DolmanDudess Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Taking Leroy out the equasion and on the grounds that Tins doesnt make anymore signings what would be your starting 11 for next season...?Mine...PhillipsCarey Coles Heywood GolbourneCotterill Wilkshire Russell G SmithStewart Brooker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Exaclty above, though sometimes depending on the opposition I'd swap S.Brown for Wilkshire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sirben Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Also agreed, spot on!!And we still have some talented players on the bench!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest port marine red Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 GOULDAMANKWAAHBUTLERHILLBELLANYINSAHDOHERTYDINNINGGOODFELLOWHEFFERNAN (AND OR LITA)ROBERTS (AND OR LITA)ALL OF THE ABOVE HAVE LEFT/WILL BE LEAVING UNDER THE TINNION REGIME. LOOKS A PRETTY GOOD TEAM TO ME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berkshire_Red Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Looks good but I have to disagree with the central midfiled pairing. They are two similar players, both don't have a great deal of physical presence and are more attack minded. I think you need someone in there capable of putting his foot in, doing some running and breaking up the opposition play - especially away from home. Cole Skuse could well be the best option at the moment, so him in for either Russell or Wiltshire (depending on form) maybe something that needs to be considered.I know its boring to say we need a grafter in midfield but you do need that balance you against strong oppostion you'll be over run in midfield.......and no I'm not saying bring back Joe Burnell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazareth Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 GOULDAMANKWAAHBUTLERHILLBELLANYINSAHDOHERTYDINNINGGOODFELLOWHEFFERNAN (AND OR LITA)ROBERTS (AND OR LITA)ALL OF THE ABOVE HAVE LEFT/WILL BE LEAVING UNDER THE TINNION REGIME. LOOKS A PRETTY GOOD TEAM TO ME←Are you kidding? The full-backs would get roasted, the central midfield would be the least mobile midfield unit since Steven Hawking's playing days and Goodfellow and Roberts would spend hours arguing over who was going to take the free kicks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest port marine red Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Are you kidding? The full-backs would get roasted, the central midfield would be the least mobile midfield unit since Steven Hawking's playing days and Goodfellow and Roberts would spend hours arguing over who was going to take the free kicks.←Yeah, Amankwaah is a bit of a slouch, isn't he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazareth Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Yeah, Amankwaah is a bit of a slouch, isn't he? ←I didn't see anything from him in the last few seasons to suggest that he's capable of playing in a division higher than league one and I don't rate him that highly to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 S Brown for Wilkshire would be my only change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest port marine red Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 I didn't see anything from him in the last few seasons to suggest that he's capable of playing in a division higher than league one and I don't rate him that highly to be honest.←You wouldn't have seen a lot of him over the past few seasons as he has been a bit unlucky with injurys. You were suggesting he was slow. I was suggesting he wasn't. Simple as. Yeovil to finish above City this season? Doesn't sound so unbeliveable now, does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tian Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 That team looks better than last years team already in my opinion, even if Leroy goes. We look to have more of an attacking threat and with a couple more additions i'm still feeling very optimistic about next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazareth Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 I didn't say he was slow, I said he'd get roasted. That's not because he's slow, it's because he's a bad defender. He didn't play much in the last few seasons, no, but when he did, he looked uncertain and nowhere near composed enough to be a defender for a team hoping to challenge for promotion.Edit: And yes I think that Yeovil finishing above us is unlikely. Even without Lita we have 2 great strikers (we scored 5 in 2 games without Leroy at the end of last season) in Brooker and Stewart, plus great potential in the likes of Cotteril. The make or break for me will be whether Heywood is upto the job or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Reynolds Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Exactly the same as Dolman Dudess, with the same idea as TomF.My captain would be Louis Carey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DolmanDudess Posted July 12, 2005 Author Share Posted July 12, 2005 Exactly the same as Dolman Dudess, with the same idea as TomF.My captain would be Louis Carey.←I was debating with S Brown.... I'm not sure. I wouldnt have Skuse in my line up just yet but with the likes of him on the bench it's going to be a pretty talented 16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest east_dundry_red Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Taking Leroy out the equasion and on the grounds that Tins doesnt make anymore signings what would be your starting 11 for next season...?Mine...PhillipsCarey Coles Heywood GolbourneCotterill Wilkshire Russell G SmithStewart Brooker ←same side but wilkshire russel smith midfieldcotteral up front with brooker stweart behind the 2 if u get what i mean?Stewart is not a striker, he's allways been played as an attacking midfielder not a striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest striker10 Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 same side but wilkshire russel smith midfieldcotteral up front with brooker stweart behind the 2 if u get what i mean?Stewart is not a striker, he's allways been played as an attacking midfielder not a striker.←well cole skuse is a definate starter in central midfied, i kno cole and tinnion has told him he will be starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest striker10 Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 cole skuse will be playing centre midfield i expect the team to look like this phillips, carey,coles,heywood,golbourne, wilkshire,russel,skuse,cotterill, stewart, brooker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kit Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 3-5-2Philips Carey Heywood ColesMurray Smith Wilkshire Skuse/Brown Russell Stewart Brooker And I think it looks very weak. There could be a lot of goals from Stewart Brooker Wilkahire and Smith. The few times that we played Murray at RWB last season he looked like scoring, he's a waste of space as a right winger. I think we are weak in a number of positions and whatever formation we play there are going to be massive problems. No real bite in midfield, Brown hasn't really looked up to it to me. Skuse is a better footballer but I don't know if his tackling and workrate is there opposite can be said of Bradley orr. Cotterill can only really play a bit part if he plays right wing cos he showed last season that he can't hold down a place long term cos he gets tired. With a 4-4-2 I think Golbourne would be a problem area as I think he is a year off at least of making a serious impact as a good first team player. Jamie Smith is a big no no for me which leaves carey or Coles as a right back. Hopefully Fortune could put in 46 performances like his one against Torquay then he would walk in to my team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BeNeRz Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 GOULDAMANKWAAHBUTLERHILLBELLANYINSAHDOHERTYDINNINGGOODFELLOWHEFFERNAN (AND OR LITA)ROBERTS (AND OR LITA)ALL OF THE ABOVE HAVE LEFT/WILL BE LEAVING UNDER THE TINNION REGIME. LOOKS A PRETTY GOOD TEAM TO ME←Okkkkkkk some1 has had the sun effect them to much, butler and dinning 3-5-2 Phillips Carey Heywood ColesMurray Smith Wilkshire Skuse/Brown Russell Brooker Stewart Perfect!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Warbie Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 the only change i would make from the first post is gillespie for brooker, i just feel we need some pace up front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Gows' Tash Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 3-5-2 Phillips Carey Coles GolbourneMurray Russell G Smith Coterill Wilkshire Stewart BrookerBenchSkuseHeywoodGillespieOrr/BrownSmith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 same side but wilkshire russel smith midfieldcotteral up front with brooker stweart behind the 2 if u get what i mean?Stewart is not a striker, he's allways been played as an attacking midfielder not a striker.←Stewart's not a striker, that has to be the best one yet.Please try to learn how to spell our players names as well, it isn't difficult, those 3 you spelt wrong were actually spelt correctly in the thread you quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest South Coast Red Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 4-3-1-2Phillips Carey/Coles/Heywood/GolbourneRussell/Scuse/ASmithStewartBrooker/Gillespie or Cotterill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.