Jump to content
IGNORED

New England Kit


Super

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, nebristolred said:

To be fair I would disagree slightly and say that I can see why people think we could and should do more for St George's Day. In the home nations it's only England and Wales that don't get a bank holiday for their national days (I think), and it would be nice to be able to do something for it.

Yes, I'm all up or an extra bank holiday :) It won't be long before a political party sees that as a vote winner and puts it in their manifesto. However, then we would see one of the real problems with the way society is going. Companies would be allowed to not officially recognise it and it would be of no benefit to their staff whatsover, a common practice in nursing care which my wife works in .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Miah Dennehy said:

They changed the colour on the Saltire on a kit a while back, no one said a dicky bird. Do you honestly think this an 'attempt to wipe out everything English' . Does that not sound a wee bit OTT when you read it back to yourself? I don't see anything wrong with having pride about where you come from, but to hinge all that on a flag? I really, really don't get it.

Speaking specifically about Englishness, every year- I've seen once already this year- social media will carry a lot of posts about St Georges day, how everyone else celebrates theirs, but we aren't 'allowed' to, like and share etc etc.it absolutely baffles me, who is stopping anyone celebrating it, and do the Scottish and Welsh really celebrate theirs that much? I,ve been in Scotland on numerous St Andrews days and apart from a view 'St Andrews day special offers' things in shops, absolutely nothing else is going on.

I think many patriotic Englishmen have been well and truly conned and whipped into a frenzy by horribly skewed media.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miah Dennehy said:

But he wasn't mocking that was he? Certainly not how I read it.

he was and proper blokes raised two grand for that flag and more later to repair it not that this poster would remember it because he was a nipper when it was done.  Good to see it still surfing recently. 

1 hour ago, Miah Dennehy said:

But he wasn't mocking that was he? Certainly not how I read it.

he was and proper blokes raised two grand for that flag and more later to repair it not that this poster would remember it because he was a nipper when it was done.  Good to see it still surfing recently. 

1 hour ago, Miah Dennehy said:

But he wasn't mocking that was he? Certainly not how I read it.

he was and proper blokes raised two grand for that flag and more later to repair it not that this poster would remember it because he was a nipper when it was done.  Good to see it still surfing recently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red Cloud said:

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then

Yes, but I hope not fall out. I think what people on my side of the fence need to recognise is that a substantial amount of people in this country do have- albeit I believe unfounded- fears that they are being demonised within their own country. Politicians need to recognise that WITHOUT just shit stirring and telling some blatant porky pies.

Hopefully there is a leader out there who can unite an increasingly divided society. Sadly , I don't see one at the moment.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Three Lions said:

That is a St George bought by fans of BCFC including Scooter RIP who did a great deal of the fundraising. Not something to laugh at.

Well firstly, I'll say no disrespect towards the origins of the flag was intended, although I think you're bwrong to suggest anyone was laughing at the source of the flag.

But quite obviously as Rich says:

16 hours ago, richwwtk said:

It was @Cowshed and his 'defacing flags is illegal' that was being laughed at, not the flag

It was Cowshed posting one minute that "defacing flags is illegal" then posting his delight at a customised England flag 2 posts later that was amusing. The complete hypocrisy of "you cant touch our flags unless it's something I approve of on the flag"

16 hours ago, Three Lions said:

Read it again and that St George flag and St Georges are part of our footballing culture and traditions something you our culture warrior mate to laugh at and look down but important to many.

Read what again? Cowshed didn't say any of that?

3 posts:
1. "Defacing flags is illegal"
2. "Yes defacing a flag can be a hate crime."
3. Post saying "lovely" with a picture of a flag that has writing on it, which some may describe as defaced.

No post about culture or tradition there at the point I responded.

For what it's worth, I love seeing all the England flags especially at games and tournaments and I'll have mine in Germany in the summer. I just think people are taking a slight change to one aspect of our flag applied on a shirt way too far - even though I agree it looks a bit shit, would be better without a cross at all on the collar IMO.

As for culture warrior, you're looking at the wrong people there... 

14 hours ago, Red Cloud said:

fair enough but for those of us who do, there's no way any other country would be expected to just accept this!

