Jump to content
IGNORED

Nigel Is In A Good Place! - Ipswich Pre-Match Interview


Curr Avon

Recommended Posts

He praises Tom Rawcliffe and infers that positive conversations have taken place this week with him and Gavin Marshall.

Plus, no change to the squad for tomorrow night's clash. And same again Saturday too, although Nahki is making progress.

For this and more take a look...

 

Edited by Curr Avon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Curr Avon said:

He praises Tom Rawcliffe and infers that positive conversations have taken place this week with him and Gavin Marshall.

Plus, no change to the squad for tomorrow night's clash. And same again Saturday too, although Nahki is making progress.

For this and more take a look...

 

Who is Tom Rawcliffe?

An internal appointment, presumably?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, GeoTheCiderHead said:

Seems it - he was Finance Director: 

https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/city-leadership-update/

He was at The Wombles before us:

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/tomrawcliffe

nice dickie bow!

I liked the way when bigging him up, Nige mentioned his football credentials, made a big point of mentioning that! Go Nige!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Curr Avon said:

He praises Tom Rawcliffe and infers that positive conversations have taken place this week with him and Gavin Marshall.

Plus, no change to the squad for tomorrow night's clash. And same again Saturday too, although Nahki is making progress.

For this and more take a look...

 

Sorry, maybe it's me but I didn't get any inference of positive conversations...... just conversations.....

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Galley is our king said:

Sorry, maybe it's me but I didn't get any inference of positive conversations...... just conversations.....

I got quite the opposite. However i guess its how you view positive and to be fair it seems there were zero conversations up until Saturday as no one had a clue who was empowered to have them. Thus just someone saying eff you, your gone in May is an improvement as the future can be planned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I took from that was that NP seems happier and I now feel much more confident he is going to be there until at least the end of the season.

My “reading between the lines” about opinions and counter-opinions is that possibly he feels he’s earned a new contract and has been told the club aren’t ready to make a decision yet, but that maybe NP feels the message now is more “you’ve not convinced us to offer you a new contract yet” rather than “we’re avoiding the conversation because you’re definitely off but we don’t want to tell you that”. Obviously that’s me guessing the inference based on his words and mood though…

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Curr Avon said:

He praises Tom Rawcliffe and infers that positive conversations have taken place this week with him and Gavin Marshall.

Plus, no change to the squad for tomorrow night's clash. And same again Saturday too, although Nahki is making progress.

For this and more take a look...

 

I watched it much earlier today but from memory, the interviewer asks if talks were positive and I don't think Nige said yes??

He said he's spoken to those two chaps, and it sounded like they were separate conversations. 

He's bigging up the COO [?] which could be a ploy, and then says it could be a "baptism of fire" for the guy, so that suggests to me that difficult conversations are being had. 

Nige says its not about being aggressive, but about getting your point of view across and then says something that sounds like the board are worried about our form.

I didn't take any positives from it, but Nige looked pretty calm.

Edited by mozo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mozo said:

I watched it much earlier today but from memory, the interviewer asks if talks were positive and I don't think Nige said yes??

He said he's spoken to those two chaps, and it sounded like they were separate conversations. 

He's bigging up the COO [?] which could be a ploy, and then says it could be a "baptism of fire" for the guy, so that suggests to me that difficult conversations are being had. 

Nige says its not about being aggressive, but about getting your point of view across and then says something that sounds like the board are worried about our form.

I didn't take any positives from it, but Nige looked pretty calm.

Well for me that was a relaxed calm comfortable interview where he enjoyed talking ,no hint of frustration or irritation it seemed to me  like he felt his comments at the weekend were heard and somewhat listened too by people higher-up.maybe he feels his points were taken on board but not expecting anything so feels comfortable in himself for what he said, he knows he can do no more with what is available and people higher up can't really argue that.injuries have cursed us for a few seasons and with a smaller squad and big players out what can he do.I believe a fully fit squad and off field team Nige has assembled is a top 10 squad and luck with injuries a top 6 squad. In good hands with Nige.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 hours ago, mozo said:

I watched it much earlier today but from memory, the interviewer asks if talks were positive and I don't think Nige said yes??

