Guest bristol south end Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 just been on talksport to ray houghton itchin to get back into football wont rule out move to city & admitted to being gas as a boy he said hes not sure how the blue few would react with a move to the reds they wouldnt be happy he says houghtons colleague adrian durham! says there is no way he could play for city after being such a hero with gas he sounded keen to be given a chance at sunderland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 says there is no way he could play for city after being such a hero with gas he sounded keen to be given a chance at sunderland Cureton said that? Different to what's posted below What was actually said then!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bristol south end Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 Sorry, adrian durham said no way he could play for us Cureton didn't rule it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TinnionForEngland Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 Errr Adrian - Shut it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 Sorry, adrian durham said no way he could play for us Cureton didn't rule it out Sorry, misread it first time. Cureton would be the missing link, especially if Goodfellow is half as good as he's made out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bristol south end Posted January 8, 2004 Share Posted January 8, 2004 I'd love to see him here, i couldn't care less about his history, he's more than proven at this level & hes just what we need + it would really pi$$ off the blue few Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted January 8, 2004 Admin Share Posted January 8, 2004 Oh how quickly people forget that we already have a striker on trial! Ohenhen has scored decent amounts of goals in the top division of two of Europe's main leagues. You don't do that without having something about you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Cureton should definitely be gone for, more experience than most of our squad, been through a promotion campaign, youngish, added to Robbo, and if this Goodfellow is any kop, and Tins, Wilks & Miller to boot, we might even manage promotion. Disagree bout Peacock, though, he is a drain on resources, and yep he's bound to score a hat-trick when he plays us next. Cheshire Red, what was Goodfellows appearances and goals scored like, at Sjoke? How much d'you reckon Cureton will cost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted January 9, 2004 Admin Share Posted January 9, 2004 You mean the "gashead mate" with a City tattoo on his leg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted January 9, 2004 Admin Share Posted January 9, 2004 O.K. O.K. If he was coming he would be here by now. We are obviously not his 1st choice though. Hey, I'm just defending "City fan" Marcus Stewart here. Though obviously Cureton is better than Peacock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Just about any striker would be more effective than Peacock... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 In my opinion, you can never turn down the chance of getting a player of Cureton's ability. You should always be looking to improve on what you have. I dont give one ###### weather he played for the blue few and as for Stewart, its not his fault that whichever City manager got rid of him didnt have a clue about potential. That boy was ###### on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Oh how quickly people forget that we already have a striker on trial! Ohenhen has scored decent amounts of goals in the top division of two of Europe's main leagues. You don't do that without having something about you. He's gone. "Not what we need," according to DW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Just about any striker would be more effective than Peacock... Apart from Miller, Matthews, Brown, Roberts and as of yet, Lita or Goodfellow. Like him or lump him (and I'm not his biggest fan by a long way) he's our top scorer. He's available on a Bosman at the end of the season, so we'll see then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted January 9, 2004 Admin Share Posted January 9, 2004 He's gone. "Not what we need," according to DW. I'll be keeping a close eye on other English clubs just in case we let another Thome/Sneekes through the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheshire_red Posted January 9, 2004 Share Posted January 9, 2004 Cureton should definitely be gone for, more experience than most of our squad, been through a promotion campaign, youngish, added to Robbo, and if this Goodfellow is any kop, and Tins, Wilks & Miller to boot, we might even manage promotion. Disagree bout Peacock, though, he is a drain on resources, and yep he's bound to score a hat-trick when he plays us next. Cheshire Red, what was Goodfellows appearances and goals scored like, at Sjoke? How much d'you reckon Cureton will cost? 8 or 9 in 25 starts I believe which is pretty good going. I saw two v a mixed man U side, made Barthez look a real dummy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.