I'm very proud to be English and see this as yet another attempt to wipe out everything English

Like I said, can you imagine what would happen if the Palestinian Flag had its colours changed? or the Saltire going pink or the Welsh Flag ditching the Dragon

Other countries have, including your example of Scotland. They've had a purple flag, a yellow cross and other manipulations of their flag on their shirts.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SecretSam said:

It IS recent. Always used to be the union flag.

George the forty foot St George being bought twenty odd years ago also is not recent and Bristol City lads with St Georges at Italia 90 thirty odd years ago aint recent either this is a long standing tradition that is still going on with our kids carrying it on.   

 

Edited by Three Lions
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Miah Dennehy said:

Hopefully there is a leader out there who can unite an increasingly divided society. Sadly , I don't see one at the moment.

Sadly the constant use of sport to engineer division between the four home "nations" hardly moves the UK towards unity does it. 

**** devolution; rule Britannia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Three Lions said:

he was and proper blokes raised two grand for that flag and more later to repair it not that this poster would remember it because he was a nipper when it was done.  Good to see it still surfing recently. 

Is it wrong to be wondering what on earth you could be meaning when you say 'proper blokes'?

Is it a badge of pride that no women were involved in the fundraising (not even ones pretending to be blokes)?

Or is there some kind of definition of bloke that only applies to people raising money to buy a flag?

  • Like 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, richwwtk said:

Is it wrong to be wondering what on earth you could be meaning when you say 'proper blokes'?

Is it a badge of pride that no women were involved in the fundraising (not even ones pretending to be blokes)?

Or is there some kind of definition of bloke that only applies to people raising money to buy a flag?

Well it's hardly going to be a badge of 'Pride' if woman pretending to be blokes were involved is it...Cmon keep up 🤷😉🤣👍

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Miah Dennehy said:

Yes, I'm all up or an extra bank holiday :) It won't be long before a political party sees that as a vote winner and puts it in their manifesto. 

Funnily enough there was some bearded chap who did have it in his manifesto not that long ago, but all the sort of "proper blokes" who define themselves as patriots didn’t vote for him. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Three Lions said:

George the forty foot St George being bought twenty odd years ago also is not recent and Bristol City lads with St Georges at Italia 90 thirty odd years ago aint recent either this is a long standing tradition that is still going on with our kids carrying it on.   

 

I believe the majority of England flags in '90 were still the union flag, but if you have evidence otherwise...(this is the semi, BTW)

Watch: Fifa World Cup 1990 semi-final Rewind - West Germany v England ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

I believe the majority of England flags in '90 were still the union flag, but if you have evidence otherwise...(this is the semi, BTW)

Watch: Fifa World Cup 1990 semi-final Rewind - West Germany v England ...

I think Italia 90 was the start of the switch from the Union Flag to St George's. Pretty much complete by Euro 96.

Having said that I took a Union Flag to the 2002 WC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

I believe the majority of England flags in '90 were still the union flag, but if you have evidence otherwise...(this is the semi, BTW)

Watch: Fifa World Cup 1990 semi-final Rewind - West Germany v England ...

Have to say, whatever my feelings about the legitimacy of the English football team, there's a damn classy Plantagenet coat of arms on display in this photo.

Edited by ExiledAjax
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough about crosses - what about stars !

France, Germany, Italy & Spain all proudly display their world cup winning stars on their shirts but for some reason we camouflage ours so it's not really visible.  It seems like we're embarrassed by it. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Red-Robbo said:

Funnily enough there was some bearded chap who did have it in his manifesto not that long ago, but all the sort of "proper blokes" who define themselves as patriots didn’t vote for him. 😉

Ha ha yes, I had forgotten that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/03/2024 at 17:17, !james said:

I haven't had my full woke bingo card until Sixtyseconds comes on and writes an illiterate sonnet

Look I cant be on line for you every day.

I have days and weeks off.

I know I am in your head every day.

I obsess your thoughts.

Your pulse races at the thought of me or any mention.

You get hot under the collar (Woohoo ..)  for me.

But i’ve pointed this out.

My posting is not a relationship .. Its platonic

I’m a family man and one woman man.

The woman who give birth.