He said he's spoken to those two chaps, and it sounded like they were separate conversations. 

He's bigging up the COO [?] which could be a ploy, and then says it could be a "baptism of fire" for the guy, so that suggests to me that difficult conversations are being had. 

Nige says its not about being aggressive, but about getting your point of view across and then says something that sounds like the board are worried about our form.

I didn't take any positives from it, but Nige looked pretty calm.

Then made a big thing about him being well liked but more importantly having integrity, implying others don’t necessarily?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LondonBristolian said:

What I took from that was that NP seems happier and I now feel much more confident he is going to be there until at least the end of the season.

My “reading between the lines” about opinions and counter-opinions is that possibly he feels he’s earned a new contract and has been told the club aren’t ready to make a decision yet, but that maybe NP feels the message now is more “you’ve not convinced us to offer you a new contract yet” rather than “we’re avoiding the conversation because you’re definitely off but we don’t want to tell you that”. Obviously that’s me guessing the inference based on his words and mood though…

If I were in Nigel's considerable boots & the hierarchy were still hedging their bets,despite the obvious excellent work, I'd at the least call the bluff.

He has nothing to lose.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hartleysbeard said:

It’s an update on the senior leadership team, i.e. the board. No reason to mention Pearson in that statement. 

The last line deviates from simply behind the scenes leadership though.

JL says, 'We are excited about this season and believe this is the right approach for us to be successful.'

Why not ' We are excited about this season with manager Nigel Pearson at the helm and believe this is the right approach for us to be successful.'

Or

'We are excited by this season and believe this is the right approach for us 'to make further progress under manager Nigel Pearson.'

Or even, 'We are excited about this season and believe we now have a great team in the background to help further enhance the very encouraging improvements we have seen on the pitch under Nigel Pearson.'

Something? Anything? NP is a part of the leadership after all and really not hard to include him with a supportive mention at the end.

If he's going to mention being 'excited about the season' at all - which he didn't have to - it is a very obvious omission to make no reference at all to NP.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
9 minutes ago, Nogbad the Bad said:

The last line deviates from simply behind the scenes leadership though.

JL says, 'We are excited about this season and believe this is the right approach for us to be successful.'

Why not ' We are excited about this season with manager Nigel Pearson at the helm and believe this is the right approach for us to be successful.'

Or

'We are excited by this season and believe this is the right approach for us 'to make further progress under manager Nigel Pearson.'

Or even, 'We are excited about this season and believe we now have a great team in the background to help further enhance the very encouraging improvements we have seen on the pitch under Nigel Pearson.'

Something? Anything? NP is a part of the leadership after all and really not hard to include him with a supportive mention at the end.

If he's going to mention being 'excited about the season' at all - which he didn't have to - it is a very obvious omission to make no reference at all to NP.

Saves going back and editing the article when they sack him 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nogbad the Bad said:

The last line deviates from simply behind the scenes leadership though.

JL says, 'We are excited about this season and believe this is the right approach for us to be successful.'

Why not ' We are excited about this season with manager Nigel Pearson at the helm and believe this is the right approach for us to be successful.'

Or

'We are excited by this season and believe this is the right approach for us 'to make further progress under manager Nigel Pearson.'

Or even, 'We are excited about this season and believe we now have a great team in the background to help further enhance the very encouraging improvements we have seen on the pitch under Nigel Pearson.'

Something? Anything? NP is a part of the leadership after all and really not hard to include him with a supportive mention at the end.

If he's going to mention being 'excited about the season' at all - which he didn't have to - it is a very obvious omission to make no reference at all to NP.

While we're at it, why is the official site bcfc.co.uk rather than npbcfc.co.uk?  Why do we play at Ashton Gate rather Ashton Gate where Nigel Pearson works.

