Jump to content
IGNORED

Sammie Szmodics


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Merrick's Marvels said:

Where are Coventry in the league?!

Unbelievable as it seems - and of course we couldn't afford him (so good luck with that Coventry) and he was rubbish for us - Manningball appears to be the future and what that style of football requires, and what we lack to make it work, is a technical, creative ACM who can receive the ball in tight, central areas, on the half turn, and then feed passes forwards to our attackers.

That type of player would transform us.

That type of player is Kasey Palmer.

Nuts.

He’s only started 11 league games for them this season, 9 more appearances as a sub, scored just one with 2 assists.

We need that type, but even at a club where the manager & coaching staff clearly rate him, he’s still not seen as the answer.

For me (& I know at least one regular poster dislikes him intensely) Jamie Paterson was twice the player that he was.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bristol Oil Services said:

This is what generates "atmosphere," this sort of football  (with something immediately at stake, helps too). The tedious "possession" shite can get tae **** give us chaos like this, fer fs

Yep, would’ve far preferred ‘Eustace’ Ball. And like Smodzics, that’s not hindsight either, it’s on record! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GrahamC said:

He’s only started 11 league games for them this season, 9 more appearances as a sub, scored just one with 2 assists.

We need that type, but even at a club where the manager & coaching staff clearly rate him, he’s still not seen as the answer.

For me (& I know at least one regular poster dislikes him intensely) Jamie Paterson was twice the player that he was.

Think Palmer was injured for a fair while earlier in the season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Remember the Florida game v Derby before the lightning…he looked good, but in a deeper role than he’s playing these days.

That's my memory. When he did play it was deeper (no.10). Seemed to be competing with KP for the same position.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Geoff said:

That's my memory. When he did play it was deeper (no.10). Seemed to be competing with KP for the same position.

Correct, signed SS early close-season, then KP just before the season started, that meant Paterson got loaned to Derby.  It was onky when he went to Peterboro permanently that he played right up top.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, fgrsimon said:

Szmodics and Chris Martin must have scored almost as many between them as our entire team this season?

Ate you suggesting that Chris Martin could still do it at Championship level?

As we see with Mehmeti, there is a huge gap between L1 and the Championship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Robbored said:

Blame LJ for allowing Szmodics to leave.

At the time it was suggested that City were after Ivan Toney so Sammie was allowed to go  to P'boro'  as a sweetener for a future deal. Trouble is Posh wanted £8 million, but City would only offer six, so Ivan T went off to Brentford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, ashton_fan said:

I have to say when he played for us looked very ordinary, I don't think anyone was too upset when we let him go. Hindsight's a wonderful thing!

Of course. That's why football clubs employ, and pay handsomely, professionals for their foresight. Get the best in the business at your club making these decisions and good times will follow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ashton_fan said:

I have to say when he played for us looked very ordinary, I don't think anyone was too upset when we let him go. Hindsight's a wonderful thing!

Which of the 108 minutes he played did you think he looked poor in?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 22A said:

At the time it was suggested that City were after Ivan Toney so Sammie was allowed to go  to P'boro'  as a sweetener for a future deal. Trouble is Posh wanted £8 million, but City would only offer six, so Ivan T went off to Brentford.

Mark Ashton was involved in that deal and refused to meet the asking price. I wasn’t aware that Szmodics was a part of the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ashton_fan said:

I have to say when he played for us looked very ordinary, I don't think anyone was too upset when we let him go. Hindsight's a wonderful thing!

I wouldn't say that, many very much liked the look of Szmodics, couldn't understand why LJ had never given him a proper chance, and thought the club would regret letting him go.

Others just said he was an Eisa/Adelukan type punt which hadn't worked out and well done the club and MA for making a profit.

There was a general acceptance that we had too many midfielders, DH wasn't going to play him (either), so better for all parties if he moved on ... but make sure there was a good sell on.

That's my take anyway from what became his departure thread from Aug/Sept 2020:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sheltons Army said:

You probably had a far longer view Lrrr but I saw him in U21 ganevatbthe Gate after he arrived and he showed everything he is now in terms of being a livewire , ability to beat a man , quick feet , and busy busy busy - he probably worked harder than I’ve ever seen for a player in U21 games

The only thing absent in that game was his finishing

Ge certainly has improved but at the time he looked as if he could have a real X factor once he broke into regular starts 

Shame

 

He looked pretty lost in his one league start (v Swansea) and just totally didn't impose himself in his two quite lengthy sub appearances thereafter. That said, 3 league and one cup game is not enough time to totally write off and clearly another loan rather than just selling him would - in hindsight - have been a better option.