Get off line … Go out more … Meet people … Its for you own good.

On 22/03/2024 at 16:13, Cowshed said:

Defacing a flag is a hate crime. 

Can be.

Could be cultural appropriation.

Bad for one side unless its applied to the other side.

Gotta be sus on this one.

Considering woke virtuous credentials they wear on hearts sleeves an collars.

Anybody asked would they do it to the native Indians?  

Get all playful with their identities.

Go all Jon Lansdown on their flags and symbols.

Probs not.

There is sketch out there that these Big Corps should do what they want.

Its all ok.

How much for that and that?

Big Corps and rackets eh.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/03/2024 at 13:27, MarcusX said:

Well firstly, I'll say no disrespect towards the origins of the flag was intended, although I think you're bwrong to suggest anyone was laughing at the source of the flag.

But quite obviously as Rich says:

It was Cowshed posting one minute that "defacing flags is illegal" then posting his delight at a customised England flag 2 posts later that was amusing. The complete hypocrisy of "you cant touch our flags unless it's something I approve of on the flag"

Read what again? Cowshed didn't say any of that?

3 posts:
1. "Defacing flags is illegal"
2. "Yes defacing a flag can be a hate crime."
3. Post saying "lovely" with a picture of a flag that has writing on it, which some may describe as defaced.

No post about culture or tradition there at the point I responded.

 

 

I posted that defacing a flag can be a hate crime. I also posted this? You ignored the this?

Could this, an American sportswear brand rebranding of our the St George be perceived as insensitive? The action has been unpopular. A reaction that should have been predicted.  

Yes I posted pictures of England and Bristol City fans St George flags because they are significant. The St George is clearly a significant part of fan culture and traditions. They are part of BCFC fan culture.

You then posted a laughing emoji regarding the St George that required a lot of effort from City fans to purchase. I with my family and a friends took a small part in that fundraising. Here's that picture again of that flag/surfer twenty years on at recent game. I do think its cool. 

3_Bristol-City-v-Cardiff-City-EFL-Sky-Bet-Championship-Football-Ashton-Gate-Bristol-UK-02-Mar-2.jpg

 

On 25/03/2024 at 05:57, sticks 1969 said:

Malmo 92?

Of course it is you stupid bugger. You were metres away from me in the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
On 25/03/2024 at 19:45, Reigate Red said:

Enough about crosses - what about stars !

France, Germany, Italy & Spain all proudly display their world cup winning stars on their shirts but for some reason we camouflage ours so it's not really visible.  It seems like we're embarrassed by it. 

Maybe we're embarrassed it's only 1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, SecretSam said:

Seriously? England loo roll? I mean, you're literally wiping your...self with the flag...

Probably marketed towards the many countries that don't like us very much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cowshed said:

I posted that defacing a flag can be a hate crime. I also posted this? You ignored the this?

Could this, an American sportswear brand rebranding of our the St George be perceived as insensitive? The action has been unpopular. A reaction that should have been predicted.  

Yes I posted pictures of England and Bristol City fans St George flags because they are significant. The St George is clearly a significant part of fan culture and traditions. They are part of BCFC fan culture.

You then posted a laughing emoji regarding the St George that required a lot of effort from City fans to purchase. I with my family and a friends took a small part in that fundraising. Here's that picture again of that flag/surfer twenty years on at recent game. I do think its cool. 

3_Bristol-City-v-Cardiff-City-EFL-Sky-Bet-Championship-Football-Ashton-Gate-Bristol-UK-02-Mar-2.jpg

 

Of course it is you stupid bugger. You were metres away from me in the ground.

Sorry, this is probably boring to everyone else but I wont have you or three lions re-write history and twist this into something it isn't.

At no point have I laughed at the specific flag or it's background or efforts towards it. It's totally dishonest of both of you to suggest I have, as others have also supported.

I'm laughing at the irony of you posting that "defacing a flag is a hate crime" - then 3 posts later posting a photo of, by definition, a defaced flag.

The evidence is clear in your history below.

No further replies before I responded laughing at the irony of your two posts.

I don't know what your ramble at the start of today's post is, but no I cannot see anywhere that you've said those things in this thread.