Or are we being a bit sensitive and looking for snubs for NP in every little thing the club does?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, red panda said:

While we're at it, why is the official site bcfc.co.uk rather than npbcfc.co.uk?  Why do we play at Ashton Gate rather Ashton Gate where Nigel Pearson works.

Or are we being a bit sensitive and looking for snubs for NP in every little thing the club does?

No…we are looking for obvious signs of disrespect to our manager.

We’ve all done the courses in work where you are asked to spot signs of non-inclusion, being left out etc.  This is just a football version.

It’s clear SL and JL are pissed off…perhaps with good reason (even if just in their eyes)…and they are using opportunities to be a bit “childish”, eg. SL praising Robins.  To give some balance, as big a fan of Nige as I am, I don’t think he’s perfect either.  He’s also resorted to a bit of “childish” comments in response.  On a pure football side of things I don’t think he’s perfect either.

But I’m on the side of Nige over our owners every day of the week, based on my interpretation of what is going on.

  • Like 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

No…we are looking for obvious signs of disrespect to our manager.

We’ve all done the courses in work where you are asked to spot signs of non-inclusion, being left out etc.  This is just a football version.

It’s clear SL and JL are pissed off…perhaps with good reason (even if just in their eyes)…and they are using opportunities to be a bit “childish”, eg. SL praising Robins.  To give some balance, as big a fan of Nige as I am, I don’t think he’s perfect either.  He’s also resorted to a bit of “childish” comments in response.  On a pure football side of things I don’t think he’s perfect either.

But I’m on the side of Nige over our owners every day of the week, based on my interpretation of what is going on.

Just remind me, what did you estimate the saving was to the playing budget since Nige joined?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it maybe a case that the conversation has been that we, the board, are happy with progress, however, we are not going to commit ourselves to entering into an extended contract until we have a clearer picture as to your long-term health prognosis?

Being realistic and putting an objective hat on things, I would love us to commit to Nige.  However, it wouldn't be financially prudent to tie us in to a 2-3 year deal if within the next 12 months Nige is forced into a long-term absence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mozo said:

Just remind me, what did you estimate the saving was to the playing budget since Nige joined?

If I base it on continuing to spend at the rates we were spending at end of 20/21:

Wages: £30m

Amortisation: £12.3m

+++++

in 21/22:

Wages: £23.8m (saving of £6.2m predominantly playing staff)

Amortisation: £7.4m (saving of £4.9m)

Total Saving: £11.1m

+++++

in 22/23 (estimated)

Wages: £21m (saving of £9m)

Amortisation: £4.9m (saving of £7.4m)

Total Saving: £16.4m

+++++

this season (estimated)

Wages: £18m (saving of £12m)

Amortisation: £2.1m (saving of £10.2m)

Total Saving: £22.2m

+++++

So, in summary “the club” have spent £49.7m less than had we had carried on at the levels previously.  The reason I use “the club” is because it’s not Nige doing the do, but it’s Nige dealing with the consequences of those cut costs (through less players, less players of needed quality, etc).

And “the club” have also brought in transfer profit of £35m in that period.  To be balanced in years prior to Nige becoming manager, we also brought in money from selling players, but….our costs were increasing and outweighed the money brought in.

Happy to be challenged on the numbers and explanation.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

No…we are looking for obvious signs of disrespect to our manager.

We’ve all done the courses in work where you are asked to spot signs of non-inclusion, being left out etc.  This is just a football version.

It’s clear SL and JL are pissed off…perhaps with good reason (even if just in their eyes)…and they are using opportunities to be a bit “childish”, eg. SL praising Robins.  To give some balance, as big a fan of Nige as I am, I don’t think he’s perfect either.  He’s also resorted to a bit of “childish” comments in response.  On a pure football side of things I don’t think he’s perfect either.

But I’m on the side of Nige over our owners every day of the week, based on my interpretation of what is going on.

Really???

How come we are dissecting the wording of club statement from 20 September?????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, red panda said:

Really???

How come we are dissecting the wording of club statement from 20 September?????

