Jump to content
IGNORED

Nottingham Forest away fourth round FA Cup replay match thread


Jerseybean

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Then why make the change.

Or why make the change at that point..feels a tad disruptive and needlessly so.

Because its difficult for Roberts to sustain more than 60 minutes with so little football in his legs

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Curr Avon said:

Knight Lebel coming on for McCrorie shortly.

Great that he gets the opportunity. 

Forest have been able to strengthen with subs. Most of our by default weaken us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr Popodopolous said:

He was clearly playing well enough, seems like it has upset or helped to upset our rhythm to me.

Rather that than flog him and risk another injury. Sensible, seems like another stick to try and beat the manager with to me.

  • Like 6
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

He was clearly playing well enough, seems like it has upset or helped to upset our rhythm to me.

I doubt Manning wanted to make any of those changes Pops

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rudy said:

Looks like we're going to extra time, hopefully this doesn't turn out like Leeds vs Plymouth yesterday 😰

You mean when the away team scored 3 ?

  • Robin 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, !james said:

Rather that than flog him and risk another injury. Sensible, seems like another stick to try and beat the manager with to me.

 

1 minute ago, mozo said:

I doubt Manning wanted to make any of those changes Pops

We will have minimum 3 more players all being well available this Saturday.

Then the return to a back 3, sorry a bit self-inflicted.

  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, elhombrecito said:

I'm generally not a fan of Manning's substitutions , but to criticise him for subbing off a player who hasn't played in months is just ridiculous so OTIB.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with some of our youngsters like Bell and Conway is that they'll try harder in the fa cup than the league because the FA cup is more focused on than the championship so they're trying to catch the eye of scouts from the big clubs (Or Bournemouth, probably Bournemouth)

  • Sad 2
  • Facepalm 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

 

We will have minimum 3 more players all being well available this Saturday.

Then the return to a back 3, sorry a bit self-inflicted.

King and Roberts wouldn't of made it. Knight although has bundles of energy can't be run into the ground. 

It's needs must.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

Understand need to change players given coming back from injury, but why make 3 changes at once also was change of shape necessary

Who would you have put at left back then? 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rudy said:

The problem with some of our youngsters like Bell and Conway is that they'll try harder in the fa cup than the league because the FA cup is more focused on than the championship so they're trying to catch the eye of scouts from the big clubs (Or Bournemouth, probably Bournemouth)

Do you actually believe that? :blink:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Betty Swallocks said:

Who would you have brought on to play at left back on the hour mark? 

I wouldnt have made the change at that point in time.

James for King is fine.

Not sure about Cornick for Knight. Cornick for one of the wide men perhaps.

Interesting choice of the term left back given that we appear to have gone to a back 3/5, have wingbacks.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rudy said:

The problem with some of our youngsters like Bell and Conway is that they'll try harder in the fa cup than the league because the FA cup is more focused on than the championship so they're trying to catch the eye of scouts from the big clubs (Or Bournemouth, probably Bournemouth)

Absolute rubbish!

  • Like 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

I wouldnt have made the change at that point in time.

James for King is fine.

Not sure about Cornick for Knight.

Roberts would have had to come off on 60 minutes, that would have been agreed with the medical staff before the game had started.

So who you bringing on to keep it a back 4 in place of Roberts?

Edited by Betty Swallocks
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Betty Swallocks said:

Robert’s would have had to come off on 60 minutes, that would have been agreed with the medical staff before the game had started.

So who you bringing on to keep it a back 4 in place of Roberts?

You know this or is it an assumption?

Tanner wouldn't be the worst..or the least bad option..definitely can't put Bell or Mehmeti there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...