Jump to content
IGNORED

See it. Hear it. Report it


phantom

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

I have to respectfully disagree. 

For as long as I can remember I've had issues with the people sat behind me and my children. All sorts of vile language for the entire game. 

Every morning after a game I'm sending emails to the club. Always promise to look into it but never get back to me. 

I now use the voice recorder on my phone which picks it up and still nothing gets done. 

I've reported it to stewards on the day but they just shut up when they see me approach a steward. 

I've text the abuse line and nothing gets done. 

I'm literally at the point now where I feel as if reporting it is pointless because nothing gets done.

It's a daft question perhaps but:

1) How frequent is it.

2) Swearing...Or other stuff?

3) Have you given their seat numbers, rows, blocks etc? If near you it shouldn't be that difficult to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

He is, I’m definitely not responding to some bizarre & frankly disturbing views expressed on this thread but Max has an Irish passport by virtue of his Grandfather being from County Kerry.

Under national football eligibility rules you can qualify to play for a nation if any of your parents or grandparents were born there.

The Irish situation is pretty unique though. Presumably I could qualify to play for the Republic via my Northern Irish, Protestant, Catholic-hating grandmother who died before I was born? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, spudski said:

Great post and spot on.

However...what pisses me off the most, is as soon as the ' racist' term is used, it's immediately seen as white being racist against black. 

Imo..it's the other way these days. 

Whites are now constantly questioning what they say etc...

I know I'll get flack for this...but for every ' Black awards ceremonies ' for various Profession's in life...( Google it)...imagine the furore if we had white awards ceremonies.

It's freakin broken...and imo considerably devisive. 

I literally don't see colour like you implied..until it's put in a title and made a point of. 

It's nuts.

It's definitely this way around especially in football.

It's always white people getting abused for the colour of their skin in games, and online. After England went out of the Euros the abuse white players got was shocking compared to our black players. Accross Europe it isn't Black players being racially abused with monkey chants, but white players are always getting racially abused on a daily basis and this is especially true in Eastern Europe. Not enough people talk about this, and I blame the MSM, WEF and Bill Gates for this tragedy. 

It's awful that white people now have to think if they are being racist before they say something that is definitely *not* racist. :(

Edited by Rebounder
  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Flames 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Red Skin said:

Very good article in the last OSIB mag about an Muslim Asian City fan and his experiences at games. Sadly, it's still a thing.  Maybe @Shtanley could share?

As a white male I really have to look the those on the receiving end to gauge its effect.  I'm sure some of subtlety and nuance is lost on me.

Personally, I'm still pretty shocked by the amount of boos from our fans on the rare occasions opposition players take the knees.  No one will ever convince this is some political conspiracy by BTM.  It's just veiled racism. 

I knew Bristol Temple Meads were up to something.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

It's a daft question perhaps but:

1) How frequent is it.

2) Swearing...Or other stuff?

3) Have you given their seat numbers, rows, blocks etc? If near you it shouldn't be that difficult to find.

Every 20 seconds or so right in the ears of my children and mine. 

It gets even worse when we're not winning. 

Its pretty much most things that you can imagine. Generally it is the constant foul language but also mixed in with racism and homophobia. 

Yep given all the details as the sests directly behind us. 

The best I've had from the club is we'll look into it and we can move your seats which really annoyed me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know racism is wrong but sometimes it takes being on the end of a racist slur to truly appreciate just how vile and hurtful it is. I live in China and I’ve been called “white ghost” and told to “go back to my country” a couple of times. It’s not a memory that ever goes away.

Of course white on black racism may be seen to carry more weight and stigma due to historical context and that’s an understandable viewpoint imho. That said, if somebody feels that they’ve been a victim of racism, then whatever skin colour they are, or whatever the background of the abuser, they should have their allegations treated seriously.

Edited by Wanderingred
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

Your son was born in the Cayman Islands, which makes him caymanian with British/English heritage.

He is not Caymanian. The Cayman. Islands does not dispense citizenship based on birth location. My son has not a drop of Caymanian blood in him. He may have a birth certificate from there but he is not Caymanian. They would laugh at this statement over there.

