Guest budbcfc Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 How many of you would accept holloway back as city manager if it was suggested. I for one could not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DolmanDudess Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 How many of you would accept holloway back as city manager if it was suggested. I for one could not. Why not?! Yeh ive given him 'stick' but his connections with the Gas are well in the past. I admire him as a manager, his passion and commitment.... I'm not doubting Wilson is commited to City but if i saw half the passion on the pitch that 'Olly gives, from Danny, id be happy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Back as City Manager? I got to stop taking this :Cool27: ; I must miss whole seasons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claverham_Red Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 http://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=6982&hl= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest citygal17 Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 I dont think hlloway is that bad i give him stick but i think he is really passionate bout his football and lets face it he aint a bad manager. But at the moment I'm v.happy with wilson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 A lot of the City faithful have a grudging respect for Hollowhead. He's passionate, always on the touchline speaking to his players, and doesn't beat about the bush. If his team has played badly he will admit it. As for the Gas links - they should be irrelevant. If he was to ever become manager here, then straight away there would be a lot of supporters that would be unhappy (Ex Gas). There would then be a certain majority that will turn on him when things start going slightly wrong. If/when we bring in a new manager though, wouldn't it be best that we go for somebody with a bit of experience in the First Division, or at least somebody that has a few promotions on their CV. Holloway has not proved himself at a higher level - wasn't he in charge when QPR were relegated to the Second Divison? I may be wrong on that point. IF at some point in the future Holloway was to take over though, I will certainly support him, as I would with any manager coming in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fct Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Pulis was an ex-Gashead who became manager and got stick but not because he was ex-Gas; it was because he was universally loathed for his tactics and attitude. Ward was an ex-Gas manager who was accepted because he managed a successful city team. Beadle was an ex-Gashead who was accepted after scoring that booming header against the Gas at the Atyeo end. Therefore Hollowhead if he became manager would be accepted by the majority if he generated success; of course, there would always be the small tiny-brained minority who would always hate him, rather in the same vein a small tiny-brained minority hate Roberts because of his birthplace. Surely its not what you are that counts, its what you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BCFC_DEANO Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 How many of you would accept holloway back as city manager if it was suggested. I for one could not. A lot of supporters wouldn't want him here and i doubt he would want to be here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rikku Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Personally, I'd accept and support anyone who would help the club succeed, regardless of their background. Sure, it may be a bit hard to take in certain cases (e.g. if we had signed Jamie Cureton), but I think you just have to see past any rivalry or history. So, no, I wouldn't have a problem with Holloway based on his background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DukeCoxer Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 I would support him, i think having a succesful manager would be much better than not having them because of a childish dislking. Tell you who we should get back though. benny leonardsen!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TimmerD Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Why would we want him? What exactly has he achieved as a manager? I for one would not want him as our manager for that reason. I also think he is a bit of a **** particularly with his post match comments which although funny make him look a bit of a fool. Also, its wrong to say DW does not have passion whilst on the touchline. I was sat in the Williams on Sat, a couple of rows back and had a good view of the City dugout. DW was on his feet most of the time, talking to players, encouraging them, shouting at officials etc I was certainly impressed by his attitude and it did work after all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Exile Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Yes yes, I know its a fair question, and personally I would not mind him. BUT, great win on Saturday, I'm DW logging on to see what fans think, and confonted with a heading about who will replace me if I go!??! Give him a break. I have to believe he is staying because we are going up. If it turns out differently, lets consider then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mesa boogie Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 hahaha thats the funniest thing ive ever heard! hed rather chop off both of his legs than manage you lot. you've got a better chance of getting Wenger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 How many of you would accept holloway back as city manager if it was suggested. I for one could not. holloway? nooooooooo never. we need a rival of holloway's stature to hurle abuse at, it wouldn't be the same if he became our manager he has passion and commitment only due to his love of 2 clubs he played for and been manager to qpr & the gas his passion is driven in trying to beat us as he has a dislike for bristol city for him being a true gas head him coming to bristol city would put that fire out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderEagle Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Reality check, guys - its one thing respecting Hollo as a hated rival, but he hasn't really done much in his managerial career, has he? Remember a few years ago when the Gas were in the top two for 90% of the season, then managed to blow even a playoff spot? I think Hollo is all very well with the "up and at em" rallying calls, but there are times when you need a calmer head. And another thing - why on earth are we even discussing Danny's potential replacement after Saturday ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Spunkwood Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 keith curle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cyprus_Red Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 he hates city even if we offered him a job he'd tell us to go **** ureselfs. sorry not for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rikku Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Reality check, guys - its one thing respecting Hollo as a hated rival, but he hasn't really done much in his managerial career, has he No, and to expand on my previous post - I wouldn't want him as city manager because of precisely that point. That's what I would base my judgement on though, not on his rovers association. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 reckon hes a really nice bloke, got nuff respect for me for the person he is and the passion he shows... i applauded him when he applauded us at the end - but as City manager? i'd have to say: NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
openEnd Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 An ex-international player manager would work best at City. Terry Cooper, Joe Jordan at BCFC and Dennis Wise at Millwall prove my point. How about Tony Adams at Wycombe then ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 what about holloway at rovers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest citylady Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest blairhater Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Gary Johnson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LeicesterRed Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 How many of you would accept holloway back as city manager if it was suggested. I for one could not. I don`t see the argument. Wilson isn`t gonig anywhere but Div 1 with the City!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MrT Posted April 5, 2004 Share Posted April 5, 2004 I would not accept him mainly on two counts. The first being the most important: Firstly I don't rate him as a manager. Screwed up at Rovers missing the play-offs on a terrible end of season. (Thank you Phillips for that penalty save) Also I don't think he has got the best out of QPR considering the talent and resources he has available this season. Secondly he is gas. I'd rather have Benny than Hollowhead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eternalgas Posted April 6, 2004 Share Posted April 6, 2004 there ain`t enough tea in china to persuade olly to manage the city once gas ......always gas !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Spunkwood Posted April 6, 2004 Share Posted April 6, 2004 ###### OFF HOLLOWAY, BENNY HILLS BARMY ARMY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.