Jump to content
IGNORED

SC&T Meeting with BCFC 13/09/23


phantom

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Cidre Monita said:

I did find it strange that Gould (a local lad) would up sticks after 18 months from a (seemingly) ambitious football club to take up a cricket position, albeit at international level. 

Probably because he’s ambitious, because it’s a bigger job, and realised to fulfil those ambitions you can’t limit yourself to Bristol or Somerset…ie why he went to Surrey previously.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Probably because he’s ambitious, because it’s a bigger job, and realised to fulfil those ambitions you can’t limit yourself to Bristol or Somerset…ie why he went to Surrey previously.

Yep, and I suspect the club will have known it was a possibility when they appointed him. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/09/2023 at 18:24, Davefevs said:

Probably because he’s ambitious, because it’s a bigger job, and realised to fulfil those ambitions you can’t limit yourself to Bristol or Somerset…ie why he went to Surrey previously.

Appreciate what you’re saying Dave but I think that Gould would have stayed if he thought SL had any serious intentions of getting to the PL. Even at international level cricket is small fry compared to top level football and the money involved. 
Whilst we’re on the topic can you remember a tweet a few years back from Angus Scott (City fan/broadcaster & brother of Steve) saying that he had inside knowledge of what a basket case the club was under the Lansdowns and that we would never make the PL with SL as owner. I think the tweet may have been deleted quite soon afterwards?! 

  • Like 3
  • Hmmm 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cidre Monita said:

Appreciate what you’re saying Dave but I think that Gould would have stayed if he thought SL had any serious intentions of getting to the PL. Even at international level cricket is small fry compared to top level football and the money involved. 
Whilst we’re on the topic can you remember a tweet a few years back from Angus Scott (City fan/broadcaster & brother of Steve) saying that he had inside knowledge of what a basket case the club was under the Lansdowns and that we would never make the PL with SL as owner. I think the tweet may have been deleted quite soon afterwards?! 

Totally agree regarding Gould and ambition at BCFC.  

I think you could also say the same for any of our players with serious ambition too.  They can all pay lip-service by saying they’d like to reach the Premier League with City, but I’ll bet none of them actually believe it and is why we can’t hang on to our young stars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BrizzleRed said:

Totally agree regarding Gould and ambition at BCFC.  

I think you could also say the same for any of our players with serious ambition too.  They can all pay lip-service by saying they’d like to reach the Premier League with City, but I’ll bet none of them actually believe it and is why we can’t hang on to our young stars

Also a way of life at this level to some extent, look at a host of clubs. Truth perhaps lies somewhere in the middle, for a time FFP was a factor but not anymore.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cidre Monita said:

Appreciate what you’re saying Dave but I think that Gould would have stayed if he thought SL had any serious intentions of getting to the PL. Even at international level cricket is small fry compared to top level football and the money involved. 
Whilst we’re on the topic can you remember a tweet a few years back from Angus Scott (City fan/broadcaster & brother of Steve) saying that he had inside knowledge of what a basket case the club was under the Lansdowns and that we would never make the PL with SL as owner. I think the tweet may have been deleted quite soon afterwards?! 

I think you’ll find you’re wrong! ??‍♂️

Lets take a rebounding club like Norwich as a fair comparison - PL turnover £133.9m (£57m in Champ).

ECB - £332m

You have to be a top 6 PL club to beat that!

Data from annual accounts (21/22) summarised below:

image.thumb.png.d4d43b560aac962b5e3153c30ff81a72.png

Does that change your mind having been presented with the facts.  I think I know which is the bigger job, even if City got to the PL.

Bristol City are currently 1/10th the turnover of the ECB!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cidre Monita said:

Appreciate what you’re saying Dave but I think that Gould would have stayed if he thought SL had any serious intentions of getting to the PL. Even at international level cricket is small fry compared to top level football and the money involved. 
Whilst we’re on the topic can you remember a tweet a few years back from Angus Scott (City fan/broadcaster & brother of Steve) saying that he had inside knowledge of what a basket case the club was under the Lansdowns and that we would never make the PL with SL as owner. I think the tweet may have been deleted quite soon afterwards?! 

Yeah, because if I was Gould, I would much rather spend part of my working week in Luton rather than Barbados 

I have absolutely no idea what your insight is to why Gould would have stayed, but given the choice between a national and international leadership role, most people are going to with the product they have most interest in (in his case, cricket) and then the opportunities that role affords them. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Also a way of life at this level to some extent, look at a host of clubs. Truth perhaps lies somewhere in the middle, for a time FFP was a factor but not anymore.

Oh definitely, but at least teams with recent Prem experience, or at least displaying genuine ambition may have a chance of getting an extra season or two out of a star player before they move on.  

I just can’t see any of our players seriously believing they’ve got a realistic chance of reaching the Prem with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cidre Monita said:

Appreciate what you’re saying Dave but I think that Gould would have stayed if he thought SL had any serious intentions of getting to the PL. Even at international level cricket is small fry compared to top level football and the money involved. 
Whilst we’re on the topic can you remember a tweet a few years back from Angus Scott (City fan/broadcaster & brother of Steve) saying that he had inside knowledge of what a basket case the club was under the Lansdowns and that we would never make the PL with SL as owner. I think the tweet may have been deleted quite soon afterwards?! 