Anis, was born in London, which is in england, which means he is English but with Albanian heritage. 

Again, "English" is not a citizenship. It is either a genetic heritage/ethnicity that formed some time in the last 1,000 years from Anglo-Saxon, Norse, Norman, and Brythonic blood, or it's a manner of cultural behaviour typical of the inhabitants of a certain part of the island of Great Britain. Neither of these things is achieved simply by the virtue of being born in London.

If you were born in the Cantonese region of Hong Kong, then yes of course you would be Cantonese.

I really wouldn't.

Ex pats in the costa del sol can’t be Spanish as they were not born there, they might get Spanish citizenship but that does not change where they were born.

You seem really confused with all of this, you are basically saying you can only be English if you act English? That’s borderline racist and xenophobic, what makes someone English?

See above.

Would you class Rishi Sunak as English as he was born in Southampton or Indian? Is he English enough? 

Obviously he's not English. I assume he's got a British passport so he's British with Indian heritage.

What about English players in the national team, who parents were born abroad, are they English? 

That depends on their heritage doesn't it.

If Anis decided to play for England and not Albania (if he was good enough), does he magically become English? He certainly wouldn’t had been able to play for wales, Scotland or north Ireland, as he isn’t welsh, Scottish or northern Irish but he is English. 

No of course not. Plenty of people play for nations without being "from" that nation. The rules of eligibility for a national football team are not the same as those for citizenship.

Sorry mate. You are very confused about a) the derivation of citizenship, b) genetic heritage, c) cultural activity, and d) football team eligibility. These things are not the same, nor are they achieved in the same way.

You're also, as @View from the Dolman has pointed out to you, fundamentally misunderstanding how this country (and many others) hands out citizenship.

10 hours ago, IAmNick said:

Yeah fair - I certainly agree with your second paragraph. It's so poorly defined I think you could make a case for multiple view points. People who tend to think about it a lot are also either very interesting or very unpleasant people!

Well hopefully I am the former. I'm not a raving Eng-er-lander, in fact I'd never even call myself English - I'm British. I'm also not trying to deny anyone their citizenship or their identity. Mehmeti, Sunak, my french mate from uni, all might have British citizenship and passports, but I know that certainly the third in that list would never, ever, call himself English. It's also only since living abroad, reading up on the way you obtain British citizenship (due to having a child abroad), and looking back at this country that the weirdness of all this became obvious.

Edited by ExiledAjax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

I’m not calling Pearson a racist by any stretch as he clearly isn’t, but he does come across as a type of manager who likes hard working brexit means brexit type players. 

I’d probably put a bet on that most of his signings, if not all, have been white British or Irish players. 

just when you think you've read it all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

The Irish situation is pretty unique though. Presumably I could qualify to play for the Republic via my Northern Irish, Protestant, Catholic-hating grandmother who died before I was born? 

Yes, my wife would be in exactly the same boat.

As a result of the GFA everyone in the North has both the right to Irish citizenship & could theoretically choose to play for either side.

Loads of Unionists have taken advantage of the passport option..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

I’m not calling Pearson a racist by any stretch as he clearly isn’t, but he does come across as a type of manager who likes hard working brexit means brexit type players. 

I’d probably put a bet on that most of his signings, if not all, have been white British or Irish players. 

Utter nonsense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

I have to respectfully disagree. 

For as long as I can remember I've had issues with the people sat behind me and my children. All sorts of vile language for the entire game. 

Every morning after a game I'm sending emails to the club. Always promise to look into it but never get back to me. 

I now use the voice recorder on my phone which picks it up and still nothing gets done. 

I've reported it to stewards on the day but they just shut up when they see me approach a steward. 

I've text the abuse line and nothing gets done. 

I'm literally at the point now where I feel as if reporting it is pointless because nothing gets done.

That's not good. I've heard a few incidents that have been reported during the match to the abuse line by text and the stewards have not only acted with total discression but made follow up calls to the person that had cause to complain too. 

Emails just seem to get lost amongst the 100's of other enquiries, but a text to the abuse line during the match has apparently been affective

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

I’m not calling Pearson a racist by any stretch as he clearly isn’t, but he does come across as a type of manager who likes hard working brexit means brexit type players. 

