Guest markiedangerous Posted March 2, 2004 Share Posted March 2, 2004 bcworld says tinman had no direct involvement in the goal, but what are we going to do without the boy when he retires? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted March 2, 2004 Share Posted March 2, 2004 Very Good question that... wife asked the same at half time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted March 2, 2004 Share Posted March 2, 2004 Tins has been poor for a good while, ever since his favourite crossfield outball has become useless since Murray left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted March 2, 2004 Share Posted March 2, 2004 So it was coincidence that we scored just after he came on then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted March 2, 2004 Share Posted March 2, 2004 Tins was apparently man of the match, and I would have to say that it was a welcome relief when he came on for Wilkshire who I thought had a rubbish game tonight (and that in his favoured position). Tinnion turned things around for us - I eat humble pie, I was one who said he should be rested and Wilks given a chance in middle alongside Doc. But didn't work tonight - Tins was way better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wesco Posted March 2, 2004 Share Posted March 2, 2004 I think Tinnion played well tonight but the only problem I found with him/the team is he was playing very very deep. That is all good if a defender pushes forward or we play 5 in midfield but I just feel there were alot of gaps in midfield late on. Tommy was tired and there was no one backong up the stikers. I do feel though that we are really going to miss the Tinman. In saying that with a bit more experience Wilkshire could be the player to replace him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.