Gould got the very very top job he could’ve basically ever dreamed of, in the sport that arguably he prefers to football and had a greater history in at more senior roles. 
 

Getting That job for him probably is on a par for if we were to get promoted. I think people understate just how big cricket in this country is…

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I think you’ll find you’re wrong! ??‍♂️

Lets take a rebounding club like Norwich as a fair comparison - PL turnover £133.9m (£57m in Champ).

ECB - £332m

You have to be a top 6 PL club to beat that!

Data from annual accounts (21/22) summarised below:

image.thumb.png.d4d43b560aac962b5e3153c30ff81a72.png

Does that change your mind having been presented with the facts.  I think I know which is the bigger job, even if City got to the PL.

Bristol City are currently 1/10th the turnover of the ECB!!!

Again appreciate what you’re saying but football is our national game followed by millions of passionate fans and has a much higher profile than cricket. If City had any serious ambitions I couldn’t see Gould jumping ship when he did. Not sure he would have been too bothered about Barbados with an away game at Old Trafford on the weekend followed by a mid-week away Euro cup tie at Inter Milan (I can dream!). If we were in the prem lots of people would know the name of Richard Gould - I doubt very much anyone will know the name of someone high up within the international cricket administration? I think being in the public eye is important to people of his ilk.
To summarise I think we can all agree that there is currently something fundamentally wrong with our club and the exit of Gould I believe was a by-product of this. If for example he were the CEO of Luton last year I’m not sure he would have left them when he left us? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cidre Monita said:

Again appreciate what you’re saying but football is our national game followed by millions of passionate fans and has a much higher profile than cricket. If City had any serious ambitions I couldn’t see Gould jumping ship when he did. Not sure he would have been too bothered about Barbados with an away game at Old Trafford on the weekend followed by a mid-week away Euro cup tie at Inter Milan (I can dream!). If we were in the prem lots of people would know the name of Richard Gould - I doubt very much anyone will know the name of someone high up within the international cricket administration? I think being in the public eye is important to people of his ilk.
To summarise I think we can all agree that there is currently something fundamentally wrong with our club and the exit of Gould I believe was a by-product of this. If for example he were the CEO of Luton last year I’m not sure he would have left them when he left us? 

I think the point you're making is, 'you don't really like cricket, and you prefer football, and therefore expect everyone else to like football more than cricket'.

If I was Gould and had the choice between the City role and the cricket role, I'd take the cricket role - and I'm a fan of City! 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cidre Monita said:

To summarise I think we can all agree that there is currently something fundamentally wrong with our club

Yep.

9 minutes ago, Cidre Monita said:

and the exit of Gould I believe was a by-product of this

Nope.

Barbados, maybe not, but this is a bloke who would rather wander around the HPC looking for golf balls than watch the game going on on the show pitch.  ECB was his dream sporting job, following the Somerset and Surrey roles.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Yep.

Nope.

Barbados, maybe not, but this is a bloke who would rather wander around the HPC looking for golf balls than watch the game going on on the show pitch.  ECB was his dream sporting job, following the Somerset and Surrey roles.

Plus, he's now working with his best mate Thompson rather than Jon and Steve Lansdown!

People forget/don't fully appreciate that financially football below the Prem and the teams with PPs is made up of pretty small businesses. £30m of revenue is, to the man on the street, a lot of money. But it represents a medium-sized business, and it's on the smaller side of medium. Most clubs in League 2, many in League 1, and even one or two in the Championship file accounts for small companies - ie they are legally defined as small companies. As a CEO, unless you're in the top 10 or so clubs in the country, there are much bigger roles available in sport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Plus, he's now working with his best mate Thompson rather than Jon and Steve Lansdown!

People forget/don't fully appreciate that financially football below the Prem and the teams with PPs is made up of pretty small businesses. £30m of revenue is, to the man on the street, a lot of money. But it represents a medium-sized business, and it's on the smaller side of medium. Most clubs in League 2, many in League 1, and even one or two in the Championship file accounts for small companies - ie they are legally defined as small companies. As a CEO, unless you're in the top 10 or so clubs in the country, there are much bigger roles available in sport.

And from a Bristol City FC Ltd perspective, as that is what he was CEO of, not Ashton Gate or Holdings, it’s a £17m business.  So ECB is 20x as big!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/09/2023 at 20:25, phantom said:

So why do Bristol City pay to rent ground etc etc

We're discussing Bristol Sport dictates the pricing in the ground, all of which is out of our control 

 

Because away supporters don't sit in either stand 

They pay their share of ground staff, ticket sellers and probably a couple of other items. This is done this way because the football club and rugby club/ basketball club, only employs player, coaching and medical staff. Unlike years ago when it was only City who played at Ashton Gate and employed all of the aforementioned functions. It's not rocket science is it. Or perhaps it needs constant explanation for some who don't want or can't understand.

Edited by cidered abroad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...