I’d probably put a bet on that most of his signings, if not all, have been white British or Irish players. 

 

Brexit means Brexit is some measure of toughness is it? 

For people with IQs below 70 maybe.

 2 things have nothing to do with each other and that the phrase is a rather desperate attempt by a certain brand of politician to popularize their political goals in tough man language.

It's pitiful.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Wanderingred said:

We all know racism is wrong but sometimes it takes being on the end of a racist slur to truly appreciate just how vile and hurtful it is. I live in China and I’ve been called “white ghost” and told to “go back to my country” a couple of times. It’s not a memory that ever goes away.

Of course white on black racism may be seen to carry more weight and stigma due to historical context and that’s an understandable viewpoint imho. That said, if somebody feels that they’ve been a victim of racism, then whatever skin colour they are, or whatever the background of the abuser, they should have their allegations treated seriously.

At the top of the game, racism and all forms of discrimination is rightfully treated very seriously. 

But the further you go down the game, from the top of clubs to the bottom, it becomes less serious. "Its just banter init" I get told. 

I've been the victim of hate speech and like you say it's not a memory that ever goes away. Especially when you call someone out for it and they then turn it on yourself by calling you a snowflake or that you're too sensitive and that you need to man up.

Those attitudes can cause deep psychological problems in the victim. It then prevents things being reported because the victim then starts to believe that everyone has that same attitude and that their complaint won't be taken seriously and that then enables further discrimination. 

I know a young disabled adult. Lovely guy. He was trolled by a person online about his disability. The troll is a footballer that plays at a decent semi pro level. He sent this lad thousands of vile messages. Comparing him to Harvey Price, calling him all the vile names you can think of. 

I went through all the FA rules and they are very clear. It says stuff such as participants shall never engage in any form of online hate speech, discrimination, bullying, harassment etc. The perpetrator tried to hide behind the fact it was in private but we provided the FA rules to him which said due to the nature of the messages the right to privacy may not exist. We sent this guy all the rules etc. He laughed it off. Said he knew people within his local FA that would make it go away. 

This guy is also a Uefa B coach, it absolutely terrifies me that this man is out there coaching children, potentially disabled children. 

We repeatedly asked him to stop as it had a huge impact on this lads mental health. To the point where the lad was sending me messages saying he was considering self harming. 

So on his behalf I gathered all the evidence and sent it to that guys local FA. Didn't recieve a response. So I then contacted them again complaining I'd not recieved a response. They then replied asking for additional info which we provided, and not had a response from them. 

This guy continues to bully this lad on a daily basis and actively mocks him for reporting him to the FA and the FA not doing anything about it. Last night he sent him a message gloating because he's playing in a game today. 

There are some really good people within football, however by and large the sport is rotten to the core with outdated attitudes and people who enable those vile behaviours. 

They all scream from the rooftops about how seriously they take all forms of discrimination but when it comes to it they close ranks to protect their mate who they think is a good guy.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

At the top of the game, racism and all forms of discrimination is rightfully treated very seriously. 

But the further you go down the game, from the top of clubs to the bottom, it becomes less serious. "Its just banter init" I get told. 

I've been the victim of hate speech and like you say it's not a memory that ever goes away. Especially when you call someone out for it and they then turn it on yourself by calling you a snowflake or that you're too sensitive and that you need to man up.

Those attitudes can cause deep psychological problems in the victim. It then prevents things being reported because the victim then starts to believe that everyone has that same attitude and that their complaint won't be taken seriously and that then enables further discrimination. 

I know a young disabled adult. Lovely guy. He was trolled by a person online about his disability. The troll is a footballer that plays at a decent semi pro level. He sent this lad thousands of vile messages. Comparing him to Harvey Price, calling him all the vile names you can think of. 

I went through all the FA rules and they are very clear. It says stuff such as participants shall never engage in any form of online hate speech, discrimination, bullying, harassment etc. The perpetrator tried to hide behind the fact it was in private but we provided the FA rules to him which said due to the nature of the messages the right to privacy may not exist. We sent this guy all the rules etc. He laughed it off. Said he knew people within his local FA that would make it go away. 