So once again, no disrespect intended to anyone involved in producing that flag, clearly being deceitful to suggest otherwise. Thankfully several people had already seen through it and replied before I could.

image.thumb.png.755f756491c1b61ce993900b3072a25c.png

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cowshed said:

I posted that defacing a flag can be a hate crime.

 

There is no case law where defacing a flag is a hate crime in the UK. However, under certain circumstances, say burning a union flag on the Cenotaph, such actions could be considered incitement to a breach of the peace and therefore be illegal.

Putting different colours on a football shirt would not fall under this definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/03/2024 at 09:32, ChippenhamRed said:

Nothing to do with “inclusion”. Just an artistic version to align with the design and colour palette on the shirt.

Linking it to “inclusion” is just your own projection.

Tbf “inclusive “ was Nike’s word not RobboRed’s so clearly not RR’s own projection. 

Edited by JP Hampton
  • Like 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/03/2024 at 09:37, SecretSam said:

Don't you think those people you think are being "included" (who are they, BTW?) might also be proud to be English?

 On that premise then every flag of every nation, should be changing to include all those who consider themselves of that Country, but aren’t in fact a native or are a different colour. 

  I don’t understand why a flag is “exclusive” as opposed to “inclusive”? Otherwise you have to apply that at all nations’ flags don’t you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW my take on it is this, I probably wouldn’t have batted an eyelid about this, just wouldn’t seem to be worth caring about, but I think I understand why people do care.
 

  Ten or more years ago people wouldn’t really have been that bothered with a few exceptions. I think the problem now is that people are seeing changes happen in this Country, which genuinely makes them feel they have little control over things, things which used to be just plain common sense are now being challenged and changed. 

 There’s been incredible changes to institutions in this country, a Police Force who are supposed to be Policing by Consent and who are not supposed to show any affiliation to any particular side, can now be seen doing just that. I could go on. 
 It’s telling that it’sNike that people are getting up in arms about, because to many they represent unwanted change, many Companies have become political and I believe that’s what people oppose. If you like it’s another straw on the camels back of unwanted change. For want of a better word they’re actually getting “triggered” by what to others may be a seemingly small thing, but it’s really, just another straw. 
 

 It’s strange that in a climate where identity politics is the rallying call of companies like Nike, that they’d see no problem in taking what some people consider part of their identity, (which is common the world over, a flag) and change it. 
 

  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tim Monaghan said:

No point, Brother. Sick of having arguments with keyboard warriors on here, so take or leave the comment buddy, and make of it what you like. 

Wow, simply a genuine question. Sounds like if you’re sick of it, it might be good to take your own advice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Red-Robbo said:

 

There is no case law where defacing a flag is a hate crime in the UK. However, under certain circumstances, say burning a union flag on the Cenotaph, such actions could be considered incitement to a breach of the peace and therefore be illegal.

Putting different colours on a football shirt would not fall under this definition.

You have just  agreed with me. I didn't state defacing a flag is a hate crime, I stated it can be because while we do not have not law that make desecrating a flag a crime, we have law that prohibit hostility aimed towards groups. 

Hence in my post I added this ? No this does not fall under the above. Was it insulting? Yes. This act caused insult. A response that was predictable.  

What was the point of Nike and the FA knowingly doing something that they must have known would have not been wildly welcomed? I don't see the point.

6 hours ago, MarcusX said:

Sorry, this is probably boring to everyone else but I wont have you or three lions re-write history and twist this into something it isn't.

At no point have I laughed at the specific flag or it's background or efforts towards it. It's totally dishonest of both of you to suggest I have, as others have also supported.

 

 

On 23/03/2024 at 10:43, MarcusX said:

 

Even @Cowshedwading in talking about defacing flags, then shared a defaced flag celebrating it 🤣

 

Your post featuring a laughing emoji about this flag. 

3_Bristol-City-v-Cardiff-City-EFL-Sky-Bet-Championship-Football-Ashton-Gate-Bristol-UK-02-Mar-2.jpg

  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ian M said:

Maybe we're embarrassed it's only 1?

Probably but we shouldn't be - at least we have won it. Albeit increasingly some time ago.

