Jump to content
IGNORED

EURO 2024


phantom

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Gazred said:

I think if you asked each manager before a game if they wanted to use VAR and they had to be in agreement to use it or not, you'd never see it again.

Well the clubs had a vote  but presumably the managers weren’t consulted or wanted to keep it infact ?

Edited by Markthehorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting game of decisions last night...

Brave (not wrong) of Oliver to disllow the Germany goal in the early mins

Offside is offside but no-one checked much to see if the ball actually came off the German.

Handball was shite , they need to sort the rules out 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, cidercity1987 said:

Interesting game of decisions last night...

Brave (not wrong) of Oliver to disllow the Germany goal in the early mins

Offside is offside but no-one checked much to see if the ball actually came off the German.

Handball was shite , they need to sort the rules out 

 

It was as a result of the rules (laws) being " sorted out" that the handball was shite!.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Markthehorn said:

Well the clubs had a vote  but presumably the managers weren’t consulted or wanted to keep it infact ?

I'm sure they were consulted but wouldn't have the final say regardless.

The recent vote included a list of improvements the PL were going to make, they've decided to give it a go.

Maybe they look at it again in a season or two, see if the proposed changes improve things.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Moving screen - offensive foul!

Probably by the letter of the law that's a foul. And technically the offside call was correct too. I'd prefer that both goals stand but it's not my choice. The German penalty was very harsh, but probably just about a correct use of the laws. It's frustrating and the rules do need to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 1960maaan said:

I've all but given up with the natural/unnatural position part of it , when it comes to decisions it doesn't seem to matter. 

Screenshot2024-06-30at06_54_17.png.3a5e59f5b8e12d20f561585c0a0ccc8f.png  Screenshot2024-06-30at06_54_38.png.27e89da4eec2b7a43fd8ffcfd6a39b7d.png

first two random photos of "sliding tackle " on Google . The arm is stretched out as balance and as it's a normal thing, then it's a natural position, but.... The arm is away from the body , so if a ball hits it , Pen.  

Still in a natural position , but still a Pen. 
They play with wording , they mess with rules , but it rarely gets better and never gets simpler .

 

 

  • touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised

I dont think the wording  in law 12 there for handball above is poor its EUFA have a different idea of what natural is. Those pics show players in natural positions but i think eufa see any arm being away from the body as unnatural and this is natural now as in natural for what they think should happen as natural for that situation.

Hands behind the back | Nana Attackora cleverly hides his ha… | Flickr

 

Try running around with your arms behind your body like that and it isnt natural. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TV Tom said:

Reminds me of that other great Danish Centre forward Nicklas Bendtner

He was a superstar too…

 

 

 

 

 

 

…unfortunately in his own head only!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TV Tom said:

Reminds me of that other great Danish Centre forward Nicklas Bendtner

Prob wish they had him last night. Hojlund was absolute litter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mozo said:

Probably by the letter of the law that's a foul. And technically the offside call was correct too. I'd prefer that both goals stand but it's not my choice. The German penalty was very harsh, but probably just about a correct use of the laws. It's frustrating and the rules do need to change.

I'm intrigued that you think that Germany's disallowed goal should have stood, likening the German players premeditated block on the defender to a basketball move, as though that legitemizes it.

If so, then I presume you'd be happy with this scenario. A striker has beaten has beaten the full back and pulls the ball back to the penalty spot. A defender is on the floor on the edge of the box and another striker is running into the area at speed to pick up the pass. The defender realising he will not be able to catch and tackle him,  stands up and just blocks his run, allowing the keeper to collect the ball. Other than this prevented a goal, rather than enabling one to be scored, the actions are the same.

Would/should that also be allowed?

In this scenario it's highly likely, and correct, that the defender would be red carded for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. Why should the same offence ( a "professional" foul on a layer who doesn't have the ball not be penalised, just because it was at the other end of the pitch and that it enabled a goal scoring opportunity?

I'd suggest that had Germany's disallowed goal been against their team, but had been allowed to stand, fans of every club, having seen the replay, would be apoplectic - as would we.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just make handball anywhere on the pitch (including in the box) an indirect free kick or something like that?

Maybe it wouldn't work right on the goal line, but I think part of the issue is that the result of the tiniest bit of a hand accidentally touching the ball resulting in a near certain goal is way too much of a game decider. If it wasn't, then it wouldn't matter quite as much.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, downendcity said:

I'm intrigued that you think that Germany's disallowed goal should have stood, likening the German players premeditated block on the defender to a basketball move, as though that legitemizes it.

If so, then I presume you'd be happy with this scenario. A striker has beaten has beaten the full back and pulls the ball back to the penalty spot. A defender is on the floor on the edge of the box and another striker is running into the area at speed to pick up the pass. The defender realising he will not be able to catch and tackle him,  stands up and just blocks his run, allowing the keeper to collect the ball. Other than this prevented a goal, rather than enabling one to be scored, the actions are the same.

Would/should that also be allowed?

In this scenario it's highly likely, and correct, that the defender would be red carded for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. Why should the same offence ( a "professional" foul on a layer who doesn't have the ball not be penalised, just because it was at the other end of the pitch and that it enabled a goal scoring opportunity?

I'd suggest that had Germany's disallowed goal been against their team, but had been allowed to stand, fans of every club, having seen the replay, would be apoplectic - as would we.

 

I accepted that it's probably a foul, but yes it would be my preference for there to be more physicality in football, and a screen is fine. This was a fairly aggressive screen so I'm sure people don't like it. My preferences count for nothing.