This guy is also a Uefa B coach, it absolutely terrifies me that this man is out there coaching children, potentially disabled children. 

We repeatedly asked him to stop as it had a huge impact on this lads mental health. To the point where the lad was sending me messages saying he was considering self harming. 

So on his behalf I gathered all the evidence and sent it to that guys local FA. Didn't recieve a response. So I then contacted them again complaining I'd not recieved a response. They then replied asking for additional info which we provided, and not had a response from them. 

This guy continues to bully this lad on a daily basis and actively mocks him for reporting him to the FA and the FA not doing anything about it. Last night he sent him a message gloating because he's playing in a game today. 

There are some really good people within football, however by and large the sport is rotten to the core with outdated attitudes and people who enable those vile behaviours. 

They all scream from the rooftops about how seriously they take all forms of discrimination but when it comes to it they close ranks to protect their mate who they think is a good guy.

 

Sounds like you need to get the old bill involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GrahamC said:

Yes, my wife would be in exactly the same boat.

As a result of the GFA everyone in the North has both the right to Irish citizenship & could theoretically choose to play for either side.

 

Mark Sykes being just one Northern Ireland-born example. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, as it must do to some degree as it does in life, but how often do people openly hear racist abuse at city?

I can honestly say in my 30ish years of watching city, I’ve never heard a racist remark. 

Unfortunately cant say the same.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Bard said:

 

Brexit means Brexit is some measure of toughness is it? 

For people with IQs below 70 maybe.

 2 things have nothing to do with each other and that the phrase is a rather desperate attempt by a certain brand of politician to popularize their political goals in tough man language.

It's pitiful.

Please have a look at brexit tackles on YouTube, that’s what I meant by brexit means brexit, it wasn’t any relation to brexit.

It’s just a modern day saying for hard tackles, I understand this is probably missed by many. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Sorry mate. You are very confused about a) the derivation of citizenship, b) genetic heritage, c) cultural activity, and d) football team eligibility. These things are not the same, nor are they achieved in the same way.

You're also, as @View from the Dolman has pointed out to you, fundamentally misunderstanding how this country (and many others) hands out citizenship.

Well hopefully I am the former. I'm not a raving Eng-er-lander, in fact I'd never even call myself English - I'm British. I'm also not trying to deny anyone their citizenship or their identity. Mehmeti, Sunak, my french mate from uni, all might have British citizenship and passports, but I know that certainly the third in that list would never, ever, call himself English. It's also only since living abroad, reading up on the way you obtain British citizenship (due to having a child abroad), and looking back at this country that the weirdness of all this became obvious.

You are right, a third of your list , your mate wouldn’t be English, if he is French due to being born in France, if he wasn’t born in France he wouldn’t be French. 

Rishi and Anis are.

Born in English, are English, end of. 

Edited by Wedontplayinblue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

You are right, a third of your list , your mate wouldn’t be English, if he is French due to being born in France, if he wasn’t born in France he wouldn’t be French. 

Rishi and Anis are.

Born in English, are English, end of. 

Ok, I'll stop trying to explain things to you. In return, could you please explain something to me: what is "English"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

You are right, a third of your list , your mate wouldn’t be English, if he is French due to being born in France, if he wasn’t born in France he wouldn’t be French. 

Rishi and Anis are.

Born in English, are English, end of. 

Haaland was born in England and he's Norwegian. Also, Sterling wasn't born in England and he's English

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

English, being born within the country boundaries of England as set out by internationally recognised boundaries. 

Ah. Ok. Now I see why we are at cross-purposes. You are treating England as a country capable of conferring "English" citizenship. This is the "country" that has no government, no monarch, no army, issues no passport, has no citizens, no controlled borders, no sovereign waters, and which ceased to be a sovereign state more than 700 years ago.

No nation "recognises" England as a country and "England" does not engage in any international relations or diplomacy. This is all done by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a sovereign state, a country.

Therefore we arrive at my conclusion, which is that the only manner in which you, I, Anis Mehmeti, Rishi Sunak, or anyone else in the modern world can be "English" is by genetic heritage or behaviour. The first is a matter of parental fact, the second is a flexible matter of circumstance which counts for naught.

