nester Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 quick question: how much did holloway pay for cureton and for thorpe? and I'll get this off my chest while I'm yer: supporting City when they play average is ok, we're a small club with very limited ambitions and that's life but ... ... it's the hope that kills me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest City+Rangers_loyal Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 £50,000 for Thorpe and £100,000 for cureton not 100% sure though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest whitesat2000 Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 £50,000 for Thorpe and £100,000 for cureton not 100% sure though good god and what did we get for 700,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maltshoveller Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 Its not a question of how much they cost in transfer fees the question is how much are their wages?? Any way what difference does it make how much QPR got thorpe for when he played for city didnt most of the fans (you know if your one of them) think he was just a lazy sod who did nothing but scored the odd goal!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 good god and what did we get for 700,000 WE PAID 600,000 for that donkey Peacock!!! for a start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Red_Rat Posted March 20, 2004 Share Posted March 20, 2004 We need some serious scouting missions, 600,000 for Peacock when i'd rate Cureton and Thorpe better than him, and Wilkshire and Miller cost 700,000 between them. A bit more depth is needed when signing a player I cant help but feel that Wilkshire was signed just beacuse he's played the odd game for a premiership club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.