Technically, the Swiss goal was offside. I'd prefer the benefit go to the attacker whereby they're marginal, but again, it's not in my gift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the handball "rule" are the player's hands only in an unnatural position if the ball hits them? During any play within the penalty area there are hands and arms all over the place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take but whether it is truly aligned is.. 

If your arms are widely stretched out that is blatantly trying to gain an advantage or even if fairly stretched yeah, and as the rules stand.

Arms tucked in, or behind back or whatever- ball comes at them obviously not.

Yesterday wasn't quite either but where are his arms supposed to go?? It felt a ridiculous call and arguably a gsme changer given Denmark post the first 20 or so of Germany dominance were well in the game.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think we should revert to a much simpler rule - it’s only handball if it’s deliberate, and that criterion is down to the subjective judgement of the ref. That’s what the discussion really amounts to - is the player attempting to cheat, or was the contact accidental/unavoidable. All the “unnatural position” rules are really about judging the intent.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having said all that about Denmark, their finishing in this game and this tournament, they probably have had one of the worst goal to shot ratios. May not have been a game changer anyway.

My rolling position was 2 Goals from 53 Shots in 4 Games. Your underlying numbers sound but your conversion and output...

Edited by Mr Popodopolous
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MelksRed said:

We look crap

After 20 mins it's obvious that England are too ponderous in the build up allowing the Slovaks to defend. They on the other hand make rapid stabbing attacks and have come close to scoring three times already.

Off the pitch; a wide variety of place names on the England flags including Bydgoszcz which is in Poland.

As I write, Slovaks take the lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Slack Bladder said:

We seriously look like we just haven't got a Scooby Doo

They all look scared!

What happened to getting the ball and driving at them and committing their players

Its easy to play against us because we play back & sideways too much 

get Palmer & Gordon on and tell them to get at their defence 

Foden is no use out wide, play a 3 at the back and give it go for gods sake 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, INCRED said:

They all look scared!

What happened to getting the ball and driving at them and committing their players

Its easy to play against us because we play back & sideways too much 

get Palmer & Gordon on and tell them to get at their defence 

Foden is no use out wide, play a 3 at the back and give it go for gods sake 

All we're doing at the moment is coming home.

Shit or bust, as you say, bloody go for it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Barry Sheene said:

You lucky lucky Bast**d Southgate

We'll never know of course, but at the 95 minute mark was he composing his resignation or were the FA sending his P454?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long night tonight but Mamardashvili has been excellent in the Georgia net this tournament. Young too. Wouldn’t be surprised to see Valencia facing interest from some of the European giants in the next year or two. Could sort a club out for the next decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

My take but whether it is truly aligned is.. 

If your arms are widely stretched out that is blatantly trying to gain an advantage or even if fairly stretched yeah, and as the rules stand.

Arms tucked in, or behind back or whatever- ball comes at them obviously not.

Yesterday wasn't quite either but where are his arms supposed to go?? It felt a ridiculous call and arguably a gsme changer given Denmark post the first 20 or so of Germany dominance were well in the game.

 

Players arms here widely outstretched and totally natural. they become unnatural if their above the head (Why would they be there??) or a player does that Peter Schmeichel handball block thing.  That was called biggering where the body is made unnaturally bigger alongside what the players is doing. 

Premier League managers rally against 'ludicrous' changes to the handball  law

arms behind the back unnatural?? 

Hands behind the back | Nana Attackora cleverly hides his ha… | Flickr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, cityexile said:

Do Spain know what on earth they are doing here? They are winning and still forcing the opponents back and trying to score more. Is this allowed?

Agreed. It seems a British thing that if winning near full time, you play the ball into a corner to keep it from the oppos. Other countries will take the ball and try to score another goal to cement their win.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, 22A said:

Agreed. It seems a British thing that if winning near full time, you play the ball into a corner to keep it from the oppos. Other countries will take the ball and try to score another goal to cement their win.

 

That tactic was not originally British. The origins are unclear but until the WC in 1966  no British person had seen it before but began to adopt it the following season. 

It’s common sense to keep the ball as far away from your goal as possible. If ‘other countries’ don’t do it when winning late in game then that’s their prerogative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a ticket for France Belgium today,  should be good. Better start than yesterday as at least Dusseldorf is a functioning and interesting city. Gelsenkirchen on a Sunday not so much, I can see why Kalas still lives in Bristol

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, cidercity1987 said:

Got a ticket for France Belgium today,  should be good. Better start than yesterday as at least Dusseldorf is a functioning and interesting city. Gelsenkirchen on a Sunday not so much, I can see why Kalas still lives in Bristol

Both teams haven’t been at their best .

Hopefully as you say it’s an attacking open game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Were do these refs come from, certain corner off a Belgium's players head, the ref was yards away looking straight at the incident, gives a goal kick and books a player for protesting!

Edited by EstoniaTallinnRed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Both France and Belgium appear more direct than England. If a midfielder is being closed down, he doesn't turn and hit the ball back to the goalie. Instead he hits it across the field to an unmarked team mate so they can advance again.

Latvia and Venezuela(!) flags on show amongst the French fans.

Edited by 22A
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UEFA opened a disciplinary investigation on Monday into a gesture made by Jude Bellingham after he scored a stunning overhead kick to keep England in Euro 2024.

In the aftermath of the goal, Bellingham was caught on film mimicking a crotch grab while apparently looking towards the Slovakian bench.

In a statement competition organisers UEFA said an investigation had been launched into "a potential violation of the basic rules of decent conduct by the English Football Association player, Jude Bellingham, having allegedly occurred in the scope of this match."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...