Because the current mood of OTIB is to exclusively find fault with SL/JL and anything they’ve ever said. Ever. 
 

Bristol Sport listed this recently. It’s a disgrace. It’s not “Bristol City” it should be “Nigel Pearson’s Bristol City”.

https://jobsinfootball.com/job/43528/marketing-manager/

The level of disrespect shown to him here is staggering 🤦‍♂️

  • Confused 3
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, red panda said:

Really???

How come we are dissecting the wording of club statement from 20 September?????

It’s simple…it’s not just one thing, it a continual build-up of things like this over a period of time, that came to a bit of a head on Saturday post-match.  And that’s what forum are here for.  

38 minutes ago, t_b said:

The level of disrespect shown to him here is staggering 🤦‍♂️

SL and JL have a unique way of gaining respect!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, t_b said:

Because the current mood of OTIB is to exclusively find fault with SL/JL and anything they’ve ever said. Ever. 
 

Bristol Sport listed this recently. It’s a disgrace. It’s not “Bristol City” it should be “Nigel Pearson’s Bristol City”.

https://jobsinfootball.com/job/43528/marketing-manager/

The level of disrespect shown to him here is staggering 🤦‍♂️

Respect is earned. Never had any for Jon. In a job he’s totally unsuitable for through nepotism. 
 

What I had for Steve has been slowly eroded over the last few years. H

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

It’s simple…it’s not just one thing, it a continual build-up of things like this over a period of time, that came to a bit of a head on Saturday post-match.  And that’s what forum are here for.

"things like this" - failing to namecheck NP in one specific quote in a statement about no longer having a CEO (NP is mentioned elsewhere in the statement).  Shocking.  I'm amazed NP didn't walk away immediately

So I disagree that it's "simple".  As I've said in another thread, if we had lost on Saturday, and we deserved to, we would have been 17th in the table and the mood here might have been a bit different.  But the forum wants its heros and villains so please don't let me get in the way of that.

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, red panda said:

"things like this" - failing to namecheck NP in one specific quote in a statement about no longer having a CEO (NP is mentioned elsewhere in the statement).  Shocking.  I'm amazed NP didn't walk away immediately

So I disagree that it's "simple".  As I've said in another thread, if we had lost on Saturday, and we deserved to, we would have been 17th in the table and the mood here might have been a bit different.  But the forum wants its heros and villains so please don't let me get in the way of that.

If the dog had stopped for a shit, it wouldn’t have won the race. 🤷🏻‍♂️

As for ifs and buts statements like the Cov result, how do you feel about the Stoke result for example?

It’s clear you hold SL in higher esteem than me.  But rather than say we should have more respect, and not criticise, why not explain why you have the view you do - it helps inform a better debate.  You might even change my view / some of my thoughts.  But if you just come up with stuff like “you’re all nitpicking” or “the forum wants its heroes and villains” that just ends up dragging the thread down. and then people start attacking the poster rather than debate the topic.

So, in Monty Python styleee - what have the Lansdown’s ever done for us?

(FWIW I don’t think they are all bad in everything they do, but be good to read your thoughts)

  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davefevs said:

If I base it on continuing to spend at the rates we were spending at end of 20/21:

Wages: £30m

Amortisation: £12.3m

+++++

in 21/22:

Wages: £23.8m (saving of £6.2m predominantly playing staff)

Amortisation: £7.4m (saving of £4.9m)

Total Saving: £11.1m

+++++

in 22/23 (estimated)

Wages: £21m (saving of £9m)

Amortisation: £4.9m (saving of £7.4m)

Total Saving: £16.4m

+++++

this season (estimated)

Wages: £18m (saving of £12m)

Amortisation: £2.1m (saving of £10.2m)

Total Saving: £22.2m

+++++

So, in summary “the club” have spent £49.7m less than had we had carried on at the levels previously.  The reason I use “the club” is because it’s not Nige doing the do, but it’s Nige dealing with the consequences of those cut costs (through less players, less players of needed quality, etc).

