elhombrecito Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 I was just on the fishy people site and the were talking about the two penalty incidents - the second being the one that was given. I wasn't listening to the game in the first half so would someone care to fill me in on what exactly happened for the first one?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted February 17, 2004 Admin Share Posted February 17, 2004 I was just on the fishy people site and the were talking about the two penalty incidents - the second being the one that was given. I wasn't listening to the game in the first half so would someone care to fill me in on what exactly happened?! Just seen the one that was given on Sky and Matt Hill made an inch perfect, brilliantly timed tackle on Isiah Rankine to give away one of the most blatant penalties you'll see this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc seattle Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 well someone had to score a penallty against us this year. at least it came in a win. as 3pts is 3pts which let me see is 3pts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whirling Ted Smith Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 There is no way no way no way that that was a penalty. That was a superb tackle - the ball went cleanly away flying off for a corner. Just as well we won or the ref might have been lynched !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest martin Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 I was celebrating a truly great sliding challenge and didn't realise that ref had given a dodgy pen. It was a very poor decision but the ref was very poor full stop. He was fussy and took ages over evry decision. Miller looked very sharp up front: MOTM I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest comeonyoureds Posted February 17, 2004 Share Posted February 17, 2004 i was at the game tonight! theres absolutely no way that matty hills tackle was a penalty, it happened right in front of me and he clearly got the ball! i dont know what the linesman was playing at cause he MUST have seen! as for the first incident it was one of those that sometimes they are given and sometimes not, either way i think it would have been harsh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Rocker Posted February 18, 2004 Share Posted February 18, 2004 Just saw it on Sky. No one, not even the most die-hard Grimsby (or Plymouth) fan would give it, it was SO not a penalty. Still, doesn't matter really does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooter Posted February 18, 2004 Share Posted February 18, 2004 I was just on the fishy people site and the were talking about the two penalty incidents - the second being the one that was given. I wasn't listening to the game in the first half so would someone care to fill me in on what exactly happened for the first one?! I believe the Fishermen felt that they should have had a penalty after the first penalty incident occurred, which luckily for us got turned down. Of course by what was mentioned on Radio Commentary, I couldn't really work out for myself what to think, and then of course they got a penalty decision in their favour not long after the other decision for the previous incident was ruled out, so they obviously felt that justice was done. I heard that it was an absolutely brilliant tackle made by Matty Hill which somehow stupidly lead into a penalty decision after the Grimsby player went down. (It wasn't Rankin was it?) Anyways, true justice was luckily restored right at the death of the game once again thanks to a star City player getting that one step further to Superstardom each and every day! Well done Aaron!!! Up the City!!!!! :Party27: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.