Thus Mehmeti cannot reasonably be considered "English".

39 minutes ago, AshtonGreat said:

No, Haaland is recognised as Norwegian and Sterling is recognised as English. 

Along similar lines to the above, Norway is a sovereign state, something which England has not been for more than 700 years. You can have a Norwegian passport and be a Norwegian citizen, but you can't have an English passport nor be an English citizen. The two statuses are not equivalent.

Sterling has Jamaican genetic heritage. I don't know if he has a British or Jamaican passport, but it won't be an English one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/10/2023 at 14:45, ExiledAjax said:

Lads it's true.

Honestly, these kidz. Won't someone tell them that Brexit should be used in relation to reclaiming sovereignty of your half of the pitch and getting all the opposition players out of your half.

A "Brexit clearance" would be more apt.

I think it’s a poor attempt to dig his way out of what he said by the poster - but anyway it’s nonsense because we don’t have any players that do this? Last player to fly into tackles consistently like that was Baker.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/10/2023 at 19:01, ExiledAjax said:

If their mother was of English heritage then partially yes. But otherwise no I'd probably not class them as English just because (and assuming they were) born in "England". They'd also not necessarily be British citizens either.

English is a vague heritage, and I said I don't know exactly when English as a heritage would have crystallised. I guess I wonder if the answer is similar to - and I don't know the answer here either - the point someone can be considered Cantonese, or Igbo, or Navajo.

Surely it comes down to what the person feels?

My mum is of foreign descent but you wouldn’t know it and she doesn’t really embrace it due to a family fall out.

I on the other hand do embrace that culture and heritage and am proud of that part of me.

My partner was born in England, always lived here except a brief spell in Cardiff for uni, yet both her parents are Welsh. She considers herself English but with Welsh heritage. It’s purely down to the individual and how they identify IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
On 06/10/2023 at 15:04, Steve Watts said:

I was a child of the 80's and so grew up with the term coloured being preferred because black was seen as offensive because of the context it was used in - "You black bastard" and all that.  Over the years that viewpoint has swapped over and a lot of people who were adults in that era probably haven't adjusted or see anything wrong with it.

I'm exactly the same, I still find using the word "black" as being of racist connotations but would use the word coloured. 

But when I am in conversation with younger people they often pull me up on this. 

I work with medical colleagues and I still refer to them as Dr *****, even though I am told to call them by their first name. 

It's just the way it was when I was brought up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MarcusX said:

Surely it comes down to what the person feels?

My mum is of foreign descent but you wouldn’t know it and she doesn’t really embrace it due to a family fall out.

I on the other hand do embrace that culture and heritage and am proud of that part of me.

My partner was born in England, always lived here except a brief spell in Cardiff for uni, yet both her parents are Welsh. She considers herself English but with Welsh heritage. It’s purely down to the individual and how they identify IMO.

It's interesting how self-identification feeds into it. I'm about to assume a couple of things about your wife so tell me I get disrespectful here - but your wife is a British citizen, and she's identifying there with two things that are covered by that umbrella of being British. So my question is why doesn't she  say she's British? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MarcusX said:

I think it’s a poor attempt to dig his way out of what he said by the poster - but anyway it’s nonsense because we don’t have any players that do this? Last player to fly into tackles consistently like that was Baker.

Dig my way out of what? Not really sure what I’ve said for myself to have to dig myself out of,

The brexit means brexit meaning was along the same lines as a brexit tackle.

It’s pretty obvious nige wouldn’t allow players to be gung ho but does want a hard working no nonsense player which is what I meant under the same terms as brexit means brexit / brexit tackles. 
 

Not really hard to understand. 

Edited by Wedontplayinblue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

It's interesting how self-identification feeds into it. I'm about to assume a couple of things about your wife so tell me I get disrespectful here - but your wife is a British citizen, and she's identifying there with two things that are covered by that umbrella of being British. So my question is why doesn't she  say she's British? 

As she’s English, so that’s why I imagine she doesn’t say she’s British.