And “the club” have also brought in transfer profit of £35m in that period.  To be balanced in years prior to Nige becoming manager, we also brought in money from selling players, but….our costs were increasing and outweighed the money brought in.

Happy to be challenged on the numbers and explanation.

Well. Let me summarise; in Nigel's time at the club, we have cut a shit-ton from the player budget, and made a shit-ton in transfers out.

So, to do that, with relatively minimal transfer budget, makes finishing the season in the top 6 an almost impossible job.

And if that kind of humongous financial saving was overtly part of the remit for Nige to achieve top 6 in three years, then that's incomprehensible. 

I've said before that I think Nige inherited an incredible generation of young talent, and has made a few errors along the way (most managers do), but still, this is nuts.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

If the dog had stopped for a shit, it wouldn’t have won the race. 🤷🏻‍♂️

As for ifs and buts statements like the Cov result, how do you feel about the Stoke result for example?

It’s clear you hold SL in higher esteem than me.  But rather than say we should have more respect, and not criticise, why not explain why you have the view you do - it helps inform a better debate.  You might even change my view / some of my thoughts.  But if you just come up with stuff like “you’re all nitpicking” or “the forum wants its heroes and villains” that just ends up dragging the thread down. and then people start attacking the poster rather than debate the topic.

So, in Monty Python styleee - what have the Lansdown’s ever done for us?

(FWIW I don’t think they are all bad in everything they do, but be good to read your thoughts)

I will respond constructively - just quickly point out that you've attributed to me lots of things I haven't actually said, and then move on.

I'm pressed for time and so some of these may be partly attributable to others, but here goes:

  • we need to start with the absolutely obvious, SL's put a huge amount of his own money in
  • the infrastructure is so very very much better - Ashton Gate and the HPC being the most obvious examples, and we are enjoying the fruits of previous investment in the academy
  • we haven't (yet?) made the Prem, but we were one match away in 2008 and for a while it looked like Lee Johnson might be taking us there.  Even so, we are now an established Championship club, and generally looking up rather than down, a position we could only have dreamed of not that many years ago.  I have too many memories of trips to Gillingham, Northampton and the like not to appreciate the vast difference between now and then
  • unless things are going very badly wrong, our managers are usually given quite a lot of time.  That's something that can't be said for many clubs
  • there seems to be a received wisdom here that SL is useless at appointing managers, but I disagree.  First it's important to acknowledge that there are not dozens of other clubs out there making successful appointment after successful appointment.  Personally I think many of our managers have been well chosen.  Steve Cotterill and Gary Johnson spring to mind as the most obviously successful, and hopefully NP will join them.  Controversially, I think Lee Johnson was a good appointment and he moved the club forward.  Hindsight is wonderful, but at the time I was really excited when we appointed Derek McInnes, and even Sean O'Driscoll looked good on paper.  Some such as Tinnion and Holden haven't worked out, but I have a lot of respect for both of them and I can absolutely see why people thought it was worth giving them a try.  SL takes a lot of stick for Holden, but I still think we probably dodged a bullet with Chris Hughton and maybe we were in a difficult position once the penny dropped that perhaps Hughton wasn't the Messiah after all. And appointing Paul Simpson and Keith Downing alongside him seemed a good move
  • I'm running out of time, there are probably more I could think of.  And there is certainly a long list of things that he hasn't done, such as saddling us with mountains of debt, changing the club colours, trying to change the club name, appointing someone like Joey Barton, taking us into administration, getting points deductions, or selling the club on to an unscrupulous new owner who might do some or all of the above.

Other than that, what have they ever done for us?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, red panda said:

I will respond constructively - just quickly point out that you've attributed to me lots of things I haven't actually said, and then move on.

