarke etc that'd hardly ripped the Championship up before, the difference between them and us was they went out and recruited sensibly by strengthening the side with players like Egan, Baldock, Stevens etc who didn't cost a fortune but all improved the side, fit their way of playing and carried that on.

We tried that with Maguire, Gray, Gayle etc but for one reason or another those didn't come off.

I think they'll surprise a few next season, Ipswich. I hope they don't, as I'd love for it to go tits up for Mark Ashton, but I think they will.

Sheff Utd is a good example and your right their recruitment was excellent. Can Ashton replicate that sort of recruitment at this level? From experience here, the answer is no.

Our list of players is the same with the exception of Chaplin who whilst at 26 could improve but was a 1 goal in 5 game player at Champ level would need to improve substantially for them to be at the top of this league. With regards to Hirst I think he'll stay at Leicester now they have been relegated

I don't think they'll struggle but do feel they are being overhyped massively. my prediction currently is they'll be a midtable/ lower midtable team, obviously we need to see who they (and everyone else) signs before we can have a proper guess.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Nogbad the Bad said:

Give us a clue?;)

Depends what you think of as interesting. Unless we got the signings just right after promotion we'd be struggling all season, take some horrendous beatings, and almost certainly be relegated.

Life for newcomers in the top division is unrecognisable from our last promotion in 75-76 when we played our first game at Arsenal with no new signings at all, and won of course, but still only stayed up by the skin of our teeth.

Although there were the occasional highs much of it wasn't particularly interesting either - I remember home games v the likes of Leicester, QPR, Sunderland, Stoke, Middlesbro' etc that were pretty drab affairs with not much bigger crowds and no more atmosphere than Div.2 .

Entertainment factor too. If we go up we'll likely score 70+ goals, we could probably expect to see less than half of that in the top league (38 goals in 42 games in 76-77)

I should make it clear I'm only interested in City, I'm not that interested in watching the opposition, and I suspect if we do go up a lot of the crowd will be there for the occasion, the day out, and to see ( and possibly even support) the opposition.

Of course it will be tough to stay up but it's what we are playing for to test ourselves in the top league. Such a losers mentality people who would prefer us playing championship football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, M.D said:

A good friend of mine is an Ipswich fan, He still thinks playoffs is a minimum and auto promotion is realistic.

'Bring bring bring bring'

Thats his alarm clock waking him up..

Playoffs is definitely achievable whilst they have McKenna. Definitely shouldn’t be seen as a minimum and god help them also if McKenna gets poached mid season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/05/2023 at 11:31, sticks 1969 said:

I’m going to be honest I pinched this picture of Facebook 

some big teams again next season 

IMG_8737.png

Looks strong but I do remember being really worried the last time all of the promoted sides stayed up and only one made the playoffs and we finished 8th. One team I really fancy this season is Sunderland even without Diallo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Charlie BCFC said:

Looks strong but I do remember being really worried the last time all of the promoted sides stayed up and only one made the playoffs and we finished 8th. One team I really fancy this season is Sunderland even without Diallo

Having seriously underestimated Sunderland last season, I think they will go well again this season.  They should be getting good income streams to support recruitment.  And they have a top manager, that’s my excuse, as he wasn’t there at the start of the season when I did my predictions ?.  Losing Alex Neil turned out well for them.

Theyll have Ross Stewart back I assume?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, M.D said:

A good friend of mine is an Ipswich fan, He still thinks playoffs is a minimum and auto promotion is realistic.

'Bring bring bring bring'

Thats his alarm clock waking him up..

I agree with him to an extent, excellent side with momentum could be challenging top 6..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Having seriously underestimated Sunderland last season, I think they will go well again this season.  They should be getting good income streams to support recruitment.  And they have a top manager, that’s my excuse, as he wasn’t there at the start of the season when I did my predictions ?.  Losing Alex Neil turned out well for them.

Theyll have Ross Stewart back I assume?

Yep had Cirkin out for the playoffs and then didn’t field a centre back for the back end of the season so would imagine they get the likes of Batth and Alese back. Aswell as them no doubt splashing some cash 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jimbo123 said:

Stewart should be back in August.

I had Sunderland to finish 10th under Neil, think he's a great manager too. I'd have gone for him when Holden got the job.

He’s a good manager, no arguments there…I think there will be big expectations on Stoke this season…I’m not sure they are quite ready for full lift-off yet from what Neil was saying in January.

But a lot can change in a summer window.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swansea had a good run at the end of last season winning 7 and drawing 2 of the last ten games (unbeaten in the last 9).

Scored 21 and conceded 9 in that run.

Not sure of any loan players or OOC players they will lose, but they should be confident going into the season.

9/1 for promotion at the moment (odds from oddschecker).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bcfc01 said:

Swansea had a good run at the end of last season winning 7 and drawing 2 of the last ten games (unbeaten in the last 9).

Scored 21 and conceded 9 in that run.

Not sure of any loan players or OOC players they will lose, but they should be confident going into the season.

9/1 for promotion at the moment (odds from oddschecker).

 

image.png.271c946021bdbfe014de2f9040d50ab0.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Super said:

You would rather be in the championship than the prem?

Being in the PL would not be enjoyable if we're struggling at the bottom of the table - very likely - and the Championship is a great league to be in if you're established and competitive which imo. City now are.

Lots of big clubs (if not the very biggest) and 6 new ones every year to keep it interesting.

We do need to be patient and keep on building until we're strong enough to go up in some style with the real prospect of staying up rather than scraping up through the play offs and the likelihood of a very unenjoyable season up there and almost inevitable relegation.

We're nowhere near that yet and realism and patience is required by fans over the next 2-3 years - and perhaps the owner after recent mutterings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...