Numero Uno Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 I wonder if Belgium would have taken an uninspiring 1-0 win? Not all gimme’s these games. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 Just now, !james said: I'd argue the movement of his arms was justifiable by his running motion, wasn't a deliberate move to handle the ball. The rules are the rules so it's an offence but as we've seen in the premier league this season it's an absolute mess Certainly is pal, just like the daft offside 'delay'. WTF is that about? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFCGav Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 Probably the biggest upset yet. Belgium and major tournaments just don’t click. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecko Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 This yank needs to piss off 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 Would the handball decision have anything to do with gaining an advantage? I don't know the actual rule nowadays. Much simpler when a handball was given if the ball struck a hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markthehorn Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 5 minutes ago, BCFCGav said: Probably the biggest upset yet. Belgium and major tournaments just don’t click. Big win for Slovakia. Think that handball decision was harsh though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 6 minutes ago, BCFCGav said: Probably the biggest upset yet. Belgium and major tournaments just don’t click. Definitely, it's one of the biggest ever at the Euros in terms of ranking 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 7 hours ago, TV Tom said: Serial loser Talking about yourself? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, Markthehorn said: Big win for Slovakia. Think that handball decision was harsh though. Lukaku was cursed today. Clear chance he fluffed, chance off the line and two tight VAR calls to disallow goals. Agree the hand ball very harsh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1960maaan Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 3 minutes ago, Markthehorn said: Big win for Slovakia. Think that handball decision was harsh though. Harsh , and worse when you think if it was the defender it wouldn't have ben given . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 19 minutes ago, Jose said: I hate VAR. Load of shit. Not VAR is it? They changed the rule/ interpretation of the rule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transfer reader Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 11 minutes ago, Numero Uno said: I wonder if Belgium would have taken an uninspiring 1-0 win? Not all gimme’s these games. A few times I thought of posting similar. It's a not perfect, but similar parallel, Slovakia weaker than Serbia and Belgium weaker than England. Belgium and England both would have been expecting to get a win in their game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handsofclay Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 Although it looked like he didn't deliberately handball it the ball fell into his path due to it hitting his hand, therefore he gained an advantage from a handball albeit he didn't plan on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cellist Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 defender didn't even appeal for a handball as far as I could see. wasn't his arm sort of pushed into the ball by the momentum of their defender? just feels wrong. As for the coverage - seeing the damned "snick-o-meter" and hearing that so-called VAR expert - was anybody asking for that? Awful stuff. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 1 minute ago, handsofclay said: Although it looked like he didn't deliberately handball it the ball fell into his path due to it hitting his hand, therefore he gained an advantage from a handball albeit he didn't plan on that. Does the 'advantage' bit have any bearing on the decision? I genuinely don't know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fgrsimon Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 The problem with VAR is that it's taken away the fundamental moment of joy celebrating a goal. If the players have lined up for the restart before anyone notices something wrong, it can't have been an obvious mistake. The defender made no appeal, no shout from the crowd. Along with someone's fingernail playing him offside, if you're taking about millimeters, I'd much rather any advantage is with the attacker and no messing around wasting time with people in a room and ref having to go to look at a screen. It's just unnecessary complications. KISS principle - keep it simple, stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handsofclay Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 Just now, Ska Junkie said: Does the 'advantage' bit have any bearing on the decision? I genuinely don't know. Same here but maybe it sways the decision. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 8 hours ago, Davefevs said: I do agree with this, hence my unbalanced squad comment earlier. We probably have a couple of players who aren’t suited to a position / role (TAA / Foden) in the system that Southgate plays. The problem (?j is the quality of the players that might fit. The thing I liked about Sven was he picked players he thought were best/ most effective for his system, not necessarily the best club players. Players like Trevor Sinclair. He dropped Mcmamaman for Trevor Sinclair because he felt threatened by him (came from the Real Madrid of Zidane, Raul, Hierro, Figo where the players more or less ran the team). He was a dreadful England manager. Pulled the wool over people's eyes. That collection of players didn’t even make a semi final. Miles better than the 2018 squad for example. People said Southgate doesn’t react to things happening in games. Ericsson was different level with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 19 minutes ago, Numero Uno said: I wonder if Belgium would have taken an uninspiring 1-0 win? Not all gimme’s these games. Probably, but that’s because that’s where they are now. Their golden generation 6 or 8 years ago wouldn’t have done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said: Does the 'advantage' bit have any bearing on the decision? I genuinely don't know. Yes. Had they not scored from it, it wouldn’t have been reviewed, so the advantage had everything to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 1 minute ago, fgrsimon said: The problem with VAR is that it's taken away the fundamental moment of joy celebrating a goal. This gets said a lot but I dont think it's actually true. Dont get me wrong I dont like VAR and its a terrible stadium experience (especially at places with no screen / notice that VAR is looking) but from talking to mates who go regularly to Prem games, they dont think its ever stopped them celebrating a goal 1 minute ago, fgrsimon said: If the players have lined up for the restart before anyone notices something wrong, it can't have been an obvious mistake. The defender made no appeal, no shout from the crowd. The players not noticing it doesn't necessarily mean a mistake hasnt been made though. 1 minute ago, fgrsimon said: Along with someone's fingernail playing him offside, if you're taking about millimeters, I'd much rather any advantage is with the attacker and no messing around wasting time with people in a room and ref having to go to look at a screen. It's just unnecessary complications. KISS principle - keep it simple, stupid. Offside is very objective though, that's down to the rule, not VAR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 1 minute ago, formerly known as ivan said: Yes. Had they not scored from it, it wouldn’t have been reviewed, so the advantage had everything to do with it. Well obviously, if there's no goal it wouldnt need to be reviewed as it wouldnt be a red card potential Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie BCFC Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, cellist said: defender didn't even appeal for a handball as far as I could see. wasn't his arm sort of pushed into the ball by the momentum of their defender? just feels wrong. As for the coverage - seeing the damned "snick-o-meter" and hearing that so-called VAR expert - was anybody asking for that? Awful stuff. Sorry to sound all Joey Barton on you but she is awful. No wonder they bring her in after the decision is made so she can just support whatever they say. Awful coverage on ITV this year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 Just now, formerly known as ivan said: Yes. Had they not scored from it, it wouldn’t have been reviewed, so the advantage had everything to do with it. That makes sense. The 'handball' wouldn't have even registered then. It does make the rules a bit of a mockery tbh as in 'when is a handball not a handball'? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 1 minute ago, MarcusX said: Well obviously, if there's no goal it wouldnt need to be reviewed as it wouldnt be a red card potential Exactly my point. The question was does the advantage play a part in the decision. It’s the biggest part of the decision Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, formerly known as ivan said: Exactly my point. The question was does the advantage play a part in the decision. It’s the biggest part of the decision Is 'advantage' in the rule book out of interest? I totally agree with you BTW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markthehorn Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, Charlie BCFC said: Sorry to sound all Joey Barton on you but she is awful. No wonder they bring her in after the decision is made so she can just support whatever they say. Awful coverage on ITV this year Being compared as better than Mike Dean or Peter Walton but that is a low bar ! Probably gives the pundits more excuses to not know the rules themselves .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 1 minute ago, Ska Junkie said: Is 'advantage' in the rule book out of interest? I totally agree with you BTW. I believe so yes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFCGav Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 24 minutes ago, Markthehorn said: Big win for Slovakia. Think that handball decision was harsh though. It was but I think wasn’t surprised honestly. Cruel rule. 21 minutes ago, MarcusX said: Definitely, it's one of the biggest ever at the Euros in terms of ranking For sure but I think Belgium’s ranking is a hangover from the ‘golden generation’, I’m surprised they lost but not to the extent I would be if Germany, France or someone lost. Belgium just seem to have that in them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 24 minutes ago, formerly known as ivan said: Any contact to the hand in an unnatural position that leads to an advantage is the rule I believe. i think the ball bouncing at head height and hitting a hand is pretty unnatural. I think the rule is that if the ball is in contact with an attackers hand (even if accidental) and a goal results then it's handball and the goal is ruled out. The idiocy of making such a prescriptive change to the laws is that exactly the same accidental handball in the penalty area by a defender is not handball! We all know when pundits say, about a tackle in the penalty area, " anywhere else on the pitch that's a foul"? In the case of handball by an attacker in the penalty area, " anywhere else on the pitch it's not handball" If it's handball, then surely it's handball wherever it occured and whoever committed the handball. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.