Uruguay last won it in 1950 but are not shy about stars. They even include four stars on their shirts despite only having won the world cup twice! Maybe we should follow their example and just add a few :)

 

Footnote: The other two Uruguayan stars are supposed to be for winning the Olympics before the world cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cowshed said:

You have just  agreed with me. I didn't state defacing a flag is a hate crime, I stated it can be because while we do not have not law that make desecrating a flag a crime, we have law that prohibit hostility aimed towards groups. 

Hence in my post I added this ? No this does not fall under the above. Was it insulting? Yes. This act caused insult. A response that was predictable.  

 

Well spotted. I did agree with you, once you changed your posts from saying "flag defacement is a hate crime" to "flag defacement can be a hate crime".

But as for the second bit of your response, the law isn't there to protect the delicate sensibilities of snowflakes hurt because a near invisible and non-traditional feature of one particular football kit has changed colour.  It not only is not near the threshold of behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace, it isn't in the same county, the same country or even the same frigging continent as that threshold. 

Not sure how a tribute to the training colours of the England 1966 kit can be insulting, but then I'm not a led-by-the-nose to be offended by whatever culture war bullshit is being peddled by right-wing media sort of guy. 

I don't give a shit if Nike keep it, change it back, or drop the flag altogether in a tribute to all England kits pre-2002. 

I'm more offended by the shirt's price and I don't generally like Nike sportswear anyway.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Cowshed said:

You have just  agreed with me. I didn't state defacing a flag is a hate crime, I stated it can be because while we do not have not law that make desecrating a flag a crime, we have law that prohibit hostility aimed towards groups. 

Hence in my post I added this ? No this does not fall under the above. Was it insulting? Yes. This act caused insult. A response that was predictable.  

What was the point of Nike and the FA knowingly doing something that they must have known would have not been wildly welcomed? I don't see the point.

 

Your post featuring a laughing emoji about this flag. 

3_Bristol-City-v-Cardiff-City-EFL-Sky-Bet-Championship-Football-Ashton-Gate-Bristol-UK-02-Mar-2.jpg

Your either being thick or deliberately misleading. I can't decide which but I'm sure most reasonable people see straight through it and I won't be entertaining you further on this. Very obvious to most I was laughing at you and your posts on this subject - not the flag itself (or background to it that wasn't even posted).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/03/2024 at 11:55, Cowshed said:

I posted that defacing a flag can be a hate crime.

'Defacing' would mean that the original would be still there, but then written on/marked, etc.

What Nike did was recolour the same flag shape. A shape of flag that is used by a number of countries. That's not defacing it, it's recolouring it. Defacing it would have been to write "England were poor against Brazil" across the flag.

#PedanticRantOver 😄

12 minutes ago, JP Hampton said:

I think you’ve just got the nail on the head, as to why some people are taking offence. 

I was saying that the number of people who hate England (across the world) is pretty big. I mean, our history is a little...checkered...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

'Defacing' would mean that the original would be still there, but then written on/marked, etc.

What Nike did was recolour the same flag shape. A shape of flag that is used by a number of countries. That's not defacing it, it's recolouring it. Defacing it would have been to write "England were poor against Brazil" across the flag.

#PedanticRantOver 😄

I was saying that the number of people who hate England (across the world) is pretty big. I mean, our history is a little...checkered...

Whose isn’t? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I am looking to buy the new England away shirt but I'm not going to spend £85.

I looked through this thread and saw DHGate recommended but whenever I go on their site, it is completely empty, and all of the ebay listings linked have been taken down.

Does anyone have any up to date suggestions or links?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nathandao said:

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I am looking to buy the new England away shirt but I'm not going to spend £85.

I looked through this thread and saw DHGate recommended but whenever I go on their site, it is completely empty, and all of the ebay listings linked have been taken down.

Does anyone have any up to date suggestions or links?

Thanks

I'll DM you a link to the seller I used, got both shirts and they are very good quality. Literally can't tell them apart from the real ones

On a separate note related to the flag, I notice that the Olympic jerseys got criticised for being "boring" and scared to upset people... can't win can they 😂

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Nathandao said:

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I am looking to buy the new England away shirt but I'm not going to spend £85.