Put it this way, when Scotland becomes independent, NI is integrated back into Ireland and then wales decide to leave too, does everyone then born in England magically become English as there isn’t a union or Britain anymore? But then technically Northern Ireland isn’t part of Britain but of the United Kingdom, so should unionists in NI not feel British as they arnt?

Youre just changing the parameters to suit yourself.

Being English isn’t the same as being welsh, like you said the cultures historically are different, the same with being Scottish but are all bought under the union of being British, you are just making this up as you go along now. 

You still haven’t explained what being English is, or how someone for example with immigrant parents but born in London magically become English?

Edited by Wedontplayinblue
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/10/2023 at 00:06, Rebounder said:

It's always white people getting abused for the colour of their skin in games, and online. After England went out of the Euros the abuse white players got was shocking compared to our black players. Accross Europe it isn't Black players being racially abused with monkey chants, but white players are always getting racially abused on a daily basis and this is especially true in Eastern Europe. Not enough people talk about this, and I blame the MSM, WEF and Bill Gates for this tragedy. 

I'm sure I'm about to embarrass myself, but this is a joke, yes?

  • Like 1
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Along similar lines to the above, Norway is a sovereign state, something which England has not been for more than 700 years. You can have a Norwegian passport and be a Norwegian citizen, but you can't have an English passport nor be an English citizen. The two statuses are not equivalent.

The major problem with your position is that the concept of linking a state to its citizens is a relatively modern concept, it started in the 19th Century, but it wasn't until the aftermath of the First World War that it became of major interest to sovereign states.

I'd also point out that modern Norway came into existence in the early 19th Century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/10/2023 at 11:16, W-S-M Seagull said:

At the top of the game, racism and all forms of discrimination is rightfully treated very seriously. 

But the further you go down the game, from the top of clubs to the bottom, it becomes less serious. "Its just banter init" I get told. 

I've been the victim of hate speech and like you say it's not a memory that ever goes away. Especially when you call someone out for it and they then turn it on yourself by calling you a snowflake or that you're too sensitive and that you need to man up.

Those attitudes can cause deep psychological problems in the victim. It then prevents things being reported because the victim then starts to believe that everyone has that same attitude and that their complaint won't be taken seriously and that then enables further discrimination. 

I know a young disabled adult. Lovely guy. He was trolled by a person online about his disability. The troll is a footballer that plays at a decent semi pro level. He sent this lad thousands of vile messages. Comparing him to Harvey Price, calling him all the vile names you can think of. 

I went through all the FA rules and they are very clear. It says stuff such as participants shall never engage in any form of online hate speech, discrimination, bullying, harassment etc. The perpetrator tried to hide behind the fact it was in private but we provided the FA rules to him which said due to the nature of the messages the right to privacy may not exist. We sent this guy all the rules etc. He laughed it off. Said he knew people within his local FA that would make it go away. 

This guy is also a Uefa B coach, it absolutely terrifies me that this man is out there coaching children, potentially disabled children. 

We repeatedly asked him to stop as it had a huge impact on this lads mental health. To the point where the lad was sending me messages saying he was considering self harming. 

So on his behalf I gathered all the evidence and sent it to that guys local FA. Didn't recieve a response. So I then contacted them again complaining I'd not recieved a response. They then replied asking for additional info which we provided, and not had a response from them. 

This guy continues to bully this lad on a daily basis and actively mocks him for reporting him to the FA and the FA not doing anything about it. Last night he sent him a message gloating because he's playing in a game today. 

There are some really good people within football, however by and large the sport is rotten to the core with outdated attitudes and people who enable those vile behaviours. 

They all scream from the rooftops about how seriously they take all forms of discrimination but when it comes to it they close ranks to protect their mate who they think is a good guy.

 

Its rare that a semi pro possesses a EUFA B licence, but if the individual does he will have had to have the backing of a club to achieve this. If the player is coaching it would be appropriate to contact the club the player is coaching at and raise your concern about inappropriate behaviour. 

You should also contact your regional FA safeguarding team (again?), copy in all the safeguarding team from the lead to the champion.

Disability is a protected characteristic its possible a hate crime has been committed. Bullying is defined as repetitive abuse, and abuse of a vulnerable adult is illegal. Contact the police. 