I'm pressed for time and so some of these may be partly attributable to others, but here goes:

  • we need to start with the absolutely obvious, SL's put a huge amount of his own money in
  • the infrastructure is so very very much better - Ashton Gate and the HPC being the most obvious examples, and we are enjoying the fruits of previous investment in the academy
  • we haven't (yet?) made the Prem, but we were one match away in 2008 and for a while it looked like Lee Johnson might be taking us there.  Even so, we are now an established Championship club, and generally looking up rather than down, a position we could only have dreamed of not that many years ago.  I have too many memories of trips to Gillingham, Northampton and the like not to appreciate the vast difference between now and then
  • unless things are going very badly wrong, our managers are usually given quite a lot of time.  That's something that can't be said for many clubs
  • there seems to be a received wisdom here that SL is useless at appointing managers, but I disagree.  First it's important to acknowledge that there are not dozens of other clubs out there making successful appointment after successful appointment.  Personally I think many of our managers have been well chosen.  Steve Cotterill and Gary Johnson spring to mind as the most obviously successful, and hopefully NP will join them.  Controversially, I think Lee Johnson was a good appointment and he moved the club forward.  Hindsight is wonderful, but at the time I was really excited when we appointed Derek McInnes, and even Sean O'Driscoll looked good on paper.  Some such as Tinnion and Holden haven't worked out, but I have a lot of respect for both of them and I can absolutely see why people thought it was worth giving them a try.  SL takes a lot of stick for Holden, but I still think we probably dodged a bullet with Chris Hughton and maybe we were in a difficult position once the penny dropped that perhaps Hughton wasn't the Messiah after all. And appointing Paul Simpson and Keith Downing alongside him seemed a good move
  • I'm running out of time, there are probably more I could think of.  And there is certainly a long list of things that he hasn't done, such as saddling us with mountains of debt, changing the club colours, trying to change the club name, appointing someone like Joey Barton, taking us into administration, getting points deductions, or selling the club on to an unscrupulous new owner who might do some or all of the above.

Other than that, what have they ever done for us?

Thanks, that’s tonnes better to debate for or against isn’t it.  That’s not meant to sound patronising at all, there are many things in there I agree with, there are some that I don’t, there are some where there is another side to the argument.  Just about to leave for tonight’s game.  Will come back to later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Thanks, that’s tonnes better to debate for or against isn’t it.  That’s not meant to sound patronising at all, there are many things in there I agree with, there are some that I don’t, there are some where there is another side to the argument.  Just about to leave for tonight’s game.  Will come back to later.

Sorry - you failed completely.  Why don't we just leave it there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, red panda said:
  • we need to start with the absolutely obvious, SL's put a huge amount of his own money in
  •  

 

the reason he has put in so much of his own money is that he has, over some considerable period, overseen the massive increase in debt (be that through poor decision making or bad luck - although he is one unlucky MoFo if thats the argument ) Resulting in him having to keep things afloat if he has any hopes of retaining and recouping  his investment.

been said many times before and i'll keep saying it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Davefevs said:

No…we are looking for obvious signs of disrespect to our manager.

We’ve all done the courses in work where you are asked to spot signs of non-inclusion, being left out etc.  This is just a football version.

It’s clear SL and JL are pissed off…perhaps with good reason (even if just in their eyes)…and they are using opportunities to be a bit “childish”, eg. SL praising Robins.  To give some balance, as big a fan of Nige as I am, I don’t think he’s perfect either.  He’s also resorted to a bit of “childish” comments in response.  On a pure football side of things I don’t think he’s perfect either.

But I’m on the side of Nige over our owners every day of the week, based on my interpretation of what is going on.

Glad I finished when i did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, red panda said:

While we're at it, why is the official site bcfc.co.uk rather than npbcfc.co.uk?  Why do we play at Ashton Gate rather Ashton Gate where Nigel Pearson works.

Or are we being a bit sensitive and looking for snubs for NP in every little thing the club does?

I didn't say it was a snub, but I see it as at the very least remiss not to mention NP at that stage when he'd moved on from talking about leadership behind the scenes.

Particularly from a Chairman who surfaces so seldom and says so little.

I'm not in favour of any change to the title of the official site btw, but should there be one slbcfc.co.uk is the most likely imo.

After all he's told us it's his club, and he can do what he likes, so why not make it official?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...