He was with us 5 years ago and although he'd done great at L2 level with Colchester, I didn't necessarily see how he'd develop. Other players who looked exciting prospects for us five years ago, have not pulled up any trees since.  It's an inexact science predicting how young players will develop and I'm not going to beat up anyone at the club at the time who saw what I did - a L2 player who looked like he was really struggling to adapt to Championship football.

Szmodics is 28 now and right on what is usually the peak performance year as a striker.  You can do no more than shrug your shoulders and say the time and place just wasn't right here in 2019. Over the 50+ years I've followed City there are lots like that. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Sheltons Army said:

You probably had a far longer view Lrrr but I saw him in U21 ganevatbthe Gate after he arrived and he showed everything he is now in terms of being a livewire , ability to beat a man , quick feet , and busy busy busy - he probably worked harder than I’ve ever seen for a player in U21 games

The only thing absent in that game was his finishing

Ge certainly has improved but at the time he looked as if he could have a real X factor once he broke into regular starts 

Shame

You’re an absolute marvel if that word is in your dictionary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Clutton Caveman said:

Ate you suggesting that Chris Martin could still do it at Championship level?

As we see with Mehmeti, there is a huge gap between L1 and the Championship

I wasn't expecting him to do anything at Rovers to be honest, thought he was over the hill! He did score a couple for QPR at the end of last season IIRC so I'm wondering if he could still get goals in last 20 mins of game as a sub. Martin never had any pace to lose. Whichever way you look at it, 14 goals in 24 games from a standing start is pretty exceptional. I couldn't see Cornick getting those kind of figures in L2.

Edited by fgrsimon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, exAtyeoMax said:

 

 

What is Mark Ashton going to tell him this time? “Don’t worry Sammie, Kieran is a much better manager than Lee Johnson!”

Edited by Dr Balls
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
11 minutes ago, East End Old Boy said:

We sold him to Peterborough and had some dosh when they sold him to Blackburn.

If they inserted their own sell on clause when selling to Blackburn, we will get a percentage of their percentage.

Unlikely to be huge, like £200-300k but better than nowt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Just now, Nugget said:

Wasn’t he here around the time of Palmer? Maybe we were obliged to play him a certain number of times from Chelsea if it was the loan 

I think he was signed the Summer we spunked £4m on making Kasey a permanent move.

  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Dolman Pragmatist said:

So why was Szmodics such a failure with us?  He had so few match chances that, presumably, he wasn’t impressing anyone in training.  I struggle to think of another player in my lifetime who was such a flop for us but went on to be so successful elsewhere.

As I have said before, it's taken him 5 seasons to become an overnight success, people on here want to ditch players after a couple of games. Do you really think the crowd would have been happy to wait this long to see him come good?

  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, The Dolman Pragmatist said:

So why was Szmodics such a failure with us?  He had so few match chances that, presumably, he wasn’t impressing anyone in training.  I struggle to think of another player in my lifetime who was such a flop for us but went on to be so successful elsewhere.

I think I read or listened to an interview with him where he said he found the step up too big for him at the time

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/football/sammie-szmodics-championship-bristol-city-9232265.amp

Edited by Ashton Fete
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BCFC31 said:

Hopefully we have a 20 percent sell on clause that would be a 2.2m cash windfall for us on top of the 4.5m were getting for Conway.

Apologies I forget he went to Peterborough first  🤦🏻‍♂️

I posted a hypothetical breakdown of the sell-on that City would get on the “other signings” thread.  Prepare your select to be disappointed! 😉😉😉

(I think you forgot Peterborough)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone could've predicted the career he has had since leaving us. Yes he didn't get enough opportunities for us due to Palmer also being signed at the same time (unnecessarily in my view), but when he did play he looked miles off the standard required.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ian M said:

I think he was signed the Summer we spunked £4m on making Kasey a permanent move.

Yep, been covered a million times before.

Already had Paterson, bought Szmodics, then Palmer, didn’t need them all, so Paterson was shipped off on loan to Detby.

Szmodics got minimal opportunity then was sold to (League One) Peterborough.

Palmer did nothing & Paterson came back from his loan & got back in the team.

Muddled thinking par excellence.

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...