Edited by Cowshed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/10/2023 at 13:15, Wedontplayinblue said:

I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, as it must do to some degree as it does in life, but how often do people openly hear racist abuse at city?

I can honestly say in my 30ish years of watching city, I’ve never heard a racist remark. 

Not so much in the last couple of decades, but back in the day...and it's not just racism, it's sexism and homophobia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I can remember season or two back, that sounds vague, front block Lansdown. I had my two grandsons with me as per normal and two blokes where giving it large to a black player of the opposition. I had a quiet word with a steward. Nothing was done. When I clearly restated my complaint to the same steward. He had a word with another steward  and still did nothing.

Edited by Rocking Red Cyril
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
14 minutes ago, Rocking Red Cyril said:

Yes I can remember season or two back, that sounds vague, front block Lansdown. I had my two grandsons with me as per normal and two blokes where giving it large to a black player of the opposition. I had a quiet word with a steward. Nothing was done. When I clearly restated my complaint to the same steward. He had a word with another steward  and still did nothing.

In the future if this ever happens you should get their coat numbers and report it to their supervisor - they would be more likely to respond as I would imagine the majority of stewards are there via an agency and probably not too bothered in what they are doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, phantom said:

In the future if this ever happens you should get their coat numbers and report it to their supervisor - they would be more likely to respond as I would imagine the majority of stewards are there via an agency and probably not too bothered in what they are doing

Yes good idea. I am certainly not over protective with my grandsons their. And I appreciate its BS 3 and we are at a football game. But racism is totally unacceptable at all levels. And I not willing tolerate it 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/10/2023 at 16:28, Red Skin said:

Very good article in the last OSIB mag about an Muslim Asian City fan and his experiences at games. Sadly, it's still a thing.  Maybe @Shtanley could share?

As a white male I really have to look the those on the receiving end to gauge its effect.  I'm sure some of subtlety and nuance is lost on me.

Personally, I'm still pretty shocked by the amount of boos from our fans on the rare occasions opposition players take the knees.  No one will ever convince this is some political conspiracy by BTM.  It's just veiled racism. 

part 1

Screenshot 2023-10-09 at 12.11.05.png

part 2

Screenshot 2023-10-09 at 12.11.12.png

Edited by Shtanley
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

You still haven’t explained what being English is

I have. I've said that I think it's a genetic heritage based on a mix of Anglo-Saxon, Norse, Norman and Brythonic DNA that probably came into being about 1,000 years ago.

19 hours ago, Wedontplayinblue said:

Put it this way, when Scotland becomes independent, NI is integrated back into Ireland and then wales decide to leave too, does everyone then born in England magically become English as there isn’t a union or Britain anymore? But then technically Northern Ireland isn’t part of Britain but of the United Kingdom, so should unionists in NI not feel British as they arnt?

Unionists in N Ireland are British citizens. They're British, as are republicans in N Ireland. The side of that debate on which someone sits does not affect their citizenship.

You are conflating citizenship, heritage and personal identity into a single descriptor. You're not listening to what I am saying which is that we are British citizens, because that is the country that exists as a sovereign state capable of conferring that status. England, Wales, Scotland and N Ireland are not countries and cannot do that.

If the union dissolved and England became a separate state and became capable of handing out citizenship status then yes we would become English citizens. Would you lose you're genetic heritage? No, as I've said that's a matter of fact. The only other thing is your behavioural culture, which is flexible, and is determined by - as @MarcusX elucidates - feeling. Whether "feeling" is sufficient to be the primary determining factor in someone's identity is doubtful in my opinion.

Regardless, none  of these aspects of identity - citizenship, heritage, feeling -is determined by birth location alone, and so we get back to the original point - that Mehmeti isn't English simply by virtue of being born in "England".

18 hours ago, Hxj said:

The major problem with your position is that the concept of linking a state to its citizens is a relatively modern concept, it started in the 19th Century, but it wasn't until the aftermath of the First World War that it became of major interest to sovereign states.

I'd also point out that modern Norway came into existence in the early 19th Century.