I looked through this thread and saw DHGate recommended but whenever I go on their site, it is completely empty, and all of the ebay listings linked have been taken down.

Does anyone have any up to date suggestions or links?

Thanks

https://www.kitgg6.com/Search-england+25/list-r1.html

Due to our clubs inept stocking through the season, I used this site to get my kids City shirts.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, MarcusX said:

I'll DM you a link to the seller I used, got both shirts and they are very good quality. Literally can't tell them apart from the real ones

On a separate note related to the flag, I notice that the Olympic jerseys got criticised for being "boring" and scared to upset people... can't win can they 😂

Any chance you could provide me the link please mate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kmpowell said:

https://www.kitgg6.com/Search-england+25/list-r1.html

Due to our clubs inept stocking through the season, I used this site to get my kids City shirts.

What’s the quality like KM? £12 is ridiculous! 
 

I’m usually dead against copies - I just like the real deal.  Completely get why people buy copies now though.  Especially when they are a) £85 for an England shirt or b) the original (hi ONeills 👋🏼) is such shite quality that the copy is probably better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, lenred said:

What’s the quality like KM? £12 is ridiculous! 
 

I’m usually dead against copies - I just like the real deal.  Completely get why people buy copies now though.  Especially when they are a) £85 for an England shirt or b) the original (hi ONeills 👋🏼) is such shite quality that the copy is probably better!

I'm also normally against buying copies/replicas of things, but the club left me no other option if I wanted to buy my kids the black and pink shirts. Shirts, shorts, name & number printing, was a total of £28.30 for both. Quality was/is more than fine for the kids.

Fresh out of the packet that morning (hence the creases on my daughters sleeves/shorts)...

IMG-0712.jpg

 

IMG-0715.jpg

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, kmpowell said:

Shirts, shorts, name & number printing, was a total of £28.30 for both

Insane pricing.  Absolutely don’t blame you at that cost.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Yeah England shirts are basically identical to ones sold in sports direct 

Thank you.  And sizing wise would you go up a size? Sorry for all the Qs! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Please stop sharing my go to site for kits, I don't want this website being taken down, it needs to remain a secret 🤣

36 minutes ago, lenred said:

Have you used them Pete? Any good? 

I can vouch for him and say, the quality is the exact same as what you'd buy in Sports Direct imo from what I've bought from it. Just go a size or two up than your usual.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, 2015 said:

Please stop sharing my go to site for kits, I don't want this website being taken down, it needs to remain a secret 🤣

I can vouch for him and say, the quality is the exact same as what you'd buy in Sports Direct imo from what I've bought from it. Just go a size or two up than your usual.

Cheers! Ps I’ll keep schtum on it from now on 😉🤣

Edited by lenred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frenchred said:

Any chance you could provide me the link please mate

I didnt know if it was ok to share, but others have shared links. i used this:  https://www.dhgate.com/product/2023-2024-afc-richmond-soccer-jerseys-kids/860299516.html

Note that the pics dont include logos and badges etc, guessing copyright rules?! but they do come as you'd expect

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Tinmans Love Child said:

I've just ordered a 98 shirt to replace my original that got lost!  Price was £17 with postage but they took £19 from my bank for some reason, will see what happens next! 😂

There is some blurb on the order confirmation that the price may change slightly. I ordered the ‘98 as well and the ‘86 away. Charged me about £4 more than it said.  Quite a difference % wise but still peanuts! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lenred said:

There is some blurb on the order confirmation that the price may change slightly. I ordered the ‘98 as well and the ‘86 away. Charged me about £4 more than it said.  Quite a difference % wise but still peanuts! 

Yeh absolutely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Just come back from Thailand where these are all made I think.

Got the Ajax special edition three little birds shirt for a tenner and it looks the dogs bollox! 

I think they import them from China. I’ve bought a couple myself before 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, supercidered said:

I've got the England 82 in red. Proper lush and good quality. Definitely go at least a size or maybe two sizes bigger than you would buy in the UK.

Bought that last year. Got the 16 on the back just because Bryan Robson was my hero growing up. My fav England kit. 

Trying to find an England euro 88 shirt but couldnt see one on that site. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...