How else can a citizen be linked to the state other than through a passport? I know modern Norway is a young country (as is modern Britain). That's fine, and it doesn't make it's citizens any less Norwegian.

More absurd is @Wedontplayinblue's assertion that identity/citizenship (he conflates the two) is defined at birth by birth location alone. Essentially it seems that in his opinion a Saudi and a German could land at Heathrow, have a child, then move to the USA and raise that child there...and that child would be English. Not British of course. English. Absurd.

Regardless, I'm not seeking to define anyone solely by their citizenship. An individual can have a personal identity as well, but that cannot be of the same status as that person's citizenship. It cannot be the one thing that they "are".

2 hours ago, Rocking Red Cyril said:

So if you hold a British passport. Why are you not English ? Surely he holds dual citizenship 

Citizenship is a legal status. There is no such thing as English citizenship. 

Edited by ExiledAjax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Unionists in N Ireland are British citizens. They're British, as are republicans in N Ireland. The side of that debate on which someone sits does not affect their citizenship.

I am not sure where this thread has veered off to, but where does nationality sit with this?  Citizenship and nationality are distinct and different things.   

Since the Good Friday Agreement anyone in the North of Ireland can choose their nationality. That's why Mark Sykes can choose to play for the Republic of Ireland, whereas Neil Lennon could only play for Northern Ireland (and receive bullets in the post for the privilege from his NI 'supporters') .  And why since the GFA some unionists disgruntled with Brexit have got Irish passports and claim can Irish nationality (as well as British).  Isn't citizenship more about the right to residency and right work?  If this has morphed into a debate about identity, then surely nationality is a better yardstick then citizenship?   

Anyway, back on topic. I, for one, applaud the club for this.  Racist behaviour shouldn't be tolerated and hopefully it will make it easier to call out if it is witnessed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red Skin said:

I am not sure where this thread has veered off to, but where does nationality sit with this?  Citizenship and nationality are distinct and different things.   

Since the Good Friday Agreement anyone in the North of Ireland can choose their nationality. That's why Mark Sykes can choose to play for the Republic of Ireland, whereas Neil Lennon could only play for Northern Ireland (and receive bullets in the post for the privilege from his NI 'supporters') .  And why since the GFA some unionists disgruntled with Brexit have got Irish passports and claim can Irish nationality (as well as British).  Isn't citizenship more about the right to residency and right work?  If this has morphed into a debate about identity, then surely nationality is a better yardstick then citizenship?   

Anyway, back on topic. I, for one, applaud the club for this.  Racist behaviour shouldn't be tolerated and hopefully it will make it easier to call out if it is witnessed.

Not really. Your nationality - ie which nation you belong to - is determined by your citizenship. 

Rights to live/work somewhere are separate. You don't have to have British citizenship/nationality to live and work in Britain. I didn't change my nationality when I lived and worked abroad.

Which football team someone plays for is only their "nationality" so far as the white line around the pitch extends.

As to racist behaviour. Yes it should be called out. I've never hear it at AG but normally hear something ranging from ignorant/rude comments through to full blown racism from our fans at every away game I go to.

Edited by ExiledAjax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Red Skin said:

Broadly speaking you are close enough, but there are subtle differences.   Have a read of this:

https://www.visagov.com/en/blog/nationality-vs-citizenship

We'll agree racism = bad though 

Visagov appear to be a private company trying to sell a one stop shop for visas. They cite no legal authority on that blog, and it appears to be focussed on US law and the US market.

I'm not sure I totally trust their interpretation of the difference between nationality and citizenship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/10/2023 at 17:57, Wedontplayinblue said:

Dig my way out of what? Not really sure what I’ve said for myself to have to dig myself out of,

The brexit means brexit meaning was along the same lines as a brexit tackle.

It’s pretty obvious nige wouldn’t allow players to be gung ho but does want a hard working no nonsense player which is what I meant under the same terms as brexit means brexit / brexit tackles. 
 

Not really hard to understand. 

The Brexit means Brexit thing was weird, though I’m assuming you must be young as I have heard the under 18s in my team say it.

However you then went on to say he only wants hard working players and then suggested that would mean most of his signings will have been white and British.

What does colour and nationality have to do with how hard someone works?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...